• Rachel Madcow gets nailed!

    From Irish Mike@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 07:45:22 2023
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.

    Fox News contributor Joe Concha believes Maddow suffers
    from a "lack of a contrition gene," like many others liberal
    pundits who share her views.

    "A lack of shame. Their egos and myopia simply won't allow for it,"
    Concha told Fox News Digital. "And she'll never be held accountable
    by those who allegedly cover media. Because they're in the same ideological boat that she's in, and therefore she is almost never
    criticized by so-called media reporters who only exist to criticize
    any media right of center."

    Any loss for Madcow and the lying left is
    a win for America!

    Irish Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Fri May 19 09:26:15 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:45:26 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.

    Fox News contributor Joe Concha believes Maddow suffers
    from a "lack of a contrition gene," like many others liberal
    pundits who share her views.

    "A lack of shame. Their egos and myopia simply won't allow for it,"
    Concha told Fox News Digital. "And she'll never be held accountable
    by those who allegedly cover media. Because they're in the same ideological boat that she's in, and therefore she is almost never
    criticized by so-called media reporters who only exist to criticize
    any media right of center."

    Any loss for Madcow and the lying left is
    a win for America!

    Irish Mike


    In other news, non-earthly intelligent life in the universe has been confirmed- see the blockbuster documentary 'E.T.'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to irishranger317@gmail.com on Fri May 19 17:09:38 2023
    Irish Mike <irishranger317@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Fri May 19 12:16:35 2023
    On 5/19/2023 12:09 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <irishranger317@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    --bks

    Get that from the NY Post, eh?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTSinAustin@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Fri May 19 11:47:21 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 1:09:46 PM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    --bks

    Well she is know to be soooo truthful

    https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1614384626969067520?s=20

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com on Fri May 19 18:42:40 2023
    da pickle <jcpickels@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 5/19/2023 12:09 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <irishranger317@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    Get that from the NY Post, eh?


    No, from Irish Mike.

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to btsinaustin@gmail.com on Fri May 19 19:16:55 2023
    BTSinAustin <btsinaustin@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 1:09:46 PM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    Well she is know to be soooo truthful
    ...

    The only time I watch TV news is if they have live coverage of
    something I'm interested in. I know who Maddow is, but I have
    never watched her show. Irish Mike could be schtupping her and
    it would make no difference to me.

    I subscribe to the major archival newspapers online and I'm a
    fast reader. By the time someone is yapping about a story on
    TV, I probably know more about it than they do --if I'm interested.

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to risky biz on Fri May 19 13:37:05 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 9:26:18 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:45:26 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.

    Fox News contributor Joe Concha believes Maddow suffers
    from a "lack of a contrition gene," like many others liberal
    pundits who share her views.

    "A lack of shame. Their egos and myopia simply won't allow for it,"
    Concha told Fox News Digital. "And she'll never be held accountable
    by those who allegedly cover media. Because they're in the same ideological boat that she's in, and therefore she is almost never
    criticized by so-called media reporters who only exist to criticize
    any media right of center."

    Any loss for Madcow and the lying left is
    a win for America!

    Irish Mike
    In other news, non-earthly intelligent life in the universe has been confirmed- see the blockbuster documentary 'E.T.'
    .

    IRISH MICK NAILES E.T.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to BTSinAustin on Fri May 19 13:40:41 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 11:47:25 AM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 1:09:46 PM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    --bks
    Well she is know to be soooo truthful

    https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1614384626969067520?s=20

    Yea, a reporter that reports what she's given by the CDC.
    Which are you calling a liar?

    The CDC best guess at that time? Or FOX that admits they lie to you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Fri May 19 13:36:08 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 7:45:26 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday
    .

    As did everybody. It contained nothing but fake inuendoes.
    .

    but critics are firing back

    What critics? Where did you get this bullshit?
    .

    … saying she had no intentions of taking the report seriously

    And they would know this how?

    because it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.

    As was shown. Yea, your ‘news source’ has been holding out on you.
    A couple of Trump assholes were convicted for it.
    .

    Fox News contributor.

    **** WHA~HA~Ha! **** FOX NEWS!

    You little idiot. How many times must you be shown that Fox ADMITS IT LIES TO ITS VIEWERS?
    .

    Joe Concha believes Maddow suffers from a "lack of a contrition gene,"
    .

    LOL! THAT’S your proof? “Critics” and a Fox contributer that diagnosed a “lack of a contrition gene?”
    .
    You’re as fucking gullible as the rest of the FoxShitEaters…
    .


    Now runaway like you always do when I bitch-slap your ignorant ass….

    RUN MICK RUN & HIDE AGAIN… SHOO!
    .
    LOL
    .
    .
    .
    .



    "A lack of shame. Their egos and myopia simply won't allow for it,"
    Concha told Fox News Digital. "And she'll never be held accountable
    by those who allegedly cover media. Because they're in the same ideological boat that she's in, and therefore she is almost never
    criticized by so-called media reporters who only exist to criticize
    any media right of center."

    Any loss for Madcow and the lying left is
    a win for America!

    Running Irish Mick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Fri May 19 13:47:08 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 12:17:02 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    BTSinAustin <btsin...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 1:09:46 PM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    Well she is know to be soooo truthful
    ...

    The only time I watch TV news is if they have live coverage of
    something I'm interested in. I know who Maddow is, but I have
    never watched her show. Irish Mike could be schtupping her and
    it would make no difference to me.

    I subscribe to the major archival newspapers online and I'm a
    fast reader.
    .

    As do I. I subscribe to The New York Times and The Washington Post online and my local Las Vegas
    Review Journal and Las Vegas Sun paper (co-printed. One right wing, the other truthful) delivered to
    my door, and online. On TV it's NBC and MSNBC.
    .

    By the time someone is yapping about a story on
    TV, I probably know more about it than they do --if I'm interested.

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From C Mayhem@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Fri May 19 14:14:09 2023
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 9:45:26 AM UTC-5, Irish Mike wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.

    Fox News contributor Joe Concha believes Maddow suffers
    from a "lack of a contrition gene," like many others liberal
    pundits who share her views.

    "A lack of shame. Their egos and myopia simply won't allow for it,"
    Concha told Fox News Digital. "And she'll never be held accountable
    by those who allegedly cover media. Because they're in the same ideological boat that she's in, and therefore she is almost never
    criticized by so-called media reporters who only exist to criticize
    any media right of center."

    Any loss for Madcow and the lying left is
    a win for America!

    Irish Mike
    Well, MSNBC isn't stuck for over 800 million because of lies and Maddow hasn't been shit canned because she called her bosses assholes and viewers morons. Probably just more liberal bias though...

    C

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Sat May 20 07:17:38 2023
    On 5/19/2023 3:47 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 12:17:02 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    BTSinAustin <btsin...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 1:09:46 PM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >>>> Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    Well she is know to be soooo truthful
    ...

    The only time I watch TV news is if they have live coverage of
    something I'm interested in. I know who Maddow is, but I have
    never watched her show. Irish Mike could be schtupping her and
    it would make no difference to me.

    I subscribe to the major archival newspapers online and I'm a
    fast reader.
    .

    As do I. I subscribe to The New York Times and The Washington Post online and my local Las Vegas
    Review Journal and Las Vegas Sun paper (co-printed. One right wing, the other truthful) delivered to
    my door, and online. On TV it's NBC and MSNBC.
    .

    By the time someone is yapping about a story on
    TV, I probably know more about it than they do --if I'm interested.

    --bks

    Jerry and Bradley sitting on a swing

    k i s s i n g

    [Get all your news from only one side (and none of the "other" side's')
    and you know the whole truth and nothing but the truth.]

    Even bad guys have good dogs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to da pickle on Sat May 20 07:28:55 2023
    On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 5:17:48 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/19/2023 3:47 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 12:17:02 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    BTSinAustin <btsin...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 1:09:46 PM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >>>> Irish Mike <irishra...@gmail.com> wrote:
    "MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dismissed Special Counsel
    John Durham’s report and mocked Republicans who
    anticipated it on Monday, but critics are firing back saying
    she had no intentions of taking the report seriously because
    it contradicted her beloved narrative that suggested the
    Kremlin and former President Trump were in cahoots to
    fix the 2016 election.
    ...

    Har! The RWEC has given up on Biden and now they hope to
    embarrass Rachel Maddow. How the mighty have fallen.

    Well she is know to be soooo truthful
    ...

    The only time I watch TV news is if they have live coverage of
    something I'm interested in. I know who Maddow is, but I have
    never watched her show. Irish Mike could be schtupping her and
    it would make no difference to me.

    I subscribe to the major archival newspapers online and I'm a
    fast reader.
    .

    As do I. I subscribe to The New York Times and The Washington Post online and my local Las Vegas
    Review Journal and Las Vegas Sun paper (co-printed. One right wing, the other truthful) delivered to
    my door, and online. On TV it's NBC and MSNBC.
    .

    By the time someone is yapping about a story on
    TV, I probably know more about it than they do --if I'm interested.

    --bks
    Jerry and Bradley sitting on a swing

    k i s s i n g

    [Get all your news from only one side (and none of the "other" side's').
    .

    It's not a 'side.' There's the right-wing FOX that admits they lie to their viewers,

    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/rupert-murdoch-admits-fox-news-hosts-election-lies-1234687700/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_eyTrbzElo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VTBXAMNH1E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Fh4Q9pq3tY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJW848OEDPU

    More here: https://tinyurl.com/yv3m8tmc

    and NBC News which can't lie. It's actually illegal. (FCC Rules)(I have a First Class FCC License). And I watch MSNBC which slants left but does not lie because they don't have to. They report FOX's lies.

    and you know the whole truth and nothing but the truth.]

    And now you do.



    Even bad guys have good dogs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)