• Re: OT: An honour...

    From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 15:54:30 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    ...or did I just draw the short straw? :-)

    The Race Drivers Committee (RDC) of the Sports Car Club of British
    Columbia (SCCBC) met last night for our end-of-season meeting to discuss issues impacting road racing with the SCCBC (and the other groups who
    run races at our facility), and somehow, I was nominated and accepted to
    be the RDC Chairman for 2023.

    It's not that onerous a job (so I'm told), but for this coming season,
    we decided as a group that we'd like to see some changes in the way we
    hold drivers accountable for on-track incidents, and my very first duty
    as chair is going to be writing a letter to one of the RDC to officially inform him that he has been suspended from the committee for the coming year, due to a number of on-track incidents that we feel don't meet the standard of driving that every race driver should meet.

    There's an odd dichotomy about this "sport":

    We all want to compete to one degree or another.

    But we all should also acknowledge that there are lines of
    aggressiveness that we shouldn't cross.

    Even at the highest levels of motorsport, there should never be
    incidents where one driver basically offers the options: "I win, or we
    both crash".

    And we saw a little too much of that mentality (probably to a lesser
    degree, but still in the ballpark)—particularly at our last race of the year.

    The actual incident that I think galvanized us to change our system (in
    ways yet to be determined) was between two drivers who were both in the running to win their class championship, and running 1-2 in the race as
    it came near its finish.

    They came up on a car on the exit of turn 9 onto the front straight and
    as both moved to lap it the driver behind feinted as if he would go to
    the left of the car ahead and then moved over and drove to the right of
    the lead car, and the lead car then tried too late to "block" the pass, ending up with both of them crashing out with the trailing car hitting
    the concrete block wall so hard that one of the blocks broken in half.

    The contact with the wall peeled of the sheet metal door panel from
    right ride side and it went flying into the tech area (where cars are safety-checked and weighed) where three of the emeritus members of the
    club were sitting as they always do.

    It was only luck that there were no serious injuries, but the car that
    hit the wall is almost certainly a complete write-off.

    Need I say that the lead driver was found to be mostly at fault for an
    (at best) ill-advised, too late attempt to prevent the car behind from passing when that car had in fact already got an overlap, and that that
    lead driver was the RDC member whom I must inform of his suspension?

    So I'm honoured...I guess.

    they know you are an anti passing fucking pussy
    you are hired
    fuck they must be desperate to hire a dumb cunt like

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 15:58:08 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 4:17:54 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    Hilarious...

    fuck you
    you fucking dumb cunt
    you cant afford to race
    because you are fucking loser
    fuck me
    they must be desperate to hire a fucking idiot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 16:03:16 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    ...or did I just draw the short straw? :-)

    The Race Drivers Committee (RDC) of the Sports Car Club of British
    Columbia (SCCBC) met last night for our end-of-season meeting to discuss issues impacting road racing with the SCCBC (and the other groups who
    run races at our facility), and somehow, I was nominated and accepted to
    be the RDC Chairman for 2023.

    It's not that onerous a job (so I'm told), but for this coming season,
    we decided as a group that we'd like to see some changes in the way we
    hold drivers accountable for on-track incidents, and my very first duty
    as chair is going to be writing a letter to one of the RDC to officially inform him that he has been suspended from the committee for the coming year, due to a number of on-track incidents that we feel don't meet the standard of driving that every race driver should meet.

    There's an odd dichotomy about this "sport":

    We all want to compete to one degree or another.

    But we all should also acknowledge that there are lines of
    aggressiveness that we shouldn't cross.

    Even at the highest levels of motorsport, there should never be
    incidents where one driver basically offers the options: "I win, or we
    both crash".

    And we saw a little too much of that mentality (probably to a lesser
    degree, but still in the ballpark)—particularly at our last race of the year.

    The actual incident that I think galvanized us to change our system (in
    ways yet to be determined) was between two drivers who were both in the running to win their class championship, and running 1-2 in the race as
    it came near its finish.

    They came up on a car on the exit of turn 9 onto the front straight and
    as both moved to lap it the driver behind feinted as if he would go to
    the left of the car ahead and then moved over and drove to the right of
    the lead car, and the lead car then tried too late to "block" the pass, ending up with both of them crashing out with the trailing car hitting
    the concrete block wall so hard that one of the blocks broken in half.

    The contact with the wall peeled of the sheet metal door panel from
    right ride side and it went flying into the tech area (where cars are safety-checked and weighed) where three of the emeritus members of the
    club were sitting as they always do.

    It was only luck that there were no serious injuries, but the car that
    hit the wall is almost certainly a complete write-off.

    Need I say that the lead driver was found to be mostly at fault for an
    (at best) ill-advised, too late attempt to prevent the car behind from passing when that car had in fact already got an overlap, and that that
    lead driver was the RDC member whom I must inform of his suspension?

    So I'm honoured...I guess.

    yup
    no passing allowed
    its clearly your MO in motorsports
    single file when the green flag drops
    stay safe
    dont scratch the paint
    you fucking pathetic pussy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 16:07:25 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    ...or did I just draw the short straw? :-)

    why the question mark?
    you have got the short straw since day 1
    you dumb cunt

    So I'm honoured...I guess.

    keep on guessing asshole
    24/7/365
    you fucking dim cunt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 16:10:05 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    lead driver was the RDC member whom I must inform of his suspension?

    hopefully he kicks you in the cunt
    you fucking idiot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 16:19:06 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    ...or did I just draw the short straw? :-)

    The Race Drivers Committee (RDC) of the Sports Car Club of British
    Columbia (SCCBC) met last night for our end-of-season meeting to discuss issues impacting road racing with the SCCBC (and the other groups who
    run races at our facility), and somehow, I was nominated and accepted to
    be the RDC Chairman for 2023.

    It's not that onerous a job (so I'm told), but for this coming season,
    we decided as a group that we'd like to see some changes in the way we
    hold drivers accountable for on-track incidents, and my very first duty
    as chair is going to be writing a letter to one of the RDC to officially inform him that he has been suspended from the committee for the coming year, due to a number of on-track incidents that we feel don't meet the standard of driving that every race driver should meet.

    There's an odd dichotomy about this "sport":

    We all want to compete to one degree or another.

    But we all should also acknowledge that there are lines of
    aggressiveness that we shouldn't cross.

    Even at the highest levels of motorsport, there should never be
    incidents where one driver basically offers the options: "I win, or we
    both crash".

    And we saw a little too much of that mentality (probably to a lesser
    degree, but still in the ballpark)—particularly at our last race of the year.

    The actual incident that I think galvanized us to change our system (in
    ways yet to be determined) was between two drivers who were both in the running to win their class championship, and running 1-2 in the race as
    it came near its finish.

    They came up on a car on the exit of turn 9 onto the front straight and
    as both moved to lap it the driver behind feinted as if he would go to
    the left of the car ahead and then moved over and drove to the right of
    the lead car, and the lead car then tried too late to "block" the pass, ending up with both of them crashing out with the trailing car hitting
    the concrete block wall so hard that one of the blocks broken in half.

    The contact with the wall peeled of the sheet metal door panel from
    right ride side and it went flying into the tech area (where cars are safety-checked and weighed) where three of the emeritus members of the
    club were sitting as they always do.

    It was only luck that there were no serious injuries, but the car that
    hit the wall is almost certainly a complete write-off.

    Need I say that the lead driver was found to be mostly at fault for an
    (at best) ill-advised, too late attempt to prevent the car behind from passing when that car had in fact already got an overlap, and that that
    lead driver was the RDC member whom I must inform of his suspension?

    So I'm honoured...I guess.

    ban passing
    call it day
    you fucking moron

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 16:17:11 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    and somehow, I was nominated

    ya
    they are fucking desperate
    and you are anti passing
    you fucking idiot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 17:45:20 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    ...or did I just draw the short straw? :-)

    The Race Drivers Committee (RDC) of the Sports Car Club of British
    Columbia (SCCBC) met last night for our end-of-season meeting to discuss issues impacting road racing with the SCCBC (and the other groups who
    run races at our facility), and somehow, I was nominated and accepted to
    be the RDC Chairman for 2023.

    It's not that onerous a job (so I'm told), but for this coming season,
    we decided as a group that we'd like to see some changes in the way we
    hold drivers accountable for on-track incidents, and my very first duty
    as chair is going to be writing a letter to one of the RDC to officially inform him that he has been suspended from the committee for the coming year, due to a number of on-track incidents that we feel don't meet the standard of driving that every race driver should meet.

    There's an odd dichotomy about this "sport":

    We all want to compete to one degree or another.

    But we all should also acknowledge that there are lines of
    aggressiveness that we shouldn't cross.

    Even at the highest levels of motorsport, there should never be
    incidents where one driver basically offers the options: "I win, or we
    both crash".

    And we saw a little too much of that mentality (probably to a lesser
    degree, but still in the ballpark)—particularly at our last race of the year.

    The actual incident that I think galvanized us to change our system (in
    ways yet to be determined) was between two drivers who were both in the running to win their class championship, and running 1-2 in the race as
    it came near its finish.

    They came up on a car on the exit of turn 9 onto the front straight and
    as both moved to lap it the driver behind feinted as if he would go to
    the left of the car ahead and then moved over and drove to the right of
    the lead car, and the lead car then tried too late to "block" the pass, ending up with both of them crashing out with the trailing car hitting
    the concrete block wall so hard that one of the blocks broken in half.

    The contact with the wall peeled of the sheet metal door panel from
    right ride side and it went flying into the tech area (where cars are safety-checked and weighed) where three of the emeritus members of the
    club were sitting as they always do.

    It was only luck that there were no serious injuries, but the car that
    hit the wall is almost certainly a complete write-off.

    Need I say that the lead driver was found to be mostly at fault for an
    (at best) ill-advised, too late attempt to prevent the car behind from passing when that car had in fact already got an overlap, and that that
    lead driver was the RDC member whom I must inform of his suspension?

    So I'm honoured...I guess.

    Is there a special needs employment quota at that organization?
    Because you filled it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 20:34:29 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    There's an odd dichotomy about this "sport":

    We all want to compete to one degree or another.

    But we all should also acknowledge that there are lines of
    aggressiveness that we shouldn't cross.

    kill yourself
    you piece of shit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Nov 17 22:01:26 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    we

    We

    we

    we

    lol

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Nov 18 01:22:37 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    ...or did I just draw the short straw? :-)

    yup
    your whore mother shit you out in pub toilet
    now here you are

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Nov 18 01:16:55 2022
    On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:39:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    (RDC)
    (SCCBC)
    SCCBC
    RDC
    RDC

    fuck you
    you fucking cunt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)