Sidebar
They all seem to be crap. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9664948/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_4
RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote: They all seem to be crap. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9664948/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_4 There's a writer/director/actor movie, which has repeatedly been ranked very high on the "greatest films" list. Citizen Kane (1941) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033467/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_Kane -- /* * * Otto J. Makela <o...@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */ /* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */ /* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */ /* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */
On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 14:21:50 UTC-5, Otto J. Makela wrote: RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote: They all seem to be crap. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9664948/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_4 There's a writer/director/actor movie, which has repeatedly been ranked very high on the "greatest films" list. Citizen Kane (1941) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033467/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_Kane -- /* * * Otto J. Makela <o...@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */ /* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */ /* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */ /* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */ Citizen Kane was dull, plodding. Compared to the real Hearst, not like him. Hey look! Here's another one: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10789062/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0