1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.ARTS.MOVIES.CURRENT-F

  • War of the Worlds. 2005. As bad as when I saw it in the theatre

    From RichA@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 1 20:01:51 2023
    It really was second-rate compared to the original. Letting Tim Robbins once more go on a rampage against anything right-wing was part of why it stunk. That, and having an intelligent kid like Cruise's daughter constantly screeching.
    There were other problems,but the TV show, "Invasion" currently running is a much better attempt at the idea.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T987654321@21:1/5 to RichA on Mon Oct 2 10:08:42 2023
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 8:01:53 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
    It really was second-rate compared to the original. Letting Tim Robbins once more go on a rampage against anything right-wing was part of why it stunk. That, and having an intelligent kid like Cruise's daughter constantly screeching.
    There were other problems,but the TV show, "Invasion" currently running is a much better attempt at the idea.


    The only thing bad about it was the screaming brat.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 3 08:38:46 2023
    On 2023-10-02 17:08:42 +0000, T987654321 said:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 8:01:53 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:

    It really was second-rate compared to the original. Letting Tim Robbins
    once more go on a rampage against anything right-wing was part of why
    it stunk. That, and having an intelligent kid like Cruise's daughter
    constantly screeching.> There were other problems,but the TV show,
    "Invasion" currently running is a much better attempt at the idea.

    The only thing bad about it was the screaming brat.

    *Everything* with Tom Cruise in is horribly bad ... he can't act for
    toffee and he's a weirdo with a massively over-bloated ego.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Nolan @21:1/5 to YourName@YourISP.com on Mon Oct 2 21:57:29 2023
    In article <uff686$33hc4$1@dont-email.me>,
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2023-10-02 17:08:42 +0000, T987654321 said:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 8:01:53 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:

    It really was second-rate compared to the original. Letting Tim Robbins
    once more go on a rampage against anything right-wing was part of why
    it stunk. That, and having an intelligent kid like Cruise's daughter
    constantly screeching.> There were other problems,but the TV show,
    "Invasion" currently running is a much better attempt at the idea.

    The only thing bad about it was the screaming brat.

    *Everything* with Tom Cruise in is horribly bad ... he can't act for
    toffee and he's a weirdo with a massively over-bloated ego.



    That last part is a description of actors in general, I think.
    --
    columbiaclosings.com
    What's not in Columbia anymore..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to RichA on Tue Oct 3 16:42:58 2023
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 8:01:53 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
    It really was second-rate compared to the original. Letting Tim Robbins
    once more go on a rampage against anything right-wing was part of why
    it stunk. That, and having an intelligent kid like Cruise's daughter constantly screeching.> There were other problems,but the TV show,
    "Invasion" currently running is a much better attempt at the idea.

    Many shows have done it better (at least to begin with, many American
    shows seem to lose the plot after a season or two and then go silly):
    "Falling Skies", "V" (the original one, not the idiotic reboot), "War
    of the Worlds" (French-English joint series), etc. Even "Earth Final
    Conflict" was better than Cruise's awfulness.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Oct 5 17:10:56 2023
    On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 23:43:02 UTC-4, Your Name wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 8:01:53 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
    It really was second-rate compared to the original. Letting Tim Robbins once more go on a rampage against anything right-wing was part of why
    it stunk. That, and having an intelligent kid like Cruise's daughter constantly screeching.> There were other problems,but the TV show, "Invasion" currently running is a much better attempt at the idea.
    Many shows have done it better (at least to begin with, many American
    shows seem to lose the plot after a season or two and then go silly): "Falling Skies", "V" (the original one, not the idiotic reboot), "War
    of the Worlds" (French-English joint series), etc. Even "Earth Final Conflict" was better than Cruise's awfulness.

    The problem with the Cruise movie was it was wholly-derivative and lacked much real suspense.
    There is a difference between an action film and a terror thriller, Spielberg was off his game.
    But he sure was "on the game" when he agreed to make it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)