• About that Holley carb ...

    From Snag@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 4 17:43:58 2022
    After exhausting every avenue locally , today I ordered one on eBay .
    I have one already , but everybody says that a 750CFM 4160 is just too
    much carb for a 305 small block GM motor even with the mods I've made .
    The one I ordered is a 600 CFM 4160 , and it has some differences . The
    biggest one is the fuel bowls on the 750 have center pivot floats and
    dual inlets vs the 600 has side pivot floats and a tube to feed the rear
    bowl . Both have metering plates on the secondaries and in all other
    respects as far as I can tell are identical . Is there anything
    inherently better about either center vs side pivot floats ? I have a
    full rebuild kit that fits both , so it will be torn down as far as they recommend .
    The stock quadrajet has problems , and I'm tired of trying to tune it
    . Everybody always told me Holleys are a lot easier , and I've always
    wanted to try one so here we go !
    --
    Snag
    “Free speech is my right to say what you don’t
    want to hear.” -George Orwell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Snag on Sat Jun 4 18:09:34 2022
    On 6/4/2022 3:43 PM, Snag wrote:
      After exhausting every avenue locally , today I ordered one on eBay .
    I have one already , but everybody says that a 750CFM 4160 is just too
    much carb for a 305 small block GM motor even with the mods I've made .
    The one I ordered is a 600 CFM 4160 , and it has some differences . The biggest one is the fuel bowls on the 750 have center pivot floats and
    dual inlets vs the 600 has side pivot floats and a tube to feed the rear
    bowl . Both have metering plates on the secondaries and in all other
    respects as far as I can tell are identical . Is there anything
    inherently better about either  center vs side pivot floats ? I have a
    full rebuild kit that fits both , so it will be torn down as far as they recommend .
      The stock quadrajet has problems , and I'm tired of trying to tune it
    . Everybody always told me Holleys are a lot easier , and I've always
    wanted to try one so here we go !


    Don't have much to add directly, but we ran a Holley 650 with vacuum secondaries on a 351W in a full size 2 door Bronco. (a little bigger
    engine) and it was plenty.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 5 21:16:22 2022
    On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 18:09:34 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 6/4/2022 3:43 PM, Snag wrote:
    After exhausting every avenue locally , today I ordered one on eBay .
    I have one already , but everybody says that a 750CFM 4160 is just too
    much carb for a 305 small block GM motor even with the mods I've made .
    The one I ordered is a 600 CFM 4160 , and it has some differences . The
    biggest one is the fuel bowls on the 750 have center pivot floats and
    dual inlets vs the 600 has side pivot floats and a tube to feed the rear
    bowl . Both have metering plates on the secondaries and in all other
    respects as far as I can tell are identical . Is there anything
    inherently better about either center vs side pivot floats ? I have a
    full rebuild kit that fits both , so it will be torn down as far as they
    recommend .
    The stock quadrajet has problems , and I'm tired of trying to tune it
    . Everybody always told me Holleys are a lot easier , and I've always
    wanted to try one so here we go !


    Don't have much to add directly, but we ran a Holley 650 with vacuum >secondaries on a 351W in a full size 2 door Bronco. (a little bigger
    engine) and it was plenty.
    Unless you have a huge cam in that 305 a 500cfm carb would be
    adequate, and the 600 will be as big as you want to go. As for the
    floats? if you are going off-road or severe off-camber driving the
    center-hung carb will make you a LOT happier. Can you put the center
    hung bowls on the 600???

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Clare Snyder on Sun Jun 5 22:30:58 2022
    On 6/5/2022 8:16 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 18:09:34 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 6/4/2022 3:43 PM, Snag wrote:
      After exhausting every avenue locally , today I ordered one on eBay . >>> I have one already , but everybody says that a 750CFM 4160 is just too
    much carb for a 305 small block GM motor even with the mods I've made .
    The one I ordered is a 600 CFM 4160 , and it has some differences . The
    biggest one is the fuel bowls on the 750 have center pivot floats and
    dual inlets vs the 600 has side pivot floats and a tube to feed the rear >>> bowl . Both have metering plates on the secondaries and in all other
    respects as far as I can tell are identical . Is there anything
    inherently better about either  center vs side pivot floats ? I have a
    full rebuild kit that fits both , so it will be torn down as far as they >>> recommend .
      The stock quadrajet has problems , and I'm tired of trying to tune it >>> . Everybody always told me Holleys are a lot easier , and I've always
    wanted to try one so here we go !


    Don't have much to add directly, but we ran a Holley 650 with vacuum
    secondaries on a 351W in a full size 2 door Bronco. (a little bigger
    engine) and it was plenty.
    Unless you have a huge cam in that 305 a 500cfm carb would be
    adequate, and the 600 will be as big as you want to go. As for the
    floats? if you are going off-road or severe off-camber driving the center-hung carb will make you a LOT happier. Can you put the center
    hung bowls on the 600???


    I was wondering about switching the bowls ... which would also mean switching to the dual fuel inlet setup . I'll see what will fit when the
    "new" carb arrives . As far as the cam , the mfr classes it as a "stage
    3 RV cam" (Elgin E-922-P) , whatever that means . I think it's pretty
    close to what we used to call a "3/4 race cam" . Specs are .444 lift
    intake and .466 exhaust , with 214° and 224° duration @ .050 lift (288°
    and 298°) . Lobe separation is 112° . I don't think it's all that
    radical ... I expected a reasonably decent idle around 800-900 , but I
    can't get the quad to run right below about 1500 or so (haven't hooked
    up the new tach yet) . Idle speed screw is almost all the way in and the
    idle mix needles are making no difference at all . I just totally
    rebuilt that carb , everything is spot on the specs and I sealed the
    metering needle wells with JB weld . This carb has had a history of long cranking to start if it's been sitting more than a few hours , like the
    bowl is emptying while it sits . I'm just tired of trying to figure this
    one out , I usually have no problems with getting a quad to run well .
    --
    Snag
    “Free speech is my right to say what you don’t
    want to hear.” -George Orwell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to Snag on Mon Jun 6 01:33:31 2022
    On Sun, 5 Jun 2022 22:30:58 -0500, Snag <Snag_one@msn.com> wrote:

    On 6/5/2022 8:16 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 18:09:34 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 6/4/2022 3:43 PM, Snag wrote:
    After exhausting every avenue locally , today I ordered one on eBay . >>>> I have one already , but everybody says that a 750CFM 4160 is just too >>>> much carb for a 305 small block GM motor even with the mods I've made . >>>> The one I ordered is a 600 CFM 4160 , and it has some differences . The >>>> biggest one is the fuel bowls on the 750 have center pivot floats and
    dual inlets vs the 600 has side pivot floats and a tube to feed the rear >>>> bowl . Both have metering plates on the secondaries and in all other
    respects as far as I can tell are identical . Is there anything
    inherently better about either center vs side pivot floats ? I have a >>>> full rebuild kit that fits both , so it will be torn down as far as they >>>> recommend .
    The stock quadrajet has problems , and I'm tired of trying to tune it >>>> . Everybody always told me Holleys are a lot easier , and I've always
    wanted to try one so here we go !


    Don't have much to add directly, but we ran a Holley 650 with vacuum
    secondaries on a 351W in a full size 2 door Bronco. (a little bigger
    engine) and it was plenty.
    Unless you have a huge cam in that 305 a 500cfm carb would be
    adequate, and the 600 will be as big as you want to go. As for the
    floats? if you are going off-road or severe off-camber driving the
    center-hung carb will make you a LOT happier. Can you put the center
    hung bowls on the 600???


    I was wondering about switching the bowls ... which would also mean
    switching to the dual fuel inlet setup . I'll see what will fit when the >"new" carb arrives . As far as the cam , the mfr classes it as a "stage
    3 RV cam" (Elgin E-922-P) , whatever that means . I think it's pretty
    close to what we used to call a "3/4 race cam" . Specs are .444 lift
    intake and .466 exhaust , with 214 and 224 duration @ .050 lift (288
    and 298) . Lobe separation is 112 . I don't think it's all that
    radical ... I expected a reasonably decent idle around 800-900 , but I
    can't get the quad to run right below about 1500 or so (haven't hooked
    up the new tach yet) . Idle speed screw is almost all the way in and the
    idle mix needles are making no difference at all . I just totally
    rebuilt that carb , everything is spot on the specs and I sealed the
    metering needle wells with JB weld . This carb has had a history of long >cranking to start if it's been sitting more than a few hours , like the
    bowl is emptying while it sits . I'm just tired of trying to figure this
    one out , I usually have no problems with getting a quad to run well .
    Put a good heat insulator between the carb and manifold to help
    prevent the bowls boiling dry on a hot shut-down (makng the engine
    over rich after a short shutdown - and slow to start after a long
    soak.
    The "stage 3 RV cam" WILL be lumpy below 1200RPM but unlike the "3/4
    race" will be biased twards low end "grunt", not high RPM
    performance. Good from 2000 to 4600 RPM. The 922 runs from 2200 to
    5400 RPM - more of the "3/4 race" grind. - close to the factory z28
    cam of the late sixties. The 921 is basically the L82 cam. Whar CR are
    you running? Hopefully better than 9:1

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Clare Snyder on Mon Jun 6 06:49:32 2022
    On 6/6/2022 12:33 AM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jun 2022 22:30:58 -0500, Snag <Snag_one@msn.com> wrote:

    On 6/5/2022 8:16 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 18:09:34 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 6/4/2022 3:43 PM, Snag wrote:
      After exhausting every avenue locally , today I ordered one on eBay .
    I have one already , but everybody says that a 750CFM 4160 is just too >>>>> much carb for a 305 small block GM motor even with the mods I've made . >>>>> The one I ordered is a 600 CFM 4160 , and it has some differences . The >>>>> biggest one is the fuel bowls on the 750 have center pivot floats and >>>>> dual inlets vs the 600 has side pivot floats and a tube to feed the rear >>>>> bowl . Both have metering plates on the secondaries and in all other >>>>> respects as far as I can tell are identical . Is there anything
    inherently better about either  center vs side pivot floats ? I have a >>>>> full rebuild kit that fits both , so it will be torn down as far as they >>>>> recommend .
      The stock quadrajet has problems , and I'm tired of trying to tune it
    . Everybody always told me Holleys are a lot easier , and I've always >>>>> wanted to try one so here we go !


    Don't have much to add directly, but we ran a Holley 650 with vacuum
    secondaries on a 351W in a full size 2 door Bronco. (a little bigger
    engine) and it was plenty.
    Unless you have a huge cam in that 305 a 500cfm carb would be
    adequate, and the 600 will be as big as you want to go. As for the
    floats? if you are going off-road or severe off-camber driving the
    center-hung carb will make you a LOT happier. Can you put the center
    hung bowls on the 600???


    I was wondering about switching the bowls ... which would also mean
    switching to the dual fuel inlet setup . I'll see what will fit when the
    "new" carb arrives . As far as the cam , the mfr classes it as a "stage
    3 RV cam" (Elgin E-922-P) , whatever that means . I think it's pretty
    close to what we used to call a "3/4 race cam" . Specs are .444 lift
    intake and .466 exhaust , with 214° and 224° duration @ .050 lift (288° >> and 298°) . Lobe separation is 112° . I don't think it's all that
    radical ... I expected a reasonably decent idle around 800-900 , but I
    can't get the quad to run right below about 1500 or so (haven't hooked
    up the new tach yet) . Idle speed screw is almost all the way in and the
    idle mix needles are making no difference at all . I just totally
    rebuilt that carb , everything is spot on the specs and I sealed the
    metering needle wells with JB weld . This carb has had a history of long
    cranking to start if it's been sitting more than a few hours , like the
    bowl is emptying while it sits . I'm just tired of trying to figure this
    one out , I usually have no problems with getting a quad to run well .
    Put a good heat insulator between the carb and manifold to help
    prevent the bowls boiling dry on a hot shut-down (makng the engine
    over rich after a short shutdown - and slow to start after a long
    soak.
    The "stage 3 RV cam" WILL be lumpy below 1200RPM but unlike the "3/4
    race" will be biased twards low end "grunt", not high RPM
    performance. Good from 2000 to 4600 RPM. The 922 runs from 2200 to
    5400 RPM - more of the "3/4 race" grind. - close to the factory z28
    cam of the late sixties. The 921 is basically the L82 cam. Whar CR are
    you running? Hopefully better than 9:1


    Original C/R was 9:1 , we replaced the .080 dished pistons with .060
    over flat tops . The machinist that did all the work figured that I
    should be right around 9.5 or a bit more . This guy is known regionally
    for his excellent motor work . The motor came with what are supposed to
    be the best flowing stock 305 heads , I forget which casting number (816
    ?) they are . I did a little port matching on them to match the
    Edelbrock Performer intake manifold .
    As far as the carb , I did use the thick spacer supplied in the carb
    kit . The truck has done this from the day I drove it home . I thought
    the well plugs might be leaking from researching that problem , so I
    coated the bottom of all 4 with some JB Weld - the machine shop guy also suggested I do that just as a preventive measure . If it's leaking , it
    ain't from the plugs . I really wanted to run that original carb ,
    nothing in the world sounds like that quadrajet moan when you dump the
    throttle , and IMO the balance between performance and economy is very
    hard to beat .
    --
    Snag
    “Free speech is my right to say what you don’t
    want to hear.” -George Orwell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Bob La Londe on Mon Jun 6 13:37:40 2022
    On 6/4/2022 6:09 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 6/4/2022 3:43 PM, Snag wrote:
       After exhausting every avenue locally , today I ordered one on eBay
    . I have one already , but everybody says that a 750CFM 4160 is just
    too much carb for a 305 small block GM motor even with the mods I've
    made . The one I ordered is a 600 CFM 4160 , and it has some
    differences . The biggest one is the fuel bowls on the 750 have center
    pivot floats and dual inlets vs the 600 has side pivot floats and a
    tube to feed the rear bowl . Both have metering plates on the
    secondaries and in all other respects as far as I can tell are
    identical . Is there anything inherently better about either  center
    vs side pivot floats ? I have a full rebuild kit that fits both , so
    it will be torn down as far as they recommend .
       The stock quadrajet has problems , and I'm tired of trying to tune
    it . Everybody always told me Holleys are a lot easier , and I've
    always wanted to try one so here we go !


    Don't have much to add directly, but we ran a Holley 650 with vacuum secondaries on a 351W in a full size 2 door Bronco.  (a little bigger engine) and it was plenty.



    Oh, I should have said that was two different CAMs. First time was
    somthing called a 1/4 race CAM. Second rebuild was with an RV (long
    duration) CAM. The same carb worked great for both applications. Never
    felt like it was leaning out.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)