https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH pressuring facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of gov't directed censorship.
On 7/27/23 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH pressuring facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of gov't directed censorship.I guess the Twitter Files went over so well...
Requesting a platform enforce its own rules is not "pressuring."
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:25 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/27/23 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128I guess the Twitter Files went over so well...
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK
CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH pressuring
facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of gov't directed
censorship.
I read them and we did discuss them at some length.
Requesting a platform enforce its own rules is not "pressuring."
You obviously didn't read it. Lot's of internal debate among
Facebook execs that the information the WH wanted taken down did not
violate any Facebook rules. But FB did it anyway...."too maintain
positive relations with the WH".
WTF should FB have any relations with the WH?
It's just stunning how much corruption and malfeasance you'll turn a
blind eye to for your God, the dem party.
On 7/28/23 10:50 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:25 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/27/23 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128I guess the Twitter Files went over so well...
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK
CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH pressuring
facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of gov't directed
censorship.
I read them and we did discuss them at some length.Yes, a complete and utter flop that discredited Taibbi and anyone who
took him seriously.
Requesting a platform enforce its own rules is not "pressuring."
You obviously didn't read it. Lot's of internal debate amongThat's a decision they're allowed to make.
Facebook execs that the information the WH wanted taken down did not violate any Facebook rules. But FB did it anyway...."too maintain
positive relations with the WH".
WTF should FB have any relations with the WH?Why shouldn't the WH be able to communicate with FB the same as any
other customer?
It's just stunning how much corruption and malfeasance you'll turn aCan't turn a blind eye to something you haven't shown. I'll do my own search...
blind eye to for your God, the dem party.
WSJ reports the WH didn't want FB to repeat pandemic man-made virus conspiracy theories.
Talk about turning a blind eye. This didn't seem important to you? And
FB not having rules against lies and disinformation isn't the greatest
idea. They've literally facilitated genocide through inaction.
Funny how those "conspiracy" theories are now considered by the scientific community
at large as the most likely origin.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:19:22 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 10:50 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:25 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Yes, a complete and utter flop that discredited Taibbi and anyone
On 7/27/23 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128I guess the Twitter Files went over so well...
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK
CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH
pressuring facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of
gov't directed censorship.
I read them and we did discuss them at some length.
who took him seriously.
I see twitter changed a lot since. Is that your flop? That dems
lost one of their censorship wands?
That's a decision they're allowed to make.Requesting a platform enforce its own rules is not
"pressuring."
You obviously didn't read it. Lot's of internal debate among
Facebook execs that the information the WH wanted taken down did
not violate any Facebook rules. But FB did it anyway...."too
maintain positive relations with the WH".
How quickly you abandon your opening argument. In any form of debate....that's a loser.
WTF should FB have any relations with the WH?Why shouldn't the WH be able to communicate with FB the same as
any other customer?
Can you call up FB and ask for material to be censored and get anyone
to listen? You're being absurd.
It's just stunning how much corruption and malfeasance you'llCan't turn a blind eye to something you haven't shown. I'll do my
turn a blind eye to for your God, the dem party.
own search...
WSJ reports the WH didn't want FB to repeat pandemic man-made
virus conspiracy theories.
Funny how those "conspiracy" theories are now considered by the
scientific community at large as the most likely origin.
Also Funny is how Fauci seems to be the main instigator of the
natural origin theory and was able to get his minions in science to
hop and produce a paper in under a week.
Read the background e-mails and you can see a whole lotta lying going
on.
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023.03.05-SSCP-Memo-Re.-New-Evidence.Proximal-Origin.pdf
Talk about turning a blind eye. This didn't seem important to you?
And FB not having rules against lies and disinformation isn't the
greatest idea. They've literally facilitated genocide through
inaction.
How does debate about covid origin cause genocide?
On 7/28/23 5:00 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:19:22 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 10:50 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:25 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Yes, a complete and utter flop that discredited Taibbi and anyone
On 7/27/23 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128I guess the Twitter Files went over so well...
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK
CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH
pressuring facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of
gov't directed censorship.
I read them and we did discuss them at some length.
who took him seriously.
I see twitter changed a lot since. Is that your flop? That demsThere was no "censorship wand," just an online form for complaining
lost one of their censorship wands?
about nonconsensual nudes.
Perhaps you've heard: there was a change in ownership.
That's a decision they're allowed to make.Requesting a platform enforce its own rules is not
"pressuring."
You obviously didn't read it. Lot's of internal debate among
Facebook execs that the information the WH wanted taken down did
not violate any Facebook rules. But FB did it anyway...."too
maintain positive relations with the WH".
How quickly you abandon your opening argument. In any form of debate....that's a loser.An even worse loser is not making sense.
WTF should FB have any relations with the WH?Why shouldn't the WH be able to communicate with FB the same as
any other customer?
Can you call up FB and ask for material to be censored and get anyoneFB's lack of responsiveness to consumers is not a plus.
to listen? You're being absurd.
It's just stunning how much corruption and malfeasance you'llCan't turn a blind eye to something you haven't shown. I'll do my
turn a blind eye to for your God, the dem party.
own search...
WSJ reports the WH didn't want FB to repeat pandemic man-made
virus conspiracy theories.
Funny how those "conspiracy" theories are now considered by theThey're not. A lab leak is only a distant possibility and "man made" is right out.
scientific community at large as the most likely origin.
Also Funny is how Fauci seems to be the main instigator of theHe wasn't.
natural origin theory and was able to get his minions in science to
hop and produce a paper in under a week.
Read the background e-mails and you can see a whole lotta lying going
on.
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023.03.05-SSCP-Memo-Re.-New-Evidence.Proximal-Origin.pdfI see a bunch of open-minded scientists considering possibilities and arriving at the most likely ones.
That's some cherry-picking there: "Our main work over the last couple of weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory"
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 6:52:11 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 5:00 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:19:22 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:There was no "censorship wand," just an online form for complaining
On 7/28/23 10:50 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:25 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Yes, a complete and utter flop that discredited Taibbi and anyone
On 7/27/23 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128I guess the Twitter Files went over so well...
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK
CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH
pressuring facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of
gov't directed censorship.
I read them and we did discuss them at some length.
who took him seriously.
I see twitter changed a lot since. Is that your flop? That dems
lost one of their censorship wands?
about nonconsensual nudes.
Yeah...and phone calls and e-mails up your wazoo.
Perhaps you've heard: there was a change in ownership.
And for that we should ALL be eternally grateful.
An even worse loser is not making sense.That's a decision they're allowed to make.Requesting a platform enforce its own rules is not
"pressuring."
You obviously didn't read it. Lot's of internal debate among
Facebook execs that the information the WH wanted taken down did
not violate any Facebook rules. But FB did it anyway...."too
maintain positive relations with the WH".
How quickly you abandon your opening argument. In any form of
debate....that's a loser.
I see debate judge is another career path closed to you.
FB's lack of responsiveness to consumers is not a plus.WTF should FB have any relations with the WH?Why shouldn't the WH be able to communicate with FB the same as
any other customer?
Can you call up FB and ask for material to be censored and get anyone
to listen? You're being absurd.
LoL....and I don't make sense while you're flipflopping like a toad on
hot phoenix asphalt. Sadly, you have more endurance.
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023.03.05-SSCP-Memo-Re.-New-Evidence.Proximal-Origin.pdfI see a bunch of open-minded scientists considering possibilities and
arriving at the most likely ones.
That's some cherry-picking there: "Our main work over the last couple of
weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory"
So "open-minded".
You're getting pathetic. I say grass is green. You say here's some green grass to disprove your point.
On 7/29/23 11:30 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 6:52:11 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 5:00 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:19:22 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:There was no "censorship wand," just an online form for complaining
On 7/28/23 10:50 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:25 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Yes, a complete and utter flop that discredited Taibbi and anyone
On 7/27/23 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128I guess the Twitter Files went over so well...
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK
CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH
pressuring facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of
gov't directed censorship.
I read them and we did discuss them at some length.
who took him seriously.
I see twitter changed a lot since. Is that your flop? That dems
lost one of their censorship wands?
about nonconsensual nudes.
Yeah...and phone calls and e-mails up your wazoo.As much fun as it is to talk about my "wazoo," there was no undue
influence from the White House in the Twitter Files unless you count
that of Trump.
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 10:02:30 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/29/23 11:30 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 6:52:11 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:As much fun as it is to talk about my "wazoo," there was no undue
On 7/28/23 5:00 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:19:22 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:There was no "censorship wand," just an online form for complaining
On 7/28/23 10:50 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:23:25 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Yes, a complete and utter flop that discredited Taibbi and anyone
On 7/27/23 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128I guess the Twitter Files went over so well...
THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK
CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE
The thread is packed with documented examples of WH
pressuring facebook to engage in a wide ranging campaign of
gov't directed censorship.
I read them and we did discuss them at some length.
who took him seriously.
I see twitter changed a lot since. Is that your flop? That dems
lost one of their censorship wands?
about nonconsensual nudes.
Yeah...and phone calls and e-mails up your wazoo.
influence from the White House in the Twitter Files unless you count
that of Trump.
BS. You can surrender your first amendment rights without a fight, but I'm going down swinging.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 108:52:16 |
| Calls: | 6,852 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,355 |
| Messages: | 5,416,064 |