I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >> end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >>> end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of >welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just >gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid >after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about >letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of >> welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just >> gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid >> after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about >> letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only protects early term abortions.
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of >>> welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just >>> gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid >>> after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about >>> letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
I don’t think Roe specifies a time frame.
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those womenÂ’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >> end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
Well, little piece of shit, we don't care what you think, you
misgoynistic dog shit of a person.
Mr Robot <robot@mr_robot.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women?s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >>> end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
Well, little piece of shit, we don't care what you think, you
misgoynistic dog shit of a person.
And we care what your atrophied brain spews?
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who are pro-women's rights however.
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill ><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >>end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill ><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >>end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
Well, little piece of shit, we don't care what you think, you
misgoynistic dog shit of a person.
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill ><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of >>welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s >>right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just >>gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid >>after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about >>letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only >protects early term abortions.
On Thu, 19 May 2022 07:49:13 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
No to all
On Thu, 19 May 2022 20:58:25 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill >><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >>>end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
Have you ever heard of adoption? Or: >https://www.wikihow.com/Drop-Off-an-Unwanted-Baby
You're very out of touch with the real world.
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill >><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of >>>welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just >>>gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid >>>after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about >>>letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only >>protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
On Thu, 19 May 2022 20:58:25 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those womenÂ’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >>> end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
Have you ever heard of adoption? Or: https://www.wikihow.com/Drop-Off-an-Unwanted-Baby
You're very out of touch with the real world.
John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 20:58:25 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women?s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
Have you ever heard of adoption? Or:
https://www.wikihow.com/Drop-Off-an-Unwanted-Baby
You're very out of touch with the real world.
How many get adopted these days? Especially crack babies, etc.
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:57:28 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 20:58:25 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill >>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>>months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid >>>>end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>>rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>>irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
Have you ever heard of adoption? Or: >>https://www.wikihow.com/Drop-Off-an-Unwanted-Baby
You're very out of touch with the real world.
I understand how many kids are in foster care or just living on the
street because nobody will adopt them. That doesn't even include the
ones living with a crack head mom who haven't been taken away by the
state.
I agree there is a waiting list for healthy babies with light skin.
Kids with birth defects, born addicted to drugs or ones who are "in
the system" at an early age, not so much.
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill >>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who >>>>>>> are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of >>>>welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s >>>>right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just >>>>gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid >>>>after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about >>>>letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own >>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to >>>abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only >>>protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions
because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare
late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a
medical necessity designated by the doctor.
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill >>>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>>>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just >>>>>gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own >>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for >>>>the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to >>>>abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only >>>>protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions >>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare
late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a
medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't >protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those
committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature
babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the
number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two
years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000
later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>>>On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>>>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>><gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:>>>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>>>> <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>> >>>>
wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown! >>>>waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:>>>>>>>>> I have three questions: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you have kids in wedlock? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did your
rights however.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where do those women?s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid>>>>>>> end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day.Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ===>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who>>>>>>>> are pro-women's
gfretwell@aol.com Wrote in message:raol.com wrote:>>>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>><gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:>>>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>>>> <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>> >>>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>>>On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfretwell@
wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>>>>> some big-time hypocrisywaynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:>>>>>>>>> I have three questions: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you have kids in wedlock? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did your
being shown! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ===>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who>>>>>>>>are pro-women's rights however.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where do those women?s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid>>>>>>> end? She has a right to not get
had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just>>>>>gave up some rights. Just like you don?t have the right to kill your kid>>>>>after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about>>>>>letting a newborn die thatwas not really a viable human.>>>>>>>>Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own>>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this>>>>conversation. >>>>>>>>The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out
abortions>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare>>late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a>>medical necessity designated by the doctor. >>>>>>I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" commentshave to do with>your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't>protect, and don't give a shit.>>"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and>Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions>
prevent?You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal inmost states if they are NOT medically indicated. You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in insideher own body. I accept that as your right to feel that waybut whenyour prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.
That last remark. I don't get it.
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 20:03:31 -0400 (EDT), justan <me@here.com> wrote:aol.com wrote:>>>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>><gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:>>>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>>>> <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>> >>>>
gfretwell@aol.com Wrote in message:r
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>>>On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfretwell@
wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>>>>> some big-timewaynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:>>>>>>>>> I have three questions: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you have kids in wedlock? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did your
are pro-women's rights however.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where do those women?s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid>>>>>>> end? She has a right to not getbeing shown! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ===>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who>>>>>>>>
was not really a viable human.>>>>>>>>Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own>>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this>>>>conversation. >>>>>>>>The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown outhad the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just>>>>>gave up some rights. Just like you don?t have the right to kill your kid>>>>>after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about>>>>>letting a newborn die that
have to do with>your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't>protect, and don't give a shit.>>"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and>Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions>abortions>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare>>late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a>>medical necessity designated by the doctor. >>>>>>I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments
but whenyour prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.prevent?You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal inmost states if they are NOT medically indicated. You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in insideher own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way
That last remark. I don't get it.
Which part
That women should be able to own the inside of their body?
The late term abortions usually being medically indicated?
The idea that using personal prejudices to infringe on the rights of
others is being out of your lane?
On Wed, 01 Jun 2022 22:41:07 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>>>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>><gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:>>>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>>>> <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 20:03:31 -0400 (EDT), justan <me@here.com> wrote:
gfretwell@aol.com Wrote in message:r
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>>>On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400,
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>>>>> some big-timewaynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:>>>>>>>>> I have three questions: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you have kids in wedlock? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
hypocrisypregnant these day. Pills, mechanical>>>>>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.>>>>>> >>>>>> OK>>>>>> Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to>>>>>>
are pro-women's rights however.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where do those women?s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid>>>>>>> end? She has a right to not getbeing shown! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ===>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who>>>>>>>
Youwas not really a viable human.>>>>>>>>Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own>>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this>>>>conversation. >>>>>>>>The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out
had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just>>>>>gave up some rights. Just like you don?t have the right to kill your kid>>>>>after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about>>>>>letting a newborn die that
have to do with>your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't>protect, and don't give a shit.>>"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and>Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions>abortions>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare>>late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a>>medical necessity designated by the doctor. >>>>>>I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments
but whenyour prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.prevent?You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal inmost states if they are NOT medically indicated. You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in insideher own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way
That last remark. I don't get it.
Which part
That women should be able to own the inside of their body?
The late term abortions usually being medically indicated?
The idea that using personal prejudices to infringe on the rights of
others is being out of your lane?
I would rather not see your head squeezed between forceps. I suppose
that meets your 'personal prejudices infringing' requirements?
On Thu, 02 Jun 2022 05:27:30 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>>>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>><gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:>>>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill>>>>>> <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:>
On Wed, 01 Jun 2022 22:41:07 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 20:03:31 -0400 (EDT), justan <me@here.com> wrote:
gfretwell@aol.com Wrote in message:r
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:>>>On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:>>>>>On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400,
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's >>>>>>>>> some big-timewaynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:>>>>>>>>> I have three questions: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did you have kids in wedlock? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical>>>>>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.>>>>>> >>>>>> OK>>>>>> Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to>>>>>>hypocrisy
are pro-women's rights however.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where do those women?s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid>>>>>>> end? She has a right to not getbeing shown! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ===>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who>>>>>>
was not really a viable human.>>>>>>>>Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own>>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this>>>>conversation. >>>>>>>>The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown outYou
had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just>>>>>gave up some rights. Just like you don?t have the right to kill your kid>>>>>after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about>>>>>letting a newborn die that
termhave to do with>your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't>protect, and don't give a shit.>>"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and>Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions>
abortions>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare>>late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a>>medical necessity designated by the doctor. >>>>>>I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments
but whenyour prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane. >>>>prevent?You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal inmost states if they are NOT medically indicated. You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in insideher own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way
That last remark. I don't get it.
Which part
That women should be able to own the inside of their body?
The late term abortions usually being medically indicated?
The idea that using personal prejudices to infringe on the rights of >>>others is being out of your lane?
I would rather not see your head squeezed between forceps. I suppose
that meets your 'personal prejudices infringing' requirements?
Again you pick a very rare occurrence and present it as the norm.
You sound like the Biden people who say you shouldn't have your guns
because someone shot up a school.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill >>>>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical >>>>>>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to >>>>>>> raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid >>>>>>after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own >>>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for >>>>>the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to >>>>>abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only >>>>>protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions >>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare
late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a
medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't >>protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those
committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature
babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the >>number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two
years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000
later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in
most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside
her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when
your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill >>>>>><califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com <wayne.beardsley@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't >>>>>>>>>>> wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >>>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to >>>>>>>> raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own >>>>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>>conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for >>>>>>the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to >>>>>>abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only >>>>>>protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of >>>>>the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions >>>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare
late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >>>>medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with >>>your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't >>>protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those
committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature
babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the >>>number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two
years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes >>>more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000
later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in
most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside
her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when
your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.
I promise not to cum on your face again!
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill >>>>>><califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to >>>>>>>> raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own >>>>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>>conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for >>>>>>the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to >>>>>>abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only >>>>>>protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of >>>>>the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions >>>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare >>>>late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >>>>medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with >>>your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't >>>protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and >>>Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions >>>were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those >>>committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature >>>babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the >>>number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two >>>years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes >>>more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000 >>>later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in
most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside >>her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when
your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.
I promise not to cum on your face again!Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 >> >>>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to >> >>>>>>>> raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own >> >>>>>>body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for >> >>>>>>the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to >> >>>>>>abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only >> >>>>>>protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions
because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare
late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a
medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't
protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those
committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature
babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the
number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two
years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000
later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in
most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside
her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when
your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.
I promise not to cum on your face again!
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >> >>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >> >>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of >> >>>>>the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions >> >>>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare
late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a
medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with >> >>>your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't >> >>>protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions >> >>>were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those
committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature
babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the >> >>>number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two
years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes >> >>>more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000
later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in
most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside >> >>her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when
your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.
I promise not to cum on your face again!
Control yourself Johnny.How stupid are you, Donnie?
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:How stupid are you, Donnie?
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>I promise not to cum on your face again!
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own >>>>>>>>>> body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>>>>>> conversation.
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>>>>>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to >>>>>>>>>>>> raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human. >>>>>>>>>>
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of >>>>>>>>> the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions >>>>>>>> because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare >>>>>>>> late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >>>>>>>> medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with >>>>>>> your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't >>>>>>> protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions >>>>>>> were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those
committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature >>>>>>> babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the >>>>>>> number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two >>>>>>> years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes >>>>>>> more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000 >>>>>>> later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in >>>>>> most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside >>>>>> her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when >>>>>> your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane. >>>>>
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
Not quite stupid enough to throw myself off ladders, landing on my head.
How about y'all? SNERK!
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:How stupid are you, Donnie?
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> >>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >> >> >>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of >> >> >>>>>the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions >> >> >>>>because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare
late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a
medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with >> >> >>>your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't >> >> >>>protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions >> >> >>>were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those
committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature
babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the >> >> >>>number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two
years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes >> >> >>>more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000
later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in
most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside >> >> >>her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when
your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane.
I promise not to cum on your face again!
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
Not quite stupid enough to throw myself off ladders, landing on my head.
How about y'all? SNERK!
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:How stupid are you, Donnie?
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> >>I promise not to cum on your face again!
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking?
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus?
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human.
Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this
conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions
because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare >> >> >>>>late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >> >> >>>>medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't
protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those
committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature >> >> >>>babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the
number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two >> >> >>>years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000 >> >> >>>later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in >> >> >>most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside
her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when >> >> >>your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane. >> >> >
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
Not quite stupid enough to throw myself off ladders, landing on my head. >How about y'all? SNERK!Stupid enough to respond to an impersonator, dummy!
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 15:45:10 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote:Stupid enough to respond to an impersonator, dummy!
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:How stupid are you, Donnie?
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>I promise not to cum on your face again!
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human. >>>>>>>>>>>>
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>>>>>>>> conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of >>>>>>>>>>> the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions
because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare >>>>>>>>>> late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >>>>>>>>>> medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't
protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and >>>>>>>>> Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions >>>>>>>>> were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those >>>>>>>>> committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature >>>>>>>>> babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the >>>>>>>>> number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two >>>>>>>>> years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000 >>>>>>>>> later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in >>>>>>>> most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside >>>>>>>> her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when >>>>>>>> your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane. >>>>>>>
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
Not quite stupid enough to throw myself off ladders, landing on my head. >>> How about y'all? SNERK!
Just wondering....does calling other posters names make y'all feel better about yourself?
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 15:45:10 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote:Stupid enough to respond to an impersonator, dummy!
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:How stupid are you, Donnie?
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote: >>>>>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>I promise not to cum on your face again!
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most
irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human. >>>>>>>>>>>>
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>>>>>>>> conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions
because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare
late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >>>>>>>>>> medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't
protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and >>>>>>>>> Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those >>>>>>>>> committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature
babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the
number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two >>>>>>>>> years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000 >>>>>>>>> later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in >>>>>>>> most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside
her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when >>>>>>>> your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane. >>>>>>>
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
Not quite stupid enough to throw myself off ladders, landing on my head. >>> How about y'all? SNERK!
Just wondering....does calling other posters names make y'all feel better about yourself?
Where did he call you a name? Stating a fact, is not name calling.
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 18:50:37 UTC-3, Bill wrote:
True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 15:45:10 UTC-3, John H wrote:Where did he call you a name? Stating a fact, is not name calling.
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote:Stupid enough to respond to an impersonator, dummy!
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:How stupid are you, Donnie?
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>I promise not to cum on your face again!
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions
because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare >>>>>>>>>>>> late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >>>>>>>>>>>> medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't
protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and >>>>>>>>>>> Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those >>>>>>>>>>> committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature >>>>>>>>>>> babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the
number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two >>>>>>>>>>> years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000 >>>>>>>>>>> later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in >>>>>>>>>> most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside
her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when >>>>>>>>>> your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane. >>>>>>>>>
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
Not quite stupid enough to throw myself off ladders, landing on my head. >>>>> How about y'all? SNERK!
Just wondering....does calling other posters names make y'all feel
better about yourself?
You'd better stick to your drinks, Swill. Your attempt to excuse his behaviour is pathetic at best.
True North <princecraft49@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 15:45:10 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote:Stupid enough to respond to an impersonator, dummy!
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:How stupid are you, Donnie?
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>I promise not to cum on your face again!
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those women’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for?
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just don’t claim it is a woman’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you don’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions
because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare >>>>>>>>>>> late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >>>>>>>>>>> medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't
protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and >>>>>>>>>> Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions >>>>>>>>>> were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those >>>>>>>>>> committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature >>>>>>>>>> babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the
number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two >>>>>>>>>> years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000 >>>>>>>>>> later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in >>>>>>>>> most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside >>>>>>>>> her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when >>>>>>>>> your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane. >>>>>>>>
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
Not quite stupid enough to throw myself off ladders, landing on my head. >>>> How about y'all? SNERK!
Just wondering....does calling other posters names make y'all feel better about yourself?
Where did he call you a name? Stating a fact, is not name calling.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:50:34 -0000 (UTC), Bill <califbill9998remove8@gmail.com> wrote:
True North <princecraft49@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 15:45:10 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote:Stupid enough to respond to an impersonator, dummy!
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
<prince...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote:How stupid are you, Donnie?
On Sun, 05 Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote:Promises promises. Besides, I like it.
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>I promise not to cum on your face again!
On Mon, 30 May 2022 18:34:00 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 30 May 2022 16:58:57 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 01:14:39 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill
<califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
<gfre...@aol.com> wrote:Why isn't it a right for a woman to control something inside her own
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote:
waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions:
Did you have kids in wedlock?
Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's
some big-time hypocrisy being shown!
Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't
wait to see the answers.
===
I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who
are pro-women's rights however.
Where do those womenÂ’s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6
months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid
end? She has a right to not get pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical
rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill.
OK
Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irresponsible people in society. Do we really want them trying to
raise children that we will end up paying for? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am all for legal abortion in the first trimester. Free! We give lots of
welfare out, this will be a lot cheaper. Just donÂ’t claim it is a womanÂ’s
right. You had the right not to get pregnant. But once there, you just
gave up some rights. Just like you donÂ’t have the right to kill your kid
after it is born. Fact is, a nurse got the rules changed years ago, about
letting a newborn die that was not really a viable human. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
body? If men had the babies we wouldn't even be having this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation.
The whole late term thing is a red herring, just thrown out there for
the shock value. Women are not carrying a baby for 7-8 months just to
abort it. These are virtually all medical necessities BY LAW. Roe only
protects early term abortions.
Who represents the baby? Red herring my ass. Your continuous use of
the phrase is a 'red herring'.
What "baby". You mean the unborn fetus?
"It's just an unborn fetus kicking, dear!"
It belongs to the person carrying it.
BTW you dodged the point that Roe only protected early term abortions
because you keep spouting "bullshit" (better?) about the very rare >>>>>>>>>>>> late term abortion that is illegal virtually everywhere without a >>>>>>>>>>>> medical necessity designated by the doctor.
I have not been discussing Roe. My "bullshit" comments have to do with
your bullshit comments. Not Roe. I don't know what Roe does or doesn't
protect, and don't give a shit.
"A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and >>>>>>>>>>> Prevention (CDC) reveals that in 2018, an estimated 50,000 abortions
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,200 of those >>>>>>>>>>> committed at or over 21 weeks — the point at which some premature >>>>>>>>>>> babies have survived with assistance. The report also showed that the
number of later abortions increased by four percent from just two >>>>>>>>>>> years prior (2016). In 2017, the Guttmacher Institute, which publishes
more comprehensive abortion totals, reported an estimated 100,000 >>>>>>>>>>> later abortions that year."
That's a lot of dead babies.
How many dead moms did it prevent?
You are still tossing around abortions that are already illegal in >>>>>>>>>> most states if they are NOT medically indicated.
You don't think a woman has any rights about things that go in inside
her own body. I accept that as your right to feel that way but when >>>>>>>>>> your prejudice infringes on other people, you are out of your lane. >>>>>>>>>
Control yourself Johnny.
This is a family newsgroup.
Do you play here with your grandkids?
Not quite stupid enough to throw myself off ladders, landing on my head. >>>>> How about y'all? SNERK!
Just wondering....does calling other posters names make y'all feel better about yourself?
Where did he call you a name? Stating a fact, is not name calling.
Well, you're right! As usual. Oh, you're a cocksucking little prick,
and thems facts.
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 18:50:37 UTC-3, Bill wrote:> True North <prince...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 15:45:10 UTC-3, John H wrote: > >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT), True North > >> <prince...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Jun 2022 22:48:47 -0700, justan <m...@here.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:55:31 -0400, gfre...@aol.com wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:29:16 -0400, John H <jher...@cox.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Mon,
On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 19:15:07 UTC-3, John H wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT), True North > >>>> <prince...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 18:47:11 UTC-3, John H wrote: > >>>>>> On Sun, 05
gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waynebatr...@hotmail.com <wayne.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 7:49:15 AM UTC-4, John H wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have three questions: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >On Fri, 20 May 2022 02:09:06 -0000 (UTC), Bill > >>>>>>>>>>>> <califbill9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <gfre...@aol.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:41:53 -0000 (UTC), Bill > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <califbill9...@
pregnant these day. Pills, mechanical > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rings, injectable stuff, morning after pill. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then by definition the unwanted pregnancies are among the most > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> irresponsibleIf the first two answers are 'yes', and the last is 'no', then there's > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some big-time hypocrisy being shown! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Going glamping to Natural Bridge, VA. Will be back Sunday PM. Can't > >>>Did you have kids in wedlock? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did your wife ever ask you to feel the baby kicking? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you tell her it wasn't a baby, just a fetus? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>
wait to see the answers. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> === > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion. I do know a lot of people who > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are pro-women's rights however. > >>>>>>>>>>>
Where do those women?s rights end? At 3 months of pregnancy? At 6 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> months? At 12 months? At 2 years? So when does the right to kill the kid > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end? She has a right to not get
were committed at 14 weeks or later, with nearly 6,
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 369 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 90:50:50 |
| Calls: | 7,897 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,968 |
| Messages: | 5,792,629 |
