So is the new Thor: Love and Thunder any good?
On 2022-07-08 17:10:10 +0000, T987654321 said:
So is the new Thor: Love and Thunder any good?
No ... it's just "Politically Correct" / "Equality" garbage with Natalie Portman playing a female Thor. :-\
Grosses
DOMESTIC (46.9%)
$233,271,136
INTERNATIONAL (53.1%)
$264,600,000
WORLDWIDE
$497,871,136
On 2022-07-08 17:10:10 +0000, T987654321 said:
So is the new Thor: Love and Thunder any good?
No ... it's just "Politically Correct" / "Equality" garbage with Natalie Portman playing a female Thor. :-\
Trotsky
Your Name
No ... it's just "Politically Correct" / "Equality" garbage with Natalie Portman playing a female Thor. :-\
What should have been about, rocket scientist? Obviously, even though
the movie biz has been around for about a hundred years you seem to know what's bankable. "Bankable" means what will make them money, because
it's a business, after all. Some movies are good but make no money,
which apparently would make you happy in the Thor franchise's case.
Trotsky
Your Name
No ... it's just "Politically Correct" / "Equality" garbage with Natalie >>> Portman playing a female Thor. :-\
What should have been about, rocket scientist? Obviously, even though
the movie biz has been around for about a hundred years you seem to know
what's bankable. "Bankable" means what will make them money, because
it's a business, after all. Some movies are good but make no money,
which apparently would make you happy in the Thor franchise's case.
Seems to me that the movie/tv business nowadays is more concerned about political correctness and checking off the mandated Progressive propaganda points then making a good flick, even if this means alienating the existing fanbase and losing money in the process.
The modern American executive class is even more brainwashed by social
media then regular people, to the point their entire lives revolve around how they're perceived on Facebook, with the result that movies/tv shows are seen as vehicles for shilling the Progressive agenda regardless of the financial costs.
(This space ___ reserved for Trotsky calling me a sock puppet.)
moviepig
Ed Stasiak
The modern American executive class is even more brainwashed by social media then regular people, to the point their entire lives revolve around how
they're perceived on Facebook, with the result that movies/tv shows are seen
as vehicles for shilling the Progressive agenda regardless of the financial costs.
You lost me at "business...more concerned about...X...than...money".
On 7/22/2022 4:13 AM, Ed Stasiak wrote:
Trotsky
Your Name
No ... it's just "Politically Correct" / "Equality" garbage with
Natalie
Portman playing a female Thor. :-\
What should have been about, rocket scientist? Obviously, even though
the movie biz has been around for about a hundred years you seem to know >>> what's bankable. "Bankable" means what will make them money, because
it's a business, after all. Some movies are good but make no money,
which apparently would make you happy in the Thor franchise's case.
Seems to me that the movie/tv business nowadays is more concerned about
political correctness and checking off the mandated Progressive
propaganda
points then making a good flick, even if this means alienating the
existing
fanbase and losing money in the process.
The modern American executive class is even more brainwashed by social
media then regular people, to the point their entire lives revolve
around how
they're perceived on Facebook, with the result that movies/tv shows
are seen
as vehicles for shilling the Progressive agenda regardless of the
financial costs.
(This space ___ reserved for Trotsky calling me a sock puppet.)
You lost me at "business...more concerned about...X...than...money".
On 7/8/2022 4:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
On 2022-07-08 17:10:10 +0000, T987654321 said:
So is the new Thor: Love and Thunder any good?
No ... it's just "Politically Correct" / "Equality" garbage with Natalie Portman playing a female Thor. :-\
What should have been about, rocket scientist? Obviously, even though
the movie biz has been around for about a hundred years you seem to know what's bankable. "Bankable" means what will make them money, because
it's a business, after all. Some movies are good but make no money,
which apparently would make you happy in the Thor franchise's case.
On Tuesday, 19 July 2022 at 05:29:16 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/8/2022 4:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
On 2022-07-08 17:10:10 +0000, T987654321 said:What should have been about, rocket scientist? Obviously, even though
So is the new Thor: Love and Thunder any good?
No ... it's just "Politically Correct" / "Equality" garbage with Natalie >>> Portman playing a female Thor. :-\
the movie biz has been around for about a hundred years you seem to know
what's bankable. "Bankable" means what will make them money, because
it's a business, after all. Some movies are good but make no money,
which apparently would make you happy in the Thor franchise's case.
But it still doesn't explain why they can't be really good, though FEW have been.
Good acting, good plots, good dialog, good on-screen interrelationships to go with the $150M in
special effects. "The Batman" was another one released not too long ago that was
just dull. Ladle-on the brooding, the ever-present rain, the uber-sleaziness of fake
New York that for some reasons leftists seem to pine for. It's overdone. It's like the writers
and directors read one line in the propaganda playbook: "Beat people over the head endlessly
with the same thing and you'll convince them of whatever you are trying to sell." It must work, on stupid people,
since these movies do make money. Even the audience doesn't really care any more. The last time I saw
a genuine reaction of audience pleasure at a Superhero movie was when Wolverine told someone to F--- off in a 3 second
cameo.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 308 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 89:27:16 |
Calls: | 6,923 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,382 |
Messages: | 5,433,893 |