In article <ultj6k$983c$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/12/2023 09:01, The Last Doctor wrote:
So we can certainly look forward to Aggie flying into an apoplectic rage.
That would depend if the baby-stealing whatever they might be are let
off the hook at the end.
But doubtless that will be as nothing compared to his rage when we get to >>> the Strictly Come Dancing crossover episode at Easter … (I’m justguessing
as to when in the series it will happen)
What?
And I reckon Indira Varma’s Duchess will be the Rani … because after all,
when the character was played by an ethnically white actress she had a
culturally Indian aristo title … symmetry).
Speaking of Varma - she was of course Susie Costello in Torchwood. But
Christmas quiz question - which actor, playing the same character, has
appeared on screen in Doctor Who, the Sarah Jane Adventures AND Torchwood? >>>
You mean Rani from the SJAs, not the Rani?
That Rani.
But Christmas quiz question - which actor, playing the same character, has appeared on screen in Doctor Who, the Sarah Jane Adventures AND Torchwood?
On 2023-12-19 09:01:44 +0000, The Last Doctor said:
But Christmas quiz question - which actor, playing the same character, has >> appeared on screen in Doctor Who, the Sarah Jane Adventures AND Torchwood?
Paul Marc Davis has also been in all three (plus "Class"), but again
played different characters. Some places report that he is the only
actor to have appeared in all three shows, but ...
Paul Kasey has also been in all three shows, multiple times, but he has played lots of different characters.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
American. Female. On screen.
Random guess from Blueshirt HQ...
The Chinese looking bird from Torchwood, Toshika? She was Doctor Sato
in a Doctor Who episode I know that, but I can't recall a SJA
appearance.
Don't know if she's American either, but hey ho...
Not Naoko Mori, no.
And she’s Japanese.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ultj6k$983c$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/12/2023 09:01, The Last Doctor wrote:
So we can certainly look forward to Aggie flying into an apoplectic rage.
That would depend if the baby-stealing whatever they might be are let
off the hook at the end.
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even charity
minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s taken for the last
six years.
But doubtless that will be as nothing compared to his rage when we get to >>>> the Strictly Come Dancing crossover episode at Easter … (I’m justguessing
as to when in the series it will happen)
What?
RTD, Shirley Ballas and Johannes Radebe confirmed that there is an episode
in the upcoming series that features the dancing show and its stars.
after all,And I reckon Indira Varma’s Duchess will be the Rani … because
when the character was played by an ethnically white actress she had a >>>> culturally Indian aristo title … symmetry).
Speaking of Varma - she was of course Susie Costello in Torchwood. But >>>> Christmas quiz question - which actor, playing the same character, has >>>> appeared on screen in Doctor Who, the Sarah Jane Adventures AND Torchwood? >>>>
You mean Rani from the SJAs, not the Rani?
That Rani.
No, the Rani. If RTD wanted Rani Chandra to return I’m sure he’d use Anjli >Mohindra, who is still doing Big Finish as the character and played an
alien queen in a 13th Doctor episode as well as a voice role in the rather >poor) Daleks! cartoon miniseries that was part of the BBC centenary >celebrations last year!
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
In article <ulu2cr$euhg$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
No, the Rani. If RTD wanted Rani Chandra to return I’m sure he’d use Anjli
Mohindra, who is still doing Big Finish as the character and played an
alien queen in a 13th Doctor episode as well as a voice role in the rather >> poor) Daleks! cartoon miniseries that was part of the BBC centenary
celebrations last year!
Christmas Day will be fun!
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-19 09:01:44 +0000, The Last Doctor said:
Paul Marc Davis has also been in all three (plus "Class"), but again
But Christmas quiz question - which actor, playing the same character, has >>>> appeared on screen in Doctor Who, the Sarah Jane Adventures AND Torchwood? >>>
played different characters. Some places report that he is the only
actor to have appeared in all three shows, but ...
Paul Kasey has also been in all three shows, multiple times, but he has
played lots of different characters.
Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t think her >> character was named in that one. She has featured in 10 episodes of Who
(most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2 of Torchwood (in series 3,
“Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu2cr$euhg$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
use AnjliNo, the Rani. If RTD wanted Rani Chandra to return I’m sure he’d
Mohindra, who is still doing Big Finish as the character and played an
alien queen in a 13th Doctor episode as well as a voice role in the rather >>> poor) Daleks! cartoon miniseries that was part of the BBC centenary
celebrations last year!
Christmas Day will be fun!
The Duchess isn’t part of the announced Christmas Day character roster.
That list is mainly the Doctor, Ruby, various goblins and Anita Dobson’s >character, whose name has slipped my mind again.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
American. Female. On screen.
Random guess from Blueshirt HQ...
The Chinese looking bird from Torchwood, Toshika? She was Doctor
Sato in a Doctor Who episode I know that, but I can't recall a SJA appearance.
Don't know if she's American either, but hey ho...
Not Naoko Mori, no.
And she’s Japanese.
The Doctor wrote:
Looking for the REAL 14th Doctor, or New 1st Docgtor or whoever he
might be!
It might officially termed "Season One" but nobody is claiming Ncuti
Gatwa is the new 1st Doctor.
At least, I don't think so!
Looking for the REAL 14th Doctor, or New 1st Docgtor or whoever he
might be!
Sushi anyone?
The Doctor wrote:
Sushi anyone?
Yuk!
In article <nnd$4d1b2ea1$6a440be3@bff4b142598f94e5>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Sushi anyone?
Yuk!
Ha! HA!!
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ultj6k$983c$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/12/2023 09:01, The Last Doctor wrote:
So we can certainly look forward to Aggie flying into an apoplectic rage.
That would depend if the baby-stealing whatever they might be are let
off the hook at the end.
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even charity
minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s taken for the last
six years.
But doubtless that will be as nothing compared to his rage when we get to >>>> the Strictly Come Dancing crossover episode at Easter … (I’m justguessing
as to when in the series it will happen)
What?
RTD, Shirley Ballas and Johannes Radebe confirmed that there is an episode
in the upcoming series that features the dancing show and its stars.
And I reckon Indira Varma’s Duchess will be the Rani … because after all,
when the character was played by an ethnically white actress she had a >>>> culturally Indian aristo title … symmetry).
Speaking of Varma - she was of course Susie Costello in Torchwood. But >>>> Christmas quiz question - which actor, playing the same character, has >>>> appeared on screen in Doctor Who, the Sarah Jane Adventures AND Torchwood?
You mean Rani from the SJAs, not the Rani?
That Rani.
No, the Rani. If RTD wanted Rani Chandra to return I’m sure he’d use Anjli
Mohindra, who is still doing Big Finish as the character and played an
alien queen in a 13th Doctor episode as well as a voice role in the rather poor) Daleks! cartoon miniseries that was part of the BBC centenary celebrations last year!
In article <nnd$4ad6621f$4b228ec2@723523a5eccd3769>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Looking for the REAL 14th Doctor, or New 1st Docgtor or whoever
he might be!
It might officially termed "Season One" but nobody is claiming
Ncuti Gatwa is the new 1st Doctor. At least, I don't think so!
As I said whoever he might be!
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s
taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It sounds like it's going to be a fun episode so I'm really
looking forward to it...
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good
for him.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s
taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
So what are you most looking forward to on Monday's episode of Aggy?
Ncuti strutting his stuff? The hot blonde? Or the baby eating Goblins?
Of course, you'll probably consider Goblin inclusivity "woke garbage"
and refuse to sing along to the song... but it wouldn't be an episode
of Doctor Who without something upsetting your sensibilities.
It sounds like it's going to be a fun episode so I'm really looking
forward to it...
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <nnd$4d1b2ea1$6a440be3@bff4b142598f94e5>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Sushi anyone?
Yuk!
Ha! HA!!
There’s nothing wrong with sushi. Until they wrap it in raw fish or >incorporate raw seafood into it. Then yes, yuk.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:the last
In article <ultj6k$983c$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/12/2023 09:01, The Last Doctor wrote:
So we can certainly look forward to Aggie flying into an apoplectic rage. >>That would depend if the baby-stealing whatever they might be are let
off the hook at the end.
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even charity
minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s taken for
six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be tolerated
or excused.
But doubtless that will be as nothing compared to his rage when we get to >>>>> the Strictly Come Dancing crossover episode at Easter … (I’m just >>>> guessing
as to when in the series it will happen)
What?
RTD, Shirley Ballas and Johannes Radebe confirmed that there is an episode >> in the upcoming series that features the dancing show and its stars.
Dancing to the Doctor Who theme music? They've done it at least twice >already.
All the more evidence to prove that Doctor Who ended in 2017 and
everything after that is a bad dream or hallucination of Peter Capaldi
after he was shot by the Cybermen.
after all,And I reckon Indira Varma’s Duchess will be the Rani … because
when the character was played by an ethnically white actress she had a >>>>> culturally Indian aristo title … symmetry).
Speaking of Varma - she was of course Susie Costello in Torchwood. But >>>>> Christmas quiz question - which actor, playing the same character, has >>>>> appeared on screen in Doctor Who, the Sarah Jane Adventures AND Torchwood?
David Tennant and David Tennant's hand.
You mean Rani from the SJAs, not the Rani?
That Rani.
No, the Rani. If RTD wanted Rani Chandra to return I’m sure he’d use Anjli
She's not been on Torchwood or the SJAs.
Mohindra, who is still doing Big Finish as the character and played an
alien queen in a 13th Doctor episode as well as a voice role in the rather >> poor) Daleks! cartoon miniseries that was part of the BBC centenary
celebrations last year!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$4ad6621f$4b228ec2@723523a5eccd3769>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Looking for the REAL 14th Doctor, or New 1st Docgtor or whoever
he might be!
It might officially termed "Season One" but nobody is claiming
Ncuti Gatwa is the new 1st Doctor. At least, I don't think so!
As I said whoever he might be!
Well RTD says Ncuti is the 15th Doctor but that won't be good enough
for you will it? You'll still persist with your childish 'REal' this
and that nonsense no matter what his official designation is.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s
taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
So what are you most looking forward to on Monday's episode of Aggy?
Ncuti strutting his stuff? The hot blonde? Or the baby eating Goblins?
Of course, you'll probably consider Goblin inclusivity "woke garbage"
and refuse to sing along to the song... but it wouldn't be an episode
of Doctor Who without something upsetting your sensibilities.
It sounds like it's going to be a fun episode so I'm really looking
forward to it...
The Last Doctor wrote:
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Harriet Jones?
If not, I give up!!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s
taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
Whereas sleeping right wing insane bigotry and racism must be glorified in
a ranting screed against modern values and stories at every turn.
Honestly if Aggie thinks TV is full of “woke bigotry” that he can’t >tolerate, he should just go and watch GB News and ancient old shows on UK >Gold. 21st century shows just aren’t made for him or people like him - NOT >because of “woke agendas”. But because the right wing bigoted sexist >audience is ageing and tiny. Shows made for people like Aggie wouldn’t sell >these days. The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is down to >the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
So what are you most looking forward to on Monday's episode of Aggy?
Ncuti strutting his stuff? The hot blonde? Or the baby eating Goblins?
Of course, you'll probably consider Goblin inclusivity "woke garbage"
and refuse to sing along to the song... but it wouldn't be an episode
of Doctor Who without something upsetting your sensibilities.
It sounds like it's going to be a fun episode so I'm really looking
forward to it...
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good for him.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It sounds like it's going to be a fun episode so I'm really
looking forward to it...
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good
for him.
A kilt? Oh no... I can see it now... all over YouTube... people are
gonna be saying the Doctor was wearing a skirt!!!
There will be snow too... it's Christmas Day, RTD likes his snow.
It should all be jolly good festive fun anyway, roll on Monday.
:-)
Alas it’s set in the 20th Century, not the 9th, but this Christmas
special features baby-stealing goblins, rather like my own Christmas
Special story “Deck the Halls
Meanwhile, Helena Bonham Carter for the 16th Doctor once Ncuti
finishes his run. I betcha.
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote in >news:ulrm5o$3vko4$1@dont-email.me:
Alas it’s set in the 20th Century, not the 9th, but this Christmas
special features baby-stealing goblins, rather like my own Christmas
Special story “Deck the Halls
It also features a villain from an old sci-fi movie called Weird Science.
https://gifer.com/es/756i
Meanwhile, Helena Bonham Carter for the 16th Doctor once Ncuti
finishes his run. I betcha.
She's much too old now. They want young bloods.
.
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <nnd$4d1b2ea1$6a440be3@bff4b142598f94e5>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Sushi anyone?
Yuk!
Ha! HA!!
There’s nothing wrong with sushi. Until they wrap it in raw fish or incorporate raw seafood into it. Then yes, yuk.
In article <ulu1rl$esik$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Not Naoko Mori, no.
And she’s Japanese.
Sushi anyone?
In article <nnd$2eddeabe$39995638@7138e8443b5ca4c6>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Well RTD says Ncuti is the 15th Doctor but that won't be good enough
for you will it? You'll still persist with your childish 'REal' this
and that nonsense no matter what his official designation is.
1st new Doctor? 14th REal Doctor?
Looks like a 2 Doctor unverse to me with 2 Doctor TARDISes.
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t
think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2
of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
The Doctor wrote:
Looking for the REAL 14th Doctor, or New 1st Docgtor or whoever he
might be!
It might officially termed "Season One" but nobody is claiming Ncuti
Gatwa is the new 1st Doctor.
At least, I don't think so!
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<Snip>
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t
think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2
of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<Snip>
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t
think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2 >>>>> of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
That really is a clue. Honestly. Think about it.
The Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 12:44 am:
In article <ulu1rl$esik$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
<Snip>
Not Naoko Mori, no.
And she’s Japanese.
Sushi anyone?
No thanks. I had it Tuesday night!
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 21/12/23 2:24 am:
The Doctor wrote:
Looking for the REAL 14th Doctor, or New 1st Docgtor or whoever he
might be!
It might officially termed "Season One" but nobody is claiming Ncuti
Gatwa is the new 1st Doctor.
... but, Blueshirt the % typed "New 1st Docgtor" not "new 1st
Doctor"!!
At least, I don't think so!O.K.
--
Daniel
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<Snip>
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t
think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2
of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
--
Daniel
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<Snip>
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t
think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2 >>>>> of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
That really is a clue. Honestly. Think about it.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 9:58 pm:
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:Whoooosh! Straight over my head!
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<Snip>
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t >>>>>> think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2 >>>>>> of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
That really is a clue. Honestly. Think about it.
--
Daniel
In article <um15o2$11ut6$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
That really is a clue. Honestly. Think about it.
We are scouse boy!
In article <um14q5$11qt5$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<Snip>
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t
think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2 >>>>> of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
Gemma Redgrave?
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um15o2$11ut6$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
That really is a clue. Honestly. Think about it.
We are scouse boy!
Who are “ scouse boy”? You and who else make up this “we” who
“are scouse
boy”?
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? NO !! You're joking!!
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 9:58 pm:
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? NO !! You're
joking!! Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How
radical! ;-P
That really is a clue. Honestly. Think about it.
Whoooosh! Straight over my head!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? NO !! You're joking!!
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
It means she appeared on a TV or other screen within the episode.
Trinity Wells?
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s
taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
Whereas sleeping right wing insane bigotry and racism must be glorified in
a ranting screed against modern values and stories at every turn.
Honestly if Aggie thinks TV is full of “woke bigotry” that he can’t
tolerate, he should just go and watch GB News and ancient old shows on UK Gold. 21st century shows just aren’t made for him or people like him - NOT
because of “woke agendas”. But because the right wing bigoted sexist audience is ageing and tiny. Shows made for people like Aggie wouldn’t sell
these days. The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is down to the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
So what are you most looking forward to on Monday's episode of Aggy?
Ncuti strutting his stuff? The hot blonde? Or the baby eating Goblins?
Of course, you'll probably consider Goblin inclusivity "woke garbage"
and refuse to sing along to the song... but it wouldn't be an episode
of Doctor Who without something upsetting your sensibilities.
It sounds like it's going to be a fun episode so I'm really looking
forward to it...
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good for him.
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It means she appeared on a TV or other screen within the episode.
Trinity Wells?
We have a winner! As portrayed by Lachele Carl - clearly RTD’s
favourite go-to news anchor / magazine show host, she has reprised
her moments of reportage across his tenures of the Whoniverse.
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is
down to the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good
for him.
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<Snip>
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t
think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2
of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
Daniel65 wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? NO !! You're joking!!
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
It means she appeared on a TV or other screen within the episode.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? NO !! You're joking!!
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
It means she appeared on a TV or other screen within the episode.
Trinity Wells?
--
solar penguin
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? NO !! You're joking!!
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
It means she appeared on a TV or other screen within the episode.
Trinity Wells?
We have a winner! As portrayed by Lachele Carl - clearly RTD’s favourite >go-to news anchor / magazine show host, she has reprised her moments of >reportage across his tenures of the Whoniverse.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
The Last Doctor wrote:
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It means she appeared on a TV or other screen within the episode.
Trinity Wells?
We have a winner! As portrayed by Lachele Carl - clearly RTD’s
favourite go-to news anchor / magazine show host, she has reprised
her moments of reportage across his tenures of the Whoniverse.
I would never have got it... even though I knew it was something like
that.
Well done SP <claps>
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s >>>>> taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
Whereas sleeping right wing insane bigotry and racism must be glorified in >> a ranting screed against modern values and stories at every turn.
Racism and bigotry are far left socialist ideologies. You only have to
look at history and literature to prove that. The Democrats, Stalin, >Mussolini and Hitler were all racists with bigoted ideologies that
followed the ideologies of Socialism and Marxism.
The right on the other hand is anti-racist and anti-bigotry by
definition since free market capitalism believes in the free movement of >goods, services, and people, without the imposition of any kind of
national boundaries or restrictions of the right of establishment. The
right believes in the freedom of the individual and meritocracy, whereas
the socialism of the far left which the woke practice believes in
controlling the individual and turning everyone into slaves to serve the >political and social elites who are created through a system of
nepotism, bribery, and favours. Just look at the racists and bigots
currently running Doctor Who giving jobs to their gay friends and race >swapping historical figures and characters to give roles to their gay
friends as well.
Honestly if Aggie thinks TV is full of “woke bigotry” that he can’t
I don't just think, I know.
tolerate, he should just go and watch GB News and ancient old shows on UK
Gold. 21st century shows just aren’t made for him or people like him - NOT
They're not made for anyone except the bigots and self centred >institutionally autistic retards making them. Just look at the way they >write, where every character is turned into them, acting and behaving
like themselves instead of an independent character. These protagonists
are completely unable to tolerate and opposing point of view or enter
into a reasoned and rational debate. All the villains have been turned
into nihilistic psychopaths rather than intelligent adversaries.
Just compare Ming from the Amazon series of Flash Gordon from 2008 who >presents logical justification for his belief in himself as the
beneficent father who is doing good for his people by ensuring their
survival after a catastrophic disaster on Mongo, but has no choice but
to rule as a dictator so as to bring order to society, and his daughter
Aura constantly challenging and arguing with him over his actors and how
he could be better; with RTDs woke construct of the Celestial Toymaker
as a racist nihilistic psychopath that only wants to destroy order and
bring chaos without any kind of justification for it other than to give
him pleasure. RTDs writing is the writing of someone who is autistic, a >racist, a sexist, a homophobe and a bigot who understands nothing, can't >empathise with others, and is incapable of expressing, defending, or >understanding any logical or rational opinions.
Why the hell would anyone want to watch a show where men are constantly >attacked, vilified, and demeaned, and women are uglified and made to
look act and behave like men, and placed in traditional male roles such
as the military, where they wouldn't last 5 seconds in real life, and no
one would accept their authority because of their inability to complete
the same rigorous training regime and protect the lives of their male >colleges. No heterosexual man and no heterosexual woman wants to watch
this woke garbage which is clearly written for and directed at 4th wave >feminist lesbians and effeminate homosexual men. Just look at the
casting of Gatwa.
The overwhelming majority of female viewers want to see strong
attractive men that they can trust to protect them and fancy, and the >overwhelming majority of male viewers want to see attractive nubile
women that they can protect from danger and save peril and make into
their wife. Over 99% of women and men want to see feminine women
behaving as women, and heroic masculine men behaving like men and not
trodden over.
because of “woke agendas”. But because the right wing bigoted sexist
audience is ageing and tiny. Shows made for people like Aggie wouldn’t sell
Your degenerate woke garbage has no audience except in the less than
0.5% of bigoted man hating lesbian feminists, effeminate female
presenting gay men, and transgender bigots.
these days. The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is down to >> the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
So what are you most looking forward to on Monday's episode of Aggy?
Ncuti strutting his stuff? The hot blonde? Or the baby eating Goblins?
Of course, you'll probably consider Goblin inclusivity "woke garbage"
and refuse to sing along to the song... but it wouldn't be an episode
of Doctor Who without something upsetting your sensibilities.
It sounds like it's going to be a fun episode so I'm really looking
forward to it...
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good for him. >>
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is
down to the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as I
can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who thinks
like you.
Now, I have seen some similar comments online, specifically a few
YouTube channels... and believe it or not, one or two of them
actually make you look tame! But these are just reactionary channels
to get likes and subscribers as YouTube is monetised. So the more
extreme the better.
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good
for him.
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
But it's Christmas Aggy! Christmas just wouldn't be Christmas without
some camping it up and double entendre tittilation and edifications
to help us through the day.
He's behind you...
[Ooh er missus]
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who would
we all be?
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It means she appeared on a TV or other screen within the episode.
Trinity Wells?
We have a winner! As portrayed by Lachele Carl - clearly RTD’s
favourite go-to news anchor / magazine show host, she has reprised
her moments of reportage across his tenures of the Whoniverse.
I would never have got it... even though I knew it was something like
that.
Well done SP <claps>
I wouldn’t’ve got it without you explaining the clue. Thanks. :)
--
solar penguin
On 2023-12-21 10:42:15 +0000, Daniel65 said:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <ulu4cf$fdc6$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<Snip>
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!Her first appearance was in “World War Three” though I don’t
think her character was named in that one. She has featured in 10
episodes of Who (most recently in “The Giggle”), 2 of SJA, and 2 >>>>> of Torchwood (in series 3, “Children of Earth”)
Hmm...
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
Someone who appears on a TV screen (for example) within the episode's story.
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s >>>>> taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
Whereas sleeping right wing insane bigotry and racism must be
glorified in
a ranting screed against modern values and stories at every turn.
Racism and bigotry are far left socialist ideologies. You only have to
look at history and literature to prove that. The Democrats, Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler were all racists with bigoted ideologies that
followed the ideologies of Socialism and Marxism.
The right on the other hand is anti-racist and anti-bigotry by
definition since free market capitalism believes in the free movement of goods, services, and people, without the imposition of any kind of
national boundaries or restrictions of the right of establishment. The
right believes in the freedom of the individual and meritocracy, whereas
the socialism of the far left which the woke practice believes in
controlling the individual and turning everyone into slaves to serve the political and social elites who are created through a system of
nepotism, bribery, and favours. Just look at the racists and bigots
currently running Doctor Who giving jobs to their gay friends and race swapping historical figures and characters to give roles to their gay
friends as well.
Idlehands wrote:
On 2023-12-21 10:34 a.m., The True Doctor wrote:🌞 killfile
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all it’s >>>>>>> taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
Whereas sleeping right wing insane bigotry and racism must be
glorified in
a ranting screed against modern values and stories at every turn.
Racism and bigotry are far left socialist ideologies. You only have to
look at history and literature to prove that. The Democrats, Stalin,
Mussolini and Hitler were all racists with bigoted ideologies that
followed the ideologies of Socialism and Marxism.
Just when I think you will never post anything dumber you post this.
Does your well of stupidity have a bottom?
The right on the other hand is anti-racist and anti-bigotry by
definition since free market capitalism believes in the free movement
of goods, services, and people, without the imposition of any kind of
national boundaries or restrictions of the right of establishment. The
right believes in the freedom of the individual and meritocracy,
whereas the socialism of the far left which the woke practice believes
in controlling the individual and turning everyone into slaves to
serve the political and social elites who are created through a system
of nepotism, bribery, and favours. Just look at the racists and bigots
currently running Doctor Who giving jobs to their gay friends and race
swapping historical figures and characters to give roles to their gay
friends as well.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....what a load of garden fertilizer.
<CHOP BECAUSE LIFE IS TOO DAMN SHORT>
In article <um13bo$11e7i$5@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 11:56 am:
In article <nnd$2eddeabe$39995638@7138e8443b5ca4c6>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
"universe"??Well RTD says Ncuti is the 15th Doctor but that won't be good enough
for you will it? You'll still persist with your childish 'REal' this
and that nonsense no matter what his official designation is.
1st new Doctor? 14th REal Doctor?
Looks like a 2 Doctor universe to me with 2 Doctor TARDISes.
Yes?
In article <um12p3$11e7i$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 12:44 am:
In article <ulu1rl$esik$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
<Snip>
Not Naoko Mori, no.
And she’s Japanese.
Sushi anyone?
No thanks. I had it Tuesday night!
--
Daniel
Why not every night?
In article <um1302$11e7i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 3:30 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:'wrap it in raw fish'?? YOU have weird sushi!!
In article <nnd$4d1b2ea1$6a440be3@bff4b142598f94e5>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Sushi anyone?
Yuk!
Ha! HA!!
There’s nothing wrong with sushi. Until they wrap it in raw fish or >>> incorporate raw seafood into it. Then yes, yuk.
'raw fish' ... YUCK!!
Gotta have seafood in it!!
Salmon, Tuna, Cod ...
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all
it’s taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
Whereas sleeping right wing insane bigotry and racism must be
glorified in a ranting screed against modern values and stories at
every turn.
Racism and bigotry are far left socialist ideologies. You only have
to look at history and literature to prove that. The Democrats,
Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler were all racists with bigoted ideologies
that followed the ideologies of Socialism and Marxism.
The right on the other hand is anti-racist and anti-bigotry by
definition since free market capitalism believes in the free movement
of goods, services, and people, without the imposition of any kind of national boundaries or restrictions of the right of establishment.
In article <nnd$05c2d61e$35566876@0def724d200e16c4>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is
down to the free market. Not “woke bigotryâ€.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as I
can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who thinks
like you.
Now, I have seen some similar comments online, specifically a few
YouTube channels... and believe it or not, one or two of them
actually make you look tame! But these are just reactionary channels
to get likes and subscribers as YouTube is monetised. So the more
extreme the better.
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good >>>> for him.
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
But it's Christmas Aggy! Christmas just wouldn't be Christmas without
some camping it up and double entendre tittilation and edifications
to help us through the day.
He's behind you...
[Ooh er missus]
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who would
we all be?
Merry Christmas.
In article <lNqcnUUgirANcRn4nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% ð <ð pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....what a load of garden fertilizer.🌞 killfile
<CHOP BECAUSE LIFE IS TOO DAMN SHORT>
Go % !!
Daniel65 wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 9:58 pm:
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:Whoooosh! Straight over my head!
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? NO !! You're
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
joking!! Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How
radical! ;-P
That really is a clue. Honestly. Think about it.
Best to concentrate on catching up on all those unread RADW
messages... I suspect it's gonna be one of those face palm answers!
:-)
Most of those "unread RADW messages" are Original posts to threads
by ME. For some reason, after having read them, I re-mark them as
"Unread", so If anyone makes as reply in "my" thread, I see it ....
as though I don't see any responce posts made in threads initiated
by someone else!!
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is
down to the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as I
can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who thinks
like you.
Now, I have seen some similar comments online, specifically a few
YouTube channels... and believe it or not, one or two of them
actually make you look tame! But these are just reactionary channels
to get likes and subscribers as YouTube is monetised. So the more
extreme the better.
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good
for him.
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
But it's Christmas Aggy! Christmas just wouldn't be Christmas without
some camping it up and double entendre tittilation and edifications
to help us through the day.
He's behind you...
[Ooh er missus]
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who would
we all be?
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 11:04 am:
In article <nnd$05c2d61e$35566876@0def724d200e16c4>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Merry Christmas.
Ah!! So YOU, asswipe, fancy yourself as a girl, do YOU, asswipe??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of pantomime
horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime horse poo, so
without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low on cast options
I’m afraid.
The % answered:
In article <um2ak0$17lm3$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-21 10:42:15 +0000, Daniel65 said:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 1:03 am:
"Her on screen appearances were on screen."?? *NO* !! You're joking!!
One final clue. Her on screen appearances were on screen.
Her on screen appearances were on screen!! How radical! ;-P
Someone who appears on a TV screen (for example) within the episode's story.
Trinity Wells.
I said it first!
--
solar penguin
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of pantomime
horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime horse poo, so
without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low on cast options
I’m afraid.
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil
Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny Scrumptious,
CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the Fairy Godmother...
and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 12:28 am:
In article <um1302$11e7i$3@dont-email.me>,No, %, they ARE FISH, not seafood (prawns, oysters, scallops, etc).
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 3:30 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:'wrap it in raw fish'?? YOU have weird sushi!!
In article <nnd$4d1b2ea1$6a440be3@bff4b142598f94e5>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Sushi anyone?
Yuk!
Ha! HA!!
There’s nothing wrong with sushi. Until they wrap it in raw fish or >>>> incorporate raw seafood into it. Then yes, yuk.
'raw fish' ... YUCK!!
Gotta have seafood in it!!
Salmon, Tuna, Cod ...
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 12:28 am:
In article <um13bo$11e7i$5@dont-email.me>,Do YOU, %, forget that YOUR f*k-ups are "out there" forever,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 11:56 am:
In article <nnd$2eddeabe$39995638@7138e8443b5ca4c6>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
"universe"??Well RTD says Ncuti is the 15th Doctor but that won't be good enough >>>>> for you will it? You'll still persist with your childish 'REal' this >>>>> and that nonsense no matter what his official designation is.
1st new Doctor? 14th REal Doctor?
Looks like a 2 Doctor universe to me with 2 Doctor TARDISes.
Yes?
%!!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 4:34 am:
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 06:42, The Last Doctor wrote:
No, I rather suspect it depends only on an episode (or even
charity minisode) of Doctor Who being broadcast. That’s all
it’s taken for the last six years.
It has always depended on the content. Woke bigotry cannot be
tolerated or excused.
Whereas sleeping right wing insane bigotry and racism must be
glorified in a ranting screed against modern values and stories at
every turn.
Racism and bigotry are far left socialist ideologies. You only have
to look at history and literature to prove that. The Democrats,
Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler were all racists with bigoted ideologies
that followed the ideologies of Socialism and Marxism.
Gee Whiz!! Didn't the (Socialism and Marxism) Russians cause (Nazi)
Hitler a bit of a problem for a few years back in the 40's??
The right on the other hand is anti-racist and anti-bigotry by
definition since free market capitalism believes in the free movement
of goods, services, and people, without the imposition of any kind of
national boundaries or restrictions of the right of establishment.
And wouldn't that, therefore, include U.S. of A. and U.K. as being on
the Right, so "anti-racist and anti-bigotry by definition"??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 11:04 am:
In article <nnd$05c2d61e$35566876@0def724d200e16c4>,Ah!! So YOU, %, fancy yourself as a girl, do YOU, %??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is
down to the free market. Not “woke bigotryâ€.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as I
can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who thinks
like you.
Now, I have seen some similar comments online, specifically a few
YouTube channels... and believe it or not, one or two of them
actually make you look tame! But these are just reactionary channels
to get likes and subscribers as YouTube is monetised. So the more
extreme the better.
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good >>>>> for him.
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
But it's Christmas Aggy! Christmas just wouldn't be Christmas without
some camping it up and double entendre tittilation and edifications
to help us through the day.
He's behind you...
[Ooh er missus]
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who would
we all be?
Merry Christmas.
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 4:00 pm:
In article <lNqcnUUgirANcRn4nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% ð <ð pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
.... but .... but .... using a "killfile" will break the Internet,BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....what a load of garden fertilizer.🌞 killfile
<CHOP BECAUSE LIFE IS TOO DAMN SHORT>
Go % !!
wouldn't it, %??
--
Daniel
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is
down to the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as I
can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who thinks
like you.
Now, I have seen some similar comments online, specifically a few
YouTube channels... and believe it or not, one or two of them
actually make you look tame! But these are just reactionary channels
to get likes and subscribers as YouTube is monetised. So the more
extreme the better.
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good
for him.
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
But it's Christmas Aggy! Christmas just wouldn't be Christmas without
some camping it up and double entendre tittilation and edifications
to help us through the day.
He's behind you...
[Ooh er missus]
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who would
we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of pantomime horses >with no front half, and a pile of pantomime horse poo, so without any roles >for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low on cast options I’m afraid.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
Daniel65 wrote:
Most of those "unread RADW messages" are Original posts to threads
by ME. For some reason, after having read them, I re-mark them as
"Unread", so If anyone makes as reply in "my" thread, I see it ....
as though I don't see any responce posts made in threads initiated
by someone else!!
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
When I'm busy or working and there's heavy traffic here, Yours,
Mike's and, strangely enough, Agamemnon's posts are the ones I read
first... I skip over everything else and return to them later. I know
there will be some actual content to read that way!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of pantomime
horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime horse poo, so
without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low on cast options
I’m afraid.
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil
Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny Scrumptious,
CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the Fairy Godmother...
and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
Bah, I’m Baron Hardup if anyone. Or Dick Whittington’s cat. Or preferably, >Statler and Waldorf, heckling from a Box …
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
In article <um435p$1j31n$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of pantomime
horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime horse poo, so
without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low on cast options
I’m afraid.
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil
Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny Scrumptious,
CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the Fairy Godmother...
and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
Bah, I’m Baron Hardup if anyone. Or Dick Whittington’s cat. Or preferably,
Statler and Waldorf, heckling from a Box …
Scouse on!
In article <nnd$03874a54$3ed35741@3488570c01038f6b>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny
Scrumptious, CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the
Fairy Godmother... and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
Are you certain your Irish Whiskey is not at least 150 proof ?
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 4:00 pm:
In article <lNqcnUUgirANcRn4nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% ð <ð pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
killfile
Go % !!.... but .... but .... using a "killfile" will break the Internet,
wouldn't it, asswipe??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of
pantomime horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime
horse poo, so without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low
on cast options I’m afraid.
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny
Scrumptious, CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the
Fairy Godmother... and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
Bah, I’m Baron Hardup if anyone.
In article <nnd$0e58ec2e$4eef1244@05b687247fcbdced>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
When I'm busy or working and there's heavy traffic here, Yours,
Mike's and, strangely enough, Agamemnon's posts are the ones I
read first... I skip over everything else and return to them
later. I know there will be some actual content to read that way!
You love a good fight!
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um435p$1j31n$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of pantomime >>>>> horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime horse poo, so
without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low on cast options >>>>> I’m afraid.
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil
Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny Scrumptious,
CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the Fairy Godmother...
and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
Bah, I’m Baron Hardup if anyone. Or Dick Whittington’s cat. Or >preferably,
Statler and Waldorf, heckling from a Box …
Scouse on!
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor do I >wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are about to >explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
Daniel65 wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 4:00 pm:
In article <lNqcnUUgirANcRn4nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>,.... but .... but .... using a "killfile" will break the Internet,
% ð <ð pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
killfile
Go % !!
wouldn't it, %??
Funnily enough, when I dropped my Google Groups filter and used a
killfile on the specific Google posters I wanted to block instead,
just a few months later Google announced their were severing their
Google Groups link to Usenet... and now look what's happened!
So maybe Dave was right after all?! ;-)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$0e58ec2e$4eef1244@05b687247fcbdced>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
When I'm busy or working and there's heavy traffic here, Yours,
Mike's and, strangely enough, Agamemnon's posts are the ones I
read first... I skip over everything else and return to them
later. I know there will be some actual content to read that way!
You love a good fight!
I'm Irish, what do you think!? ;-)
But a frank exchange of opinions is perfectly fine... you should try
it sometime!
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor do I wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are about to explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
I’m not from Merseyside nor do I wear shell suits and
tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are
about to explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
The Last Doctor wrote:
I’m not from Merseyside nor do I wear shell suits and
tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are
about to explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
Yeah I know, great ain't it... and there's more to come on Monday!
It's entertainment Jim, but not as we know it.
On 12/22/2023 08:22, The Last Doctor wrote:
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor do I
wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are about to
explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
Indeed. After all these years, I would have thought he would have had a >stroke a long time ago (having had one myself...they aren't
pleasant...even a mild one).
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <nnd$1d9c700c$7e6c2914@16126dfc54df86c1>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Are you certain your Irish Whiskey is not at least 150 proof ?
It was either an Ugly Sister or Widow Twanky <shrugs>
This year we're doing Cinderella though so yourself and Tim were shoo-ins...
Definitely a high proof whiskey!
In article <nnd$137bd6ad$6c0dd811@eddd7d80315e2d9c>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
.... but .... but .... using a "killfile" will break the
Internet, wouldn't it, asswipe??
Funnily enough, when I dropped my Google Groups filter and used a
killfile on the specific Google posters I wanted to block instead,
just a few months later Google announced their were severing their
Google Groups link to Usenet... and now look what's happened!
So maybe Dave was right after all?! ;-)
Killfiles are useless! News server level filtering OTOH ...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is
down to the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as I
can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who thinks
like you.
Now, I have seen some similar comments online, specifically a few
YouTube channels... and believe it or not, one or two of them
actually make you look tame! But these are just reactionary channels
to get likes and subscribers as YouTube is monetised. So the more
extreme the better.
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good
for him.
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
But it's Christmas Aggy! Christmas just wouldn't be Christmas without
some camping it up and double entendre tittilation and edifications
to help us through the day.
He's behind you...
[Ooh er missus]
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who would
we all be?
On 21/12/2023 19:45, Blueshirt wrote:
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as
I can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who
thinks like you.
I have the results of the UK Census of 2021 which back me up
statistically. Over 99% of the population are either male or
heterosexual.
These anti-woke channels have subscribers numbering up to one and
two million and live streams with close to 20,000 viewers. That's
more than the official YouTube Doctor Who channel has.
The majority have had enough of the vile Marxist-Fascist ideology
of woekry, its totalitarian attempts at thought control, its agenda
of gender and identity politics, and its attempts to sexually groom
them and their children.
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil
wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots.
You can be Snow White
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$137bd6ad$6c0dd811@eddd7d80315e2d9c>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
.... but .... but .... using a "killfile" will break the
Internet, wouldn't it, asswipe??
Funnily enough, when I dropped my Google Groups filter and used a
killfile on the specific Google posters I wanted to block instead,
just a few months later Google announced their were severing their
Google Groups link to Usenet... and now look what's happened!
So maybe Dave was right after all?! ;-)
Killfiles are useless! News server level filtering OTOH ...
My Bozo Bin blocked you perfectly well for the five or six weeks you
were in mine... October was a great month. I'll surely do it again
the way you carry on...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/12/2023 19:45, Blueshirt wrote:
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as
I can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who
thinks like you.
I have the results of the UK Census of 2021 which back me up
statistically. Over 99% of the population are either male or
heterosexual.
Clearly statistics are not your strong point...
But regardless of who you think you represent - beyond yourself - I
can guarantee that you do not speak for 99% of the UK population.
These anti-woke channels have subscribers numbering up to one and
two million and live streams with close to 20,000 viewers. That's
more than the official YouTube Doctor Who channel has.
And some of them make you look calm and logical. It doesn't mean they
are all right though. YouTube, like here, is all about opinions.
The majority have had enough of the vile Marxist-Fascist ideology
of woekry, its totalitarian attempts at thought control, its agenda
of gender and identity politics, and its attempts to sexually groom
them and their children.
Yes, so why can't your YouTube channel get those sort of figures then?
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil
wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots.
You can be Snow White
But I AM white, so that's not gonna do in 2023 now is it? Maybe I'll
play her as a lesbian attracted to under age one-legged female dwarfs?
Heigh-Ho,
Heigh-Ho
...
On 21/12/2023 19:45, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/12/2023 20:21, The Last Doctor wrote:
The fact that TV isn’t made for his tiny minority is
down to the free market. Not “woke bigotry”.
I represent a majority of over 99% of the population. You and the
bigoted woke retards you support are but a tiny minority.
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as I
can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who thinks
like you.
I have the results of the UK Census of 2021 which back me up
statistically. Over 99% of the population are either male or
heterosexual. TV and movies are not being made for them any more. Based
on their content and how they are written and who they're written by
they're only being made for far-left lesbian-feminist activists who
suffer from autism and are incapable of understanding literature,
fiction, comedy or humour, and to sexually groom children.
Now, I have seen some similar comments online, specifically a few
YouTube channels... and believe it or not, one or two of them
actually make you look tame! But these are just reactionary channels
to get likes and subscribers as YouTube is monetised. So the more
extreme the better.
These anti-woke channels have subscribers numbering up to one and two
million and live streams with close to 20,000 viewers. That's more than
the official YouTube Doctor Who channel has.
The majority have had enough of the vile Marxist-Fascist ideology of
woekry, its totalitarian attempts at thought control, its agenda of
gender and identity politics, and its attempts to sexually groom them
and their children.
It’ll be silly fluff, with Ncuti joyfully dancing in a kilt. Good
for him.
So Doctor Who is back to being a pantomime.
But it's Christmas Aggy! Christmas just wouldn't be Christmas without
some camping it up and double entendre tittilation and edifications
to help us through the day.
The show is supposed to be Doctor Who, not Carry On Doctor.
He's behind you...
[Ooh er missus]
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who would
we all be?
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil wizard
from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You can be Snow White.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 12:28 am:
In article <um1302$11e7i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 3:30 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <nnd$4d1b2ea1$6a440be3@bff4b142598f94e5>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Sushi anyone?
Yuk!
Ha! HA!!
There’s nothing wrong with sushi. Until they wrap it in raw fish or >>>> incorporate raw seafood into it. Then yes, yuk.
'wrap it in raw fish'?? YOU have weird sushi!!
'raw fish' ... YUCK!!
Gotta have seafood in it!!
Salmon, Tuna, Cod ...
No, asswipe, they ARE FISH, not seafood (prawns, oysters, scallops, etc).
On 2023-12-22 09:39:53 +0000, Daniel65 said:
The Doctor wrote on 22/12/23 12:28 am:
In article <um1302$11e7i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote on 21/12/23 3:30 am:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <nnd$4d1b2ea1$6a440be3@bff4b142598f94e5>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Sushi anyone?
Yuk!
Ha! HA!!
There’s nothing wrong with sushi. Until they wrap it in raw fish or
incorporate raw seafood into it. Then yes, yuk.
'wrap it in raw fish'?? YOU have weird sushi!!
'raw fish' ... YUCK!!
Gotta have seafood in it!!
Salmon, Tuna, Cod ...
No, asswipe, they ARE FISH, not seafood (prawns, oysters, scallops, etc).
Fish are also seafood.
SEAFOOD:
animals from the sea that can be eaten,
especially fish or sea creatures with shells
Some people restrict it to ocean / saltwater fish, while others
(include the US FDA) include freshwater fish as well.
In article <um462r$1ji4f$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um435p$1j31n$1@dont-email.me>,preferably,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of pantomime >>>>>> horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime horse poo, so
without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low on cast options >>>>>> I’m afraid.
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil
Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny Scrumptious, >>>>> CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the Fairy Godmother...
and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
Bah, I’m Baron Hardup if anyone. Or Dick Whittington’s cat. Or
Statler and Waldorf, heckling from a Box …
Scouse on!
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor do I
wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are about to
explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
Then where are you from?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$137bd6ad$6c0dd811@eddd7d80315e2d9c>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
.... but .... but .... using a "killfile" will break the
Internet, wouldn't it, asswipe??
Funnily enough, when I dropped my Google Groups filter and used a
killfile on the specific Google posters I wanted to block instead,
just a few months later Google announced their were severing their
Google Groups link to Usenet... and now look what's happened!
So maybe Dave was right after all?! ;-)
Killfiles are useless! News server level filtering OTOH ...
My Bozo Bin blocked you perfectly well for the five or six weeks you
were in mine... October was a great month. I'll surely do it again
the way you carry on...
On 2023-12-22 8:08 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$137bd6ad$6c0dd811@eddd7d80315e2d9c>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
.... but .... but .... using a "killfile" will break the
Internet, wouldn't it, asswipe??
Funnily enough, when I dropped my Google Groups filter and used a
killfile on the specific Google posters I wanted to block instead,
just a few months later Google announced their were severing their
Google Groups link to Usenet... and now look what's happened!
So maybe Dave was right after all?! ;-)
Killfiles are useless! News server level filtering OTOH ...
My Bozo Bin blocked you perfectly well for the five or six weeks you
were in mine... October was a great month. I'll surely do it again
the way you carry on...
The asswipe continues to reside in my RADW kill file, it's been quite pleasant not dealing with his trash.
He doesn't understand how to create a kill file hence his disdain, he
also cannot figure how how use a server level filter to remove spam but
keep genuine posters. Ray Banana has it down to a science and his
service is free.
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um462r$1ji4f$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um435p$1j31n$1@dont-email.me>,preferably,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who >>>>>>>> would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of pantomime >>>>>>> horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime horse poo, so >>>>>>> without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low on cast options >>>>>>> I’m afraid.
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil
Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny Scrumptious, >>>>>> CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the Fairy Godmother... >>>>>> and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
Bah, I’m Baron Hardup if anyone. Or Dick Whittington’s cat. Or
Statler and Waldorf, heckling from a Box …
Scouse on!
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor do I >>> wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are about to >>> explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
Then where are you from?
Originally Derbyshire. University and early working years in London. A few >years in Nottinghamshire. A few years in Northamptonshire. Fifteen years in >Cheshire. Then the last decade or so around Peterborough - the northernmost >part of Cambridgeshire.
Essentially I’m generically English. Though my mother is Irish and I >obtained my Irish passport a few years ago so that I can hold on to my EU >citizenship. Brexit was not my favourite eventuality.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
Idlehands wrote:
On 2023-12-22 8:08 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:you have him killfiled but you answer every post he makes ,
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$137bd6ad$6c0dd811@eddd7d80315e2d9c>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
.... but .... but .... using a "killfile" will break the
Internet, wouldn't it, asswipe??
Funnily enough, when I dropped my Google Groups filter and used a
killfile on the specific Google posters I wanted to block instead,
just a few months later Google announced their were severing their
Google Groups link to Usenet... and now look what's happened!
So maybe Dave was right after all?! ;-)
Killfiles are useless! News server level filtering OTOH ...
My Bozo Bin blocked you perfectly well for the five or six weeks you
were in mine... October was a great month. I'll surely do it again
the way you carry on...
The asswipe continues to reside in my RADW kill file, it's been quite
pleasant not dealing with his trash.
He doesn't understand how to create a kill file hence his disdain, he
also cannot figure how how use a server level filter to remove spam but
keep genuine posters. Ray Banana has it down to a science and his
service is free.
and you don't create a killfile your newsreader has one or it doesn't , >you're such a weenie
In article <um55r2$1ohdq$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um462r$1ji4f$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
Scouse on!
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor do I >>>> wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are about to >>>> explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
Then where are you from?
Originally Derbyshire. University and early working years in London. A few >> years in Nottinghamshire. A few years in Northamptonshire. Fifteen years in >> Cheshire. Then the last decade or so around Peterborough - the northernmost >> part of Cambridgeshire.
Essentially I’m generically English. Though my mother is Irish and I
obtained my Irish passport a few years ago so that I can hold on to my EU
citizenship. Brexit was not my favourite eventuality.
Derby boy then! Ramming it?
On 12/22/2023 08:22, The Last Doctor wrote:
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor
do I wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are
about to explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
Indeed. After all these years, I would have thought he would have
had a stroke a long time ago (having had one myself...they aren't pleasant...even a mild one).
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That's got me thinking, <light bulb> if we had a RADW Panto who
would we all be?
Can’t think of a pantomime that features two back ends of
pantomime horses with no front half, and a pile of pantomime
horse poo, so without any roles for Dave, Tim or Aggie we’re low
on cast options I’m afraid.
I've cast Dave and Tim as the Ugly Sisters. Agamemnon is the Evil
Stepmother, Solar Penguin is Dandini, Idlehands is Nanny
Scrumptious, CCK is Buttons and % is Cinderella. I'll be the
Fairy Godmother... and you can be Prince Charming...
Oh yes you are!
Bah, I’m Baron Hardup if anyone.
Hardup? Ooh er missus... that's it Mike, get in to the spirit of it...
As it's silly season...
A pantomime horse walks into a bar. The barman says “would you like a pint?” The horse says, “No, two halves” ! :-)
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil wizard
from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You can be Snow White.
Daniel65 wrote:
Most of those "unread RADW messages" are Original posts to threads
by ME. For some reason, after having read them, I re-mark them as
"Unread", so If anyone makes as reply in "my" thread, I see it ....
as though I don't see any responce posts made in threads initiated
by someone else!!
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
When I'm busy or working and there's heavy traffic here, Yours,
Mike's and, strangely enough, Agamemnon's posts are the ones I read
first... I skip over everything else and return to them later. I know
there will be some actual content to read that way!
Blueshirt wrote on 23/12/23 12:12 am:
Daniel65 wrote:
Most of those "unread RADW messages" are Original posts to
threads by ME. For some reason, after having read them, I
re-mark them as "Unread", so If anyone makes as reply in "my"
thread, I see it .... as though I don't see any responce posts
made in threads initiated by someone else!!
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
When I'm busy or working and there's heavy traffic here, Yours,
Mike's and, strangely enough, Agamemnon's posts are the ones I
read first... I skip over everything else and return to them
later. I know there will be some actual content to read that way!
Well, thank you for including me in such esteemed company ... and
with Aggy!
The True Doctor wrote on 23/12/23 4:04 am:
<Snip>
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain
Hook, Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the
evil wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You can
be Snow White.
Hmm! Does this mean I can go "POOF" ....
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um55r2$1ohdq$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um462r$1ji4f$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
Scouse on!
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor do I >>>>> wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are about to >>>>> explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
Then where are you from?
Originally Derbyshire. University and early working years in London. A few >>> years in Nottinghamshire. A few years in Northamptonshire. Fifteen years in >>> Cheshire. Then the last decade or so around Peterborough - the northernmost >>> part of Cambridgeshire.
Essentially I’m generically English. Though my mother is Irish and I
obtained my Irish passport a few years ago so that I can hold on to my EU >>> citizenship. Brexit was not my favourite eventuality.
Derby boy then! Ramming it?
I don’t even own a cannon, let alone a rammer.
Some people don’t give a damn about football Dave. I have always been one >of those people.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
Hornplayer9599 wrote on 23/12/23 2:06 am:
On 12/22/2023 08:22, The Last Doctor wrote:I had a 'mild' stroke, 27 years ago, but compared to the 'mild' stroke
Why do you refer to me as Scouse Dave? I’m not from Merseyside nor
do I wear shell suits and tell everyone to “calm down!”
Though Aggie really needs to. His posts read like his veins are
about to explode, spurting green vitriol around the room.
Indeed. After all these years, I would have thought he would have
had a stroke a long time ago (having had one myself...they aren't
pleasant...even a mild one).
one of my Brothers-in-law had three years ago, mine must have been 'very >mild' or even 'very, very, mild'!!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 23/12/23 4:04 am:
<Snip>
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil wizard
from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You can be Snow White.
Hmm! Does this mean I can go "POOF" .... and disappear in a puff of smoke?? >--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 23/12/23 12:12 am:
Daniel65 wrote:Well, thank you for including me in such esteemed company ... and with Aggy! >--
Most of those "unread RADW messages" are Original posts to threads
by ME. For some reason, after having read them, I re-mark them as
"Unread", so If anyone makes as reply in "my" thread, I see it ....
as though I don't see any responce posts made in threads initiated
by someone else!!
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
When I'm busy or working and there's heavy traffic here, Yours,
Mike's and, strangely enough, Agamemnon's posts are the ones I read
first... I skip over everything else and return to them later. I know
there will be some actual content to read that way!
Daniel
Daniel65 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 23/12/23 12:12 am:
Daniel65 wrote:Well, thank you for including me in such esteemed company ... and
Most of those "unread RADW messages" are Original posts to
threads by ME. For some reason, after having read them, I
re-mark them as "Unread", so If anyone makes as reply in "my"
thread, I see it .... as though I don't see any responce posts
made in threads initiated by someone else!!
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
When I'm busy or working and there's heavy traffic here, Yours,
Mike's and, strangely enough, Agamemnon's posts are the ones I
read first... I skip over everything else and return to them
later. I know there will be some actual content to read that way!
with Aggy!
There's always something to read with Aggy!!!
Although it is handy to have a cup of tea made too...
Daniel65 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 23/12/23 4:04 am:
<Snip>
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain
Hook, Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the
evil wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You can
be Snow White.
Hmm! Does this mean I can go "POOF" ....
You can go Poof if you want to Daniel... we won't judge you.
It is 2023 after all. :-)
In article <um64bv$203o7$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um55r2$1ohdq$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Essentially I’m generically English. Though my mother is Irish and I >>>> obtained my Irish passport a few years ago so that I can hold on to my EU >>>> citizenship. Brexit was not my favourite eventuality.
Derby boy then! Ramming it?
I don’t even own a cannon, let alone a rammer.
Some people don’t give a damn about football Dave. I have always been one >> of those people.
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um64bv$203o7$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um55r2$1ohdq$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Essentially I’m generically English. Though my mother is Irish and I >>>>> obtained my Irish passport a few years ago so that I can hold on to my EU >>>>> citizenship. Brexit was not my favourite eventuality.
Derby boy then! Ramming it?
I don’t even own a cannon, let alone a rammer.
Some people don’t give a damn about football Dave. I have always been one >>> of those people.
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Wow Dave, you’ve been lying about me being a “Chibnallite” for the last 5
years - and now you’re just talking nonsense. RTD is the current showrunner >of Doctor Who. Chris Chibnall’s last episode was the almost-great Power of >the Doctor, over a year ago.
Why would I want him out of anything?
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
In article <nnd$2db926c9$6a8dbc9f@6a452a020a9408d0>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
Well, thank you for including me in such esteemed company ... and
with Aggy!
There's always something to read with Aggy!!!
Although it is handy to have a cup of tea made too...
Or whiskey in your case!
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
The True Doctor wrote on 23/12/23 4:04 am:
<Snip>
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil wizard
from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You can be Snow White.
Hmm! Does this mean I can go "POOF" .... and disappear in a puff of smoke??
On 23/12/2023 09:22, Daniel65 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 23/12/23 4:04 am:
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain
Hook, Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel
the evil wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You
can be Snow White.
Hmm! Does this mean I can go "POOF" .... and disappear in a puff
of smoke??
Not any more after you gave your ring to Aladdin.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$2db926c9$6a8dbc9f@6a452a020a9408d0>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
Well, thank you for including me in such esteemed company ... and
with Aggy!
There's always something to read with Aggy!!!
Although it is handy to have a cup of tea made too...
Or whiskey in your case!
No Dave, Tea during the day... lots of it...
...then a glass of Whiskey in the evening.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/12/2023 19:45, Blueshirt wrote:
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as
I can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who
thinks like you.
I have the results of the UK Census of 2021 which back me up
statistically. Over 99% of the population are either male or
heterosexual.
Clearly statistics are not your strong point...
But regardless of who you think you represent - beyond yourself - I
can guarantee that you do not speak for 99% of the UK population.
These anti-woke channels have subscribers numbering up to one and
two million and live streams with close to 20,000 viewers. That's
more than the official YouTube Doctor Who channel has.
And some of them make you look calm and logical. It doesn't mean they
are all right though. YouTube, like here, is all about opinions.
The majority have had enough of the vile Marxist-Fascist ideology
of woekry, its totalitarian attempts at thought control, its agenda
of gender and identity politics, and its attempts to sexually groom
them and their children.
Yes, so why can't your YouTube channel get those sort of figures then?
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil
wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots.
You can be Snow White
But I AM white, so that's not gonna do in 2023 now is it? Maybe I'll
play her as a lesbian attracted to under age one-legged female dwarfs?
Heigh-Ho,
Heigh-Ho
...
I am an expert on statistics.
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
You are the one who is not calm and logical.
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
The Doctor wrote:
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Out from where? Have you been asleep for the past year, Chibnall is
out. As in, he's gone. Stop being an idiot.
On 23/12/2023 09:22, Daniel65 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 23/12/23 4:04 am:
<Snip>
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil wizard
from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You can be Snow White.
Hmm! Does this mean I can go "POOF" .... and disappear in a puff of smoke??
Not any more after you gave your ring to Aladdin. On the other hand RTD
would be ready, willing, and able to make you go poof in a split second.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$2db926c9$6a8dbc9f@6a452a020a9408d0>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
Well, thank you for including me in such esteemed company ... and
with Aggy!
There's always something to read with Aggy!!!
Although it is handy to have a cup of tea made too...
Or whiskey in your case!
No Dave, Tea during the day... lots of it...
...then a glass of Whiskey in the evening.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 09:22, Daniel65 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 23/12/23 4:04 am:
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain
Hook, Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel
the evil wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You
can be Snow White.
Hmm! Does this mean I can go "POOF" .... and disappear in a puff
of smoke??
Not any more after you gave your ring to Aladdin.
I see what you did there! <VBG>
Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:oh no , i'm killfiled
In article <nnd$2db926c9$6a8dbc9f@6a452a020a9408d0>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
Well, thank you for including me in such esteemed company ... and
with Aggy!
There's always something to read with Aggy!!!
Although it is handy to have a cup of tea made too...
Or whiskey in your case!
No Dave, Tea during the day... lots of it...
...then a glass of Whiskey in the evening.
On 22/12/2023 20:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/12/2023 19:45, Blueshirt wrote:
I think it'll be very hard for you back that up statistically, as
I can honestly say I have not met one person in real life who
thinks like you.
I have the results of the UK Census of 2021 which back me up
statistically. Over 99% of the population are either male or
heterosexual.
Clearly statistics are not your strong point...
I am an expert on statistics. Read the census. Over 99% of the
population are either male or heterosexual. Only 0.75% at most are
lesbians which is who this woke garbage is aimed at.
But regardless of who you think you represent - beyond yourself - I
can guarantee that you do not speak for 99% of the UK population.
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority. They've
had enough of this woke garbage produced by people who are autistic and
think the Bechdel test was serious because being autistic they don't >understand humour. Even its creator said it was joke.
These anti-woke channels have subscribers numbering up to one and
two million and live streams with close to 20,000 viewers. That's
more than the official YouTube Doctor Who channel has.
And some of them make you look calm and logical. It doesn't mean they
are all right though. YouTube, like here, is all about opinions.
You are the one who is not calm and logical.
The majority have had enough of the vile Marxist-Fascist ideology
of woekry, its totalitarian attempts at thought control, its agenda
of gender and identity politics, and its attempts to sexually groom
them and their children.
Yes, so why can't your YouTube channel get those sort of figures then?
Because no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were totally >destroyed by wokery.
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain Hook,
Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the evil
wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots.
You can be Snow White
But I AM white, so that's not gonna do in 2023 now is it? Maybe I'll
That wokery for you. It's autistic. Mirror, mirror on the wall,
who is the fairest of them all. Not Snow White played by Rachel Zegler.
Cast olive skinned actresses in the lead roles and then tell them
they're not white enough. racist retards.
play her as a lesbian attracted to under age one-legged female dwarfs?
Heigh-Ho,
Heigh-Ho
...
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving.
You are the one who is not calm and logical.
Oh, right back at me. I'm so hurt... <rolls eyes>
I'm not the man that can't even talk about "wokery" without getting
excited and frothing at the mouth.
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
But if the YouTube channels discussing Doctor Who can get subscribers
in more than double digits, why can't yours? Everyone is against
"wokery" after all [you say] and you can't even get ten subscribers
for your "truth".
In article <um6tjs$241do$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Wow Dave, you’ve been lying about me being a “Chibnalliteâ€
for the last 5 years - and now you’re just talking nonsense. RTD
is the current showrunner of Doctor Who. Chris Chibnall’s last
episode was the almost-great Power of the Doctor, over a year ago.
Why would I want him out of anything?
Great? I was a flop like the whole Timeless Child ERa!
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving.
Daniel65 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 23/12/23 4:04 am:
<Snip>
Mike M will be Squealer just as he is now, Idlehands; Captain
Hook, Solar Penguin the witch from Hansel and Gretel, Daniel the
evil wizard from Aladdin, and I will be Puss In Boots. You can
be Snow White.
Hmm! Does this mean I can go "POOF" ....
You can go Poof if you want to Daniel... we won't judge you.
It is 2023 after all. :-)
Daniel65 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 23/12/23 12:12 am:
Daniel65 wrote:Well, thank you for including me in such esteemed company ... and
Most of those "unread RADW messages" are Original posts to
threads by ME. For some reason, after having read them, I
re-mark them as "Unread", so If anyone makes as reply in "my"
thread, I see it .... as though I don't see any responce posts
made in threads initiated by someone else!!
But I am, slowly, catching up on the other initial thread posts,
mainly made by Aggy and Mike.
When I'm busy or working and there's heavy traffic here, Yours,
Mike's and, strangely enough, Agamemnon's posts are the ones I
read first... I skip over everything else and return to them
later. I know there will be some actual content to read that way!
with Aggy!
There's always something to read with Aggy!!!
Although it is handy to have a cup of tea made too...
In article <nnd$55d99288$041a17b7@766a8ad657c7b144>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Out from where? Have you been asleep for the past year, Chibnall
is out. As in, he's gone. Stop being an idiot.
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
The Doctor wrote on 24/12/23 2:24 am:
In article <um6tjs$241do$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
<Snip>
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Wow Dave, you’ve been lying about me being a “Chibnalliteâ€
for the last 5 years - and now you’re just talking nonsense. RTD
is the current showrunner of Doctor Who. Chris Chibnall’s last
episode was the almost-great Power of the Doctor, over a year ago.
Why would I want him out of anything?
Great? I was a flop like the whole Timeless Child ERa!
Yes, %, we know YOU, %, was/are a flop!!
--
Daniel
Blueshirt wrote on 24/12/23 9:02 am:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving.
Hey, Blueshirt, I reckon The Sun is BLUE ...... and as no one has
disagreed with me, that MUST mean everyone agrees with me that The Sun
*IS* BLUE!!
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as well!
--
Daniel
Or whiskey in your case!
No Dave, Tea during the day... lots of it...
Which brand?
...then a glass of Whiskey in the evening.
Over 150 proof?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$55d99288$041a17b7@766a8ad657c7b144>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Out from where? Have you been asleep for the past year, Chibnall
is out. As in, he's gone. Stop being an idiot.
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
Oh no he didn't!
In article <nnd$1ec18833$1652ad42@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$55d99288$041a17b7@766a8ad657c7b144>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Out from where? Have you been asleep for the past year,
Chibnall is out. As in, he's gone. Stop being an idiot.
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
Oh no he didn't!
The Chibnall/Whittaker ERa is worse than the McCoy Era!
In article <nnd$69bab080$1ba5c50e@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Or whiskey in your case!
No Dave, Tea during the day... lots of it...
Which brand?
Barry's of course. Gold Blend or Master Blend, depending on the
mood
...then a glass of Whiskey in the evening.
Over 150 proof?
No Dave. Be sensible.
You sure act like it!
Blueshirt wrote on 24/12/23 9:02 am:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure
improving.
Hey, Blueshirt, I reckon The Sun is BLUE ...... and as no one has
disagreed with me, that MUST mean everyone agrees with me that The
Sun IS BLUE!!
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as well!
In article <um6tjs$241do$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Wow Dave, you’ve been lying about me being a “Chibnallite” for the last 5
years - and now you’re just talking nonsense. RTD is the current showrunner
of Doctor Who. Chris Chibnall’s last episode was the almost-great Power of >> the Doctor, over a year ago.
Why would I want him out of anything?
Great? I was a flop like the whole Timeless Child ERa!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$69bab080$1ba5c50e@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Or whiskey in your case!
No Dave, Tea during the day... lots of it...
Which brand?
Barry's of course. Gold Blend or Master Blend, depending on the
mood
...then a glass of Whiskey in the evening.
Over 150 proof?
No Dave. Be sensible.
You sure act like it!
I must admit, too much tea makes me a bit merry... I should cut down.
But it is x-mas after all. So, put the kettle on Mrs B...
Daniel65 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 24/12/23 9:02 am:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure
improving.
Hey, Blueshirt, I reckon The Sun is BLUE ...... and as no one has
disagreed with me, that MUST mean everyone agrees with me that The
Sun IS BLUE!!
...and, you represent the majority that thinks the sun is blue and
the people that believe the sun is a bright white is falling. The
scientists are just grooming children to believe the sun is a
different colour to what is actually is.
Blue works for me though! :-)
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as well!
Agamemnon and logic don't really go together in the same sentence...
In article <xn0oays4p2huldu001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as
well!
Agamemnon and logic don't really go together in the same
sentence...
IYIO !
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um6tjs$241do$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
the last 5
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Wow Dave, you’ve been lying about me being a “Chibnallite” for
years - and now you’re just talking nonsense. RTD is the current showrunner
of Doctor Who. Chris Chibnall’s last episode was the almost-great Power of
the Doctor, over a year ago.
Why would I want him out of anything?
Great? I was a flop like the whole Timeless Child ERa!
Yes Dave, you’ve always been a flop.
The Timeless Children was one episode. Hardly an “era”. The arc it started >was a six episode season called “Flux”. I’m happy to agree that the only >episode out of those seven that was up with the best of modern Who is >“Village of the Angels”.
But Chibnall also gave us Rosa, Demons of the Punjab, Resolution, Spyfall, >Nikola Tesla’s Night of Terror, Fugitive of the Judoon, The Haunting of >Villa Deodati and The Power of the Doctor, amongst others, all of which
hold up well against most modern Who.
The Power of the Doctor had much to commend it, it just also had enough >weaknesses to drop it below great. In my opinion.
I’m no great fan of Chibnall but I’m not throwing the baby out with the >bath water.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
In article <nnd$4bd72f28$5935d8b1@374f66af19489340>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$1ec18833$1652ad42@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
Oh no he didn't!
The Chibnall/Whittaker ERa is worse than the McCoy Era!
Oh no it's isn't!
McCoy has more talanet than Chibnall and Whittker combined any day!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$4bd72f28$5935d8b1@374f66af19489340>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$1ec18833$1652ad42@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
Oh no he didn't!
The Chibnall/Whittaker ERa is worse than the McCoy Era!
Oh no it's isn't!
McCoy has more talanet than Chibnall and Whittker combined any day!
Oh no he hasn't!
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving.
You are the one who is not calm and logical.
Oh, right back at me. I'm so hurt... <rolls eyes>
I'm not the man that can't even talk about "wokery" without getting
excited and frothing at the mouth.
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
But if the YouTube channels discussing Doctor Who can get subscribers
in more than double digits, why can't yours? Everyone is against
"wokery" after all [you say] and you can't even get ten subscribers
for your "truth".
Blueshirt wrote on 24/12/23 9:02 am:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving.
Hey, Blueshirt, I reckon The Sun is BLUE ...... and as no one has
disagreed with me, that MUST mean everyone agrees with me that The Sun
*IS* BLUE!!
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as well!
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
But if the YouTube channels discussing Doctor Who can get
subscribers in more than double digits, why can't yours? Everyone
is against "wokery" after all [you say] and you can't even get
ten subscribers for your "truth".
They're not discussing Doctor Who. They're discussing the wokery
that has destroyed the entertainment industry completely. No one
wants to talk about Doctor Who. No school kids will even admit to
watching it because of the shame attached to it now it has been
turned gay.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oays4p2huldu001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as
well!
Agamemnon and logic don't really go together in the same
sentence...
IYIO !
Yes Dave, it is my opinion and it is very informed... unlike your
opinions, which are deformed!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$4bd72f28$5935d8b1@374f66af19489340>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$1ec18833$1652ad42@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
Oh no he didn't!
The Chibnall/Whittaker ERa is worse than the McCoy Era!
Oh no it's isn't!
McCoy has more talent than Chibnall and Whittker combined any day!
Oh no he hasn't!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$4bd72f28$5935d8b1@374f66af19489340>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$1ec18833$1652ad42@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
Oh no he didn't!
The Chibnall/Whittaker ERa is worse than the McCoy Era!
Oh no it's isn't!
McCoy has more talanet than Chibnall and Whittker combined any day!
Oh no he hasn't!
I’d like to join in the pantomime spirit but “oh yes he has! Would just be >a sad lie.
Now I want Dave to bang on about the Timeless Child again so I can shout >“It’s behind us!”
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
Only in your deluded imagination, whereas I have actual qualifications
which is something woke retards don't understand. They don't value >qualifications. They think everything including maths and science is a >popularity contest rather than based on factual evidence and proof.
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving.
According to my doctor my blood pressure is perfectly good.
You are the one who is not calm and logical.
Oh, right back at me. I'm so hurt... <rolls eyes>
I'm not the man that can't even talk about "wokery" without getting
excited and frothing at the mouth.
You are hallucinating your own fantasies.
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same people >watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing that matters is
how many people watch it on the night.
But if the YouTube channels discussing Doctor Who can get subscribers
in more than double digits, why can't yours? Everyone is against
"wokery" after all [you say] and you can't even get ten subscribers
for your "truth".
They're not discussing Doctor Who. They're discussing the wokery that
has destroyed the entertainment industry completely. No one wants to
talk about Doctor Who. No school kids will even admit to watching it
because of the shame attached to it now it has been turned gay.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <um9o9c$2l2sg$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
They're not discussing Doctor Who. They're discussing the wokery
that has destroyed the entertainment industry completely. No one
wants to talk about Doctor Who. No school kids will even admit to
watching it because of the shame attached to it now it has been
turned gay.
Exactly what I tell the Timeless Child facton!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <um9o9c$2l2sg$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
They're not discussing Doctor Who. They're discussing the wokery
that has destroyed the entertainment industry completely. No one
wants to talk about Doctor Who. No school kids will even admit to
watching it because of the shame attached to it now it has been
turned gay.
Exactly what I tell the Timeless Child facton!
There is no Timeless Child faction here Dave... point me to one post
made on RADW that supports the idea of the Timeless Child. Go back
through your NetKnow archive (assuming you have retention) and post a
copy of the it here...
......................
You don't pay attention to anything and just carry on with your
simple minded delusions.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
So, the official seven day figures are not acceptable to you as they
don't fit your agenda? <face palm>
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing, this
is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no longer the
be all and end all in television broadcasting, as online viewing is
now part of the way we live. Whether you like it or not that is how
TV works these days. I didn't make the rules! Ignoring iPlayer
viewings doesn't make any sense. You claim to be clever but your
words let you down...
But, even using the Agamemnon accepted figures and also accepted
English, 4.62 million people still can't be defined as "no one". So
guess what, you're WRONG AGAIN!!!
But if the YouTube channels discussing Doctor Who can get
subscribers in more than double digits, why can't yours? Everyone
is against "wokery" after all [you say] and you can't even get
ten subscribers for your "truth".
They're not discussing Doctor Who. They're discussing the wokery
that has destroyed the entertainment industry completely. No one
wants to talk about Doctor Who. No school kids will even admit to
watching it because of the shame attached to it now it has been
turned gay.
Stop now. The truth is nobody is interested in YOUR agenda... eight >subscribers to your YouTube channel. Eight? WTF? Your viewpoint is
about as popular as haemorrhoids. You post here to about fifteen
people, most of whom disagree with you, and the ONE person that does
agree with you is Dave!!! It was only a week or two ago he was
proclaiming a chick with a dick to be "hot". That's your support
here!!! ROTFLMAO!!!
We look forward to reading more of your ranting and raving tomorrow
night...
Merry X-Mas.
In article <um9iht$2k567$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:I’d like to join in the pantomime spirit but “oh yes he has!” would just be
McCoy has more talanet than Chibnall and Whittker combined any day!
Oh no he hasn't!
a sad lie.
Now I want Dave to bang on about the Timeless Child again so I can shout
“It’s behind us!”
On[c]e retconned, the Timeless Child will full[y] be behind us!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
So, the official seven day figures are not acceptable to you as they
don't fit your agenda? <face palm>
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing, this
is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no longer the
be all and end all in television broadcasting, as online viewing is
now part of the way we live. Whether you like it or not that is how
TV works these days. I didn't make the rules! Ignoring iPlayer
viewings doesn't make any sense. You claim to be clever but your
words let you down...
But if the YouTube channels discussing Doctor Who can get
subscribers in more than double digits, why can't yours? Everyone
is against "wokery" after all [you say] and you can't even get
ten subscribers for your "truth".
They're not discussing Doctor Who. They're discussing the wokery
that has destroyed the entertainment industry completely. No one
wants to talk about Doctor Who. No school kids will even admit to
watching it because of the shame attached to it now it has been
turned gay.
Stop now. The truth is nobody is interested in YOUR agenda... eight subscribers to your YouTube channel. Eight? WTF? Your viewpoint is
about as popular as haemorrhoids. You post here to about fifteen
people, most of whom disagree with you, and the ONE person that does
agree with you is Dave!!! It was only a week or two ago he was
proclaiming a chick with a dick to be "hot". That's your support
here!!! ROTFLMAO!!!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
So, the official seven day figures are not acceptable to you as they
don't fit your agenda? <face palm>
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing, this
is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no longer the
be all and end all in television broadcasting, as online viewing is
now part of the way we live. Whether you like it or not that is how
TV works these days. I didn't make the rules! Ignoring iPlayer
viewings doesn't make any sense. You claim to be clever but your
words let you down...
But, even using the Agamemnon accepted figures and also accepted
English, 4.62 million people still can't be defined as "no one". So
guess what, you're WRONG AGAIN!!!
On 24/12/2023 21:12, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
So, the official seven day figures are not acceptable to you as they
don't fit your agenda? <face palm>
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing, this
is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no longer the
be all and end all in television broadcasting, as online viewing is
now part of the way we live. Whether you like it or not that is how
TV works these days. I didn't make the rules! Ignoring iPlayer
viewings doesn't make any sense. You claim to be clever but your
words let you down...
Once again you fail to understand the issue. People watching the same
thing twice on iPlayer should not be counted as extra viewers. The real >viewing figures are the over nights.
But if the YouTube channels discussing Doctor Who can get
subscribers in more than double digits, why can't yours? Everyone
is against "wokery" after all [you say] and you can't even get
ten subscribers for your "truth".
They're not discussing Doctor Who. They're discussing the wokery
that has destroyed the entertainment industry completely. No one
wants to talk about Doctor Who. No school kids will even admit to
watching it because of the shame attached to it now it has been
turned gay.
Stop now. The truth is nobody is interested in YOUR agenda... eight
subscribers to your YouTube channel. Eight? WTF? Your viewpoint is
about as popular as haemorrhoids. You post here to about fifteen
people, most of whom disagree with you, and the ONE person that does
agree with you is Dave!!! It was only a week or two ago he was
proclaiming a chick with a dick to be "hot". That's your support
here!!! ROTFLMAO!!!
More of your stupid imbecility. 8 subscribers for a channel with less
than 8 videos and which hasn't been updated in months due to Doctor Who
being effectively dead and burred as a franchise is quite good going,
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um9iht$2k567$1@dont-email.me>,would just be
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:I’d like to join in the pantomime spirit but “oh yes he has!”
McCoy has more talanet than Chibnall and Whittker combined any day!
Oh no he hasn't!
a sad lie.
Now I want Dave to bang on about the Timeless Child again so I can shout >>> “It’s behind us!”
On[c]e retconned, the Timeless Child will full[y] be behind us!
(Have some missing letters).
It is behind us Dave. But it is now entwined with the Doctor’s history. >Don’t you remember the “Donna” from outside the Universe pointing out that
the Doctor is not Gallifreyan? Don’t you recall the Toymaker tormenting the >Doctor with “Und then there came the Flux. Oh, Donna Noble, the poor >Doctor. The Flux was killing everything.”
It’s not going to get retconned.
But IT’S BEHIND YOU!!
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <umad9i$2o4q1$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the U.K. >>> to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other shows’
viewership is determined in the same way.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the
facts and the impartial statistics remain.
That the numbers are down!
Numbers.
“The Giggle” was the least watched of the three specials but in absolute >terms even that is higher than any Jodie episode since “Spyfall Part 1”, >higher than all of Capaldi Series 10, higher than all but 3 of Series 9 …
Did you know that in 2006, four episodes in a row of series 2 garnered
fewer viewers than “The Giggle”? That’s 17 years ago, in a very different
TV environment than pertains today.
Audience share over 40% - the last time that happened was 2013.
Appreciation Index up in the mid 80s for all 3 episodes this year.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
In article <umad9i$2o4q1$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the U.K. >> to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other shows’ >> viewership is determined in the same way.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the
facts and the impartial statistics remain.
That the numbers are down!
It’s not going to get retconned.
But IT’S BEHIND YOU!!
More of your stupid imbecility. 8 subscribers for a channel with
less than 8 videos and which hasn't been updated in months due to
Doctor Who being effectively dead and burred as a franchise is
quite good going,
In article <umab73$2nq5l$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
More of your stupid imbecility. 8 subscribers for a channel with
less than 8 videos and which hasn't been updated in months due to
Doctor Who being effectively dead and burred as a franchise is
quite good going,
Unless RTD make the decision to retcon the Timeless Child
from the lore!
In article <umb8j9$2vall$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Numbers.
“The Giggle” was the least watched of the three specials but in absolute terms even that is higher than any Jodie episode since
“Spyfall Part 1”, higher than all of Capaldi Series 10, higher
than all but 3 of Series 9 …
Did you know that in 2006, four episodes in a row of series 2
garnered fewer viewers than “The Giggle”? That’s 17 years ago, in
a very different TV environment than pertains today.
Audience share over 40% - the last time that happened was 2013. Appreciation Index up in the mid 80s for all 3 episodes this
year.
ARe these spun numbers.
On 24/12/2023 21:12, Blueshirt wrote:
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing,
this is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no
longer the be all and end all in television broadcasting, as
online viewing is now part of the way we live. Whether you like
it or not that is how TV works these days. I didn't make the
rules! Ignoring iPlayer viewings doesn't make any sense. You
claim to be clever but your words let you down...
Once again you fail to understand the issue. People watching the
same thing twice on iPlayer should not be counted as extra viewers.
The real viewing figures are the over nights.
In article <nnd$7121fadb$3f6ad199@393240a04931895c>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Exactly what I tell the Timeless Child facton!
There is no Timeless Child faction here Dave... point me to one
post made on RADW that supports the idea of the Timeless Child.
Go back through your NetKnow archive (assuming you have
retention) and post a copy of it here...
......................
You don't pay attention to anything and just carry on with your
simple minded delusions.
Oh? SWilson is definitely one.
Unless RTD make the decision to retcon the Timeless Child
from the lore!
In article <umacbg$2o0mo$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
It’s not going to get retconned.
But IT’S BEHIND YOU!!
Then it is a lingering albatross!!
For someone who claims to understand statistics, Aggie is at best
being disingenuous and at worst just doubling down on his lies.
In article <nnd$1de11684$0813234c@2bfc0eb2d661e935>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$4bd72f28$5935d8b1@374f66af19489340>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$1ec18833$1652ad42@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
Oh no he didn't!
The Chibnall/Whittaker ERa is worse than the McCoy Era!
Oh no it's isn't!
McCoy has more talent than Chibnall and Whittker combined any day!
Oh no he hasn't!
Chibnall is a talentless hack!
Daniel65 wrote:
Hey, Blueshirt, I reckon The Sun is BLUE ...... and as no one has
disagreed with me, that MUST mean everyone agrees with me that The
Sun IS BLUE!!
...and, you represent the majority that thinks the sun is blue and
the people that believe the sun is a bright white is falling. The
scientists are just grooming children to believe the sun is a
different colour to what is actually is.
Blue works for me though! :-)
On 24/12/2023 09:06, Daniel65 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 24/12/23 9:02 am:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving.
Hey, Blueshirt, I reckon The Sun is BLUE ...... and as no one has
disagreed with me, that MUST mean everyone agrees with me that The Sun
*IS* BLUE!!
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as well!
No it isn't logical. It's totally retarded. Science is not a popularity contest. It's about proof. You have not provided any proof for your
claim therefore your claim has no validity as anything more than a
personal opinion and evidence of your stupidity or that you're colour
blind. Proof would be compiling or referring to a spectograph of the
sun's radiation and demonstrating that the majority of the radiation as
it is perceived by the human eye is biased towards the blue end of the spectrum, which it isn't. The sun is a typical mainstream star and
according to NASA is white. It appears yellow in the sky because of the scattering of different frequencies of its light at different angles by
the atmosphere, with lower frequencies being scattered less than higher
ones, which is why the sky appears blue.
Where are your facts, explanations and rationale? Nowhere. The woke are degenerate brainwashed retards and don't believe in facts or proving
what they claim is correct.
In article <um9ce5$2j6hh$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <um6tjs$241do$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
At least you want Chris Chibnall out!
Wow Dave, you’ve been lying about me being a
“Chibnallite†for the last 5 years - and now you’re just
talking nonsense. RTD is the current showrunner of Doctor Who.
Chris Chibnall’s last episode was the almost-great Power of
the Doctor, over a year ago.
Why would I want him out of anything?
Great? I was a flop like the whole Timeless Child ERa!
Yes Dave, you’ve always been a flop.
The Timeless Children was one episode. Hardly an “eraâ€. The
arc it started was a six episode season called “Fluxâ€. I’m
happy to agree that the only episode out of those seven that was up
with the best of modern Who is “Village of the Angelsâ€.
But Chibnall also gave us Rosa, Demons of the Punjab, Resolution,
Spyfall, Nikola Tesla’s Night of Terror, Fugitive of the Judoon,
The Haunting of Villa Deodati and The Power of the Doctor, amongst
others, all of which hold up well against most modern Who.
The Power of the Doctor had much to commend it, it just also had
enough weaknesses to drop it below great. In my opinion.
I’m no great fan of Chibnall but I’m not throwing the baby out >> with the bath water.
The Timeless Child is a wrecking ball to Doctor Who!
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
Only in your deluded imagination, whereas I have actual
qualifications which is something woke retards don't understand. They
don't value qualifications. They think everything including maths and
science is a popularity contest rather than based on factual evidence
and proof.
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <umab73$2nq5l$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
More of your stupid imbecility. 8 subscribers for a channel with
less than 8 videos and which hasn't been updated in months due to
Doctor Who being effectively dead and burred as a franchise is
quite good going,
Unless RTD make the decision to retcon the Timeless Child
from the lore!
Dave, the adults are talking... go to your room and stop being stupid.
There is no Timeless Child retcon coming, not today, not next week,
not ever...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <umb8j9$2vall$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
Numbers.
“The Giggle” was the least watched of the three specials but in
absolute terms even that is higher than any Jodie episode since
“Spyfall Part 1”, higher than all of Capaldi Series 10, higher
than all but 3 of Series 9 …
Did you know that in 2006, four episodes in a row of series 2
garnered fewer viewers than “The Giggle”? That’s 17 years ago, in
a very different TV environment than pertains today.
Audience share over 40% - the last time that happened was 2013.
Appreciation Index up in the mid 80s for all 3 episodes this
year.
ARe these spun numbers.
The only spinning is being done by the naysayers, who want to exclude
iPlayer figures and pretend less people watched Doctor Who as it
suits their own agenda. Because they no longer like the show they
think nobody else does.
The ratings and AI for the three Doctor Who 60th anniversary specials
are quite healthy and it's a plain fact that Doctor Who was one of
the most watched shows on British TV for those weeks.
The True Doctor wrote:
More of your stupid imbecility. 8 subscribers for a channel with
less than 8 videos and which hasn't been updated in months due to
Doctor Who being effectively dead and burred as a franchise is
quite good going,
Well, update it then! There are plenty of Doctor Who bashing videos
on YouTube, why not put some of your own content up. You feel
strongly against wokery, go for it!
I might even subscribe if you made content.
The Last Doctor wrote:
For someone who claims to understand statistics, Aggie is at best
being disingenuous and at worst just doubling down on his lies.
Isn't that what statistics are for though? To be spun to suit the
required agenda?! :-)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$7121fadb$3f6ad199@393240a04931895c>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Exactly what I tell the Timeless Child facton!
There is no Timeless Child faction here Dave... point me to one
post made on RADW that supports the idea of the Timeless Child.
Go back through your NetKnow archive (assuming you have
retention) and post a copy of it here...
......................
You don't pay attention to anything and just carry on with your
simple minded delusions.
Oh? SWilson is definitely one.
That's fine... find a post and paste it here then...
I just can't recall anybody saying the Timeless Child was a great
idea.
The Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 8:25 am:
In article <nnd$1de11684$0813234c@2bfc0eb2d661e935>,Oh, no he isn't!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$4bd72f28$5935d8b1@374f66af19489340>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$1ec18833$1652ad42@07eaa470b08f2bd8>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
During the time he was wrecking Doctor Who, making it into a
pantomime!
Oh no he didn't!
The Chibnall/Whittaker ERa is worse than the McCoy Era!
Oh no it's isn't!
McCoy has more talent than Chibnall and Whittker combined any day!
Oh no he hasn't!
Chibnall is a talentless hack!
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 4:03 am:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
Only in your deluded imagination, whereas I have actual
qualifications which is something woke retards don't understand. They
don't value qualifications. They think everything including maths and
science is a popularity contest rather than based on factual evidence
and proof.
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
Sure you do!! How would YOU know what the silent majority want if they
are silent??
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote:
Unless RTD make the decision to retcon the Timeless Child
from the lore!
Not RTD anyway...
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <umad9i$2o4q1$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the U.K. >>> to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other shows’
viewership is determined in the same way.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the
facts and the impartial statistics remain.
That the numbers are down!
Numbers.
“The Giggle” was the least watched of the three specials but in absolute terms even that is higher than any Jodie episode since “Spyfall Part 1”, higher than all of Capaldi Series 10, higher than all but 3 of Series 9 …
Did you know that in 2006, four episodes in a row of series 2 garnered
fewer viewers than “The Giggle”? That’s 17 years ago, in a very different
TV environment than pertains today.
Audience share over 40% - the last time that happened was 2013.
Appreciation Index up in the mid 80s for all 3 episodes this year.
On 2023-12-25 06:48:09 +0000, The Last Doctor said:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <umad9i$2o4q1$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the U.K.
to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other shows’
viewership is determined in the same way.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the >>>> facts and the impartial statistics remain.
That the numbers are down!
Numbers.
“The Giggle” was the least watched of the three specials but in absolute >> terms even that is higher than any Jodie episode since “Spyfall Part 1”, >> higher than all of Capaldi Series 10, higher than all but 3 of Series 9 … >>
Did you know that in 2006, four episodes in a row of series 2 garnered
fewer viewers than “The Giggle”? That’s 17 years ago, in a very >different
TV environment than pertains today.
Audience share over 40% - the last time that happened was 2013.
Appreciation Index up in the mid 80s for all 3 episodes this year.
Viwership numbers always have to be taken with a mountain of salt, but
since the Disney deal, the numbers will need a whole planet load of
salt. The numbers may include those now watching on Disney+, whereas >previously they rarely included overseas viewers.
Plus, with it being on Disney+, you're likely to get a pile of new
American viewers who previously never seen an episode tuning in just to
see what the fuss has been about, and then most of them quickly
dropping away again.
In article <umcn7l$35bfq$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-25 06:48:09 +0000, The Last Doctor said:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:different
In article <umad9i$2o4q1$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the U.K.
to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other shows’
viewership is determined in the same way.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the >>>>> facts and the impartial statistics remain.
That the numbers are down!
Numbers.
“The Giggle” was the least watched of the three specials but in absolute
terms even that is higher than any Jodie episode since “Spyfall Part 1”,
higher than all of Capaldi Series 10, higher than all but 3 of Series 9 … >>>
Did you know that in 2006, four episodes in a row of series 2 garnered
fewer viewers than “The Giggle”? That’s 17 years ago, in a very
TV environment than pertains today.
Audience share over 40% - the last time that happened was 2013.
Appreciation Index up in the mid 80s for all 3 episodes this year.
Viwership numbers always have to be taken with a mountain of salt, but
since the Disney deal, the numbers will need a whole planet load of
salt. The numbers may include those now watching on Disney+, whereas
previously they rarely included overseas viewers.
Plus, with it being on Disney+, you're likely to get a pile of new
American viewers who previously never seen an episode tuning in just to
see what the fuss has been about, and then most of them quickly
dropping away again.
And those are the facts!
Viwership numbers always have to be taken with a mountain of salt,
but since the Disney deal, the numbers will need a whole planet
load of salt. The numbers may include those now watching on
Disney+, whereas previously they rarely included overseas viewers.
Plus, with it being on Disney+, you're likely to get a pile of new
American viewers who previously never seen an episode tuning in
just to see what the fuss has been about, and then most of them
quickly dropping away again.
The True Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 4:15 am:
Where are your facts, explanations and rationale? Nowhere. The
woke are degenerate brainwashed retards and don't believe in
facts or proving what they claim is correct.
Umm! Aggy, where are YOUR FACTS in support of YOUR claim??
In article <umbqfa$31jcc$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/12/23 6:41 pm:
Dave, the adults are talking... go to your room and stop being
stupid.
I'd accept him just going to his room!! Unfortunately that might
be where his computer is located!! ;-(
And a few other things!
In article <umboli$31b4f$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 8:25 am:
Oh, no he isn't!
Chibnall is a talentless hack!
He did a good job of alienating Who Fans,
something JN-T could never do!
The Doctor wrote:
He did a good job of alienating Who Fans,
something JN-T could never do!
At least Chris Chibnall didn't get Doctor Who taken off the air,
which is something that RTD did do!
Your Name wrote:
Viwership numbers always have to be taken with a mountain of salt,
but since the Disney deal, the numbers will need a whole planet
load of salt. The numbers may include those now watching on
Disney+, whereas previously they rarely included overseas viewers.
No, UK only for the BARB figures.
Plus, with it being on Disney+, you're likely to get a pile of new
American viewers who previously never seen an episode tuning in
just to see what the fuss has been about, and then most of them
quickly dropping away again.
You never know, some might stay on and find Doctor Who enjoyable...
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <umcn7l$35bfq$1@dont-email.me>,the U.K.
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-25 06:48:09 +0000, The Last Doctor said:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <umad9i$2o4q1$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in
other shows’to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the
differentviewership is determined in the same way.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the >>>>>> facts and the impartial statistics remain.
That the numbers are down!
Numbers.
“The Giggle” was the least watched of the three specials but in absolute
terms even that is higher than any Jodie episode since “Spyfall Part 1”,
higher than all of Capaldi Series 10, higher than all but 3 of Series 9 …
Did you know that in 2006, four episodes in a row of series 2 garnered >>>> fewer viewers than “The Giggle”? That’s 17 years ago, in a very
TV environment than pertains today.
Audience share over 40% - the last time that happened was 2013.
Appreciation Index up in the mid 80s for all 3 episodes this year.
Viwership numbers always have to be taken with a mountain of salt, but
since the Disney deal, the numbers will need a whole planet load of
salt. The numbers may include those now watching on Disney+, whereas
previously they rarely included overseas viewers.
Nope, the numbers we are looking at are UK BBC (and IPlayer) only. It’s not >on Disney+ in the UK and BARB doesn’t include foreign viewerships.
Plus, with it being on Disney+, you're likely to get a pile of new
American viewers who previously never seen an episode tuning in just to
see what the fuss has been about, and then most of them quickly
dropping away again.
Possibly - but those aren’t in the numbers we’re talking about.
And those are the facts!
In this case, that is speculation, and not facts about the U.K. only, BBC >only ratings.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
Your Name wrote:
Viwership numbers always have to be taken with a mountain of salt,
but since the Disney deal, the numbers will need a whole planet
load of salt. The numbers may include those now watching on
Disney+, whereas previously they rarely included overseas viewers.
No, UK only for the BARB figures.
Plus, with it being on Disney+, you're likely to get a pile of new
American viewers who previously never seen an episode tuning in
just to see what the fuss has been about, and then most of them
quickly dropping away again.
You never know, some might stay on and find Doctor Who enjoyable...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <umbqfa$31jcc$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 25/12/23 6:41 pm:
Dave, the adults are talking... go to your room and stop being
stupid.
I'd accept him just going to his room!! Unfortunately that might
be where his computer is located!! ;-(
And a few other things!
That's your own business!
On 2023-12-25 22:42:10 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Your Name wrote:
Viwership numbers always have to be taken with a mountain of salt,
but since the Disney deal, the numbers will need a whole planet
load of salt. The numbers may include those now watching on
Disney+, whereas previously they rarely included overseas viewers.
No, UK only for the BARB figures.
I must have missed where it said that.
Even then, viewership numbers are awlays highly inaccurate anyway.
People who record to watch later, people who start watching, but switch
off half-way through, etc. There are numerous problems that polls like
that never take into account.
Plus, with it being on Disney+, you're likely to get a pile of new
American viewers who previously never seen an episode tuning in
just to see what the fuss has been about, and then most of them
quickly dropping away again.
You never know, some might stay on and find Doctor Who enjoyable...
That's why I said "most" and not "all". :-)
The True Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 4:15 am:
On 24/12/2023 09:06, Daniel65 wrote:Umm! Aggy, where are YOUR *FACTS* in support of YOUR claim??
Blueshirt wrote on 24/12/23 9:02 am:
The True Doctor wrote:
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving.
Hey, Blueshirt, I reckon The Sun is BLUE ...... and as no one has
disagreed with me, that MUST mean everyone agrees with me that The
Sun *IS* BLUE!!
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as well!
No it isn't logical. It's totally retarded. Science is not a
popularity contest. It's about proof. You have not provided any proof
for your claim therefore your claim has no validity as anything more
than a personal opinion and evidence of your stupidity or that you're
colour blind. Proof would be compiling or referring to a spectograph
of the sun's radiation and demonstrating that the majority of the
radiation as it is perceived by the human eye is biased towards the
blue end of the spectrum, which it isn't. The sun is a typical
mainstream star and according to NASA is white. It appears yellow in
the sky because of the scattering of different frequencies of its
light at different angles by the atmosphere, with lower frequencies
being scattered less than higher ones, which is why the sky appears blue.
Where are your facts, explanations and rationale? Nowhere. The woke
are degenerate brainwashed retards and don't believe in facts or
proving what they claim is correct.
On 25/12/2023 11:31, Daniel65 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 4:15 am:
On 24/12/2023 09:06, Daniel65 wrote:Umm! Aggy, where are YOUR *FACTS* in support of YOUR claim??
Blueshirt wrote on 24/12/23 9:02 am:
The True Doctor wrote:Hey, Blueshirt, I reckon The Sun is BLUE ...... and as no one has
I am an expert on statistics.
Clearly! (Just as I'm an expert on Quantum mechanics.)
You only speak for yourself. I speak for the silent majority.
If only you were silent. You might find you blood pressure improving. >>>>
disagreed with me, that MUST mean everyone agrees with me that The
Sun *IS* BLUE!!
That's logical, isn't it?? ;-P Maybe that's Aggie's logic as well!
No it isn't logical. It's totally retarded. Science is not a
popularity contest. It's about proof. You have not provided any proof
for your claim therefore your claim has no validity as anything more
than a personal opinion and evidence of your stupidity or that you're
colour blind. Proof would be compiling or referring to a spectograph
of the sun's radiation and demonstrating that the majority of the
radiation as it is perceived by the human eye is biased towards the
blue end of the spectrum, which it isn't. The sun is a typical
mainstream star and according to NASA is white. It appears yellow in
the sky because of the scattering of different frequencies of its
light at different angles by the atmosphere, with lower frequencies
being scattered less than higher ones, which is why the sky appears blue. >>>
Where are your facts, explanations and rationale? Nowhere. The woke
are degenerate brainwashed retards and don't believe in facts or
proving what they claim is correct.
I've already provided facts, rationale, and quantitative and qualitative >analysis. It's not my fault that it's all beyond your comprehension.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
More of your stupid imbecility. 8 subscribers for a channel with
less than 8 videos and which hasn't been updated in months due to
Doctor Who being effectively dead and burred as a franchise is
quite good going,
Well, update it then! There are plenty of Doctor Who bashing videos
on YouTube, why not put some of your own content up. You feel
strongly against wokery, go for it!
I might even subscribe if you made content.
In article <nnd$0477b660$76029399@29edb0a001abddd1>, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <umboli$31b4f$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 8:25 am:
Oh, no he isn't!
Chibnall is a talentless hack!
He did a good job of alienating Who Fans, something JN-T could
never do!
At least Chris Chibnall didn't get Doctor Who taken off the air,
which is something that RTD did do!
CC alsomost got DW taken off air if it wasn't for RTD!!!!
Daniel65 wrote:
The True Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 4:15 am:
Umm! Aggy, where are YOUR FACTS in support of YOUR claim??
Where are your facts, explanations and rationale? Nowhere. The
woke are degenerate brainwashed retards and don't believe in
facts or proving what they claim is correct.
Facts? Cough... splutter... isn't it enough that Agamemnon speaks for
the silent majority and you want HIM to back his opinions up with
facts?
That's not how it works here Daniel, as well you know!
GG has been blocked from her since 11 October 2023
since they coud not get their abusers and trolls under control.
Even then, viewership numbers are awlays highly inaccurate anyway.
People who record to watch later, people who start watching, but
switch off half-way through, etc. There are numerous problems that
polls like that never take into account.
In article <nnd$0477b660$76029399@29edb0a001abddd1>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
He did a good job of alienating Who Fans,
something JN-T could never do!
At least Chris Chibnall didn't get Doctor Who taken off the air,
which is something that JNT did do!
CC alsomost got DW taken off air if it wasn't for RTD!!!!
Blueshirt wrote on 26/12/23 9:46 am:
Daniel65 wrote:Oh!! But!! ..... But!! ..... But!! ;-P
The True Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 4:15 am:
Umm! Aggy, where are YOUR FACTS in support of YOUR claim??
Where are your facts, explanations and rationale? Nowhere. The
woke are degenerate brainwashed retards and don't believe in
facts or proving what they claim is correct.
Facts? Cough... splutter... isn't it enough that Agamemnon speaks for
the silent majority and you want HIM to back his opinions up with
facts?
That's not how it works here Daniel, as well you know!
--
Daniel
The Doctor wrote on 25/12/23 11:47 pm:
<Snip>
GG has been blocked from here since 11 October 2023
since they coud not get their abusers and trolls under control.
Gobble-de-gook!!
--
Daniel
Your Name wrote:
Even then, viewership numbers are awlays highly inaccurate anyway.
People who record to watch later, people who start watching, but
switch off half-way through, etc. There are numerous problems that
polls like that never take into account.
They are not polls but extrapolations from a sample audience. So if
they say 4.5 million people watched something they can't KNOW that
4.5 million people watched it... it is just a guesstimate based on
the homes that make up the BARB panel. (Which in the UK is
surprisingly small... around five thousand households.) So no, TV
ratings are not accurate.
More or less people could have watched something than the figures
given, as the official ratings are just based on what the people who
make up the BARB panel watched. In reality the ratings for TV shows
are just a guide to viewer habits as opposed to definitive figures.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/12/2023 21:12, Blueshirt wrote:
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing,
this is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no
longer the be all and end all in television broadcasting, as
online viewing is now part of the way we live. Whether you like
it or not that is how TV works these days. I didn't make the
rules! Ignoring iPlayer viewings doesn't make any sense. You
claim to be clever but your words let you down...
Once again you fail to understand the issue. People watching the
same thing twice on iPlayer should not be counted as extra viewers.
I don't think they are.
My two daughters didn't watch the "The Giggle" live when broadcast on
BBC1 as they were both going out, but one watched it on the Sunday
evening and the other one caught up with it during the week. Their
'views' as such might not be counted in the figures, but that is an
example of how some people use the iPlayer. Hence why time-shifted
viewings are factored in to ratings. By failing to understand how
younger people consume TV shows in 2023 it is you who is not getting
it.
The real viewing figures are the over nights.
Not everyone sits down and watches TV shows when broadcast, this is a
simple fact. I have a family and that is how things are these days.
It is not spin, it is the modern world! Plus, a lot of people in the
UK have Sky boxes and they would probably record and watch - or
re-watch - the episode on Sky+ as opposed to the BBC iPlayer. So I
don't think it's a fair assumption to make that every person that
watched Doctor Who on the iPlayer are people watching it again,
although I dare say some fans of the show did.
Times change Aggy and the overnights - while important - are not the
be all and end all of television statistics in 2023.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
So, the official seven day figures are not acceptable to you as they
don't fit your agenda? <face palm>
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing, this
is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no longer the
be all and end all in television broadcasting, as online viewing is
now part of the way we live. Whether you like it or not that is how
TV works these days. I didn't make the rules! Ignoring iPlayer
viewings doesn't make any sense. You claim to be clever but your
words let you down...
But, even using the Agamemnon accepted figures and also accepted
English, 4.62 million people still can't be defined as "no one". So
guess what, you're WRONG AGAIN!!!
For someone who claims to understand statistics, Aggie is at best being disingenuous and at worst just doubling down on his lies.
“The same people watching it again on iPlayer” is just plain wrong. The viewership is determined additively from new viewers - no-one is counted twice. It isn’t done by “Netflix hours” where it doesn’t matter who’s
watching or how many times they’ve watched before.
Yes, viewing figures are constructed from a sample and that sample is only about 1 in 4,000 of households. But it’s honest statistics, and as valid as any other polling method.
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the U.K. to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other shows’ viewership is determined in the same way.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the
facts and the impartial statistics remain.
On 24/12/2023 23:02, Squealer wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
So, the official seven day figures are not acceptable to you as they
don't fit your agenda? <face palm>
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing, this
is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no longer the
be all and end all in television broadcasting, as online viewing is
now part of the way we live. Whether you like it or not that is how
TV works these days. I didn't make the rules! Ignoring iPlayer
viewings doesn't make any sense. You claim to be clever but your
words let you down...
But, even using the Agamemnon accepted figures and also accepted
English, 4.62 million people still can't be defined as "no one". So
guess what, you're WRONG AGAIN!!!
For someone who claims to understand statistics, Aggie is at best being
disingenuous and at worst just doubling down on his lies.
I am not the one who is lying.
“The same people watching it again on iPlayer” is just plain wrong. The >> viewership is determined additively from new viewers - no-one is counted
twice. It isn’t done by “Netflix hours” where it doesn’t matter who’s
watching or how many times they’ve watched before.
So its counting exactly the same people not just twice but many times
over, on top of those who watched it on live TV.
Yes, viewing figures are constructed from a sample and that sample is
only
about 1 in 4,000 of households. But it’s honest statistics, and as
valid as
any other polling method.
No. When someone conducts an opinion poll for an election they don't
count the same people more than once.
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the
U.K.
to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other
shows’
viewership is determined in the same way.
If that's the case then BBC should be de-funded. Why should people pay
£160 or more for woke garbage the majority don't like and watch.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the
facts and the impartial statistics remain.
Get Woke, Go Broke!
If it's important enough to them then they will. Doctor Who is no
longer important.
Most people in the UK have a TV you can plug a USB stick into,
record a show, and skip all the ads. That's why overnights are the
most important figures.
The overnights determine the cultural impact of a show. No one is
talking about Doctor Who. No one is buying any Doctor Who
merchandise. No one is going to conventions. The show is
effectively dead and buried thanks to wokery.
The True Doctor wrote:
If it's important enough to them then they will. Doctor Who is no
longer important.
Some people have this thing called, a life. You know, where they go
<whisper it quietly> 'outside' sometimes... and actually do things.
The unTrue Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 25/12/2023 08:07, Blueshirt wrote:
Not everyone sits down and watches TV shows when broadcast,
If it's important enough to them then they will. Doctor Who
is no longer important.
Guess it’s not important to me then. I watched it timeshifted.
But it’s still important enough for me to post here….
On 24/12/2023 23:02, Squealer wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
So, the official seven day figures are not acceptable to you as they
don't fit your agenda? <face palm>
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing, this
is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no longer the
be all and end all in television broadcasting, as online viewing is
now part of the way we live. Whether you like it or not that is how
TV works these days. I didn't make the rules! Ignoring iPlayer
viewings doesn't make any sense. You claim to be clever but your
words let you down...
But, even using the Agamemnon accepted figures and also accepted
English, 4.62 million people still can't be defined as "no one". So
guess what, you're WRONG AGAIN!!!
For someone who claims to understand statistics, Aggie is at best being
disingenuous and at worst just doubling down on his lies.
I am not the one who is lying.
“The same people watching it again on iPlayer” is just plain wrong. The >> viewership is determined additively from new viewers - no-one is countedmatter who’s
twice. It isn’t done by “Netflix hours” where it doesn’t
watching or how many times they’ve watched before.
So its counting exactly the same people not just twice but many times
over, on top of those who watched it on live TV.
Yes, viewing figures are constructed from a sample and that sample is only >> about 1 in 4,000 of households. But it’s honest statistics, and as valid as
any other polling method.
No. When someone conducts an opinion poll for an election they don't
count the same people more than once.
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the U.K. >> to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other shows’ >> viewership is determined in the same way.
If that's the case then BBC should be de-funded. Why should people pay
£160 or more for woke garbage the majority don't like and watch.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the
facts and the impartial statistics remain.
Get Woke, Go Broke!
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/12/2023 23:02, Squealer wrote:matter who’s
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/12/2023 22:02, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
no one is interested in Doctor Who any more. No one is
interested in Star Wars either, nor Star Trek after they were
totally destroyed by wokery.
Six million people isn't "no one". (The ratings of the last three
Doctor Who episodes.) I thought you were good at statistics?
The ratings for the last special were only 4.62 million. The same
people watching it again on iPlayer don't count. The only thing
that matters is how many people watch it on the night.
So, the official seven day figures are not acceptable to you as they
don't fit your agenda? <face palm>
TV ratings in 2023 include overnight and time-shifted viewing, this
is a fact. It is not 1974 and the overnight ratings are no longer the
be all and end all in television broadcasting, as online viewing is
now part of the way we live. Whether you like it or not that is how
TV works these days. I didn't make the rules! Ignoring iPlayer
viewings doesn't make any sense. You claim to be clever but your
words let you down...
But, even using the Agamemnon accepted figures and also accepted
English, 4.62 million people still can't be defined as "no one". So
guess what, you're WRONG AGAIN!!!
For someone who claims to understand statistics, Aggie is at best being
disingenuous and at worst just doubling down on his lies.
I am not the one who is lying.
“The same people watching it again on iPlayer” is just plain wrong. The >>> viewership is determined additively from new viewers - no-one is counted >>> twice. It isn’t done by “Netflix hours” where it doesn’t
watching or how many times they’ve watched before.
So its counting exactly the same people not just twice but many times
over, on top of those who watched it on live TV.
Yes, viewing figures are constructed from a sample and that sample is
only
about 1 in 4,000 of households. But it’s honest statistics, and as
valid as
any other polling method.
No. When someone conducts an opinion poll for an election they don't
count the same people more than once.
And Doctor Who was still the most watched dramea series of 2023 in the
U.K.
to date, regardless of the absolute numbers - because all the other
shows’
viewership is determined in the same way.
If that's the case then BBC should be de-funded. Why should people pay
£160 or more for woke garbage the majority don't like and watch.
Sulky snowflakes can stamp their feet about wokery all they want - the
facts and the impartial statistics remain.
Get Woke, Go Broke!
doctor fake
Blueshirt wrote on 27/12/2023 7:13 pm:
The True Doctor wrote:
If it's important enough to them then they will. Doctor Who is no
longer important.
Some people have this thing called, a life. You know, where they go
<whisper it quietly> 'outside' sometimes... and actually do things.
.... do things .... WITH OTHER PEOPLE!! ;-P
--
Daniel
The True Doctor wrote:
If it's important enough to them then they will. Doctor Who is no
longer important.
Some people have this thing called, a life. You know, where they go
<whisper it quietly> 'outside' sometimes... and actually do things.
So why would they sit in front of a TV at a specific time when they
can open their laptop on a random day, and at a time that suits them,
to watch a TV show?
You do know it's not 1975 right?
Most people in the UK have a TV you can plug a USB stick into,
record a show, and skip all the ads. That's why overnights are the
most important figures.
No Aggy, most younger people have laptops or iPads to watch TV shows,
usually late at night, and they don't give a fuck about the
'overnights' unless it's at their boyfriend/girlfriend's place.
The overnights determine the cultural impact of a show. No one is
talking about Doctor Who. No one is buying any Doctor Who
merchandise. No one is going to conventions. The show is
effectively dead and buried thanks to wokery.
Well, we are talking about Doctor Who for a start, so once again,
that's not no one! Plus it was the third most watched show in the UK
on Monday, so hardly dead either.
Clearly you don't watch videos of big Doctor Who conventions on
YouTube or walk around a Forbidden Planet store... your opinion is
way out of touch with reality. Doctor Who is alive and kicking.
You can get meds for delusional disorder though...
The unTrue Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 25/12/2023 08:07, Blueshirt wrote:
Not everyone sits down and watches TV shows when broadcast,
If it's important enough to them then they will. Doctor Who
is no longer important.
Guess it’s not important to me then. I watched it timeshifted.
But it’s still important enough for me to post here….
--
solar penguin
In article <umguv0$3svd8$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Guess it’s not important to me then. I watched it timeshifted.
Time shift? As in BBC2?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <umguv0$3svd8$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Guess it’s not important to me then. I watched it timeshifted.
Time shift? As in BBC2?
That would be channel shift! ;-)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 95:08:54 |
| Calls: | 6,849 |
| Files: | 12,352 |
| Messages: | 5,414,872 |