on it's list of disinformation?
https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/09/state-department-disinformation-conservative-news-site/
Here's the bottom line. The internet is going to always have BS available. Look at some of the dregs of blogs and anyone can put an article up here crap that Stephen links.
On 2/10/23 5:36 PM, ScottW wrote:
on it's list of disinformation?
https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/09/state-department-disinformation-conservative-news-site/
Here's the bottom line. The internet is going to always have BS available. Look at some of the dregs of blogs and anyone can put an article up here crap that Stephen links.Pardon? You spam daily with opinion pieces from conservative sites.
The
trick is to able to evaluate what you see.
And if "repost isn't
endorsement" is good enough for you, it's good enough for me.
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 7:16:47 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Here's the bottom line. The internet is going to always have BS
On 2/10/23 5:36 PM, ScottW wrote:
on it's list of disinformation?
https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/09/state-department-disinformation-conservative-news-site/
Pardon? You spam daily with opinion pieces from conservative
sites.
One man's spam is another's diet to stay alive.
The trick is to able to evaluate what you see.
I question you're ability. But I do give you credit for your
perseverance and willingness to go deep into the search results
And if "repost isn't endorsement" is good enough for you, it's
good enough for me.
There's a big difference between putting up a post for debate versus
a post to refute a point.
But since you can't see it, we'll just accept that you don't really
believe what you had to say to serve your purpose.
There's a big difference between putting up a post for debate versus
a post to refute a point.
Also, at what point in your "debate" do you grant yourself
license to spew mindless insults?
On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 12:01:08 PM UTC-5, Fascist Flea wrote:
Also, at what point in your "debate" do you grant yourself
license to spew mindless insults?
For me, that would be the second Steve opens his mouth
On 2/12/23 3:03 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 12:01:08 PM UTC-5, Fascist Flea wrote:
Also, at what point in your "debate" do you grant yourself
license to spew mindless insults?
For me, that would be the second Steve opens his mouthI regret giving you another chance after my filters went down with aioe.
On 2/11/23 8:57 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 7:16:47 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Here's the bottom line. The internet is going to always have BS
On 2/10/23 5:36 PM, ScottW wrote:
on it's list of disinformation?
https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/09/state-department-disinformation-conservative-news-site/
available. Look at some of the dregs of blogs and anyone can put an
article up here crap that Stephen links.
Pardon? You spam daily with opinion pieces from conservative
sites.
One man's spam is another's diet to stay alive.You post to live? Sad.
On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 6:21:55 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/11/23 8:57 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 7:16:47 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Here's the bottom line. The internet is going to always have BS
On 2/10/23 5:36 PM, ScottW wrote:
on it's list of disinformation?
https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/09/state-department-disinformation-conservative-news-site/
available. Look at some of the dregs of blogs and anyone can put an
article up here crap that Stephen links.
Pardon? You spam daily with opinion pieces from conservative
sites.
You need food for thought.One man's spam is another's diet to stay alive.You post to live? Sad.
ScottW
Only crickets and bed bugs.
On 2/13/23 8:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Only crickets and bed bugs.I trust you are aware that the "eating bugs" trope is a right-wing fantasy.
On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 11:04:43 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/13/23 8:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Only crickets and bed bugs.I trust you are aware that the "eating bugs" trope is a right-wing fantasy.
I trust you are aware that Gates funded bug eating proponenets.
Here are other liberals pushing a bug diet:There's a difference between considering insects as a food source in
On 2/14/23 9:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 11:04:43 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/13/23 8:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Only crickets and bed bugs.I trust you are aware that the "eating bugs" trope is a right-wing fantasy.
I trust you are aware that Gates funded bug eating proponenets.Gates. Not a liberal.
Here are other liberals pushing a bug diet:There's a difference between considering insects as a food source in
the context of global warming, world poverty, etc, and "democrats want
to force you to eat bugs."
There's a difference between considering insects as a food source inkIlling the beef industry is the first step
the context of global warming, world poverty, etc, and "democrats want
to force you to eat bugs."
On Wednesday, February 15, 2023 at 8:48:35 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/14/23 9:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 11:04:43 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:Gates. Not a liberal.
On 2/13/23 8:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Only crickets and bed bugs.I trust you are aware that the "eating bugs" trope is a right-wing fantasy.
I trust you are aware that Gates funded bug eating proponenets.
Gates contributes a lot more the Dems and is a climate change nut,
The Foundation is a heavy contributor to the left wing agencies of
the UN, such as WHO, unicef, and the UN itself,
also the Clinton Foundation.
Here are other liberals pushing a bug diet:There's a difference between considering insects as a food source in
the context of global warming, world poverty, etc, and "democrats want
to force you to eat bugs."
kIlling the beef industry is the first step
Carnivore's Dilemma:
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 118:01:12 |
Calls: | 6,854 |
Files: | 12,355 |
Messages: | 5,416,837 |