Political commentator Megyn Kelly slammed the media for ignoring a story that was published this week about accusations that Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, hit a woman he was dating in the face because he thought she was flirting with another man.
"Look, people have marital problems, and they make bad decisions when they're married to people that they don't love," Kelly began. "However, banging your child's nanny and impregnating her is in a special league of its own."
"I think most of us would have left it alone if he hadn't then paraded himself out there and let the media parade himself out there like he was the ideal husband on steroids, like he is the new version of what it means to be a real man... and should really be the role model for my boys and yours,"
she continued. "F that. I want my boys to be like my husband, who did not bang the nanny, nor impregnate another woman while married to me, or ever. It's just insane that they tried to sell us this lie."
Kelly then showed a clip of former Biden-Harris official and current MSNBC host Jen Psaki declaring in a recent interview with Emhoff that he had "reshaped the perception of masculinity."
She then highlighted this week's story from the Daily Mail detailing accusations that he hit the woman, only identified in the story as "Jane",
in the face.
He "actually smacked an ex-girlfriend in the face, either a smack or a punch," Kelly said. "That this super guy who's redefined toxic masculinity actually beat a woman that he was dating prior to Kamala. The Daily Mail reports that he did not respond to requests for comment on the article. What does that mean? There's not even going to be a denial? I guess they'll get around to it, just an allegation right now, but let me tell you, take some time today to read that Daily Mail report, because it's incredibly detailed with several friends of the very successful attorney that he was dating, his alleged victim, going to the Daily Mail, providing records to the Daily Mail, speaking in great detail about the call that the abuse victim alleged [sic] made to them after he smacked her in front of other people, in front of French valets over there in Cannes, France."
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't aware of the allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading every news channel," Kelly said.
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't aware of the
allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading every news
channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story they made
(and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women >*consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a
celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking them in the
face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But the media
won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Political commentator Megyn Kelly slammed the media for ignoring a story that
was published this week about accusations that Vice President Kamala Harris’
husband, Doug Emhoff, hit a woman he was dating in the face because he
thought she was flirting with another man.
"Look, people have marital problems, and they make bad decisions when they're
married to people that they don't love," Kelly began. "However, banging your >> child's nanny and impregnating her is in a special league of its own."
And she wasn't even a hot nanny. Just like the nanny Schwarzenggar
banged and impregnated.
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't aware of the
allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading every news
channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story they made
(and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women
*consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a
celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking them in the
face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But the media
won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
On 10/4/2024 4:26 PM, shawn wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't aware of the >>>> allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading every news
channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story they made
(and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women
*consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a
celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking them in the
face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But the media
won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
Golly... who's that?
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/4/2024 4:26 PM, shawn wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't aware of the >>>>> allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading every news >>>>> channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story they made >>>> (and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women
*consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a
celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking them in the >>>> face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But the media >>>> won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
Golly... who's that?
I’ve never liked Franken, but did he actually do anything wrong? I remember >him taking a picture pretending to grope a sleeping woman that he was
nowhere near. That’s an incredibly stupid thing to do but was that it?
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:21:26 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/4/2024 4:26 PM, shawn wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't aware of the >>>>>> allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading every news >>>>>> channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story they made >>>>> (and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women
*consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a
celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking them in the >>>>> face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But the media >>>>> won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
Golly... who's that?
I’ve never liked Franken, but did he actually do anything wrong? I remember
him taking a picture pretending to grope a sleeping woman that he was
nowhere near. That’s an incredibly stupid thing to do but was that it?
Yes, that was about all that happened, but it was enough to create a
stir that led to him leaving office. I never thought he should leave
office over of it. It was obvious he was playing to the camera so at
worst he did something a bit boorish but certainly nothing worth
leaving office over.
On 10/5/2024 12:23 PM, shawn wrote:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:21:26 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/4/2024 4:26 PM, shawn wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >>>>>
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't aware >>>>>>> of the
allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading every >>>>>>> news
channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story they >>>>>> made
(and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women
*consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a
celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking them
in the
face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But the
media
won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
Golly... who's that?
I’ve never liked Franken, but did he actually do anything wrong? I
remember
him taking a picture pretending to grope a sleeping woman that he was
nowhere near. That’s an incredibly stupid thing to do but was that it?
Yes, that was about all that happened, but it was enough to create a
stir that led to him leaving office. I never thought he should leave
office over of it. It was obvious he was playing to the camera so at
worst he did something a bit boorish but certainly nothing worth
leaving office over.
Although only a few years ago, it was a different era ...when
anti-sexist cancel culture was in its bloom of youth.
On 10/5/24 1:49 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 10/5/2024 12:23 PM, shawn wrote:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:21:26 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Yes, that was about all that happened, but it was enough to create a
On 10/4/2024 4:26 PM, shawn wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >>>>>>
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't aware >>>>>>>> of the
allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading every >>>>>>>> news
channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story
they made
(and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women >>>>>>> *consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a >>>>>>> celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking them >>>>>>> in the
face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But the >>>>>>> media
won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
Golly... who's that?
I’ve never liked Franken, but did he actually do anything wrong? I
remember
him taking a picture pretending to grope a sleeping woman that he was
nowhere near. That’s an incredibly stupid thing to do but was that it? >>>
stir that led to him leaving office. I never thought he should leave
office over of it. It was obvious he was playing to the camera so at
worst he did something a bit boorish but certainly nothing worth
leaving office over.
Although only a few years ago, it was a different era ...when
anti-sexist cancel culture was in its bloom of youth.
What convoluted shit are you saying this time, that sexism should be
allowed to flourish?
On 10/7/2024 2:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 10/5/24 1:49 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 10/5/2024 12:23 PM, shawn wrote:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:21:26 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Yes, that was about all that happened, but it was enough to create a
On 10/4/2024 4:26 PM, shawn wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't
aware of the
allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading
every news
channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story
they made
(and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women >>>>>>>> *consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a >>>>>>>> celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking them >>>>>>>> in the
face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But the >>>>>>>> media
won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
Golly... who's that?
I’ve never liked Franken, but did he actually do anything wrong? I >>>>> remember
him taking a picture pretending to grope a sleeping woman that he was >>>>> nowhere near. That’s an incredibly stupid thing to do but was that it? >>>>
stir that led to him leaving office. I never thought he should leave
office over of it. It was obvious he was playing to the camera so at
worst he did something a bit boorish but certainly nothing worth
leaving office over.
Although only a few years ago, it was a different era ...when
anti-sexist cancel culture was in its bloom of youth.
What convoluted shit are you saying this time, that sexism should be
allowed to flourish?
Franken's sin wasn't sexist imo, but ribald.
women any more than a woman grabbing *his* butt would demean men. But
the country's mood was to capitally punish anything to do with gender.
On 10/7/24 11:59 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 10/7/2024 2:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 10/5/24 1:49 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 10/5/2024 12:23 PM, shawn wrote:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:21:26 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/4/2024 4:26 PM, shawn wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't >>>>>>>>>> aware of the
allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading >>>>>>>>>> every news
channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story >>>>>>>>> they made
(and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women >>>>>>>>> *consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a >>>>>>>>> celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking
them in the
face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But >>>>>>>>> the media
won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
Golly... who's that?
I’ve never liked Franken, but did he actually do anything wrong? I >>>>>> remember
him taking a picture pretending to grope a sleeping woman that he was >>>>>> nowhere near. That’s an incredibly stupid thing to do but was that >>>>>> it?
Yes, that was about all that happened, but it was enough to create a >>>>> stir that led to him leaving office. I never thought he should leave >>>>> office over of it. It was obvious he was playing to the camera so at >>>>> worst he did something a bit boorish but certainly nothing worth
leaving office over.
Although only a few years ago, it was a different era ...when
anti-sexist cancel culture was in its bloom of youth.
What convoluted shit are you saying this time, that sexism should be
allowed to flourish?
Franken's sin wasn't sexist imo, but ribald.
Agreed.
 I.e., it didn't demean
women any more than a woman grabbing *his* butt would demean men. But
the country's mood was to capitally punish anything to do with gender.
No, that's not it. LeAnn Tweeden (most people don't even bother to
mention her) complained about it simply because she was a right wing
pawn. But the general consensus is to give credence to the victim, and
then dickhead Kirsten Gillibrand picked up the torch and Franken didn't
have the spine to deal with and thus resigned.
On 10/8/2024 5:52 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 10/7/24 11:59 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 10/7/2024 2:37 AM, trotsky wrote:
On 10/5/24 1:49 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 10/5/2024 12:23 PM, shawn wrote:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:21:26 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/4/2024 4:26 PM, shawn wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:39:32 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
In article <vdoknv$71n3$7@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
Kelly concluded by saying that she hoped that Pskai wasn't >>>>>>>>>>> aware of the
allegations when the interview occurred.
"I'm sorry, if this were a Republican, it would be leading >>>>>>>>>>> every news
channel," Kelly said.
Well, she's absolutely right about that. Look how big a story >>>>>>>>>> they made
(and continue to make) out of Trump just talking about how women >>>>>>>>>> *consensually* allow him to fondle their genitals because he's a >>>>>>>>>> celebrity.
If he was out there doing it against their will or clocking >>>>>>>>>> them in the
face when he got mad, it would be wall-to-wall coverage. But >>>>>>>>>> the media
won't even acknowledge it when it's a Democrat.
I'll just throw in one name here.. Al Franken
Golly... who's that?
I’ve never liked Franken, but did he actually do anything wrong? >>>>>>> I remember
him taking a picture pretending to grope a sleeping woman that he >>>>>>> was
nowhere near. That’s an incredibly stupid thing to do but was
that it?
Yes, that was about all that happened, but it was enough to create a >>>>>> stir that led to him leaving office. I never thought he should leave >>>>>> office over of it. It was obvious he was playing to the camera so at >>>>>> worst he did something a bit boorish but certainly nothing worth
leaving office over.
Although only a few years ago, it was a different era ...when
anti-sexist cancel culture was in its bloom of youth.
What convoluted shit are you saying this time, that sexism should be
allowed to flourish?
Franken's sin wasn't sexist imo, but ribald.
Agreed.
  I.e., it didn't demean
women any more than a woman grabbing *his* butt would demean men.
But the country's mood was to capitally punish anything to do with
gender.
No, that's not it. LeAnn Tweeden (most people don't even bother to
mention her) complained about it simply because she was a right wing
pawn. But the general consensus is to give credence to the victim,
and then dickhead Kirsten Gillibrand picked up the torch and Franken
didn't have the spine to deal with and thus resigned.
Given the video, I don't recall that Tweeden's credibility was an issue.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 422 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 197:08:03 |
| Calls: | 8,951 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 13,352 |
| Messages: | 5,992,477 |