It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.

https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12

Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and
frequently veering off course.

The ethics case, brought by the Washington, DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the
office alleges that the former New York mayor filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the fact that there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.

By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice."

On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law license" in an effort to undermine the Constitution.


"Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.

Fox grew increasingly frustrated with Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started
airing nonsense allegations of voter fraud in other states.

"Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing — in drafting — the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a watch."

"Well, you know, I really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when that was not
the case."

Later in the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state.

"I recall this very, very clearly," Giuliani said of the ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."

Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted."

"So you would agree that my position is reasonable, since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was hardly — "

Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."

Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein Giuliani in.

"Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."

Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to remind him that he was testifying as a witness.

The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or more years" and that his actions were taken out of context.

"You've been a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized."

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>
Wrote in message:r

It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first

witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics case, brought by the Washington,
DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New York mayor
filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the fact that there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani
violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law license" in
an effort to undermine the Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly frustrated with
Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started airing nonsense allegations of voter
fraud in other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing ¡X in drafting ¡X the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a watch.""Well, you know, I
really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when that was not the case."Later in
the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this very, very clearly," Giuliani said of the
ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that my position is reasonable,
since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was hardly ¡X "Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein
Giuliani in."Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to
remind him that he was testifying as a witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process
works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized."

WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY.
--
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we
know it.


----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 23:47:56 UTC-4, justan wrote:

"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com>
Wrote in message:r

It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first

witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics case, brought by the Washington,
DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New York mayor
filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the fact that there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani
violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law license" in
an effort to undermine the Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly frustrated with
Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started airing nonsense allegations of voter
fraud in other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing — in drafting — the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a watch.""Well, you know,
I really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when that was not the case."Later
in the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this very, very clearly," Giuliani said of
the ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that my position is reasonable,
since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was hardly — "Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein
Giuliani in."Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to
remind him that he was testifying as a witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process
works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized."

WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY.
--
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we
know it.

----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

Why....because he is quite adept at outing y'all and your ilk?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:09:26 -0800 (PST), True North
<princecraft49@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 23:47:56 UTC-4, justan wrote:

"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com>
Wrote in message:r

It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first

witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics case, brought by the Washington,
DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New York mayor
filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the fact that there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said,

Giuliani violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law

license" in an effort to undermine the Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly
frustrated with Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started airing nonsense
allegations of voter fraud in other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing — in drafting — the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a

watch.""Well, you know, I really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when that

was not the case."Later in the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this very, very
clearly," Giuliani said of the ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that
my position is reasonable, since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was hardly — "Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the

hearings, also tried multiple times to rein Giuliani in."Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius

interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to remind him that he was testifying as a witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been a trial lawyer
for a long time, and you understand how the process works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized."

WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY.
--
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we
know it.


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

Why....because he is quite adept at outing y'all and your ilk?

It's because I'm a little whiney bitch!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, 7 December 2022 at 12:25:44 UTC-4, justan wrote:

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:09:26 -0800 (PST), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 23:47:56 UTC-4, justan wrote:

"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com>
Wrote in message:r

It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first

witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics case, brought by the Washington,
DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New York mayor
filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the fact that there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said,

Giuliani violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law

license" in an effort to undermine the Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly
frustrated with Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started airing nonsense
allegations of voter fraud in other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing — in drafting — the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a

watch.""Well, you know, I really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when

that was not the case."Later in the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this very, very
clearly," Giuliani said of the ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that
my position is reasonable, since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was hardly — "Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the

hearings, also tried multiple times to rein Giuliani in."Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius

interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to remind him that he was testifying as a witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been a trial lawyer
for a long time, and you understand how the process works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized."

WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY.
--
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we
know it.


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

Why....because he is quite adept at outing y'all and your ilk?

It's because I'm a little whiney bitch!

I agree wholeheartedly and unequivocally with this post!
Good for you, Justine. As Dr Phil says.."you can't change what you don't acknowledge".

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

justan <me@here.com> wrote:

"waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>
Wrote in message:r

It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might
add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former
Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first witness in
his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became
combative as the opposing counsel dinged Giuliani for failing to answer
straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics
case, brought by the Washington, DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary
Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election
results in Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's
personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New
York mayor filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's
presidential-election results, despite the fact that there was "no
factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter
fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani violated the
Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct
prejudicial to the administration of justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox,
the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani
"weaponized his law license" in an effort to undermine the
Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action
asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to
vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly
frustrated with Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he
was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in
litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered
off course and started airing nonsense allegations of voter fraud in
other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was
in writing — in drafting — the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox >> said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make
a watch.""Well, you know, I really do think you should let me answer the
question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani
said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and
attention was given to one matter when that was not the case."Later in
the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer
questions as a witness when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania
Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this
very, very clearly," Giuliani said of the ruling. "This is a very
debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling
held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where
the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that my position is
reasonable, since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani
said, adding: "It was hardly — "Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani,
I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over
the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein Giuliani in."Mr.
Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at
which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the
questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another
long-winded rant from Giuliani to remind him that he was testifying as a
witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or
more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been
a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process
works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized."

WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY.

With all the ONLY prosecutions on many of these investigations for being
lied to the authorities, I think the smart thing is do not say anything.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

True North <princecraft49@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 23:47:56 UTC-4, justan wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> > Wrote in message:r > > It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-

to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged
Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics case, brought by the Washington, DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in
Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New York mayor filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the fact that
there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of
justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law license" in an effort to undermine the Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action asking a court in
Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly frustrated with Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in
litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started airing nonsense allegations of voter fraud in other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing ¡X in drafting ¡X the initial
complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a watch.""Well, you know, I really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani said. "
So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when that was not the case."Later in the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness when he started opining on a
5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this very, very clearly," Giuliani said of the ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling held that election
observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that my position is reasonable, since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was hardly ¡X "Fox cut him off, saying, "
Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein Giuliani in."Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at which you should argue your
claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to remind him that he was testifying as a witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or more
years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized." > > WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY. > -- > Vote the
straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we > know it. > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlWhy....because he is quite adept at outing y'all and your ilk?

Donny, you have a bad habit of sticking your head in dark smelly
places. Thank god most kanuckers aren't as dumb as you
are.
--
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we
know it.


----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 13:38:07 UTC-4, justan wrote:

True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 23:47:56 UTC-4, justan wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> > Wrote in message:r > > It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-

to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged
Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics case, brought by the Washington, DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in
Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New York mayor filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the fact that
there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of
justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law license" in an effort to undermine the Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action asking a court in
Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly frustrated with Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in
litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started airing nonsense allegations of voter fraud in other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing — in drafting — the
initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a watch.""Well, you know, I really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was operating,"
Giuliani said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when that was not the case."Later in the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness when he
started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this very, very clearly," Giuliani said of the ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling held
that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that my position is reasonable, since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was hardly — "Fox cut him
off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein Giuliani in."Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at which you should
argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to remind him that he was testifying as a witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for
three or more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized." > > WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY. > -- >
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we > know it. > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlWhy....because he is quite adept at outing y'all and your ilk?

Donny, you have a bad habit of sticking your head in dark smelly
places. Thank god most kanuckers aren't as dumb as you
are.
--

Are y'all referring to this group?
I suppose y'all have a point considering how it's dominated by The John and his Bowl of Turds.
"dark smelly places" indeed!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

True North <princecraft49@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On Thursday, 8 December 2022 at 13:38:07 UTC-4, justan wrote:> True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r > > On Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 23:47:56 UTC-4, justan wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> > Wrote in message:r >
It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first

witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics case, brought by the Washington,
DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New York mayor
filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the fact that there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani
violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law license" in
an effort to undermine the Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly frustrated with
Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started airing nonsense allegations of voter
fraud in other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing ¡X in drafting ¡X the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a watch.""Well, you know, I
really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when that was not the case."Later in
the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this very, very clearly," Giuliani said of the
ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that my position is reasonable,
since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was hardly ¡X "Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein
Giuliani in."Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to
remind him that he was testifying as a witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process
works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized." > > WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY. > -- > Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we > know it. > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.
amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlWhy....because he is quite adept at outing y'all and your ilk? > > Donny, you have a bad habit of sticking your head in dark smelly > places. Thank god most kanuckers aren't as dumb as you > are.> -- Are y'all referring to
this group?I suppose y'all have a point considering how it's dominated by The John and his Bowl of Turds."dark smelly places" indeed!

Nope.
--
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we
know it.


----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:38:06 -0500 (EST), justan <me@here.com> wrote:

True North <princecraft49@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r

On Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 23:47:56 UTC-4, justan wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> > Wrote in message:r > > It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-

to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first witness in his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became combative as the opposing counsel dinged
Giuliani for failing to answer straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics case, brought by the Washington, DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election results in
Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New York mayor filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's presidential-election results, despite the

fact that there was "no factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani violated the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the

administration of justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox, the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani "weaponized his law license" in an effort to undermine the Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action
asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly frustrated with Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he was trying to get more details from Giuliani
about his role in litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered off course and started airing nonsense allegations of voter fraud in other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was in writing ?X in

drafting ?X the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make a watch.""Well, you know, I really do think you should let me answer the question so I can get the context in which I was

operating," Giuliani said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and attention was given to one matter when that was not the case."Later in the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer questions as a witness
when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this very, very clearly," Giuliani said of the ruling. "This is a very debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the
ruling held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that my position is reasonable, since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani said, adding: "It was

hardly ?X "Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani, I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein Giuliani in."Mr. Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the

point at which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another long-winded rant from Giuliani to remind him that he was testifying as a witness.The former mayor then said he
had been "persecuted for three or more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized." > > WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE
FAT HARRY EVERY DAY. > -- > Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we > know it. > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.htmlWhy....because he is quite adept at

outing y'all and your ilk?

Donny, you have a bad habit of sticking your head in dark smelly
places. Thank god most kanuckers aren't as dumb as you
are.

And, I have a lot of experience sticking my head up dark smelly
places!

Trump 2024! Even from prison!

--
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we
know it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 06:12:03 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:

justan <me@here.com> wrote:

"waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>
Wrote in message:r

It looks like Rudy is in hot water - well deserved I might
add.https://www.businessinsider.com/giuliani-struggled-to-answer-basic-questions-attorney-disciplinary-hearing-2022-12Former
Mayor Rudy Giuliani of New York appeared Monday as the first witness in
his own attorney-misconduct hearing. The proceedings quickly became
combative as the opposing counsel dinged Giuliani for failing to answer
straightforward questions and frequently veering off course.The ethics
case, brought by the Washington, DC, bar's Office of Disciplinary
Counsel, zeroes in on Giuliani's effort to overturn the 2020 election
results in Pennsylvania when he was then-President Donald Trump's
personal attorney. Specifically, the office alleges that the former New
York mayor filed a "frivolous" lawsuit seeking to nullify Pennsylvania's >>> presidential-election results, despite the fact that there was "no
factual or legal basis" for Giuliani's claims of widespread voter
fraud.By filing the lawsuit, the office said, Giuliani violated the
Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and "engaged in conduct
prejudicial to the administration of justice."On Monday, Hamilton Fox,
the disciplinary counsel, said in his opening arguments that Giuliani
"weaponized his law license" in an effort to undermine the
Constitution."Mr. Giuliani was responsible for filing a frivolous action >>> asking a court in Pennsylvania to deny millions of people the right to
vote," Fox said during the virtual hearing.Fox grew increasingly
frustrated with Giuliani as the proceedings went on. At one point, he
was trying to get more details from Giuliani about his role in
litigating the Pennsylvania case, but the former mayor repeatedly veered >>> off course and started airing nonsense allegations of voter fraud in
other states."Mr. Giuliani, I am trying to find out what your role was
in writing — in drafting — the initial complaint in Pennsylvania," Fox
said. "I'm asking you what time it is, and you're telling me how to make >>> a watch.""Well, you know, I really do think you should let me answer the >>> question so I can get the context in which I was operating," Giuliani
said. "So you don't create the false impression that all my time and
attention was given to one matter when that was not the case."Later in
the hearing, Giuliani was again reminded that he was there to answer
questions as a witness when he started opining on a 5-2 Pennsylvania
Supreme Court ruling about voting procedures in the state."I recall this >>> very, very clearly," Giuliani said of the ruling. "This is a very
debatable opinion."Fox ignored Giuliani and pointed out that the ruling
held that election observers "be permitted to remain in the room where
the ballots are being counted.""So you would agree that my position is
reasonable, since it was the same position as" the dissenters, Giuliani
said, adding: "It was hardly — "Fox cut him off, saying, "Mr. Giuliani,
I ask the questions."Robert Bernius, a retired lawyer who presided over
the hearings, also tried multiple times to rein Giuliani in."Mr.
Giuliani, I understand your frustration, but this is not the point at
which you should argue your claims," he said. "Just answer the
questions. Thank you."Earlier in the day, Bernius interrupted another
long-winded rant from Giuliani to remind him that he was testifying as a >>> witness.The former mayor then said he had been "persecuted for three or
more years" and that his actions were taken out of context."You've been
a trial lawyer for a long time, and you understand how the process
works," Bernius said. "The process is regularized."

WAYNE SOUNDS MORE LIKE FAT HARRY EVERY DAY.

With all the ONLY prosecutions on many of these investigations for being
lied to the authorities, I think the smart thing is do not say anything.

Shut up spoofer!

--
Vote the straight GOP ticket to save the USA and the world as we
know it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)