• Legit complaint about TV News

    From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 8 13:10:09 2024
    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sun Dec 8 19:30:03 2024
    On Dec 8, 2024 at 10:10:09 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:


    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't legitimate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 8 16:19:12 2024
    On 12/8/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Dec 8, 2024 at 10:10:09 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:


    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't legitimate.

    "All the other complaints" tend to be wing-prone, right or left ...as
    distinct from this general observation of real news being ignored.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sun Dec 8 20:37:05 2024
    On 2024-12-08 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 12/8/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Dec 8, 2024 at 10:10:09 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:


    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/
    us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't
    legitimate.

    "All the other complaints" tend to be wing-prone, right or left ...as distinct from this general observation of real news being ignored.


    Did you JUST fall off the turnip truck?

    When TV first started showing news back before you were born, they did
    it as a public service and didn't even expect to make any money on it.
    But then they noticed that advertisers were willing to pay big bucks for
    ads on the news. That was the point at which their priorities changed.

    The BBC on the other hand has no ads and gets its money strictly from
    the licence fee that Brits pay. In other words, they have an entirely
    different business model and entirely different priorities.

    Your complaint is that apples aren't the same as oranges. Most of us
    already know that.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From shawn@21:1/5 to no_offline_contact@example.com on Sun Dec 8 20:57:45 2024
    On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 20:37:05 -0500, Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2024-12-08 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 12/8/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Dec 8, 2024 at 10:10:09 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>

    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/
    us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't
    legitimate.

    "All the other complaints" tend to be wing-prone, right or left ...as
    distinct from this general observation of real news being ignored.


    Did you JUST fall off the turnip truck?

    When TV first started showing news back before you were born, they did
    it as a public service and didn't even expect to make any money on it.
    But then they noticed that advertisers were willing to pay big bucks for
    ads on the news. That was the point at which their priorities changed.

    The BBC on the other hand has no ads and gets its money strictly from
    the licence fee that Brits pay. In other words, they have an entirely >different business model and entirely different priorities.

    Your complaint is that apples aren't the same as oranges. Most of us
    already know that.

    But there are other international news agencies that don't follow the
    US model. Mostly because they can't afford to skip the news from
    around the world as their audiences are international. I suppose there
    may be Chinese news agencies that cover only Chinese based news
    because the market place is big enough to make that worth while. The
    US market is big enough to make it worth focusing just on news that
    directly impacts the USA which way too often means ignoring news from
    across the world and because the 24 news channels are businesses they
    will focus on what brings in the $$$. Which means focusing on US
    centric news because that is what the majority of viewers want/care
    about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to shawn on Sun Dec 8 21:17:00 2024
    On 2024-12-08 8:57 PM, shawn wrote:
    On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 20:37:05 -0500, Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2024-12-08 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 12/8/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Dec 8, 2024 at 10:10:09 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>

    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/
    us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't
    legitimate.

    "All the other complaints" tend to be wing-prone, right or left ...as
    distinct from this general observation of real news being ignored.


    Did you JUST fall off the turnip truck?

    When TV first started showing news back before you were born, they did
    it as a public service and didn't even expect to make any money on it.
    But then they noticed that advertisers were willing to pay big bucks for
    ads on the news. That was the point at which their priorities changed.

    The BBC on the other hand has no ads and gets its money strictly from
    the licence fee that Brits pay. In other words, they have an entirely
    different business model and entirely different priorities.

    Your complaint is that apples aren't the same as oranges. Most of us
    already know that.

    But there are other international news agencies that don't follow the
    US model. Mostly because they can't afford to skip the news from
    around the world as their audiences are international. I suppose there
    may be Chinese news agencies that cover only Chinese based news
    because the market place is big enough to make that worth while. The
    US market is big enough to make it worth focusing just on news that
    directly impacts the USA which way too often means ignoring news from
    across the world and because the 24 news channels are businesses they
    will focus on what brings in the $$$. Which means focusing on US
    centric news because that is what the majority of viewers want/care
    about.

    EVERY news organization has its own business model and each will be
    different from the others, even in the US, let alone other countries.
    For example, some US outlets tend to favour conservative viewers while
    others tend to court the "progressive" audience. The US - and probably
    other countries as well - even has news services that focus on specific
    foreign countries and not necessarily in a positive way. For instance,
    China Uncensored is an American-operated YouTube channel looks only at
    China and in a way that is clearly hostile to the CCP.

    The complaint that moviePig highlighted in his post was one where
    someone was saying that BBC had a lot of coverage of the fall of Assad's
    regime while US outlets had far less coverage. I pointed out why in a
    very general way given the very different models used in the US and
    Britain.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Sun Dec 8 22:53:55 2024
    On 12/8/2024 9:17 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2024-12-08 8:57 PM, shawn wrote:
    On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 20:37:05 -0500, Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2024-12-08 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 12/8/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Dec 8, 2024 at 10:10:09 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:


    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/
    us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't >>>>> legitimate.

    "All the other complaints" tend to be wing-prone, right or left ...as
    distinct from this general observation of real news being ignored.


    Did you JUST fall off the turnip truck?

    When TV first started showing news back before you were born, they did
    it as a public service and didn't even expect to make any money on it.
    But then they noticed that advertisers were willing to pay big bucks for >>> ads on the news. That was the point at which their priorities changed.

    The BBC on the other hand has no ads and gets its money strictly from
    the licence fee that Brits pay. In other words, they have an entirely
    different business model and entirely different priorities.

    Your complaint is that apples aren't the same as oranges. Most of us
    already know that.

    But there are other international news agencies that don't follow the
    US model. Mostly because they can't afford to skip the news from
    around the world as their audiences are international. I suppose there
    may be Chinese news agencies that cover only Chinese based news
    because the market place is big enough to make that worth while. The
    US market is big enough to make it worth focusing just on news that
    directly impacts the USA which way too often means ignoring news from
    across the world and because the 24 news channels are businesses they
    will focus on what brings in the $$$. Which means focusing on US
    centric news because that is what the majority of viewers want/care
    about.

    EVERY news organization has its own business model and each will be
    different from the others, even in the US, let alone other countries.
    For example, some US outlets tend to favour conservative viewers while
    others tend to court the "progressive" audience. The US - and probably
    other countries as well - even has news services that focus on specific foreign countries and not necessarily in a positive way. For instance,
    China Uncensored is an American-operated YouTube channel looks only at
    China and in a way that is clearly hostile to the CCP.

    The complaint that moviePig highlighted in his post was one where
    someone was saying that BBC had a lot of coverage of the fall of Assad's regime while US outlets had far less coverage. I pointed out why in a
    very general way given the very different models used in the US and
    Britain.

    *Every* US news outlet purports to curate its lineup first by global significance. The existence of "business models" makes that a lie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to Rhino on Sun Dec 8 23:44:40 2024
    On 2024-12-09 01:37:05 +0000, Rhino said:

    The BBC on the other hand has no ads and gets its money strictly from
    the licence fee that Brits pay. In other words, they have an entirely different business model and entirely different priorities.

    That's the UK where people are generally more altruistic, many of your right-wing ilk in the states can't even stand for a miniscule amount of taxpayer money going to support PBS and NPR.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoBody@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 9 07:23:52 2024
    On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 16:19:12 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/8/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Dec 8, 2024 at 10:10:09 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:


    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't
    legitimate.

    "All the other complaints" tend to be wing-prone, right or left ...as >distinct from this general observation of real news being ignored.


    It's actually because the left wingers in the media don't want you to
    know those who took over Syria have ties to terrorism.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Dec 9 04:30:44 2024
    "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
    On 12/8/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't
    legitimate.

    "All the other complaints" tend to be wing-prone, right or left ...as >distinct from this general observation of real news being ignored.


    TROLL-O-METER

    5* 6* *7
    4* *8
    3* *9
    2* *10
    1* | *stuporous
    0* -*- *catatonic
    * |\ *comatose
    * \ *clinical death
    * \ *biological death
    * _\/ *demonic apparition
    * * *damned for all eternity

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoBody@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 9 07:16:46 2024
    On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 13:10:09 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:


    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/


    You expected differently from our media?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Mon Dec 9 04:30:43 2024
    In article <vj4s3r$3vf38$1@dont-email.me>, atropos@mac.com wrote:
    On Dec 8, 2024 at 10:10:09 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/

    He says as if all the other complaints about the garbage media aren't >legitimate.

    IKR? [eyeroll]

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to NoBody on Mon Dec 9 12:37:55 2024
    On 12/9/2024 7:16 AM, NoBody wrote:
    On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 13:10:09 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:


    https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/1h9jjee/us_corporate_media_is_proving_to_be_more/


    You expected differently from our media?

    I think it's an aspect usually buried by champions of bias.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to super70s@super70s.invalid on Mon Dec 9 19:57:44 2024
    super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-09 01:37:05 +0000, Rhino said:

    The BBC on the other hand has no ads and gets its money strictly from
    the licence fee that Brits pay. In other words, they have an entirely >>different business model and entirely different priorities.

    That's the UK where people are generally more altruistic, many of your >right-wing ilk in the states can't even stand for a miniscule amount of >taxpayer money going to support PBS and NPR.

    . . . for a redefinition of "altruism" for "being required to pay a fee
    made mandatory in law"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to super70s@super70s.invalid on Mon Dec 9 15:43:29 2024
    super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:
    On 2024-12-09 01:37:05 +0000, Rhino said:

    The BBC on the other hand has no ads and gets its money strictly from
    the licence fee that Brits pay. In other words, they have an entirely
    different business model and entirely different priorities.

    That's the UK where people are generally more altruistic, many of your >right-wing ilk in the states can't even stand for a miniscule amount of >taxpayer money going to support PBS and NPR.


    TROLL-O-METER

    5* 6* *7
    4* *8
    3* *9
    2* *10
    1* | *stuporous
    0* -*- *catatonic
    * |\ *comatose
    * \ *clinical death
    * \ *biological death
    * _\/ *demonic apparition
    * * *damned for all eternity

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)