This was written just for you:https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/It won't help.
Wayne has fallen off the deep end, and just parrots the party line now. I'm afraid CNN may have Clockwork Orange'd him.
Donnie isn't smart enough to understand the article.
Harry tries to mislead and obfuscate his statements and questions with his wordsmithing. At least the stuff he doesn't cut and (sort-of) paste.
He's just not very good at it, and it's painfully obvious when he tries.
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:> This was written just for you: > > https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/===What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of them are of the non-sequitur,"but what about" genre.
On Friday, 24 June 2022 at 13:09:19 UTC-3, 345...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
This was written just for you:It won't help.
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
Wayne has fallen off the deep end, and just parrots the party line now.
I'm afraid CNN may have Clockwork Orange'd him.
Donnie isn't smart enough to understand the article.
Harry tries to mislead and obfuscate his statements and questions with
his wordsmithing. At least the stuff he doesn't cut and (sort-of) paste.
He's just not very good at it, and it's painfully obvious when he tries.
Believe I hear the Palm Sisters calling for y'all.
You never seem able to satisfy them.
True North <princecraft49@gmail.com> wrote:> On Friday, 24 June 2022 at 13:09:19 UTC-3, 345...@gmail.com wrote:>> On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:>>> This was written just for you: >>> >>> https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/>> It won't help. >> >> Wayne has fallen off the deep end, and just parrots the party line now.>> I'm afraid CNN may have Clockwork Orange'd him. >> >> Donnie isn't smart enough to understand the article. >> >> Harry tries to
On Friday, 24 June 2022 at 13:09:19 UTC-3, 345...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
This was written just for you:It won't help.
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
Wayne has fallen off the deep end, and just parrots the party line now. I'm afraid CNN may have Clockwork Orange'd him.
Donnie isn't smart enough to understand the article.
Harry tries to mislead and obfuscate his statements and questions with his wordsmithing. At least the stuff he doesn't cut and (sort-of) paste.
He's just not very good at it, and it's painfully obvious when he tries.
Believe I hear the Palm Sisters calling for y'all.
You never seem able to satisfy them.
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have
asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> This was writtenjust for you: > >> > >> https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ > > > >=== > > > >What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.> Wasn't talking about my questions
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:exchanges on here seem kind of childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to be taken so
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. With all due respect, some of the recent
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),exchanges on here seem kind of childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to be taken so
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. With all due respect, some of the recent
Sillly. How could they possibly have issues with your answers when you
don't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> On Fri, 24 Jun 202209:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> >> This was written just for you: > >> >> > >> >> https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com>2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> >> This was written just for you: > >> >> > >> >> https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-
Wrote in message:r
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> On Fri, 24 Jun
I don't suppose we're entitled to know exactly what he did to run
roughshod over the Constitution.
--
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> > Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday,
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I
answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my
answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again.
With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the
United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have >>>> asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of >>>>> them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I
answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my
answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. >>> With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of >>> childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that >>> means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to >>> be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A
lot worse than questionIng election results.
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:intimidation against Mike Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I
answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my
answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. >> >>> With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of >> >>> childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the
United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A
lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for ratification. There were also threats and
On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>> Wrote in message:r>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> >Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >>
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have >>>>>> asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of >>>>>>> them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I
answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my >>>>> answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. >>>>> With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of >>>>> childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that >>>>> means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it >>>>> surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to >>>>> be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the
United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A
lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for ratification. There were also threats andintimidation against Mike Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:rpeople-dont-give-straight-answers/ > >> > > >> >=== > >> > > >> >What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre. > >> Wasn't talking about my questions at all.
On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>> Wrote in message:r>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com>Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> >> This was written just for you: > >> >> > >> >> https://kletische.com/
Bill, Luddite, etc., have > >> asked very pertinent questions which you ignore. > > > >=== > > > >You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my answers to them, Ibelieve they're both quite capable of asking again. With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that means that most of us took an oath to defend the
the Constitution.> -- ===That's very easy to answer but I suspect you're not really interested.> > I'm anxious to hear why you think he did what you said he did.> Running roughshod over the Constitution is such a loosy goosy> expression. I Know youcan do better than that.> You've never read the Constitution. It is way way above your reading comprehension level. Maybe someone would agree to read aloud this simplified version to you and explain the big words:https://tinyurl.com/29ottg3g-- * I just
Oh, fuck off dummy. Someone who has bankrupt himself twice, is on
record for state and local tax delinquency in multiple states,
can't pay off a small payday loan company debt, can't get a woman
to accept his surname in marriage, had to go all the way to an
obscure Kansas college to find standards loiw enough to admit
him, isn't the brightest candle on the cake. If that's not enough
to embarass you, there's more, a lot more; right?
If you are so fricken smart, perhaps you can do better than Waynes
loosy goosey accusation.
On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have >>>>>>> asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of >>>>>>>> them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I
answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my >>>>>> answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking
again.
With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem
kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that >>>>>> means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it >>>>>> surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to >>>>>> be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the
United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to
be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A
lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out
going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create
fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for
ratification. There were also threats and intimidation against Mike
Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they
break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump.
There is ample proof, well documented.
If this is all true and there is "ample, documented proof" that Trump organized and sanctioned these activities, the DOJ should have no reason
to not immediately indict him and start the criminal trial process.
If so, there's no need to continue the Select Committee investigating
Jan 6th for weeks and weeks unless the purpose of the
drawn out Committee investigation is intended for another purpose.
On 6/26/22 8:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>> This was written just for you:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have >>>>>>>> asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of >>>>>>>>> them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I >>>>>>> answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my >>>>>>> answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking
again.
With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem
kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, >>>>>>> that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it >>>>>>> surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution
seem to
be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the >>>>> United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to
be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A >>>> lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With
out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to
create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for
ratification. There were also threats and intimidation against Mike
Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that
they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by
Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.
If this is all true and there is "ample, documented proof" that TrumpI'm pretty sure you ain't the "decider" on this issue.
organized and sanctioned these activities, the DOJ should have no
reason to not immediately indict him and start the criminal trial
process.
If so, there's no need to continue the Select Committee investigating
Jan 6th for weeks and weeks unless the purpose of the
drawn out Committee investigation is intended for another purpose.
On Friday, 24 June 2022 at 13:09:19 UTC-3, 345...@gmail.com wrote:> On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:> > This was written just for you: > > > > https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/> It won't help. > > Waynehas fallen off the deep end, and just parrots the party line now. I'm afraid CNN may have Clockwork Orange'd him. > > Donnie isn't smart enough to understand the article. > > Harry tries to mislead and obfuscate his statements and questions with his
On 6/26/22 7:21 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> Keyser S?ze <KeyserS??ze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r>> On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>> Wrote in message:r>> On Saturday,June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> > Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),> "waynebatr...@
True North <princecraft49@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rWayne has fallen off the deep end, and just parrots the party line now. I'm afraid CNN may have Clockwork Orange'd him. > > Donnie isn't smart enough to understand the article. > > Harry tries to mislead and obfuscate his statements and questions with
On Friday, 24 June 2022 at 13:09:19 UTC-3, 345...@gmail.com wrote:> On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:> > This was written just for you: > > > > https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/> It won't help. > >
Donnies remedy when Fat Harry is in trouble is often the Palm Sisters.
That's pretty strange. A
On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have >>>>>> asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of >>>>>>> them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I >>>>> answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my >>>>> answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. >>>>> With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that >>>>> means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it >>>>> surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to >>>>> be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the
United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A >> lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
intimidation against Mike Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for ratification. There were also threats and
If this is all true and there is "ample, documented proof" that Trump organized and sanctioned these activities, the DOJ should have no reason
to not immediately indict him and start the criminal trial process.
If so, there's no need to continue the Select Committee investigating
Jan 6th for weeks and weeks unless the purpose of the
drawn out Committee investigation is intended for another purpose.
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 8:57:18 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>> This was written just for you:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have >>>>>> asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of >>>>>>> them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I >>>>> answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my >>>>> answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again.
With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it >>>>> surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the >>> United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A >> lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
intimidation against Mike Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for ratification. There were also threats and
for all of his co-conspirators to be fully prosecuted however, and it would be interesting to watch the fallout as they squirm on the hook.If this is all true and there is "ample, documented proof" that Trump organized and sanctioned these activities, the DOJ should have no reason to not immediately indict him and start the criminal trial process.
If so, there's no need to continue the Select Committee investigating
Jan 6th for weeks and weeks unless the purpose of the
drawn out Committee investigation is intended for another purpose.
===
Those questions and issues are addressed here:
https://www.grid.news/story/politics/2022/06/16/merrick-garlands-impossible-choice-whether-or-not-to-prosecute-donald-trump
Their analysis seems fair and thoughtful to me. Much as Trump richly deserves to be drawn and quartered, that may not be the best thing for the country. I'd be happy to see him go away quietly but that seems unlikely. It would certainly be appropriate
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 12:31:00 PM UTC-4, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 8:57:18 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>> This was written just for you:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have
===
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ >>>>>>>
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I >>>>> answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my
answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again.
With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the >>> United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A
lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
intimidation against Mike Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for ratification. There were also threats and
appropriate for all of his co-conspirators to be fully prosecuted however, and it would be interesting to watch the fallout as they squirm on the hook.If this is all true and there is "ample, documented proof" that Trump organized and sanctioned these activities, the DOJ should have no reason to not immediately indict him and start the criminal trial process.
If so, there's no need to continue the Select Committee investigating Jan 6th for weeks and weeks unless the purpose of the
drawn out Committee investigation is intended for another purpose.
===
Those questions and issues are addressed here:
https://www.grid.news/story/politics/2022/06/16/merrick-garlands-impossible-choice-whether-or-not-to-prosecute-donald-trump
Their analysis seems fair and thoughtful to me. Much as Trump richly deserves to be drawn and quartered, that may not be the best thing for the country. I'd be happy to see him go away quietly but that seems unlikely. It would certainly be
Grid News presents a mix of fact and their opinion, but they are skewed left, so it's a bit tainted. Might be to your taste, however.
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 1:28:46 PM UTC-4, 345...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 12:31:00 PM UTC-4, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 8:57:18 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>> This was written just for you:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have
===
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ >>>>>>>
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I
answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my
answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again.
With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the
United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A
lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
intimidation against Mike Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for ratification. There were also threats and
appropriate for all of his co-conspirators to be fully prosecuted however, and it would be interesting to watch the fallout as they squirm on the hook.If this is all true and there is "ample, documented proof" that Trump organized and sanctioned these activities, the DOJ should have no reason
to not immediately indict him and start the criminal trial process.
If so, there's no need to continue the Select Committee investigating Jan 6th for weeks and weeks unless the purpose of the
drawn out Committee investigation is intended for another purpose.
===
Those questions and issues are addressed here:
https://www.grid.news/story/politics/2022/06/16/merrick-garlands-impossible-choice-whether-or-not-to-prosecute-donald-trump
Their analysis seems fair and thoughtful to me. Much as Trump richly deserves to be drawn and quartered, that may not be the best thing for the country. I'd be happy to see him go away quietly but that seems unlikely. It would certainly be
Grid News presents a mix of fact and their opinion, but they are skewed left, so it's a bit tainted. Might be to your taste, however.===
What part of that article did you think was skewed?
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 8:57:18 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:> On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote: > >> waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT), > >>>> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >>>
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> === > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of > >>>>>>> them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre. > >>>>>> Wasn't talkingOn Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >>>>>> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >>>>>>>> This was written just for you: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>
over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it. > >>> > >> Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the > >> constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A > >> lot worse than questionIng election results.with your answers when you > >>>> don't provide them? > >>>> > >>>> My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution. > >>> > >>> == > >>> And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the > >>> United States, ran roughshod
also threats and intimidation against Mike Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.> If this is all true and there is "=== > > > > > > It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for ratification. There were
Jan 6th for weeks and weeks unless the purpose of the > drawn out Committee investigation is intended for another purpose. > ===Those questions and issues are addressed here: https://www.grid.news/story/politics/2022/06/16/merrick-garlands-impossible-choice-whether-or-not-to-prosecute-donald-trump Their analysis seems fair and thoughtful to me. Much as Trump richly deserves to be drawn and quartered, that may not be the best thing for the country. I'd be happy to see him go away quietly but that
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 12:31:00 PM UTC-4, waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com wrote:> On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 8:57:18 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: > > On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote: > > >> waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > > >>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT), > > >>>> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...
again. > > >>>>> With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of > > >>>>> childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that > > >>>>> means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it > > >>>=== > > >>>>> > > >>>>> You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I > > >>>>> answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my > > >>>>> answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking
had nothing to do with the Constitution. > > >>> > > >>> == > > >>> And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the > > >>> United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it. > > >>> > > >>surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to > > >>>>> be taken so lightly. > > >>>> Sillly. How could they possibly have issues > > >>>>> with your answers when you > > >>>> don't provide them? > > >>>> > > >>>> My comment
On 6/26/22 7:21 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r
On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:>
"waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>> Wrote
in message:r>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan
Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> >
Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4,
John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),>
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On
Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> On Fri,
24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com"
<wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at
5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> >> This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ > >> > > >> >===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre. > >> Wasn't
talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have > >> asked
very pertinent questions which you ignore. > > > >=== > > > >You didn't
specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I answered in
regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my answers to
them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. With all
due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.> Sillly. How could they possibly have issues with
your answers when you > don't provide them? > > My comment had nothing
to do with the Constitution.===And therein lies the problem. Your hero,
the former president of the United States, ran roughshod over the
constitution and you seem to be fine with it. > > I don't suppose we're
entitled to know exactly what he did to run > roughshod over the
Constitution.> -- ===That's very easy to answer but I suspect you're
not really interested.> > I'm anxious to hear why you think he did what
you said he did.> Running roughshod over the Constitution is such a
loosy goosy> expression. I Know you can do better than that.> You've
never read the Constitution. It is way way above your reading
comprehension level. Maybe someone would agree to read aloud this
simplified version to you and explain the big >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> words:https://tinyurl.com/29ottg3g-- * I just want to find 11,780
votes... *
Oh, fuck off dummy. Someone who has bankrupt himself twice, is on
record for state and local tax delinquency in multiple states,
can't pay off a small payday loan company debt, can't get a woman
to accept his surname in marriage, had to go all the way to an
obscure Kansas college to find standards loiw enough to admit
him, isn't the brightest candle on the cake. If that's not enough
to embarass you, there's more, a lot more; right?
If you are so fricken smart, perhaps you can do better than Waynes
loosy goosey accusation.
The point remains that for you to discuss the Constitution is an
absurdity, in that you've never read it and don't have the reading comprehension skills to understand it if you tried.
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:
On 6/26/22 7:21 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r
On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:>
"waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>> Wrote >>>> in message:r>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan
Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> >
Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4,
John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),>
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On
Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> On Fri,
24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com"
<wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at
5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> >> This was written just for you: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ > >> > > >> >===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre. > >> Wasn't
talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have > >> asked
very pertinent questions which you ignore. > > > >=== > > > >You didn't
specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I answered in
regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my answers to
them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. With all
due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.> Sillly. How could they possibly have issues with
your answers when you > don't provide them? > > My comment had nothing
to do with the Constitution.===And therein lies the problem. Your hero,
the former president of the United States, ran roughshod over the
constitution and you seem to be fine with it. > > I don't suppose we're
entitled to know exactly what he did to run > roughshod over the
Constitution.> -- ===That's very easy to answer but I suspect you're
not really interested.> > I'm anxious to hear why you think he did what
you said he did.> Running roughshod over the Constitution is such a
loosy goosy> expression. I Know you can do better than that.> You've
never read the Constitution. It is way way above your reading
comprehension level. Maybe someone would agree to read aloud this
simplified version to you and explain the big >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> words:https://tinyurl.com/29ottg3g-- * I just want to find 11,780
votes... *
Oh, fuck off dummy. Someone who has bankrupt himself twice, is on
record for state and local tax delinquency in multiple states,
can't pay off a small payday loan company debt, can't get a woman
to accept his surname in marriage, had to go all the way to an
obscure Kansas college to find standards loiw enough to admit
him, isn't the brightest candle on the cake. If that's not enough
to embarass you, there's more, a lot more; right?
If you are so fricken smart, perhaps you can do better than Waynes
loosy goosey accusation.
The point remains that for you to discuss the Constitution is an
absurdity, in that you've never read it and don't have the reading
comprehension skills to understand it if you tried.
Justin is old enough to have had to read and discuss the Constitution in school. Seems as if Civics and separation of government duties is not
taught anymore.
On 6/26/22 7:56 PM, Bill wrote:> Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:>> On 6/26/22 7:21 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:>>> Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r>>>> On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:>>>>> "waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>> Wrote>>>> in message:r>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan>>>> Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> >>>>> Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday,
constitution seem to>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be taken so lightly.> Sillly. How could they possibly have issues with>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your answers when you > don't provide them? > > My comment had nothing>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do with theregard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my answers to>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. With all>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of>>>>>>>
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surprises me a little that recent attacks on the
what>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you said he did.> Running roughshod over the Constitution is such a>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loosy goosy> expression. I Know you can do better than that.> You've>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never read the Constitution. It is wayentitled to know exactly what he did to run > roughshod over the>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution.> -- ===That's very easy to answer but I suspect you're>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not really interested.> > I'm anxious to hear why you think he did
On 6/26/22 7:56 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:
On 6/26/22 7:21 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r
On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:>
"waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com" <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com>> Wrote >>>>> in message:r>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan >>>>> Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> > >>>>> Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, >>>>> John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),>
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On
Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> On Fri, >>>>> 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com"
<wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at >>>>> 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> >> This was written just for you: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ > >> > > >> >===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre. > >> Wasn't
talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have > >>
asked
very pertinent questions which you ignore. > > > >=== > > > >You
didn't
specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I answered in
regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my answers to
them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. With all
due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.> Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
with
your answers when you > don't provide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them? > > My comment had nothing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do with the Constitution.===And therein lies the problem. Your
hero,
the former president of the United States, ran roughshod over the
constitution and you seem to be fine with it. > > I don't suppose
we're
entitled to know exactly what he did to run > roughshod over the
Constitution.> -- ===That's very easy to answer but I suspect you're
not really interested.> > I'm anxious to hear why you think he did
what
you said he did.> Running roughshod over the Constitution is such a
loosy goosy> expression. I Know you can do better than that.>
You've
never read the Constitution. It is way way above your reading
comprehension level. Maybe someone would agree to read aloud this
simplified version to you and explain the big >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> words:https://tinyurl.com/29ottg3g-- * I just want to find 11,780
votes... *
Oh, fuck off dummy. Someone who has bankrupt himself twice, is on
record for state and local tax delinquency in multiple states,
can't pay off a small payday loan company debt, can't get a woman
to accept his surname in marriage, had to go all the way to an
obscure Kansas college to find standards loiw enough to admit
him, isn't the brightest candle on the cake. If that's not enough
to embarass you, there's more, a lot more; right?
If you are so fricken smart, perhaps you can do better than Waynes
loosy goosey accusation.
The point remains that for you to discuss the Constitution is an
absurdity, in that you've never read it and don't have the reading
comprehension skills to understand it if you tried.
Justin is old enough to have had to read and discuss the Constitution in
school. Seems as if Civics and separation of government duties is not
taught anymore.
That he is old enough doesn't mean that he did. There's no evidence of
that in his posts.
On 6/26/22 7:56 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote:
On 6/26/22 7:21 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r
On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:>
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com>> Wrote
in message:r>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan >>>> Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> > >>>> Wrote in message:r> > On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, >>>> John H wrote:> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),>
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On
Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> On Fri, >>>> 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com"
<wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at >>>> 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> >> This was written just for you: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ > >> > > >> >===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre. > >> Wasn't
talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have > >> asked
very pertinent questions which you ignore. > > > >=== > > > >You didn't
specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I answered in
regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my answers to
them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. With all
due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that
means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it
surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to
be taken so lightly.> Sillly. How could they possibly have issues with
your answers when you > don't provide them? > > My comment had nothing
to do with the Constitution.===And therein lies the problem. Your hero,
the former president of the United States, ran roughshod over the
constitution and you seem to be fine with it. > > I don't suppose we're
entitled to know exactly what he did to run > roughshod over the
Constitution.> -- ===That's very easy to answer but I suspect you're
not really interested.> > I'm anxious to hear why you think he did what
you said he did.> Running roughshod over the Constitution is such a
loosy goosy> expression. I Know you can do better than that.> You've
never read the Constitution. It is way way above your reading
comprehension level. Maybe someone would agree to read aloud this
simplified version to you and explain the big >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> words:https://tinyurl.com/29ottg3g-- * I just want to find 11,780
votes... *
Oh, fuck off dummy. Someone who has bankrupt himself twice, is on
record for state and local tax delinquency in multiple states,
can't pay off a small payday loan company debt, can't get a woman
to accept his surname in marriage, had to go all the way to an
obscure Kansas college to find standards loiw enough to admit
him, isn't the brightest candle on the cake. If that's not enough
to embarass you, there's more, a lot more; right?
If you are so fricken smart, perhaps you can do better than Waynes
loosy goosey accusation.
The point remains that for you to discuss the Constitution is an
absurdity, in that you've never read it and don't have the reading
comprehension skills to understand it if you tried.
Justin is old enough to have had to read and discuss the Constitution in school. Seems as if Civics and separation of government duties is not taught anymore.
That he is old enough doesn't mean that he did. There's no evidence of
that in his posts.
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 9:03:21 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:> On 6/26/22 7:56 PM, Bill wrote: > > Keyser Söze <KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com> wrote: > >> On 6/26/22 7:21 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > >>> Keyser Söze <KeyserSöz...@whitehouse.com>Wrote in message:r > >>>> On 6/25/22 8:23 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> > >>>> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com>> Wrote > >>>> in message:r>> On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 7:47:30 PM UTC-4, Justan > >>>> Ohlphart wrote:> "waynebatr...@
wrote: > >> >> This was written just for you: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/ > >> > > >> >=== > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >> On Fri, > >>>> 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT), > >> "waynebatr...@hotmail.com" > >>>> <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Friday, June 24, 2022 at > >>>> 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H
ran roughshod over the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitution and you seem to be fine with it. > > I don't suppose we're > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitled to know exactly what he did to run > roughshod over the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution.> -- ==your answers when you > don't provide them? > > My comment had nothing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do with the Constitution.===And therein lies the problem. Your hero, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the former president of the United States,
this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simplified version to you and explain the big > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> words:https://tinyurl.com/29ottg3g-- * I just want to find 11,780 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes... * > >>> > >>> Oh, fuck off dummy. Someone who hasloosy goosy> expression. I Know you can do better than that.> You've > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never read the Constitution. It is way way above your reading > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension level. Maybe someone would agree to read aloud
is old enough to have had to read and discuss the Constitution in > > school. Seems as if Civics and separation of government duties is not > > taught anymore. > >> That he is old enough doesn't mean that he did. There's no evidence of > that in hisloosy goosey accusation. > >> > >> The point remains that for you to discuss the Constitution is an > >> absurdity, in that you've never read it and don't have the reading > >> comprehension skills to understand it if you tried. > >> > > > > Justin
On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 8:57:18 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:intimidation against Mike Pence, DOJ officials and state election officials demanding that they break the law. All of that was sanctioned and organized by Trump. There is ample proof, well documented.
On 6/26/2022 12:37 AM, waynebatr...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 11:42:45 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 6:01:48 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Questioning the election results is running roughshod over the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 3:07:45 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:Sillly. How could they possibly have issues
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT),
"waynebatr...@hotmail.com" <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 5:58:43 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:Wasn't talking about my questions at all. Bill, Luddite, etc., have >> >>>>>> asked very pertinent questions which you ignore.
This was written just for you:
https://kletische.com/people-dont-give-straight-answers/
===
What makes you think that your questions deserve answers? Most of
them are of the non-sequitur, "but what about" genre.
===
You didn't specify what question(s) you were concerned about so I
answered in regard to yours. If Bill and Richard have issues with my >> >>>>> answers to them, I believe they're both quite capable of asking again. >> >>>>> With all due respect, some of the recent exchanges on here seem kind of
childish. Since many of us on this group served in the military, that >> >>>>> means that most of us took an oath to defend the constitution. So it >> >>>>> surprises me a little that recent attacks on the constitution seem to >> >>>>> be taken so lightly.
with your answers when youdon't provide them?
My comment had nothing to do with the Constitution.
==
And therein lies the problem. Your hero, the former president of the
United States, ran roughshod over the constitution and you seem to be fine with it.
constitution? Presidents have been doing that with gusto since Nixon. A >> >> lot worse than questionIng election results.
===
It was far worse than just questioning the election results. With out going into great detail, there was a wide spread conspiracy to create fake boards of electors in swing states and present them for ratification. There were also threats and
appropriate for all of his co-conspirators to be fully prosecuted however, and it would be interesting to watch the fallout as they squirm on the hook.If this is all true and there is "ample, documented proof" that Trump
organized and sanctioned these activities, the DOJ should have no reason
to not immediately indict him and start the criminal trial process.
If so, there's no need to continue the Select Committee investigating
Jan 6th for weeks and weeks unless the purpose of the
drawn out Committee investigation is intended for another purpose.
===
Those questions and issues are addressed here:
https://www.grid.news/story/politics/2022/06/16/merrick-garlands-impossible-choice-whether-or-not-to-prosecute-donald-trump
Their analysis seems fair and thoughtful to me. Much as Trump richly deserves to be drawn and quartered, that may not be the best thing for the country. I'd be happy to see him go away quietly but that seems unlikely. It would certainly be
The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisence
of how stupid he is. He hustled himself into the first college
that would accept him, in order to avoid committing to
protecting the Constitution. I imagine inductees were required to
take the same or similar oath as enlistees. Fat Harry is a
coward.
On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisence> of how stupid he is. He hustled himself into the first college> that would accept him, in order to avoid committing to> protectingthe Constitution. I imagine inductees were required to> take the same or similar oath as enlistees. Fat Harry is a> coward.Wait...you think you were protecting the Constitution when you were in the naveeeee? Seriously?-- * I just want to find 11,780
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:rthe Constitution. I imagine inductees were required to> take the same or similar oath as enlistees. Fat Harry is a> coward.Wait...you think you were protecting the Constitution when you were in the naveeeee? Seriously?-- * I just want to find 11,780
On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisence> of how stupid he is. He hustled himself into the first college> that would accept him, in order to avoid committing to> protecting
REALLY TUBBY You need to have your eyes examined. Do you see
anything here referencing me. It's all about you shithead.
"naveeeee" is about as gay as your boat's name "Yo-Ho". Have you
and Donnie decided on your gender assignments yet. If you don't
choose the same does that mean you're not gay? By the way If this
helps you chose, The latest picture we have of you and one other
person clearly shows the larger person has boobs.
On 6/27/22 11:56 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r>> On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisence> of how stupid he is. Hehustled himself into the first college> that would accept him, in order to avoid committing to> protecting the Constitution. I imagine inductees were required to> take the same or similar oath as enlistees. Fat Harry is a> coward.Wait...you
"naveeeee" is about as gay as your boat's name "Yo-Ho". Have you> and Donnie decided on your gender assignments yet. If you don't> choose the same does that mean you're not gay? By the way If this> helps you chose, The latest picture we have ofyou and one other> person clearly shows the larger person has boobs.That you and other rightwing trash here have hangups over gays is not surprising. The boat name "Yo Ho" is an homage to our favorite Disneyworld ride, Pirates of the Caribbean.-- * I
On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisenceWait...you think you were protecting the Constitution when you were in
of how stupid he is. He hustled himself into the first college
that would accept him, in order to avoid committing to
protecting the Constitution. I imagine inductees were required to
take the same or similar oath as enlistees. Fat Harry is a
coward.
the naveeeee? Seriously?
--
* I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
On 6/27/22 1:29 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r>> On 6/27/22 11:56 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r>> On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphartwrote:> The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisence> of how stupid he is. He hustled himself into the first college> that would accept him, in order to avoid committing to> protecting the Constitution. I imagine inductees
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:07:47 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:> On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > > > The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisence > > of how stupid he is. He hustled himself into the first college > >that would accept him, in order to avoid committing to > > protecting the Constitution. I imagine inductees were required to > > take the same or similar oath as enlistees. Fat Harry is a > > coward.> Wait...you think you were protecting the Constitution
True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:rthat would accept him, in order to avoid committing to > > protecting the Constitution. I imagine inductees were required to > > take the same or similar oath as enlistees. Fat Harry is a > > coward.> Wait...you think you were protecting the
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:07:47 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:> On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > > > The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisence > > of how stupid he is. He hustled himself into the first college > >
Your problem is you try to think and it just wont happen. Leave it
be or you might get a hernia for all your trouble.
--
lets go Brandon...
----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 16:57:13 UTC-3, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:07:47 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:> On
6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > > > The fact that Fat Harry
even mentions the Constitution is evisence > > of how stupid he is. He
hustled himself into the first college > > that would accept him, in
order to avoid committing to > > protecting the Constitution. I imagine
inductees were required to > > take the same or similar oath as
enlistees. Fat Harry is a > > coward.> Wait...you think you were
protecting the Constitution when you were in > the naveeeee?
Seriously?> -- > * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *I thought he
was there to "entertain" and provide comfort to lonely sailors on extended cruises.
Your problem is you try to think and it just wont happen. Leave it
be or you might get a hernia for all your trouble.
--
lets go Brandon...
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
I don't hear a denial there.........SNERK!
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 16:57:13 UTC-3, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:07:47 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:> On
6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > > > The fact that Fat Harry >>> even mentions the Constitution is evisence > > of how stupid he is. He >>> hustled himself into the first college > > that would accept him, in
order to avoid committing to > > protecting the Constitution. I imagine >>> inductees were required to > > take the same or similar oath as
enlistees. Fat Harry is a > > coward.> Wait...you think you were
protecting the Constitution when you were in > the naveeeee?
Seriously?> -- > * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *I thought he
was there to "entertain" and provide comfort to lonely sailors on extended cruises.
Your problem is you try to think and it just wont happen. Leave it
be or you might get a hernia for all your trouble.
--
lets go Brandon...
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
I don't hear a denial there.........SNERK!
Yup, no denial you are dumb and homophobic.
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 18:45:06 UTC-3, Bill wrote:
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 16:57:13 UTC-3, Justan Ohlphart wrote:Yup, no denial you are dumb and homophobic.
True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:07:47 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:> On
6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > > > The fact that Fat Harry >>>>> even mentions the Constitution is evisence > > of how stupid he is. He >>>>> hustled himself into the first college > > that would accept him, in >>>>> order to avoid committing to > > protecting the Constitution. I imagine >>>>> inductees were required to > > take the same or similar oath as
enlistees. Fat Harry is a > > coward.> Wait...you think you were
protecting the Constitution when you were in > the naveeeee?
Seriously?> -- > * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *I thought he >>>>> was there to "entertain" and provide comfort to lonely sailors on extended cruises.
Your problem is you try to think and it just wont happen. Leave it
be or you might get a hernia for all your trouble.
--
lets go Brandon...
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
I don't hear a denial there.........SNERK!
You talking to Justine?
He may not like your bottom of a liquor bottle observations.
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 18:45:06 UTC-3, Bill wrote:
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 16:57:13 UTC-3, Justan Ohlphart wrote:Yup, no denial you are dumb and homophobic.
True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:07:47 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:> On >>>>> 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > > > The fact that Fat Harry >>>>> even mentions the Constitution is evisence > > of how stupid he is. He >>>>> hustled himself into the first college > > that would accept him, in >>>>> order to avoid committing to > > protecting the Constitution. I imagine
inductees were required to > > take the same or similar oath as
enlistees. Fat Harry is a > > coward.> Wait...you think you were
protecting the Constitution when you were in > the naveeeee?
Seriously?> -- > * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *I thought he >>>>> was there to "entertain" and provide comfort to lonely sailors on extended cruises.
Your problem is you try to think and it just wont happen. Leave it
be or you might get a hernia for all your trouble.
--
lets go Brandon...
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
I don't hear a denial there.........SNERK!
You talking to Justine?
He may not like your bottom of a liquor bottle observations.
Nope, you and you are dumb and homophobic. Or a drunk pervert as
everything seems to relate homophobic and drink with you.
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 21:36:07 UTC-3, Bill wrote:
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 18:45:06 UTC-3, Bill wrote:Nope, you and you are dumb and homophobic. Or a drunk pervert as
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 16:57:13 UTC-3, Justan Ohlphart wrote:Yup, no denial you are dumb and homophobic.
True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:07:47 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:> On >>>>>>> 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > > > The fact that Fat Harry >>>>>>> even mentions the Constitution is evisence > > of how stupid he is. He >>>>>>> hustled himself into the first college > > that would accept him, in >>>>>>> order to avoid committing to > > protecting the Constitution. I imagine >>>>>>> inductees were required to > > take the same or similar oath as
enlistees. Fat Harry is a > > coward.> Wait...you think you were >>>>>>> protecting the Constitution when you were in > the naveeeee?
Seriously?> -- > * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *I thought he >>>>>>> was there to "entertain" and provide comfort to lonely sailors on extended cruises.
Your problem is you try to think and it just wont happen. Leave it >>>>>> be or you might get a hernia for all your trouble.
--
lets go Brandon...
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
I don't hear a denial there.........SNERK!
You talking to Justine?
He may not like your bottom of a liquor bottle observations.
everything seems to relate homophobic and drink with you.
No..."you and you are dumb and homophobic"
Have another drink, Swill. You're in danger of sobering up.
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 18:45:06 UTC-3, Bill wrote:
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 16:57:13 UTC-3, Justan Ohlphart wrote:Yup, no denial you are dumb and homophobic.
True North <prince...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:07:47 UTC-3, Keyser Söze wrote:> OnYour problem is you try to think and it just wont happen. Leave it
6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: > > > The fact that Fat Harry >>>>> even mentions the Constitution is evisence > > of how stupid he is. He >>>>> hustled himself into the first college > > that would accept him, in >>>>> order to avoid committing to > > protecting the Constitution. I imagine >>>>> inductees were required to > > take the same or similar oath as
enlistees. Fat Harry is a > > coward.> Wait...you think you were
protecting the Constitution when you were in > the naveeeee?
Seriously?> -- > * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *I thought he >>>>> was there to "entertain" and provide comfort to lonely sailors on extended cruises.
be or you might get a hernia for all your trouble.
--
lets go Brandon...
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
I don't hear a denial there.........SNERK!
You talking to Justine?
He may not like your bottom of a liquor bottle observations.
On 6/27/22 11:56 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:the Constitution. I imagine inductees were required to> take the same or similar oath as enlistees. Fat Harry is a> coward.Wait...you think you were protecting the Constitution when you were in the naveeeee? Seriously?-- * I just want to find 11,780
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r
On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> The fact that Fat Harry even mentions the Constitution is evisence> of how stupid he is. He hustled himself into the first college> that would accept him, in order to avoid committing to> protecting
REALLY TUBBY You need to have your eyes examined. Do you see
anything here referencing me. It's all about you shithead.
"naveeeee" is about as gay as your boat's name "Yo-Ho". Have you
and Donnie decided on your gender assignments yet. If you don't
choose the same does that mean you're not gay? By the way If this
helps you chose, The latest picture we have of you and one other
person clearly shows the larger person has boobs.
That you and other rightwing trash here have hangups over gays is not >surprising. The boat name "Yo Ho" is an homage to our favorite
Disneyworld ride, Pirates of the Caribbean.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:04:45 -0400, Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:
On 6/27/22 11:56 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r
On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> The fact that Fat Harry
even mentions the Constitution is evisence> of how stupid he is. He
hustled himself into the first college> that would accept him, in
order to avoid committing to> protecting the Constitution. I
imagine inductees were required to> take the same or similar oath as >>>> enlistees. Fat Harry is a> coward.Wait...you think you were
protecting the Constitution when you were in the naveeeee?
Seriously?-- * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
REALLY TUBBY You need to have your eyes examined. Do you see
anything here referencing me. It's all about you shithead.
"naveeeee" is about as gay as your boat's name "Yo-Ho". Have you
and Donnie decided on your gender assignments yet. If you don't
choose the same does that mean you're not gay? By the way If this
helps you chose, The latest picture we have of you and one other
person clearly shows the larger person has boobs.
That you and other rightwing trash here have hangups over gays is not
surprising. The boat name "Yo Ho" is an homage to our favorite
Disneyworld ride, Pirates of the Caribbean.
You and Donnie have made more anti-gay posts than the rest of the
posters here combined. When either of you accuse someone, maliciously,
of being gay, what are you saying about yourself.
What a dumb shit.
John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:04:45 -0400, Keyser Söze
<KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> wrote:
On 6/27/22 11:56 AM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:
Keyser Söze <KeyserSöze@whitehouse.com> Wrote in message:r
On 6/26/22 10:30 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote:> The fact that Fat Harry >>>>> even mentions the Constitution is evisence> of how stupid he is. He >>>>> hustled himself into the first college> that would accept him, in
order to avoid committing to> protecting the Constitution. I
imagine inductees were required to> take the same or similar oath as >>>>> enlistees. Fat Harry is a> coward.Wait...you think you were
protecting the Constitution when you were in the naveeeee?
Seriously?-- * I just want to find 11,780 votes... *
REALLY TUBBY You need to have your eyes examined. Do you see
anything here referencing me. It's all about you shithead.
"naveeeee" is about as gay as your boat's name "Yo-Ho". Have you
and Donnie decided on your gender assignments yet. If you don't
choose the same does that mean you're not gay? By the way If this
helps you chose, The latest picture we have of you and one other
person clearly shows the larger person has boobs.
That you and other rightwing trash here have hangups over gays is not
surprising. The boat name "Yo Ho" is an homage to our favorite
Disneyworld ride, Pirates of the Caribbean.
You and Donnie have made more anti-gay posts than the rest of the
posters here combined. When either of you accuse someone, maliciously,
of being gay, what are you saying about yourself.
What a dumb shit.
I don’t believe you are gay…you’re just a racist flaming asshole.
Thay fella. I'll bet you know some darn good councelers.
Fortunately I don't need some fake doctor person to tell me the
difference between a butt and a poosay. You and Donnie got your
pronoun assignments yet?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 369 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 91:32:01 |
| Calls: | 7,897 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,968 |
| Messages: | 5,792,638 |