XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.sport.tennis, talk.politics.guns
XPost: rec.outdoors.rv-travel, uk.politics.misc
On 03 Jan 2024, David Hartung <
junk@nogood.com> posted some news:
mjmdnfUk_tI2QQj4nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com:
On 1/3/24 15:10, David Hartung wrote:
On 1/3/2024 12:34 PM, scooter lied:
"David Hartung" <junk@LCMS_shitbags.org> wrote in message
news:p9ilN.125701$p%Mb.5638@fx15.iad...
On 1/3/2024 10:40 AM, scooter lied:
"David Hartung" <junk@LCMS_shitbags.org> wrote in message
news:6EglN.25555$Sf59.8063@fx48.iad...
On 1/3/2024 9:03 AM, Robert Peters wrote:
On 1/3/2024 11:17 AM, Real American 1944 wrote:
The Constitution is clear about who can run for president and
who cannot. It
says any American citizen can run for president, with four big >>>>>>>> exceptions.
Article II of the Constitution lays down the first three.
Anybody can run for
president as long as they are at least 35 years old, are a
natural-born
citizen and have lived in the United States for at least 14
years.
After the Civil War, members of Congress added a fourth test.
Not wanting
this country to fear that federal officials might again attempt >>>>>>>> to overthrow
the government, they added the 14th Amendment which, among
other provisions,
disqualifies as a candidate for any federal office anybody who >>>>>>>> swore to
uphold the Constitution and then sought to overturn it.
The language of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is clear: “No >>>>>>>> person shall…hold an office, civil or military, under the
United States…who, having
previously taken an oath…to support the Constitution of the
United States,
shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the
same, or given
aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
Then Congress added an important final clause: “But Congress >>>>>>>> may by a vote of
two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
Which leaves only three questions. First: Did Donald Trump
“engage in
insurrection” and/or “give comfort to” those who did?
Absolutely. Even though
not yet convicted of doing so (which the Constitution does not >>>>>>>> require),
So much for due process.
Bullshit. Due process has been followed. You don't know what due
process is or means. Fuck off.
Ok, in which Criminal Court has he been convicted of insurrection
or
Section 3 of the 14th amendment does *not* require a criminal
conviction, scooter.
No, but the 5th amendment sure does.
No, scooter, it does not. The fifth amendment has no bearing on
section 3 of the 14th amendment, scooter.
The fifth amendment is kind of like a Swiss army knife for you, isn't
it, scooter? You think you can make it do anything and everything.
You've said the fifth amendment is what means some gun control is
allowed. Anything else you'd like to try to make it cover, scooter?
I'm a fucking idiot, scooter.
I don't have a law degree.
You're missing a bunch of brain cells too!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)