<https://www.manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-SOF.pdf>
--bks
I'm not sure I agree with you 100% on your policework there, Jack.1. Banging a porn star is legal.
His personal lawyer got 3 years for his part in the scheme. His
lawyer didn't screw the porn star, his lawyer wasn't running for
POTUS; the lawyer was working on Trump's behalf.
The checks have Trump's signature on them.Funny that you make that claim when that hasn't been admitted into evidence yet, nor do we know the circumstances behind that, nor do we know what Trump thought he was writing a check for, nor do we know whether an automatic signature was used.
--bks
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:54:14 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
So, they ran out of ways to attack Trump finally and now the Deep State<https://www.manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-SOF.pdf>
is down to using a hooker and a felon to take Trump down.
These charges are complete bullshit,
...
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:51:16 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
1. Banging a porn star is legal.
I'm not sure I agree with you 100% on your policework there, Jack.
His personal lawyer got 3 years for his part in the scheme. His
lawyer didn't screw the porn star, his lawyer wasn't running for
POTUS; the lawyer was working on Trump's behalf.
2. Paying somebody to STFU is done all the time and you could put the
ENTIRE ruling class in jail for that because they all certainly
misclassified it on their taxes. Fact is these business deducations are
done daily and you could certainly scrutinize every single hush money >description that has ever been documented by any and all ruling class
types.
3. Just because Trump's lawyer is working for him, doesn't mean Trump
is guilty for all the actions of that attorney who may on his own feel
the need to protect his employer for which he thinks he has a special >relationship.
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of limitations. That alone should get him off. But, there's nothing wrong at all with paying people hush money.....it's standard operating procedure for the rich who say won't want
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:51:16 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >>You said the charges were "complete bullshit" which is clearly
I'm not sure I agree with you 100% on your policework there, Jack.1. Banging a porn star is legal.
His personal lawyer got 3 years for his part in the scheme. His
lawyer didn't screw the porn star, his lawyer wasn't running for
POTUS; the lawyer was working on Trump's behalf.
2. Paying somebody to STFU is done all the time and you could put the >ENTIRE ruling class in jail for that because they all certainly >misclassified it on their taxes. Fact is these business deducations are >done daily and you could certainly scrutinize every single hush money >description that has ever been documented by any and all ruling class >types.
3. Just because Trump's lawyer is working for him, doesn't mean Trump
is guilty for all the actions of that attorney who may on his own feel
the need to protect his employer for which he thinks he has a special >relationship.
complete bullshit.
--bks
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of >limitations.
...
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of >limitations.
...
Oh, so now you're not even arguing that he's innocent!
I'm sure the Manhattan D.A. is unaware of the statute of
limitations; you should give him a call.
--bks
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 3:27:50 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of
limitations.
...
Oh, so now you're not even arguing that he's innocent!
Do I think Trump paid off the hooker? I dunno, but it doesn't matter
because hush money to hookers is legal.
...
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:51:16 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >>You said the charges were "complete bullshit" which is clearly
I'm not sure I agree with you 100% on your policework there, Jack.1. Banging a porn star is legal.
His personal lawyer got 3 years for his part in the scheme. His
lawyer didn't screw the porn star, his lawyer wasn't running for
POTUS; the lawyer was working on Trump's behalf.
2. Paying somebody to STFU is done all the time and you could put the >ENTIRE ruling class in jail for that because they all certainly >misclassified it on their taxes. Fact is these business deducations are >done daily and you could certainly scrutinize every single hush money >description that has ever been documented by any and all ruling class >types.
3. Just because Trump's lawyer is working for him, doesn't mean Trump
is guilty for all the actions of that attorney who may on his own feel
the need to protect his employer for which he thinks he has a special >relationship.
complete bullshit.
--bks
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 3:27:50 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >> jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of >> >limitations.
...
Oh, so now you're not even arguing that he's innocent!
Do I think Trump paid off the hooker? I dunno, but it doesn't matter >because hush money to hookers is legal.
...
Okay, now I see the problem: That's not the crime he's charged with!
Here's a good link that has both the felony charges and the statement
of fact:
<https://www.lawfareblog.com/new-york-trump-indictment-unsealed>
You might want to read it rather than rely on Eric Trump for your
legal analysis.
--bks
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:34:08 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:.
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 3:27:50 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of
limitations.
...
Oh, so now you're not even arguing that he's innocent!
Do I think Trump paid off the hooker? I dunno, but it doesn't matter >because hush money to hookers is legal.
...
Okay, now I see the problem: That's not the crime he's charged with! Here's a good link that has both the felony charges and the statement
of fact:
<https://www.lawfareblog.com/new-york-trump-indictment-unsealed>
You might want to read it rather than rely on Eric Trump for your
legal analysis.
--bks
So, you and jerry both seem to think you are geniuses in this case.
1. Banging a porn star is legal.
2. Paying somebody to STFU is done all the time…
Fact is these business deducations are done daily and you could certainly scrutinize every
single hush money description that has ever been documented by any and all ruling class types.
3. Just because Trump's lawyer is working for him, doesn't mean Trump
is guilty for all the actions of that attorney who may on his own feel
the need to protect his employer for which he thinks he has a special relationship.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 6:58:37 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:'
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:34:08 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 3:27:50 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of
limitations.
...
Oh, so now you're not even arguing that he's innocent!
Do I think Trump paid off the hooker? I dunno, but it doesn't matter >because hush money to hookers is legal.
...
Okay, now I see the problem: That's not the crime he's charged with! Here's a good link that has both the felony charges and the statement
of fact: <https://www.lawfareblog.com/new-york-trump-indictment-unsealed>
You might want to read it rather than rely on Eric Trump for your
legal analysis.
.--bks
So, you and jerry both seem to think you are geniuses in this case.Compared to you, yea. Look at the ignorance of your statement:
1. Banging a porn star is legal.Who said it was? That wasn’t the charge.
2. Paying somebody to STFU is done all the time…
Again, NOT THE CHARGE; and your stupid statement is in the category of “Two wrong make a right.”
Fact is these business deducations are done daily and you could certainly scrutinize everyAnd you missed the part where the DA said this case and these charges are simply one of dozens of similar cases his office charges.
single hush money description that has ever been documented by any and all ruling class types.
3. Just because Trump's lawyer is working for him, doesn't mean TrumpAGAIN. Read the fucking charges. How many times must we embarrass you before you run & hide in shame? (As if you had any…)
is guilty for all the actions of that attorney who may on his own feel
the need to protect his employer for which he thinks he has a special relationship.
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 11:40:43 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 6:58:37 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:34:08 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 3:27:50 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of
limitations.
...
Oh, so now you're not even arguing that he's innocent!
Do I think Trump paid off the hooker? I dunno, but it doesn't matter >because hush money to hookers is legal.
...
Okay, now I see the problem: That's not the crime he's charged with! Here's a good link that has both the felony charges and the statement of fact: <https://www.lawfareblog.com/new-york-trump-indictment-unsealed>
You might want to read it rather than rely on Eric Trump for your legal analysis.
.--bks
So, you and jerry both seem to think you are geniuses in this case.Compared to you, yea. Look at the ignorance of your statement:
1. Banging a porn star is legal.Who said it was? That wasn’t the charge.
2. Paying somebody to STFU is done all the time…
Again, NOT THE CHARGE; and your stupid statement is in the category of “Two wrong make a right.”'
Fact is these business deducations are done daily and you could certainly scrutinize everyAnd you missed the part where the DA said this case and these charges are simply one of dozens of similar cases his office charges.
single hush money description that has ever been documented by any and all ruling class types.
3. Just because Trump's lawyer is working for him, doesn't mean TrumpAGAIN. Read the fucking charges. How many times must we embarrass you before you run & hide in shame? (As if you had any…)
is guilty for all the actions of that attorney who may on his own feel the need to protect his employer for which he thinks he has a special relationship.
Explain to me why Hillary ...
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 12:53:31 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 11:40:43 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 6:58:37 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:34:08 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 3:27:50 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of
limitations.
...
Oh, so now you're not even arguing that he's innocent!
Do I think Trump paid off the hooker? I dunno, but it doesn't matter
because hush money to hookers is legal.
...
Okay, now I see the problem: That's not the crime he's charged with! Here's a good link that has both the felony charges and the statement
of fact: <https://www.lawfareblog.com/new-york-trump-indictment-unsealed>
You might want to read it rather than rely on Eric Trump for your legal analysis.
.--bks
So, you and jerry both seem to think you are geniuses in this case.Compared to you, yea. Look at the ignorance of your statement:
1. Banging a porn star is legal.Who said it was? That wasn’t the charge.
2. Paying somebody to STFU is done all the time…
.Again, NOT THE CHARGE; and your stupid statement is in the category of “Two wrong make a right.”'
Fact is these business deducations are done daily and you could certainly scrutinize everyAnd you missed the part where the DA said this case and these charges are simply one of dozens of similar cases his office charges.
single hush money description that has ever been documented by any and all ruling class types.
3. Just because Trump's lawyer is working for him, doesn't mean Trump is guilty for all the actions of that attorney who may on his own feel the need to protect his employer for which he thinks he has a special relationship.AGAIN. Read the fucking charges. How many times must we embarrass you before you run & hide in shame? (As if you had any…)
Explain to me why Hillary ...
NO, you cowardly dodger. YOU go back and SHOW, LINK and explain your ignorance....
.
.
.
gets a fine for the same charges, but Trump should get 34 felony counts.
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 1:04:55 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 12:53:31 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 11:40:43 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 6:58:37 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:34:08 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 3:27:50 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
jack roth <jackden...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
They are complete bullshit in that it's WAY WAY WAY past the statute of
limitations.
...
Oh, so now you're not even arguing that he's innocent!
Do I think Trump paid off the hooker? I dunno, but it doesn't matter
because hush money to hookers is legal.
...
Okay, now I see the problem: That's not the crime he's charged with!
Here's a good link that has both the felony charges and the statement
of fact: <https://www.lawfareblog.com/new-york-trump-indictment-unsealed>
You might want to read it rather than rely on Eric Trump for your legal analysis.
.--bks
So, you and jerry both seem to think you are geniuses in this case.Compared to you, yea. Look at the ignorance of your statement:
1. Banging a porn star is legal.Who said it was? That wasn’t the charge.
2. Paying somebody to STFU is done all the time…
Again, NOT THE CHARGE; and your stupid statement is in the category of “Two wrong make a right.”
Fact is these business deducations are done daily and you could certainly scrutinize everyAnd you missed the part where the DA said this case and these charges are simply one of dozens of similar cases his office charges.
single hush money description that has ever been documented by any and all ruling class types.
3. Just because Trump's lawyer is working for him, doesn't mean TrumpAGAIN. Read the fucking charges. How many times must we embarrass you before you run & hide in shame? (As if you had any…)
is guilty for all the actions of that attorney who may on his own feel
the need to protect his employer for which he thinks he has a special
relationship.
.'.
Explain to me why Hillary ...
NO, you cowardly dodger. YOU go back and SHOW, LINK and explain your ignorance....
RIP Jerry.
.gets a fine for the same charges, but Trump should get 34 felony counts.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 53:55:52 |
| Calls: | 6,914 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,379 |
| Messages: | 5,430,312 |