https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrappedThat is defamation - once more - you are a defamer.
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >Companies.
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?How would you like to be sued by someone you defame?
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/oceans-and-fisheries-minister-shane-jones-scraps-sea-lion-safeguard-amid-declining-population.html
https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >Companies.
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/oceans-and-fisheries-minister-shane-jones-scraps-sea-lion-safeguard-amid-declining-population.html
That is defamation - once more - you are a defamer.https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >>Companies.
How would you like to be sued by someone you defame?
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 17:10:34 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/oceans-and-fisheries-minister-shane-jones-scraps-sea-lion-safeguard-amid-declining-population.html
https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >>Companies.
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?
If there is a demand, harvest them or farm them.
Bill.
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 06:44:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/oceans-and-fisheries-minister-shane-jones-scraps-sea-lion-safeguard-amid-declining-population.html
That is defamation - once more - you are a defamer.https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >>>Companies.
How would you like to be sued by someone you defame?
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?
Tony, the reality is that any defamation from these posts reaches such
a small audience that there is no cause for action. This does not
reflect the defamatory nature of Riches posts, just that the audience
is so small that the financial damage is not enough to warrant legal
action against whoever wrote the post.
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 06:44:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes Crash I understand that. Rich is a serial defamer, it goes back close to 20
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/oceans-and-fisheries-minister-shane-jones-scraps-sea-lion-safeguard-amid-declining-population.html
That is defamation - once more - you are a defamer.https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >>>>Companies.
How would you like to be sued by someone you defame?
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?
Tony, the reality is that any defamation from these posts reaches such
a small audience that there is no cause for action. This does not
reflect the defamatory nature of Riches posts, just that the audience
is so small that the financial damage is not enough to warrant legal
action against whoever wrote the post.
years - one day somebody might make an example of him. He has earned it. >Interestingly, defamation can be proven if just one person hears or reads the >questionable item (provided the item is not true of course).
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 20:26:59 -0000 (UTC), TonyIt is without any doubt defamation.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 06:44:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes Crash I understand that. Rich is a serial defamer, it goes back close to >>20
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/oceans-and-fisheries-minister-shane-jones-scraps-sea-lion-safeguard-amid-declining-population.html
That is defamation - once more - you are a defamer.https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >>>>>Companies.
How would you like to be sued by someone you defame?
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?
Tony, the reality is that any defamation from these posts reaches such
a small audience that there is no cause for action. This does not >>>reflect the defamatory nature of Riches posts, just that the audience
is so small that the financial damage is not enough to warrant legal >>>action against whoever wrote the post.
years - one day somebody might make an example of him. He has earned it. >>Interestingly, defamation can be proven if just one person hears or reads the >>questionable item (provided the item is not true of course).
There is no defamation.
Fishery companies are known to have donated toBullshit - donating to a political party is not the same as paying a person for favours. It is, and remains, defamation.
NZ First - that received a lot of publicity, and in addition an
investigation resulted in no charges being laid against NZ First with
respect to their handling of donations through a separate fund - just
as there have been no charges against ACT or National with respect to >'assistance' from the NZ Taxpayer Union.
Jones worked with and effectively for the fishery companies. HisPolitical rhetoric is all you have.
defection from Labour to NZ First was not a happy move, and NZ First
is more a gathering of independent politicians than a coherent party;
Winston is aggressively his own man and The Leader - when and if
Winston leaves NZ First Jones now knows there may be nothing left for
him to be leader of. Fisheries have treated him well - and he has in
turn been a 'good friend' to that industry, Removing cameras from
trawlers allows tem to ignore conservation requirements and destroy
the bottom of the ocean, to catch endangered species without being
caught - and now to kill a species. You are almost certainly as aware
of the value of friends as Shane Jones - when you have lost so many
any left become more valuable. Being a 'good friend' through idiotic
public political decisions is not illegal - just poor politics; but
that fits well with the National and ACT parties his party is in
government with . . ..
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Those two lines apply well to either you or Same Jones - for the
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 20:26:59 -0000 (UTC), TonyIt is without any doubt defamation.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 06:44:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes Crash I understand that. Rich is a serial defamer, it goes back close to >>>20
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/oceans-and-fisheries-minister-shane-jones-scraps-sea-lion-safeguard-amid-declining-population.html
That is defamation - once more - you are a defamer.https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >>>>>>Companies.
How would you like to be sued by someone you defame?
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?
Tony, the reality is that any defamation from these posts reaches such >>>>a small audience that there is no cause for action. This does not >>>>reflect the defamatory nature of Riches posts, just that the audience >>>>is so small that the financial damage is not enough to warrant legal >>>>action against whoever wrote the post.
years - one day somebody might make an example of him. He has earned it. >>>Interestingly, defamation can be proven if just one person hears or reads the
questionable item (provided the item is not true of course).
There is no defamation.
You cannot defend it, you cannot prove what you said and it is public - ergo >defamation.
Honesty is a word you have no understanding of.
Fishery companies are known to have donated toBullshit - donating to a political party is not the same as paying a person for
NZ First - that received a lot of publicity, and in addition an >>investigation resulted in no charges being laid against NZ First with >>respect to their handling of donations through a separate fund - just
as there have been no charges against ACT or National with respect to >>'assistance' from the NZ Taxpayer Union.
favours. It is, and remains, defamation.
Political rhetoric is all you have.
Jones worked with and effectively for the fishery companies. His
defection from Labour to NZ First was not a happy move, and NZ First
is more a gathering of independent politicians than a coherent party; >>Winston is aggressively his own man and The Leader - when and if
Winston leaves NZ First Jones now knows there may be nothing left for
him to be leader of. Fisheries have treated him well - and he has in
turn been a 'good friend' to that industry, Removing cameras from
trawlers allows tem to ignore conservation requirements and destroy
the bottom of the ocean, to catch endangered species without being
caught - and now to kill a species. You are almost certainly as aware
of the value of friends as Shane Jones - when you have lost so many
any left become more valuable. Being a 'good friend' through idiotic
public political decisions is not illegal - just poor politics; but
that fits well with the National and ACT parties his party is in
government with . . ..
What a waste of air.
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:39:35 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou wouldn't know a donation if it hit you on the head. You have never donated anything of value in your life.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Those two lines apply well to either you or Same Jones - for the
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 20:26:59 -0000 (UTC), TonyIt is without any doubt defamation.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 06:44:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes Crash I understand that. Rich is a serial defamer, it goes back close >>>>to
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2024/04/oceans-and-fisheries-minister-shane-jones-scraps-sea-lion-safeguard-amid-declining-population.html
That is defamation - once more - you are a defamer.https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/350240291/death-limit-endangered-new-zealand-sea-lions-scrapped
Clearly Jones has been bought, hook, line and sinker, by the Fishing >>>>>>>Companies.
How would you like to be sued by someone you defame?
How would you feel about sea lion meat in a burger?
Tony, the reality is that any defamation from these posts reaches such >>>>>a small audience that there is no cause for action. This does not >>>>>reflect the defamatory nature of Riches posts, just that the audience >>>>>is so small that the financial damage is not enough to warrant legal >>>>>action against whoever wrote the post.
20
years - one day somebody might make an example of him. He has earned it. >>>>Interestingly, defamation can be proven if just one person hears or reads >>>>the
questionable item (provided the item is not true of course).
There is no defamation.
You cannot defend it, you cannot prove what you said and it is public - ergo >>defamation.
Honesty is a word you have no understanding of.
Fishery companies are known to have donated toBullshit - donating to a political party is not the same as paying a person >>for
NZ First - that received a lot of publicity, and in addition an >>>investigation resulted in no charges being laid against NZ First with >>>respect to their handling of donations through a separate fund - just
as there have been no charges against ACT or National with respect to >>>'assistance' from the NZ Taxpayer Union.
favours. It is, and remains, defamation.
Political rhetoric is all you have.
Jones worked with and effectively for the fishery companies. His >>>defection from Labour to NZ First was not a happy move, and NZ First
is more a gathering of independent politicians than a coherent party; >>>Winston is aggressively his own man and The Leader - when and if
Winston leaves NZ First Jones now knows there may be nothing left for
him to be leader of. Fisheries have treated him well - and he has in
turn been a 'good friend' to that industry, Removing cameras from >>>trawlers allows tem to ignore conservation requirements and destroy
the bottom of the ocean, to catch endangered species without being
caught - and now to kill a species. You are almost certainly as aware
of the value of friends as Shane Jones - when you have lost so many
any left become more valuable. Being a 'good friend' through idiotic >>>public political decisions is not illegal - just poor politics; but
that fits well with the National and ACT parties his party is in >>>government with . . ..
What a waste of air.
latter see:
https://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/691/donations-r
You defamed the minister.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 50:50:11 |
| Calls: | 6,911 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,379 |
| Messages: | 5,429,932 |