“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect. There’s no counselling required.”
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 >> million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect.
There’s no counselling required.”
I’ve long felt that conversations between driver and engineer should not be broadcast.
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 >> million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect.
There’s no counselling required.”
I’ve long felt that conversations between driver and engineer should not be broadcast.
Sir Tim <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 >>> million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect.
There’s no counselling required.”
I’ve long felt that conversations between driver and engineer should not be
broadcast.
But why? The sport has long needed to monitor communications, and has a specific clause in the Technical Regulations (8.9.2) which means all
voice messages are available to both the FIA and broadcasters. That
keeps the teams and the FIA "clean" as they know they are being heard. Imagine the conspiracy theories (even more than now!) if there could be
cosy deals going on which only team/driver or team/FIA participants were privy to?
What's needed is for drivers and team representatives to remember that
their comms are played out in public and act in a professional manner.
There is always the "disrepute" clause that can be used to sanction individuals who forget that.
Sadly, I suspect Horner quite likes these kinds of games.
some interesting comments,
" But when the biggest talking point in a race is one driver’s dominance and his interactions with his own race engineer, you know you’re in trouble.----- The two are like an old married couple at the moment,
snapping at each other, lobbing the odd laced barb in the other’s direction,"
Sir Tim <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 >>> million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect.
There’s no counselling required.”
I’ve long felt that conversations between driver and engineer should not be
broadcast.
But why? The sport has long needed to monitor communications, and has a specific clause in the Technical Regulations (8.9.2) which means all
voice messages are available to both the FIA and broadcasters. That
keeps the teams and the FIA "clean" as they know they are being heard. Imagine the conspiracy theories (even more than now!) if there could be
cosy deals going on which only team/driver or team/FIA participants were privy to?
Sir Tim <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 >>> million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect.
There’s no counselling required.”
I’ve long felt that conversations between driver and engineer should not be
broadcast.
But why? The sport has long needed to monitor communications, and has a specific clause in the Technical Regulations (8.9.2) which means all
voice messages are available to both the FIA and broadcasters. That
keeps the teams and the FIA "clean" as they know they are being heard. Imagine the conspiracy theories (even more than now!) if there could be
cosy deals going on which only team/driver or team/FIA participants were privy to?
What's needed is for drivers and team representatives to remember that
their comms are played out in public and act in a professional manner.
There is always the "disrepute" clause that can be used to sanction individuals who forget that.
Sadly, I suspect Horner quite likes these kinds of games.
Mark <mpconmy@gmail.com> wrote:
Sir Tim <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 >>>> million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect. >>>> There’s no counselling required.”
I’ve long felt that conversations between driver and engineer should not be
broadcast.
But why? The sport has long needed to monitor communications, and has a
specific clause in the Technical Regulations (8.9.2) which means all
voice messages are available to both the FIA and broadcasters. That
keeps the teams and the FIA "clean" as they know they are being heard.
Imagine the conspiracy theories (even more than now!) if there could be
cosy deals going on which only team/driver or team/FIA participants were
privy to?
I do not say that the stewards should not be able to monitor team comms for regulatory purposes but it seems wrong to me that conversations between a driver and his engineer should be able to be overheard by their
competitors.
Obviously preventing this would also mean cutting access for broadcasters but, in any case, these communications only serve to interrupt the flow of the commentary (and possibly titillate the public when there is intemperate language or disagreement).
What's needed is for drivers and team representatives to remember that
their comms are played out in public and act in a professional manner.
There is always the "disrepute" clause that can be used to sanction
individuals who forget that.
Sadly, I suspect Horner quite likes these kinds of games.
Mark <mpconmy@gmail.com> wrote:
Sir Tim <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 >>>> million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect. >>>> There’s no counselling required.”
I’ve long felt that conversations between driver and engineer should not be
broadcast.
But why? The sport has long needed to monitor communications, and has a
specific clause in the Technical Regulations (8.9.2) which means all
voice messages are available to both the FIA and broadcasters. That
keeps the teams and the FIA "clean" as they know they are being heard.
Imagine the conspiracy theories (even more than now!) if there could be
cosy deals going on which only team/driver or team/FIA participants were
privy to?
I do not say that the stewards should not be able to monitor team comms for regulatory purposes but it seems wrong to me that conversations between a driver and his engineer should be able to be overheard by their
competitors.
On 7/31/2023 8:56 PM, a425couple wrote:
some interesting comments,
" But when the biggest talking point in a race is one driver’s
dominance and his interactions with his own race engineer, you know
you’re in trouble.----- The two are like an old married couple at the
moment, snapping at each other, lobbing the odd laced barb in the
other’s direction,"
F1 died in AD2021...Lewis clinched 8th, and Formula 1 stopped being a
sport.
Nonsense.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 6:32:31 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:
Nonsense.
logoff useless cock sucker
Mark <mpconmy@gmail.com> wrote:
Sir Tim <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
“The problem is that conversation between the two of them, there’s 200 >>>> million people listening to it. But there’s mutual trust and respect. >>>> There’s no counselling required.”
I’ve long felt that conversations between driver and engineer should not be
broadcast.
But why? The sport has long needed to monitor communications, and has a
specific clause in the Technical Regulations (8.9.2) which means all
voice messages are available to both the FIA and broadcasters. That
keeps the teams and the FIA "clean" as they know they are being heard.
Imagine the conspiracy theories (even more than now!) if there could be
cosy deals going on which only team/driver or team/FIA participants were
privy to?
I do not say that the stewards should not be able to monitor team comms for regulatory purposes but it seems wrong to me that conversations between a driver and his engineer should be able to be overheard by their
competitors.
Obviously preventing this would also mean cutting access for broadcasters but, in any case, these communications only serve to interrupt the flow of the commentary (and possibly titillate the public when there is intemperate language or disagreement).
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 88:09:49 |
Calls: | 6,922 |
Files: | 12,382 |
Messages: | 5,433,810 |