(cleaned-up copy)
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed).
For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
as a percentage of the former to calculate
the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
(Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
George J. Dance wrote:
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
Note to Corey:
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631
Have a look at the thread on Nova BBS, and you can see the post was definitely a crosspost:
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
Will Dockery wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't >>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period >>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
Note to Corey:
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631
Have a look at the thread on Nova BBS, and you can see the post was definitely a crosspost:
https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631
Yes, quite right...
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
(cleaned-up copy)
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed).
For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
as a percentage of the former to calculate
the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
(Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
On 2022-10-20 9:47 a.m., jdcha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:43:53 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:34:08 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
On 2022-10-20 8:28 a.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:02:28 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
On 2022-10-19 8:50 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
On Saturday, December 28, 2002 at 4:12:42 PM UTC-5, opb...@yahoo.com >>>>> wrote:> and you know… that over the years, I HAVE
Nothing betterHe sounds like someone happy with his life. No wonder you envy andWhy are you post-editing 20-year old conversations from rec.arts.poems, >>>>> Chimp?
Will Dockery...16 years ago
"I consider myself, above all else, an entertainer, and many people do dig a
kick-ass folk-rock performance.
Musicians see what I'm all about and want a piece of that action, and I'm a
free agent to bring my "special guest star" to anyone who calls my name, to
climb onstage and reach into my bag of tricks.
It's a great, bumpy and wild ride being Will Dockery, and I wouldn't trade
it for all the world's gold."
resent him so.
There is nothing else to know about Will Dockery.
in a group that is quite often toxic and malicious and nasty and mean spirited and hateful...actually, there's plenty of other explanations that are possible... perhaps he was grieving and was too sad and distressed to share the info here... or perhaps he felt that the info was too personal and wouldn't be recieved with sympathy and support
Thank you, Jordy; those are all good hypotheses. But I'm afraid you left
out the most obvious one:
He didn't want ace reporter "Edward Rochester" post-editing his comments
and putting them in a trollthread.
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 10:38:16 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:in a group that is quite often toxic and malicious and nasty and mean spirited and hateful...
On 2022-10-20 9:47 a.m., jdcha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:43:53 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:34:08 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
On 2022-10-20 8:28 a.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:02:28 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
On 2022-10-19 8:50 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
On Saturday, December 28, 2002 at 4:12:42 PM UTC-5, opb...@yahoo.com >> >>>>> wrote:> and you know… that over the years, I HAVE
<Troll snipped>
Nothing betterHe sounds like someone happy with his life. No wonder you envy andWhy are you post-editing 20-year old conversations from rec.arts.poems,
Chimp?
Will Dockery...16 years ago
"I consider myself, above all else, an entertainer, and many people do dig a
kick-ass folk-rock performance.
Musicians see what I'm all about and want a piece of that action, and I'm a
free agent to bring my "special guest star" to anyone who calls my name, to
climb onstage and reach into my bag of tricks.
It's a great, bumpy and wild ride being Will Dockery, and I wouldn't trade
it for all the world's gold."
resent him so.
<Malicious lies and misrepresentations from Jim Senetto snipped>
There is nothing else to know about Will Dockery.
As if you'd ever stop obsessing over me, Senetto?
actually, there's plenty of other explanations that are possible... perhaps he was grieving and was too sad and distressed to share the info here... or perhaps he felt that the info was too personal and wouldn't be recieved with sympathy and support
Thank you, Jordy; those are all good hypotheses. But I'm afraid you left
out the most obvious one:
He didn't want ace reporter "Edward Rochester" post-editing his comments
and putting them in a trollthread.
Well put, George.
(Moved from the troll thread)
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.Definitely due for an update.
I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.Your food bill must be up 99%
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:40:12 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:20:11 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:Your food bill must be up 99%
George J. Dance wrote:
Definitely due for an update.
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
Good food, low cost.
How about your food bill, obsesso?
Idiot
Look who's talking, an obsessive and feeble-minded old fart.
🙂
Dockery, I have it all over youKeep telling yourself that while you obsess over me every day, Senetto.
You're just a feeble-minded old fart, a gasbag.
And so it goes.Wow, you're fired up today,,,,,
(cleaned-up copy)
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed).
For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
as a percentage of the former to calculate
the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
(Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
George J. Dance wrote:
(cleaned-up copy)
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed).
For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
as a percentage of the former to calculate
the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.Again, I think this calls out for an update, since Jim Senetto is more unhinged than ever before.
HTH and HAND.
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 9:45:11 PM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
(cleaned-up copy)
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed).
For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter as a percentage of the former to calculate
the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.Again, I think this calls out for an update, since Jim Senetto is more unhinged than ever before.
HTH and HAND.How typical. How
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,
For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
I think these figures speak for themselves.
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 3:55:53 AM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 9:45:11 PM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
(cleaned-up copy)
"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week. However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed).
For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
as a percentage of the former to calculate
the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.Again, I think this calls out for an update, since Jim Senetto is more unhinged than ever before.
Whine much, Ash?HTH and HAND.How typical. How
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 33:33:30 |
| Calls: | 6,909 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,376 |
| Messages: | 5,428,213 |
| Posted today: | 2 |