" In the year 2524, four hundred years after humans started colonizing the outer planets, retired General James Ford is called back into service after soldiers on a remote planet are attacked by a hostile alien fleet. The threat against the human raceescalates into an inevitable interstellar war. General Ford teams up with General Eron Ryle and a team of elite soldiers in a race to stop the imminent attack before it is too late.
Cast Frank Grillo, Bruce Willis, Brandon Thomas Lee, Corey Large, Perrey Reeves, C.J. Perry, Lochlyn Munro, Costas Mandylor, Adelaide Kane, Luke Wilson, Johnny Messner, Trevor Gretzky
Director Edward Drake "
Yes you've seen this countless times before. I guess the closest in tone would be Starship Troopers. In general the future looks like today, aliens planets look just like earth, aliens look like homo sapiens wearing a cheap mask. The only thingthat sort of saved it from total dreck is Bruce.
On 6/4/2021 1:43 AM, T987654321 wrote:
" In the year 2524, four hundred years after humans started colonizing
the outer planets, retired General James Ford is called back into
service after soldiers on a remote planet are attacked by a hostile
alien fleet. The threat against the human race escalates into an
inevitable interstellar war. General Ford teams up with General Eron
Ryle and a team of elite soldiers in a race to stop the imminent
attack before it is too late.
Cast Frank Grillo, Bruce Willis, Brandon Thomas Lee, Corey Large,
Perrey Reeves, C.J. Perry, Lochlyn Munro, Costas Mandylor, Adelaide
Kane, Luke Wilson, Johnny Messner, Trevor Gretzky
Director Edward Drake "
Yes you've seen this countless times before. I guess the closest in
tone would be Starship Troopers. In general the future looks like
today, aliens planets look just like earth, aliens look like homo
sapiens wearing a cheap mask. The only thing that sort of saved it
from total dreck is Bruce.
I thought you were kidding about the movie name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_Sin
" In the year 2524, four hundred years after humans started colonizing the outer planets, retired General James Ford is called back into service after soldiers on a remote planet are attacked by a hostile alien fleet. The threat against the human raceescalates into an inevitable interstellar war. General Ford teams up with General Eron Ryle and a team of elite soldiers in a race to stop the imminent attack before it is too late.
Cast Frank Grillo, Bruce Willis, Brandon Thomas Lee, Corey Large, Perrey Reeves, C.J. Perry, Lochlyn Munro, Costas Mandylor, Adelaide Kane, Luke Wilson, Johnny Messner, Trevor Gretzky
Director Edward Drake "
Yes you've seen this countless times before. I guess the closest in tone would be Starship Troopers. In general the future looks like today, aliens planets look just like earth, aliens look like homo sapiens wearing a cheap mask. The only thing thatsort of saved it from total dreck is Bruce.
On 6/17/2021 6:04 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 6/4/2021 1:43 AM, T987654321 wrote:I think the only explanation for how it got made is someone cashed in a
" In the year 2524, four hundred years after humans started colonizing
the outer planets, retired General James Ford is called back into
service after soldiers on a remote planet are attacked by a hostile
alien fleet. The threat against the human race escalates into an
inevitable interstellar war. General Ford teams up with General Eron
Ryle and a team of elite soldiers in a race to stop the imminent
attack before it is too late.
Cast Frank Grillo, Bruce Willis, Brandon Thomas Lee, Corey Large,
Perrey Reeves, C.J. Perry, Lochlyn Munro, Costas Mandylor, Adelaide
Kane, Luke Wilson, Johnny Messner, Trevor Gretzky
Director Edward Drake "
Yes you've seen this countless times before. I guess the closest in
tone would be Starship Troopers. In general the future looks like
today, aliens planets look just like earth, aliens look like homo
sapiens wearing a cheap mask. The only thing that sort of saved it
from total dreck is Bruce.
I thought you were kidding about the movie name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_Sin
TON of blackmail material.
" In the year 2524, four hundred years after humans started colonizing the outer planets, retired General James Ford is called back into service after soldiers on a remote planet are attacked by a hostile alien fleet. The threat against the human race escalates into an inevitable interstellar war. General Ford teams up with General Eron Ryle and a team of elite soldiers in a race to stop the imminent attack before it is too late.
Cast Frank Grillo, Bruce Willis, Brandon Thomas Lee, Corey Large, Perrey Reeves, C.J. Perry, Lochlyn Munro, Costas Mandylor, Adelaide Kane, Luke Wilson, Johnny Messner, Trevor Gretzky
Director Edward Drake "
Yes you've seen this countless times before. I guess the closest in tone would be Starship Troopers. In general the future looks like today, aliens planets look just like earth, aliens look like homo sapiens wearing a cheap mask. The only thing that sort of saved it from total dreck is Bruce.
On 2021 Jun 04, T987654321 wrote
(in article<54765772-8d30-4943-879d-a4b9e61bf331n@googlegroups.com>):
" In the year 2524, four hundred years after humans started colonizing the >> outer planets, retired General James Ford is called back into service after >> soldiers on a remote planet are attacked by a hostile alien fleet. The threat
against the human race escalates into an inevitable interstellar war. General
Ford teams up with General Eron Ryle and a team of elite soldiers in a race >> to stop the imminent attack before it is too late.
Cast Frank Grillo, Bruce Willis, Brandon Thomas Lee, Corey Large, Perrey
Reeves, C.J. Perry, Lochlyn Munro, Costas Mandylor, Adelaide Kane, Luke
Wilson, Johnny Messner, Trevor Gretzky
Director Edward Drake "
Yes you've seen this countless times before. I guess the closest in tone
would be Starship Troopers. In general the future looks like today, aliens >> planets look just like earth, aliens look like homo sapiens wearing a cheap >> mask. The only thing that sort of saved it from total dreck is Bruce.
I think that Ive seen part of the trailer. Only part, I switched to >something interesting. However, Bruce was out front with a Very Big Gun.
Hes a _general_? Generals arent supposed to be out front with Very Big >Guns. The last general I can think of who was out front with a Very Big Gun >or close enough to it was the gentleman in Korea who got a Medal of Honor for >killing a tank with a grenade... which begs the question of What the _Fuck_ >was William Fucking Insane Dean _doing_ close enough to an enemy tank to kill >it with a grenade?! Worse, Bruce has a sword or a machete or something; the >last general I can think of who actually used a sword in action was Colin >Campbell, while assaulting Lucknows gates, with, ahem, a boy piper on the >parapet playing Cock o the North, but then that ol boy _was_ the
madman previously famous for the Thin Red Line. And, besides, he was a Scot. >Us Gaels, we got a thing for sharp edges, we do. Whats Bruces excuse?
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:20:59 -0400, Wolffan<akwolffan@zoho.com>
wrote:
On 2021 Jun 04, T987654321 wrote
(in article<54765772-8d30-4943-879d-a4b9e61bf331n@googlegroups.com>):
" In the year 2524, four hundred years after humans started colonizing the
outer planets, retired General James Ford is called back into service after
soldiers on a remote planet are attacked by a hostile alien fleet. The threat
against the human race escalates into an inevitable interstellar war. General
Ford teams up with General Eron Ryle and a team of elite soldiers in a race
to stop the imminent attack before it is too late.
Cast Frank Grillo, Bruce Willis, Brandon Thomas Lee, Corey Large, Perrey Reeves, C.J. Perry, Lochlyn Munro, Costas Mandylor, Adelaide Kane, Luke Wilson, Johnny Messner, Trevor Gretzky
Director Edward Drake "
Yes you've seen this countless times before. I guess the closest in tone would be Starship Troopers. In general the future looks like today, aliens
planets look just like earth, aliens look like homo sapiens wearing a cheap
mask. The only thing that sort of saved it from total dreck is Bruce.
I think that I’ve seen part of the trailer. Only part, I switched to something interesting. However, Bruce was out front with a Very Big Gun. He’s a _general_? Generals aren’t supposed to be out front with Very Big
Guns. The last general I can think of who was out front with a Very Big Gun or close enough to it was the gentleman in Korea who got a Medal of Honor for
killing a tank with a grenade... which begs the question of What the _Fuck_ was William Fucking Insane Dean _doing_ close enough to an enemy tank to kill
it with a grenade?! Worse, Bruce has a sword or a machete or something; the last general I can think of who actually used a sword in action was Colin Campbell, while assaulting Lucknow’s gates, with, ahem, a boy piper on the
parapet playing “Cock o’ the North”, but then that ol’ boy _was_ the
madman previously famous for the Thin Red Line. And, besides, he was a Scot.
Us Gaels, we got a thing for sharp edges, we do. What’s Bruce’s excuse?
Rank inflation.
I doubt it. I don't make a habit of watching films that get an RT
rating of 3%.
On 2021-06-18 at 09:57:18 MDT, "Paul S Person" <psperson1@ix.netcom.invalid> wrote:
I doubt it. I don't make a habit of watching films that get an RT
rating of 3%.
And an IMDb rating of 2.5. Absolute Razzie bait.
Neill Massello <nmassello@yahoo.com> writes:
On 2021-06-18 at 09:57:18 MDT, "Paul S Person" <psperson1@ix.netcom.invalid> >> wrote:
I doubt it. I don't make a habit of watching films that get an RT
rating of 3%.
And an IMDb rating of 2.5. Absolute Razzie bait.
I don't think I've ever seen an IMDB rating that low before. Which
raises (NOT BEGS) the question, what is the record lowest?
Neill Massello <nmassello@yahoo.com> writes:
On 2021-06-18 at 09:57:18 MDT, "Paul S Person" <psperson1@ix.netcom.invalid> >> wrote:
I doubt it. I don't make a habit of watching films that get an RT
rating of 3%.
And an IMDb rating of 2.5. Absolute Razzie bait.
I don't think I've ever seen an IMDB rating that low before. Which
raises (NOT BEGS) the question, what is the record lowest?
On 6/20/2021 8:11 AM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Neill Massello <nmassello@yahoo.com> writes:I'm pretty sure I've seen lower IMDb ratings. But since the minimum is
On 2021-06-18 at 09:57:18 MDT, "Paul S Person" <psperson1@ix.netcom.invalid>
wrote:
I doubt it. I don't make a habit of watching films that get an RT
rating of 3%.
And an IMDb rating of 2.5. Absolute Razzie bait.
I don't think I've ever seen an IMDB rating that low before. Which
raises (NOT BEGS) the question, what is the record lowest?
1 and human nature being such that at least ONE person somewhere will
give anything a 10 combined with most people simply won't rate anything
that bad at all its difficult to get any lower.
Neill Massello <nmassello@yahoo.com> writes:
On 2021-06-18 at 09:57:18 MDT, "Paul S Person" <psperson1@ix.netcom.invalid> >> wrote:
I doubt it. I don't make a habit of watching films that get an RT
rating of 3%.
And an IMDb rating of 2.5. Absolute Razzie bait.
I don't think I've ever seen an IMDB rating that low before. Which
raises (NOT BEGS) the question, what is the record lowest?
Got curious enough I went and looked; it turns out they've got a ranking
at https://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom
Lowest at 2.0 is a tie between "Disaster Movie" and "Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2".
On 2021-06-20 at 10:17:40 MDT, "Joe Pfeiffer" <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
Got curious enough I went and looked; it turns out they've got a ranking
at https://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom
Lowest at 2.0 is a tie between "Disaster Movie" and "Superbabies: Baby
Geniuses 2".
The movies on this list that I've seen are:
Battlefield Earth (2000)
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)
Hercules in New York (1970)
Aside from the Pia Zadora flick, they had at lest some "bad movie" >entertainment value.
(I should add that those are the only ones that I *remember* seeing: the mind >has its own defense mechanisms.)
Anybody else?
On 2021-06-20 at 10:17:40 MDT, "Joe Pfeiffer"<pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
Got curious enough I went and looked; it turns out they've got a ranking
at https://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom
Lowest at 2.0 is a tie between "Disaster Movie" and "Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2".
The movies on this list that I've seen are:
Battlefield Earth (2000)
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)
Hercules in New York (1970)
Aside from the Pia Zadora flick, they had at lest some "bad movie" entertainment value.
(I should add that those are the only ones that I *remember* seeing: the mind has its own defense mechanisms.)
Anybody else?
On 2021-06-20 at 10:17:40 MDT, "Joe Pfeiffer" <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
Got curious enough I went and looked; it turns out they've got a ranking
at https://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom
The movies on this list that I've seen are:
Battlefield Earth (2000)
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)
Hercules in New York (1970)
Aside from the Pia Zadora flick, they had at lest some "bad movie" >entertainment value.
Anybody else?
On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 09:12:44 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
On 6/20/2021 8:11 AM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Neill Massello <nmassello@yahoo.com> writes:I'm pretty sure I've seen lower IMDb ratings. But since the minimum is
On 2021-06-18 at 09:57:18 MDT, "Paul S Person" <psperson1@ix.netcom.invalid>
wrote:
I doubt it. I don't make a habit of watching films that get an RT
rating of 3%.
And an IMDb rating of 2.5. Absolute Razzie bait.
I don't think I've ever seen an IMDB rating that low before. Which
raises (NOT BEGS) the question, what is the record lowest?
1 and human nature being such that at least ONE person somewhere will
give anything a 10 combined with most people simply won't rate anything >>that bad at all its difficult to get any lower.
There's a chart. It doesn't seem to be maintained, but there _is_ a
chart:
<https://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom>
On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 19:56:40 -0000 (UTC), Neill Massello ><nmassello@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2021-06-20 at 10:17:40 MDT, "Joe Pfeiffer" <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote: >>
Got curious enough I went and looked; it turns out they've got a ranking >>> at https://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom
Lowest at 2.0 is a tie between "Disaster Movie" and "Superbabies: Baby
Geniuses 2".
The movies on this list that I've seen are:
Battlefield Earth (2000)
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)
Hercules in New York (1970)
Aside from the Pia Zadora flick, they had at lest some "bad movie" >>entertainment value.
(I should add that those are the only ones that I *remember* seeing: the mind >>has its own defense mechanisms.)
Anybody else?
Battlefield Earth (Worse than the novel and the Novel was bad even for
L.Ron Hubbard)
Gigli (which for some reason I enjoyed--maybe it was that I was
crushing on J Lo at the time)
Cats (I wouldn't call it "bad", it's just that the stage musical is
_so_ much better)
Jaws the Revenge (in a theater--remember nothing about it)
Rollerball (saw both of them--why I saw the second I have no idea)
Steel (Don't remember anything about it)
Catwoman (How did they manage to make Halle Berry _not_ look good in a
cat suit?)
Barb Wire (What can I say--it has Pamela Anderson's boobs in it)
Jaws 3-D (Remember the 3-d jaws at the end and not much else)
Batman & Robin (Remember nothing about it)
The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl (I think you have to be of a
certain mental age)
The Wicker Man (Remember nothing about it)
Superman IV (Remember nothing about it)
_A_ "The Fog"--I don't remember if it was that one.
The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas (Didn't have Liz)
The Avengers (Uma's no Emma)
Swept Away (Madonna's no Mariangela Melato and Adriano Giannini is not--
his dad.)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 96:28:02 |
Calls: | 6,850 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,352 |
Messages: | 5,414,945 |