• Re: Chicago Mayor: Fiscal Responsibility is the Same as Slavery

    From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 7 23:54:20 2024
    On 2024-10-07 11:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally
    responsible is the same as justifying slavery.


    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16


    He's even more flagrant than Trudeau who constantly insists that the
    Liberal Party has been fiscal prudence despite having fueled horrific
    inflation by printing money and spending money like the proverbial
    drunken sailor. Of course, this is a guy who assured us that "budgets
    will balance themselves" under his benign leadership and admitted that
    he doesn't really think about fiscal matters when asked a finance
    question by a journalist. That's why he's got a minor journalist for a
    finance minister (and Deputy Prime Minister)!

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 8 03:16:37 2024
    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally responsible is the same as justifying slavery.


    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Tue Oct 8 05:47:44 2024
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally >responsible is the same as justifying slavery.

    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16

    Brandon is a seriously weird dude.

    I didn't mention this before because I didn't think it made national
    news, but I've seen the story on AP.

    The Chicago school district, a unit school district, is coterminous with
    city of Chicago. It's one of two school boards that's appointed; all
    others are elected. Elected school boards are elected in the odd
    numbered year with municipal elections but the state legislature put
    this one in the even numbered year.

    The superintendant is left over from Lori Lightfoot and Hispanic, one of
    the few top-ranking jobs still held by Hispanics. Most kids are Mexican immigrants (barely speaking English) or ethnics (first generation). The
    black populatin of Chicago is way down and the black school-age
    populatio is way down.

    Let's get back to the school board. In the transition to an elected
    board, the legislature created a long transition period with an elected
    board whose terms all expire this year, then half the seats are elected,
    with the mayor appointing the other seats. Two years from now, those
    will be elected too.

    The current board is an interim board, 100% appointed by Brandon.

    There's been a fight between the city and school board over the last few
    years about pension contributions that are on the municipal budget but
    the emoployees perform work for the schools. Brandon, facing BILLIONS in municipal deficits in future fiscal years wanted it shift to the school
    board, which merely faces just under a billion deficit. You have no idea
    how much the schools spend on fewer and fewer kids.

    The teachers want a huge pay rise. Brandon, former teacher and union
    organizer whose campaign was paid for by the union, owes them.

    He ordered the school superintendant (appointed under Lightfoot) to
    borrow tons of monies to be repaid with taxes that haven't been and
    won't be authorized by the state legislature. It's imperitive that bonds
    are never floated for current year operating revenues for ordinary
    expenses like this. The superintendant said "no". Brandon ordered him to resignl He said "no".

    In his contract, he gets six months notice to be fired (except for malfeasance). This is typical of a contract of a top municipal staffer
    like this because with political change you don't want there to be no transition to a new top staffer. Also the new board might decide to get
    along with the guy.

    Worse still, the superintendant put out a long list of layoffs of
    nonteaching positions (many union jobs) if the teachers received the
    huge pay rise.

    The head of the teachers' union called the superintendant
    "insubordinate".

    When several Brandon appointees to the school board decided that they
    had a fiduciary duty to the taxpayers they refused to go along with the
    plan to borrow monies.

    Brandon forced every single one of them to resign. Remeber, these were
    his appointees. The mass resignations were announced by the mayor last
    Friday.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From trotsky@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 8 05:12:47 2024
    On 10/7/24 10:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally
    responsible is the same as justifying slavery.


    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16




    I could make it past the first ten seconds. Davis says "and then the
    so-called exports" and I have no idea what the fuck he's talking about
    because the Oath Keepers sent you a clip that started in mid sentence.

    This is interesting: the video in the article is a minute and a half long:

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/chicago-mayor-discusses-fiscal-responsibility-014258437.html

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said fiscally responsible stewards are
    making the same argument as those who said Black people could not be
    freed during the Confederacy because it was too expensive.


    Sounds like a very valid analogy. Conclusion: you should leave the group permanently.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to no_offline_contact@example.com on Tue Oct 8 03:51:22 2024
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:54:20 -0400, Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2024-10-07 11:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally
    responsible is the same as justifying slavery.


    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16


    He's even more flagrant than Trudeau who constantly insists that the
    Liberal Party has been fiscal prudence despite having fueled horrific >inflation by printing money and spending money like the proverbial
    drunken sailor. Of course, this is a guy who assured us that "budgets
    will balance themselves" under his benign leadership and admitted that
    he doesn't really think about fiscal matters when asked a finance
    question by a journalist. That's why he's got a minor journalist for a >finance minister (and Deputy Prime Minister)!

    Trudeau DID say that despite having in 2020 run up a deficit equal in
    a single year greater than from 1867-2019 combined (yes I do know what
    the main news story of 2020 was and why emergency measures were needed
    - though he took it higher than needed and for longer than needed)

    I told my business partner when the supports started coming out that
    he had best plan for a bad round of inflation when the pandemic was
    over since politicians being politicians they would keep the emergency financial measures in efflect longer than needed simply to win votes
    rather than any true fiscal need.

    I'm not anybody special - I was just an experienced small businessman
    who had several times learned the hard way that it wasn't cynicism to
    be cynical about politicians on a spending spree.....(which is simply
    a fancy way of saying I remember 1980-81 and 2008 and what happened
    those years)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 8 03:46:05 2024
    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:16:37 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally >responsible is the same as justifying slavery.


    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16

    May as well say if you work in a grocery store you're entitled to
    "samples". Makes as much sense (ie. none at all)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Tue Oct 8 10:28:50 2024
    On 2024-10-08 1:47 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally
    responsible is the same as justifying slavery.

    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16

    Brandon is a seriously weird dude.

    I didn't mention this before because I didn't think it made national
    news, but I've seen the story on AP.

    The Chicago school district, a unit school district, is coterminous with
    city of Chicago. It's one of two school boards that's appointed; all
    others are elected. Elected school boards are elected in the odd
    numbered year with municipal elections but the state legislature put
    this one in the even numbered year.

    The superintendant is left over from Lori Lightfoot and Hispanic, one of
    the few top-ranking jobs still held by Hispanics. Most kids are Mexican immigrants (barely speaking English) or ethnics (first generation). The
    black populatin of Chicago is way down and the black school-age
    populatio is way down.

    Let's get back to the school board. In the transition to an elected
    board, the legislature created a long transition period with an elected
    board whose terms all expire this year, then half the seats are elected,
    with the mayor appointing the other seats. Two years from now, those
    will be elected too.

    The current board is an interim board, 100% appointed by Brandon.

    There's been a fight between the city and school board over the last few years about pension contributions that are on the municipal budget but
    the emoployees perform work for the schools. Brandon, facing BILLIONS in municipal deficits in future fiscal years wanted it shift to the school board, which merely faces just under a billion deficit. You have no idea
    how much the schools spend on fewer and fewer kids.

    The teachers want a huge pay rise. Brandon, former teacher and union organizer whose campaign was paid for by the union, owes them.

    He ordered the school superintendant (appointed under Lightfoot) to
    borrow tons of monies to be repaid with taxes that haven't been and
    won't be authorized by the state legislature. It's imperitive that bonds
    are never floated for current year operating revenues for ordinary
    expenses like this. The superintendant said "no". Brandon ordered him to resignl He said "no".

    In his contract, he gets six months notice to be fired (except for malfeasance). This is typical of a contract of a top municipal staffer
    like this because with political change you don't want there to be no transition to a new top staffer. Also the new board might decide to get
    along with the guy.

    Worse still, the superintendant put out a long list of layoffs of
    nonteaching positions (many union jobs) if the teachers received the
    huge pay rise.

    The head of the teachers' union called the superintendant
    "insubordinate".

    When several Brandon appointees to the school board decided that they
    had a fiduciary duty to the taxpayers they refused to go along with the
    plan to borrow monies.

    Brandon forced every single one of them to resign. Remeber, these were
    his appointees. The mass resignations were announced by the mayor last Friday.

    How did he force his own appointees to resign? And given that he was
    presumably beholden to them in some way or was currying favour with
    them, how does he survive the backlash of their inevitable displeasure
    at being "un-hired"?

    Do you have some kind of impeachment process to get rid of a bad mayor
    or are you stuck with him until the end of his term? His fiscal
    shenanigans seem to be obvious to everyone so you'd think booting him
    out would be a popular move.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Rhino on Tue Oct 8 14:42:57 2024
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    On 2024-10-08 1:47 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    . . .

    When several Brandon appointees to the school board decided that they
    had a fiduciary duty to the taxpayers they refused to go along with the >>plan to borrow monies.

    Brandon forced every single one of them to resign. Remeber, these were
    his appointees. The mass resignations were announced by the mayor last >>Friday.

    How did he force his own appointees to resign?

    I don't know. It's an unpaid position and they probably figured it was
    no worth the hassle.

    And given that he was presumably beholden to them in some way or was
    currying favour with them, how does he survive the backlash of their >inevitable displeasure at being "un-hired"?

    He doesn't appear to care about re-election, but voters are stupid.

    Do you have some kind of impeachment process to get rid of a bad mayor
    or are you stuck with him until the end of his term? His fiscal
    shenanigans seem to be obvious to everyone so you'd think booting him
    out would be a popular move.

    I know of no impeachment proces.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From anim8rfsk@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Tue Oct 8 08:43:31 2024
    The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:16:37 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be fiscally
    responsible is the same as justifying slavery.


    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16

    May as well say if you work in a grocery store you're entitled to
    "samples". Makes as much sense (ie. none at all)


    This new DEATH IN PARADISE spin off (which has nothing to do with the
    original) RETURN TO PARADISE has a civilian assistant working with the cops
    who steals stuff from crime scenes and explains it away as the police being entitled to “free samples“

    I keep hoping someone will shoot her dead.

    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Tue Oct 8 17:27:49 2024
    On Oct 7, 2024 at 10:47:44 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: Arguing that forcing governments to be
    fiscally
    responsible is the same as justifying slavery.


    https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1843441021272600576/vid/avc1/1288x720/bwQpZE7ApUjIgtgt.mp4?tag=16

    Brandon is a seriously weird dude.

    I didn't mention this before because I didn't think it made national
    news, but I've seen the story on AP.

    The Chicago school district, a unit school district, is coterminous with
    city of Chicago. It's one of two school boards that's appointed; all
    others are elected. Elected school boards are elected in the odd
    numbered year with municipal elections but the state legislature put
    this one in the even numbered year.

    The superintendant is left over from Lori Lightfoot and Hispanic, one of
    the few top-ranking jobs still held by Hispanics. Most kids are Mexican immigrants (barely speaking English) or ethnics (first generation). The
    black populatin of Chicago is way down and the black school-age
    populatio is way down.

    Let's get back to the school board. In the transition to an elected
    board, the legislature created a long transition period with an elected
    board whose terms all expire this year, then half the seats are elected,
    with the mayor appointing the other seats. Two years from now, those
    will be elected too.

    The current board is an interim board, 100% appointed by Brandon.

    There's been a fight between the city and school board over the last few years about pension contributions that are on the municipal budget but
    the emoployees perform work for the schools. Brandon, facing BILLIONS in municipal deficits in future fiscal years wanted it shift to the school board, which merely faces just under a billion deficit. You have no idea
    how much the schools spend on fewer and fewer kids.

    Oh, sure I do. We have LAUSD, which is every bit as much a corrupt hive of
    scum and villainy as your school district. They've been seeing not just white flight, but black, brown, and Asian flight, for years. They've had to close entire schools because of lack of students. And all because LAUSD puts out a failing product. The kids who do go to school there graduate high school without knowing how to read, write, or do basic math at rates of 40% or more. Yet they still graduate somehow. And, of course, the California Teacher's Union-- the second-most powerful union in the state-- demands raises for the teachers even as they churn out illiterate students year after year.

    The number of students has been perking up lately thanks to Kammie Harris's free-for-all at the border. All the illegal kids actually had them pulling one of those old closed schools out of mothballs and repopulating it. Now they
    just need the personnel to run it.

    The teachers want a huge pay rise. Brandon, former teacher and union organizer whose campaign was paid for by the union, owes them.

    He ordered the school superintendant (appointed under Lightfoot) to
    borrow tons of monies to be repaid with taxes that haven't been and
    won't be authorized by the state legislature. It's imperitive that bonds
    are never floated for current year operating revenues for ordinary
    expenses like this. The superintendant said "no". Brandon ordered him to resignl He said "no".

    In his contract, he gets six months notice to be fired (except for malfeasance). This is typical of a contract of a top municipal staffer
    like this because with political change you don't want there to be no transition to a new top staffer. Also the new board might decide to get
    along with the guy.

    Worse still, the superintendant put out a long list of layoffs of
    nonteaching positions (many union jobs) if the teachers received the
    huge pay rise.

    The head of the teachers' union called the superintendant
    "insubordinate".

    Insubordinate to whom? The union? Hahahahahaha

    When several Brandon appointees to the school board decided that they
    had a fiduciary duty to the taxpayers they refused to go along with the
    plan to borrow monies.

    Brandon forced every single one of them to resign. Remeber, these were
    his appointees. The mass resignations were announced by the mayor last Friday.

    Sounds like your mayor and Karen Bass went to the same school of political fuckery.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)