..like Herring...
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life
starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
..like Herring... The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it should be done and how... and in all cases the mother'slife and well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
..like Herring... The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it should be done and how... and in all cases the mother'slife and well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life
starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
On 7/11/22 6:59 AM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...
 The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life
starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
While I am not religious, it is obvious I have studied the bible and
similar sorts of documents, and you have not. The early Hebrews and
other early peoples were aware of the signs of pregnancies and if they wanted, how to end pregnancies. An Egyptian papyrus from 1500 years
before the common era discusses an induced abortion.
And, no, I never had a discussion with a woman named Karen 50 years ago
about pregnancies.
On 7/11/22 6:59 AM, John H wrote:> On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser S?ze> <KeyserS??ze@whitehouse.com> wrote:> >> ..like Herring...>>>> The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:I just want to find 11,780 votes... *> > Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the> bible? Hypocrite.> > How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.> > Your Genesis reference was written well before
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it>> should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and>> well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is>> already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)>>>> *
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze <KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life
starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it >should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and >well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
On 7/11/22 6:59 AM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life
starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
While I am not religious, it is obvious I have studied the bible and
similar sorts of documents, and you have not. The early Hebrews and
other early peoples were aware of the signs of pregnancies and if they >wanted, how to end pregnancies. An Egyptian papyrus from 1500 years
before the common era discusses an induced abortion.
And, no, I never had a discussion with a woman named Karen 50 years ago
about pregnancies.
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:59:18 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life
starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document that >should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants
to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?
On 7/11/22 6:59 AM, John H wrote:> On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze> <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:> >> ..like Herring...>>>> The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:I just want to find 11,780 votes... *> > Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the> bible? Hypocrite.> > How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.> > Your Genesis reference was written well before
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it>> should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and>> well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is>> already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)>>>> *
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r2:7)>>>> The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it>> should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and>> well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is>> already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)>>>>
On 7/11/22 6:59 AM, John H wrote:> On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze> <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:> >> ..like Herring...>>>> The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life>> starts at first breath. (Genesis
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?While I am not religious, it is obvious I have studied the bible and similar sorts of documents, and you have not. The early Hebrews and other early peoples were aware of the signs of pregnancies andif they wanted, how to end pregnancies. An Egyptian papyrus from 1500 years before the common era discusses an induced abortion.And, no, I never had a discussion with a woman named Karen 50 years ago about pregnancies.-- * I just want to find 11,780
HOW BOUT THE MOTHER OF YOUR CHILDREN? DID YOUSE GUYS TALK MUCH?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:38:39 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com" <345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:59:18 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life
starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it >> >should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document thatThe passages he mentioned had nothing to do with abortions.
should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants
to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 11:07:44 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:38:39 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:59:18 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:The passages he mentioned had nothing to do with abortions.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life
starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it >> >> >should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document that
should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants
to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?
There's no doubt he lifted that off some liberal trash website that he and the other lemmings frequent.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:41:10 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com" ><3452471@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 11:07:44 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:38:39 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:59:18 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:The passages he mentioned had nothing to do with abortions.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the >>> >> bible? Hypocrite.
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life >>> >> >starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it >>> >> >should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy. >>> >>
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document that
should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants >>> >to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?
There's no doubt he lifted that off some liberal trash website that he and the other lemmings frequent.
I agree there is little doubt that this was a cut/paste but it does
point out the flaws in using the Bible as a text book, a reference or
as the basis for land claims.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:16:45 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:41:10 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com" ><345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 11:07:44 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:38:39 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:59:18 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:The passages he mentioned had nothing to do with abortions.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life >>> >> >starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is >>> >> >already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy. >>> >>
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies >>> >> only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document that
should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants >>> >to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?
There's no doubt he lifted that off some liberal trash website that he and the other lemmings frequent.
I agree there is little doubt that this was a cut/paste but it doesYou'll note he backed out rather quickly.
point out the flaws in using the Bible as a text book, a reference or
as the basis for land claims.
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:16:45 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:41:10 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"You'll note he backed out rather quickly.
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 11:07:44 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:38:39 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:59:18 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:The passages he mentioned had nothing to do with abortions.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life >> >>> >> >starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy. >> >>> >>
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies >> >>> >> only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document that
should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants >> >>> >to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?
There's no doubt he lifted that off some liberal trash website that he and the other lemmings frequent.
I agree there is little doubt that this was a cut/paste but it does
point out the flaws in using the Bible as a text book, a reference or
as the basis for land claims.
I'm surprised he didn't defend his position more vigorously. After all he says that " I have studied the bible...".
If he has, he would surely understand the context from which the quotes came?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:28:26 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com" <3452471@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:16:45 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:41:10 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"You'll note he backed out rather quickly.
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 11:07:44 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:38:39 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:59:18 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:The passages he mentioned had nothing to do with abortions.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the >>>>>>>> bible? Hypocrite.
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life >>>>>>>>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and >>>>>>>>> well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is >>>>>>>>> already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy. >>>>>>>>
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies >>>>>>>> only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your >>>>>>>> children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document that
should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants >>>>>>> to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?
There's no doubt he lifted that off some liberal trash website that he and the other lemmings frequent.
I agree there is little doubt that this was a cut/paste but it does
point out the flaws in using the Bible as a text book, a reference or
as the basis for land claims.
I'm surprised he didn't defend his position more vigorously. After all he says that " I have studied the bible...".
If he has, he would surely understand the context from which the quotes came?
Nobody cites the context with bible quotes. They cherry pick words
they like and misquote them.
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides ... yada yada"
is not Ezekiel 25:17 but are you going to tell Sam?
On 7/11/2022 8:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/11/22 6:59 AM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...
 The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life >>>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it >>>> should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and
well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is
already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies
only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your
children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
While I am not religious, it is obvious I have studied the bible and
similar sorts of documents, and you have not. The early Hebrews and
other early peoples were aware of the signs of pregnancies and if they
wanted, how to end pregnancies. An Egyptian papyrus from 1500 years
before the common era discusses an induced abortion.
And, no, I never had a discussion with a woman named Karen 50 years
ago about pregnancies.
My views on abortion have nothing to do with religion.
I believe life begins at the first cell division.
It's purely science.
I am a middle of the road Independent voter who leans
somewhat to conservatism but, it may surprise you,
am pro-choice even though abortion isn't a choice
I would personally agree with.
Anything wrong with that in your progressive liberal mind? :-)
On 7/11/22 9:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:> On 7/11/2022 8:17 AM, Keyser S?ze wrote:>> On 7/11/22 6:59 AM, John H wrote:>>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser S?ze>>> <KeyserS??ze@whitehouse.com> wrote:>>>>>>> ..like Herring...>>>>>>>> The bibledoes not say that life begins at conception. It says life>>>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)>>>>>>>> The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it>>>> should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and>>>>
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.>>>>>> Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies>>> only to the first man to walk the earth.>>>>>> What a dumb shit, Krause!>>>>>> "That's not a babykicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!">>>>>> Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your>>> children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?>>>> While I am not religious, it is obvious I have studied the bible and >> similar
On 7/13/22 8:23 AM, justan wrote:> Keyser S?ze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r>> On 7/11/22 9:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:> On 7/11/2022 8:17 AM, Keyser S?ze wrote:>> On 7/11/22 6:59 AM, John H wrote:>>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400,Keyser S?ze>>> <KeyserS??ze@whitehouse.com> wrote:>>>>>>> ..like Herring...>>>>>>>> The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life>>>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)>>>>>>>> The only time the bible mentions abortion is when
On 7/12/22 1:35 AM, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:28:26 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"
<3452471@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 5:37:25 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:16:45 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:41:10 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"You'll note he backed out rather quickly.
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 11:07:44 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:38:39 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com"
<345...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:59:18 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:The passages he mentioned had nothing to do with abortions.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:54:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
..like Herring...Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the
The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life >>>>>>>>>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)
The only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it
should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and >>>>>>>>>> well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is >>>>>>>>>> already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
bible? Hypocrite.
How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy. >>>>>>>>>
Your Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies >>>>>>>>> only to the first man to walk the earth.
What a dumb shit, Krause!
"That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!"
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your >>>>>>>>> children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?
Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document that
should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants
to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?
There's no doubt he lifted that off some liberal trash website that he and the other lemmings frequent.
I agree there is little doubt that this was a cut/paste but it does
point out the flaws in using the Bible as a text book, a reference or >>>>> as the basis for land claims.
I'm surprised he didn't defend his position more vigorously. After all he says that " I have studied the bible...".
If he has, he would surely understand the context from which the quotes came?
Nobody cites the context with bible quotes. They cherry pick words
they like and misquote them.
"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides ... yada yada"
is not Ezekiel 25:17 but are you going to tell Sam?
Herring and the other TrumpsterTrash here aren't worth "vigorous"
discussion.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:08:18 -0400, Keyser Söze<KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:>On 7/12/22 1:35 AM, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:28:26 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com">> <3452471@gmail.com> wrote:>> >>> On Monday, July 11, 2022at 5:37:25 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:16:45 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:41:10 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com">>>>> <345...@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 11:07:44 AM UTC-
bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it>>>>>>>>>> should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and>>>>>>>>>> well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is>>>>>>>>>> already aperson. (Numbers 5:11-31)>>>>>>><KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..like Herring...>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life>>>>>>>>>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only time the
interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants>>>>>>>> to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?>>>>>>> The passages he mentioned had nothing to do with abortions.>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no doubt heYour Genesis reference was written well before sonograms and applies>>>>>>>>> only to the first man to walk the earth.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What a dumb shit, Krause!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "That's not a baby kicking, Karen dear, it's just a fetus!">>>* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *>>>>>>>>> Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the>>>>>>>>> bible? Hypocrite.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter the discussion? Dummy.>>>>>>>
Well, did the discussion above take place with the mother of your>>>>>>>>> children? Or did she never mention the baby kicking?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Funny that he believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document that>>>>>>>> should be
John H <jherring@cox.net> Wrote in message:rat 5:37:25 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:16:45 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:41:10 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com">>>>> <345...@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 11:07:44 AM UTC-
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:08:18 -0400, Keyser Söze<KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:>On 7/12/22 1:35 AM, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:28:26 -0700 (PDT), "345...@gmail.com">> <3452471@gmail.com> wrote:>> >>> On Monday, July 11, 2022
Numbers 5:11-31)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *>>>>>>>>> Should we go back and resurrect all the comments you've made about the>>>>>>>>> bible? Hypocrite.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does the test for an unfaithful wife enter theThe only time the bible mentions abortion is when it describes when it>>>>>>>>>> should be done and how... and in all cases the mother's life and>>>>>>>>>> well-being take precedence over the fetus, because the mopther is>>>>>>>>>> already aperson. (<KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..like Herring...>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bible does not say that life begins at conception. It says life>>>>>>>>>> starts at first breath. (Genesis 2:7)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
breathing document that>>>>>>>> should be interpreted and changed to meet modern day beliefs, yet wants>>>>>>>> to hold up the Bible as an absolute document. Only when it suits his argument, eh?>>>>>>> The passages he mentioned had nothing to do withabortions.>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no doubt he lifted that off some liberal trash website that he and the other lemmings frequent.>>>>>>>>>> I agree there is little doubt that this was a cut/paste but it does>>>>> point out the flaws in using the Bible as a
not Ezekiel 25:17 but are you going to tell Sam?>>>Herring and the other TrumpsterTrash here aren't worth "vigorous" >discussion.Give us some more inane quotes from your bible, Krause.
This might help
-- https://quotesgram.com/atheist-quotes-about-the-bible/
lets go Brandon...
----Android NewsGroup Reader---- >https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 371 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 179:50:55 |
| Calls: | 7,918 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,989 |
| Messages: | 5,798,120 |
| Posted today: | 1 |