Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally
responsible is the same as justifying slavery.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally >responsible is the same as justifying slavery.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally
responsible is the same as justifying slavery.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16
On 2024-10-07 11:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscallyHe's even more flagrant than Trudeau who constantly insists that the
responsible is the same as justifying slavery.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16
Liberal Party has been fiscal prudence despite having fueled horrific >inflation by printing money and spending money like the proverbial
drunken sailor. Of course, this is a guy who assured us that "budgets
will balance themselves" under his benign leadership and admitted that
he doesn't really think about fiscal matters when asked a finance
question by a journalist. That's why he's got a minor journalist for a >finance minister (and Deputy Prime Minister)!
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally >responsible is the same as justifying slavery.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally
responsible is the same as justifying slavery.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16
Brandon is a seriously weird dude.
I didn't mention this before because I didn't think it made national
news, but I've seen the story on AP.
The Chicago school district, a unit school district, is coterminous with
city of Chicago. It's one of two school boards that's appointed; all
others are elected. Elected school boards are elected in the odd
numbered year with municipal elections but the state legislature put
this one in the even numbered year.
The superintendant is left over from Lori Lightfoot and Hispanic, one of
the few top-ranking jobs still held by Hispanics. Most kids are Mexican immigrants (barely speaking English) or ethnics (first generation). The
black populatin of Chicago is way down and the black school-age
populatio is way down.
Let's get back to the school board. In the transition to an elected
board, the legislature created a long transition period with an elected
board whose terms all expire this year, then half the seats are elected,
with the mayor appointing the other seats. Two years from now, those
will be elected too.
The current board is an interim board, 100% appointed by Brandon.
There's been a fight between the city and school board over the last few years about pension contributions that are on the municipal budget but
the emoployees perform work for the schools. Brandon, facing BILLIONS in municipal deficits in future fiscal years wanted it shift to the school board, which merely faces just under a billion deficit. You have no idea
how much the schools spend on fewer and fewer kids.
The teachers want a huge pay rise. Brandon, former teacher and union organizer whose campaign was paid for by the union, owes them.
He ordered the school superintendant (appointed under Lightfoot) to
borrow tons of monies to be repaid with taxes that haven't been and
won't be authorized by the state legislature. It's imperitive that bonds
are never floated for current year operating revenues for ordinary
expenses like this. The superintendant said "no". Brandon ordered him to resignl He said "no".
In his contract, he gets six months notice to be fired (except for malfeasance). This is typical of a contract of a top municipal staffer
like this because with political change you don't want there to be no transition to a new top staffer. Also the new board might decide to get
along with the guy.
Worse still, the superintendant put out a long list of layoffs of
nonteaching positions (many union jobs) if the teachers received the
huge pay rise.
The head of the teachers' union called the superintendant
"insubordinate".
When several Brandon appointees to the school board decided that they
had a fiduciary duty to the taxpayers they refused to go along with the
plan to borrow monies.
Brandon forced every single one of them to resign. Remeber, these were
his appointees. The mass resignations were announced by the mayor last Friday.
On 2024-10-08 1:47 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
. . .
When several Brandon appointees to the school board decided that they
had a fiduciary duty to the taxpayers they refused to go along with the >>plan to borrow monies.
Brandon forced every single one of them to resign. Remeber, these were
his appointees. The mass resignations were announced by the mayor last >>Friday.
How did he force his own appointees to resign?
And given that he was presumably beholden to them in some way or was
currying favour with them, how does he survive the backlash of their >inevitable displeasure at being "un-hired"?
Do you have some kind of impeachment process to get rid of a bad mayor
or are you stuck with him until the end of his term? His fiscal
shenanigans seem to be obvious to everyone so you'd think booting him
out would be a popular move.
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:16:37 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscallyMay as well say if you work in a grocery store you're entitled to
responsible is the same as justifying slavery.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16
"samples". Makes as much sense (ie. none at all)
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be
fiscally
responsible is the same as justifying slavery.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16
Brandon is a seriously weird dude.
I didn't mention this before because I didn't think it made national
news, but I've seen the story on AP.
The Chicago school district, a unit school district, is coterminous with
city of Chicago. It's one of two school boards that's appointed; all
others are elected. Elected school boards are elected in the odd
numbered year with municipal elections but the state legislature put
this one in the even numbered year.
The superintendant is left over from Lori Lightfoot and Hispanic, one of
the few top-ranking jobs still held by Hispanics. Most kids are Mexican immigrants (barely speaking English) or ethnics (first generation). The
black populatin of Chicago is way down and the black school-age
populatio is way down.
Let's get back to the school board. In the transition to an elected
board, the legislature created a long transition period with an elected
board whose terms all expire this year, then half the seats are elected,
with the mayor appointing the other seats. Two years from now, those
will be elected too.
The current board is an interim board, 100% appointed by Brandon.
There's been a fight between the city and school board over the last few years about pension contributions that are on the municipal budget but
the emoployees perform work for the schools. Brandon, facing BILLIONS in municipal deficits in future fiscal years wanted it shift to the school board, which merely faces just under a billion deficit. You have no idea
how much the schools spend on fewer and fewer kids.
The teachers want a huge pay rise. Brandon, former teacher and union organizer whose campaign was paid for by the union, owes them.
He ordered the school superintendant (appointed under Lightfoot) to
borrow tons of monies to be repaid with taxes that haven't been and
won't be authorized by the state legislature. It's imperitive that bonds
are never floated for current year operating revenues for ordinary
expenses like this. The superintendant said "no". Brandon ordered him to resignl He said "no".
In his contract, he gets six months notice to be fired (except for malfeasance). This is typical of a contract of a top municipal staffer
like this because with political change you don't want there to be no transition to a new top staffer. Also the new board might decide to get
along with the guy.
Worse still, the superintendant put out a long list of layoffs of
nonteaching positions (many union jobs) if the teachers received the
huge pay rise.
The head of the teachers' union called the superintendant
"insubordinate".
When several Brandon appointees to the school board decided that they
had a fiduciary duty to the taxpayers they refused to go along with the
plan to borrow monies.
Brandon forced every single one of them to resign. Remeber, these were
his appointees. The mass resignations were announced by the mayor last Friday.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 422 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 196:56:33 |
Calls: | 8,951 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,352 |
Messages: | 5,992,477 |