And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very different
and not workable in that harsh environment. That's why it has it's
own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into concrete or
plastic over ground injection which just sounds so sketchy. We
already have thousands of acres of dead and drying trees in the
Mammoth Lakes area due to Co2 seeps from deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
GE announced the successful test of its direct air capture (DAC)
prototype and is planning larger-scale demonstrations in 2024.
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the energy and
transportation to renewables is wasted.
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very different
and not workable in that harsh environment. That's why it has it's
own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into concrete or
plastic over ground injection which just sounds so sketchy. We
already have thousands of acres of dead and drying trees in the
Mammoth Lakes area due to Co2 seeps from deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
GE announced the successful test of its direct air capture (DAC)
prototype and is planning larger-scale demonstrations in 2024.
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the energy and transportation to renewables is wasted.If you're in a hole, first stop digging.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
I suppose you could hook
it up directly to its power source in a closed circle.
Too bad the first search result goes to ExxonMobil.
One might reasonably
wonder if this another fake to distract from the necessity of decarbonizing.
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:11:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very
different and not workable in that harsh environment. That's why
it has it's own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into concrete or
plastic over ground injection which just sounds so sketchy. We
already have thousands of acres of dead and drying trees in the
Mammoth Lakes area due to Co2 seeps from deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
GE announced the successful test of its direct air capture (DAC)If you're in a hole, first stop digging.
prototype and is planning larger-scale demonstrations in 2024.
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the energy and
transportation to renewables is wasted.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
Compared to retooling both the entire power grid and the automotive
industry?
I suppose you could hook it up directly to its power source in a
closed circle.
Too bad the first search result goes to ExxonMobil.
I give you a link...and you still can't find it. Pathetic.
One might reasonably wonder if this another fake to distract from
the necessity of decarbonizing.
It's like arguing with a religious fruitcake.
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very different and not workable in that harsh environment.
That's why it has it's own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
On 4/26/23 6:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:11:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very
different and not workable in that harsh environment. That's why
it has it's own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into concrete or
plastic over ground injection which just sounds so sketchy. We
already have thousands of acres of dead and drying trees in the
Mammoth Lakes area due to Co2 seeps from deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
GE announced the successful test of its direct air capture (DAC)If you're in a hole, first stop digging.
prototype and is planning larger-scale demonstrations in 2024.
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the energy and
transportation to renewables is wasted.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
Compared to retooling both the entire power grid and the automotive industry?You'll have to do that anyway to power those DACs.
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 8:03:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/26/23 6:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:11:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109You'll have to do that anyway to power those DACs.
wrote:
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very
different and not workable in that harsh environment. That's
why it has it's own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into concrete
or plastic over ground injection which just sounds so
sketchy. We already have thousands of acres of dead and
drying trees in the Mammoth Lakes area due to Co2 seeps from
deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
If you're in a hole, first stop digging.
GE announced the successful test of its direct air capture (DAC)
prototype and is planning larger-scale demonstrations in
2024.
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the energy and
transportation to renewables is wasted.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
Compared to retooling both the entire power grid and the
automotive industry?
No you won't.
They don't take up much space.
They can be easily located on the grid and given the fossil fuel capacity they allow to keep operating
we'll have power to spare.
On 4/27/23 9:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 8:03:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/26/23 6:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:11:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109You'll have to do that anyway to power those DACs.
wrote:
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very
different and not workable in that harsh environment. That's
why it has it's own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into concrete
or plastic over ground injection which just sounds so
sketchy. We already have thousands of acres of dead and
drying trees in the Mammoth Lakes area due to Co2 seeps from
deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
If you're in a hole, first stop digging.
GE announced the successful test of its direct air capture (DAC)
prototype and is planning larger-scale demonstrations in
2024.
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the energy and
transportation to renewables is wasted.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
Compared to retooling both the entire power grid and the
automotive industry?
No you won't.What with being imaginary, I wouldn't think so. Why are they planning "larger scale demonstrations" if little ones are all that's needed?
They don't take up much space.
They can be easily located on the grid and given the fossil fuel capacity they allow to keep operatingPerpetual motion DACs?
we'll have power to spare.
GE: “We know that to truly bring an economical, commercial-scale
solution in DAC to the market, it will require a collaborative effort
with government, industry, and academic partners,” Moore said. “If we do this right, we could have a commercially-deployable DAC solution around
the end of this decade.”
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 5:34:07 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/27/23 9:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 8:03:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:What with being imaginary, I wouldn't think so. Why are they planning
On 4/26/23 6:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:11:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109You'll have to do that anyway to power those DACs.
wrote:
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very
different and not workable in that harsh environment. That's
why it has it's own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into concrete
or plastic over ground injection which just sounds so
sketchy. We already have thousands of acres of dead and
drying trees in the Mammoth Lakes area due to Co2 seeps from
deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
If you're in a hole, first stop digging.
GE announced the successful test of its direct air capture (DAC) >>>>>>> prototype and is planning larger-scale demonstrations in
2024.
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the energy and
transportation to renewables is wasted.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
Compared to retooling both the entire power grid and the
automotive industry?
No you won't.
They don't take up much space.
"larger scale demonstrations" if little ones are all that's needed?
Larger scale is relative to the prototype.
Compare that to the land requirements for solar fields and wind farms.
They can be easily located on the grid and given the fossil fuel capacity they allow to keep operatingPerpetual motion DACs?
we'll have power to spare.
Nevermind, when you give morons a say on how to save the planet....we're doomed.
GE: “We know that to truly bring an economical, commercial-scale
solution in DAC to the market, it will require a collaborative effort
with government, industry, and academic partners,” Moore said. “If we do >> this right, we could have a commercially-deployable DAC solution around
the end of this decade.”
Which is why I say Biden should be all in on this.
On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 5:34:07 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/27/23 9:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 8:03:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:What with being imaginary, I wouldn't think so. Why are they planning
On 4/26/23 6:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:11:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109You'll have to do that anyway to power those DACs.
wrote:
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is very
different and not workable in that harsh environment. That's
why it has it's own acronym ...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into concrete
or plastic over ground injection which just sounds so
sketchy. We already have thousands of acres of dead and
drying trees in the Mammoth Lakes area due to Co2 seeps from
deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
If you're in a hole, first stop digging.
GE announced the successful test of its direct air capture (DAC) >>>>>>> prototype and is planning larger-scale demonstrations in
2024.
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the energy and
transportation to renewables is wasted.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
Compared to retooling both the entire power grid and the
automotive industry?
No you won't.
They don't take up much space.
"larger scale demonstrations" if little ones are all that's needed?
Larger scale is relative to the prototype.Which will still be required to overcome a century of carbon release.
Compare that to the land requirements for solar fields and wind farms.
They can be easily located on the grid and given the fossil fuel capacity they allow to keep operatingPerpetual motion DACs?
we'll have power to spare.
Nevermind, when you give morons a say on how to save the planet....we're doomed.Like thinking there's no need to reduce carbon emissions?
GE: “We know that to truly bring an economical, commercial-scale
solution in DAC to the market, it will require a collaborative effort
with government, industry, and academic partners,” Moore said. “If we do
this right, we could have a commercially-deployable DAC solution around >> the end of this decade.”
Which is why I say Biden should be all in on this.Like this?
https://www.catf.us/resource/carbon-capture-provisions-in-the-inflation-reduction-act-of-2022/
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 5:34:07 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/27/23 9:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 8:03:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109
wrote:
On 4/26/23 6:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:11:33 AM UTC-7,
mINE109 wrote:
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech is
very different and not workable in that harsh
environment. That's why it has it's own acronym
...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into
concrete or plastic over ground injection which just
sounds so sketchy. We already have thousands of acres
of dead and drying trees in the Mammoth Lakes area
due to Co2 seeps from deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
Which will still be required to overcome a century of carbonWhat with being imaginary, I wouldn't think so. Why are theyYou'll have to do that anyway to power those DACs.If this works....all the pain of shifting all theIf you're in a hole, first stop digging.
energy and transportation to renewables is wasted.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
Compared to retooling both the entire power grid and the
automotive industry?
No you won't. They don't take up much space.
planning "larger scale demonstrations" if little ones are all
that's needed?
Larger scale is relative to the prototype. Compare that to the
land requirements for solar fields and wind farms.
release.
BS... You're so f'ing clueless. Even this dufus doesn't have it
right. https://theconversation.com/if-we-stopped-emitting-greenhouse-gases-right-now-would-we-stop-climate-change-78882
He ignores the fact that rising ocean temps will release c02 and
further increase the co2 levels created by man which will remain for thousands of years....unless DAC can be implemented.
It's really the only hope. Stopping current emissions won't do it.
Like thinking there's no need to reduce carbon emissions?They can be easily located on the grid and given the fossilPerpetual motion DACs?
fuel capacity they allow to keep operating we'll have power
to spare.
Nevermind, when you give morons a say on how to save the
planet....we're doomed.
Like realizing that's a fools errand.
Like this?GE: “We know that to truly bring an economical,
commercial-scale solution in DAC to the market, it will require
a collaborative effort with government, industry, and academic
partners,” Moore said. “If we do this right, we could have a
commercially-deployable DAC solution around the end of this
decade.”
Which is why I say Biden should be all in on this.
https://www.catf.us/resource/carbon-capture-provisions-in-the-inflation-reduction-act-of-2022/
You call that "all in"? A tax credit for carbon captured and
stored? I'm thinking more like a Manhatten project. Not a lame ass
profit motive. That's the kind of approach that failed on all the
scrubber projects.
On 4/28/23 10:15 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 5:34:07 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Which will still be required to overcome a century of carbon
On 4/27/23 9:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 8:03:33 AM UTC-7, mINE109What with being imaginary, I wouldn't think so. Why are they
wrote:
On 4/26/23 6:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:11:33 AM UTC-7,You'll have to do that anyway to power those DACs.
mINE109 wrote:
On 4/26/23 11:05 AM, ScottW wrote:
And don't confuse this stack scrubbers. The tech isIf you're in a hole, first stop digging.
very different and not workable in that harsh
environment. That's why it has it's own acronym
...DAC... Direct Air Capture.
And I like the idea of incoporating the carbon into
concrete or plastic over ground injection which just
sounds so sketchy. We already have thousands of acres
of dead and drying trees in the Mammoth Lakes area
due to Co2 seeps from deep volcanic activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/ge-has-a-wild-plan-to-vacuum-air-pollution-right-out-of-our-skies-here-s-how-the-mind-blowing-idea-would-work/ar-AA1ajfPi?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=07cc286af12647b3aec04a0df0e6bfa1&ei=18
If this works....all the pain of shifting all the
energy and transportation to renewables is wasted.
You think operating this DAC will have no cost?
Compared to retooling both the entire power grid and the
automotive industry?
No you won't. They don't take up much space.
planning "larger scale demonstrations" if little ones are all
that's needed?
Larger scale is relative to the prototype. Compare that to the
land requirements for solar fields and wind farms.
release.
BS... You're so f'ing clueless. Even this dufus doesn't have it
right. https://theconversation.com/if-we-stopped-emitting-greenhouse-gases-right-now-would-we-stop-climate-change-78882
He ignores the fact that rising ocean temps will release c02 andYou cite someone in order to say he doesn't talk about your idea?
further increase the co2 levels created by man which will remain for thousands of years....unless DAC can be implemented.
It's really the only hope. Stopping current emissions won't do it.Way to go from "no problem" to "no use." Republicans need to pick a lane.
Like thinking there's no need to reduce carbon emissions?They can be easily located on the grid and given the fossilPerpetual motion DACs?
fuel capacity they allow to keep operating we'll have power
to spare.
Nevermind, when you give morons a say on how to save the
planet....we're doomed.
Like realizing that's a fools errand.Stop digging.
Like this?GE: “We know that to truly bring an economical,
commercial-scale solution in DAC to the market, it will require
a collaborative effort with government, industry, and academic
partners,” Moore said. “If we do this right, we could have a
commercially-deployable DAC solution around the end of this
decade.”
Which is why I say Biden should be all in on this.
https://www.catf.us/resource/carbon-capture-provisions-in-the-inflation-reduction-act-of-2022/
Republicans control the House, so this a great time for such a proposal:You call that "all in"? A tax credit for carbon captured and
stored? I'm thinking more like a Manhatten project. Not a lame ass
profit motive. That's the kind of approach that failed on all the
scrubber projects.
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 7:12:01 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:He ignores the fact that rising ocean temps will release c02 and
On 4/28/23 10:15 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
https://theconversation.com/if-we-stopped-emitting-greenhouse-gases-right-now-would-we-stop-climate-change-78882
further increase the co2 levels created by man which will remainYou cite someone in order to say he doesn't talk about your idea?
for thousands of years....unless DAC can be implemented.
It's really the only hope. Stopping current emissions won't doWay to go from "no problem" to "no use." Republicans need to pick a
it.
lane.
I'm trying to help you out....cuz you suck at both making a case for
a problem and then putting forth a solution.
Then again....it's your formula for racism all over again...and
again...and again. And it just keeps getting worse.
Stop digging.Like thinking there's no need to reduce carbon emissions?They can be easily located on the grid and given thePerpetual motion DACs?
fossil fuel capacity they allow to keep operating we'll
have power to spare.
Nevermind, when you give morons a say on how to save the
planet....we're doomed.
Like realizing that's a fools errand.
Republicans control the House, so this a great time for such aYou call that "all in"? A tax credit for carbon captured andLike this?GE: “We know that to truly bring an economical,
commercial-scale solution in DAC to the market, it will
require a collaborative effort with government, industry,
and academic partners,” Moore said. “If we do this right,
we could have a commercially-deployable DAC solution around
the end of this decade.”
Which is why I say Biden should be all in on this.
https://www.catf.us/resource/carbon-capture-provisions-in-the-inflation-reduction-act-of-2022/
stored? I'm thinking more like a Manhatten project. Not a lame
ass profit motive. That's the kind of approach that failed on all
the scrubber projects.
proposal:
You control the senate and it's your party that says we're all gonna
die from tipping.
And your plan doesn't have a prayer of working.
It doesn't even claim to meet IPCC requirements. Even your beloved
Paris Accords didn't claim to meet the need. It's almost like you
WANT to put massive numbers of more people in poverty and on gov't
handouts with a failing Climate Change program.
BTW....got a new homeless camp sprung up around the corner. But this
one's different. Not occupied by obvious drug addicts but appears
to be occupied by migrants and it's got some gangster looking dudes
wandering about policing the occupants. Very weird. A way station
for migrant trafficking in the middle of town here?
On 4/29/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 7:12:01 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/28/23 10:15 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
https://theconversation.com/if-we-stopped-emitting-greenhouse-gases-right-now-would-we-stop-climate-change-78882
He ignores the fact that rising ocean temps will release c02 and
further increase the co2 levels created by man which will remainYou cite someone in order to say he doesn't talk about your idea?
for thousands of years....unless DAC can be implemented.
It's really the only hope. Stopping current emissions won't doWay to go from "no problem" to "no use." Republicans need to pick a
it.
lane.
I'm trying to help you out....cuz you suck at both making a case forThe case is made and I'm not responsible to provide the solution.
a problem and then putting forth a solution.
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 12:05:25 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/29/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 7:12:01 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:He ignores the fact that rising ocean temps will release c02 and
On 4/28/23 10:15 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
https://theconversation.com/if-we-stopped-emitting-greenhouse-gases-right-now-would-we-stop-climate-change-78882
further increase the co2 levels created by man which will remainYou cite someone in order to say he doesn't talk about your idea?
for thousands of years....unless DAC can be implemented.
It's really the only hope. Stopping current emissions won't doWay to go from "no problem" to "no use." Republicans need to pick a
it.
lane.
I'm trying to help you out....cuz you suck at both making a case for
a problem and then putting forth a solution.
The case is made and I'm not responsible to provide the solution.
As Yoda would say...."You will be. You will be."
On 4/30/23 10:34 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 12:05:25 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Keep reading.
On 4/29/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 7:12:01 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:He ignores the fact that rising ocean temps will release c02 and
On 4/28/23 10:15 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
https://theconversation.com/if-we-stopped-emitting-greenhouse-gases-right-now-would-we-stop-climate-change-78882
further increase the co2 levels created by man which will remainYou cite someone in order to say he doesn't talk about your idea?
for thousands of years....unless DAC can be implemented.
It's really the only hope. Stopping current emissions won't doWay to go from "no problem" to "no use." Republicans need to pick a >>>> lane.
it.
I'm trying to help you out....cuz you suck at both making a case for
a problem and then putting forth a solution.
The case is made and I'm not responsible to provide the solution.
As Yoda would say...."You will be. You will be."Not "Be, you will"? Either way, not.
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 10:44:43 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/30/23 10:34 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 12:05:25 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Keep reading.
On 4/29/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 7:12:01 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:He ignores the fact that rising ocean temps will release c02 and
On 4/28/23 10:15 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
https://theconversation.com/if-we-stopped-emitting-greenhouse-gases-right-now-would-we-stop-climate-change-78882
further increase the co2 levels created by man which will remain >>>>>>> for thousands of years....unless DAC can be implemented.You cite someone in order to say he doesn't talk about your idea? >>>>>>> It's really the only hope. Stopping current emissions won't do
it.Way to go from "no problem" to "no use." Republicans need to pick a >>>>>> lane.
I'm trying to help you out....cuz you suck at both making a case for >>>>> a problem and then putting forth a solution.
Not "Be, you will"? Either way, not.The case is made and I'm not responsible to provide the solution.
As Yoda would say...."You will be. You will be."
So no price to be paid. I guess we can all forget about AGW.
On 4/30/23 1:00 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 10:44:43 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/30/23 10:34 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 12:05:25 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Keep reading.
On 4/29/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 7:12:01 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 4/28/23 10:15 PM, ScottW wrote:He ignores the fact that rising ocean temps will release c02 and >>>>>>> further increase the co2 levels created by man which will remain >>>>>>> for thousands of years....unless DAC can be implemented.
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/28/23 10:21 AM, ScottW wrote:
https://theconversation.com/if-we-stopped-emitting-greenhouse-gases-right-now-would-we-stop-climate-change-78882
You cite someone in order to say he doesn't talk about your idea? >>>>>>> It's really the only hope. Stopping current emissions won't do >>>>>>> it.
Way to go from "no problem" to "no use." Republicans need to pick a >>>>>> lane.
I'm trying to help you out....cuz you suck at both making a case for >>>>> a problem and then putting forth a solution.
Not "Be, you will"? Either way, not.The case is made and I'm not responsible to provide the solution.
As Yoda would say...."You will be. You will be."
So no price to be paid. I guess we can all forget about AGW.Leap to conclusions, you will.
Back to your expert,
I see it's dated 2017. Let's see who he is...
Richard B. (Ricky) Rood. Good enough. I don't see a case for not cutting back on carbon emissions:
"There are many reasons we need to eliminate our carbon dioxide emissions...
[O]ur job becomes one of limiting the warming. If greenhouse gas
emissions are eliminated quickly enough, within a small number of
decades, it will keep the warming manageable and the Paris Agreement
goals could be met."
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 110:22:48 |
| Calls: | 6,853 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,355 |
| Messages: | 5,416,308 |