To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
That New Zealand is open and tolerant, and values people as people
rather than for labels says a lot positive about New Zealand, but it
seems National want to drag us back to the divisive politics of the
far right . . .
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/06/worlds-first-openly-transgender-mp-georgina-beyer-dies-in-new-zealand-aged-65
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgina_Beyer
Note the use of she / her in those articles . . .
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John BowesOff topic irrelevance. The topic is what the PM thinks, not National. You are obsessed.
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he >>can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
That New Zealand is open and tolerant, and values people as people
rather than for labels says a lot positive about New Zealand, but it
seems National want to drag us back to the divisive politics of the
far right . . .
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/06/worlds-first-openly-transgender-mp-georgina-beyer-dies-in-new-zealand-aged-65
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgina_Beyer
Note the use of she / her in those articles . . .
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that questionCan you define what a woman is Rich80105?
themselves.
Bill.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
On Tuesday, 4 April 2023 at 04:48:27 UTC+12, BR wrote:
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
Dickbot thinks the naked person with a penis in the women's changing room at the swimming pool is a woman, as long as that person feels so...It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that questionCan you define what a woman is Rich80105?
themselves.
Because Dickbot is a severely mentally and emotionally challenged individual.
Bill.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 9:50:45 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:free speech and women hating ferals like you Rich! Georgina is from a time when Labour wasn't controlled by feral gende rconfused people like Chris Hipkins and the current Labour party and it's supporters like you Rich....
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
themselves.
That New Zealand is open and tolerant, and values people as people
rather than for labels says a lot positive about New Zealand, but it
seems National want to drag us back to the divisive politics of the
far right . . .
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/06/worlds-first-openly-transgender-mp-georgina-beyer-dies-in-new-zealand-aged-65
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgina_Beyer
Note the use of she / her in those articles . . .
Why are you dragging Georgina into this? Don't have a problem with him. I doubt if he'd have anything to do with the trans mob. Georgina prefered transexual which the current feral trans don't like being called. Georgina was a great person unlike the
Who wrote the articles? Georgina or some woke left wing gender confused feral?
But guess you're just trying to distract from our embarrassing PM. A person who watches where he walks because of his propensity to put his foot in his mouth up to his hips!
It's not about pronouns it's about stupid political parties that take away the right of people to be identified by their sex at birth!
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:LIAR!
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.Yes - can you?
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:We knew you couldn't, John . . .
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:LIAR!
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>Yes - can you?
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT), John BowesLying feral slime. Please tell us then if you know different from your biology failing feral PM!
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:We knew you couldn't, John . . .
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:LIAR!
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>Yes - can you?
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think >>>>he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Rich will give us an even crazier explanation than his nutcase of a leader. Both suffer from Labours failed mental health initiative and are desperately in need of help...
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?Ok then tell us.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:03:50?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT), John BowesLying feral slime. Please tell us then if you know different from your biology failing feral PM!
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:We knew you couldn't, John . . .
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:LIAR!
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>Yes - can you?
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Here's a clue: Two sex known to humankind, child bearing and ball bearing. Something that confuses the shit out of feral woke twats like you and Hipkins!
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think >>>>>he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 20:10:35 -0700 (PDT), John BowesAn even niver try from you Rich :)
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:03:50?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Nive try, but no, that is not a definition, John. Seems even with all
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT), John BowesLying feral slime. Please tell us then if you know different from your biology failing feral PM!
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:We knew you couldn't, John . . .
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:LIAR!
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >> >> >wrote:Yes - can you?
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Here's a clue: Two sex known to humankind, child bearing and ball bearing. Something that confuses the shit out of feral woke twats like you and Hipkins!
the time you have been given, you still can't define what a woman is .
. .
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), TonyWrong as usual Rich. We just want you to prove for once in your feral life that you can answer your own question.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know?
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), TonyI have never said that I do or do not. But you have said that you do, so do tell us. Or be the coward you normally are and spin and twist your way into some sort of silly abusive post - again!
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think >>>>>>he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
Why, Tony? Do you not know?
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tonyhttps://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know?
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John BowesRich it is YOU who are confused. I know damn well what a woman is. It's a human female capable of having baby's something the men wearing skirts will NEVER do! btw it was only irrelevant to gender confused ferals like you!
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to contribute . . .
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), TonyAnybody who posts a listing from a dictionary as an attempt to define women is illiterate.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think >>>>>>he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
Why, Tony? Do you not know?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), TonyAnybody who posts a listing from a dictionary as an attempt to define women is >illiterate.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
Why, Tony? Do you not know?
Dictionaries define words very well, they define complex things not at all.
J K Rowling has quite accurately asked whether to gain some balance maybe women
should define Chris Hipkins. Good idea, he is much easier to define than women.
On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 19:58:46 -0000 (UTC), TonyWe respect sensible opinions Rich. This is the reason we have nothing but contempt for your over politicised ramblings. You know you were wrong in your protest and ignoring of common sense and are now desperately failing to try and achieve some
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:I was asked to provide a definition, just as our Prime Minister was
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), TonyAnybody who posts a listing from a dictionary as an attempt to define women is
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>>>
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
Why, Tony? Do you not know?
illiterate.
Dictionaries define words very well, they define complex things not at all. >J K Rowling has quite accurately asked whether to gain some balance maybe women
should define Chris Hipkins. Good idea, he is much easier to define than women.
asked. Frankly I do not care that you and John Bowes do not agree with
the definition I gave - provided you comply with our laws, and respect
the different opinions of others, why should I care? I sus[pect
however that respect for opinions contrary to your own is a big ask
from you and John. I note that you tried to distract from the issue of defining a woman with an irrelevncy - yet again when you realise you
do not understand you attempt to go off topic . . .
On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 19:58:46 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou went off topic and I responded to you.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), TonyAnybody who posts a listing from a dictionary as an attempt to define women >>is
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to >>>>>>>>think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
Why, Tony? Do you not know?
illiterate.
Dictionaries define words very well, they define complex things not at all. >>J K Rowling has quite accurately asked whether to gain some balance maybe >>women
should define Chris Hipkins. Good idea, he is much easier to define than >>women.
I was asked to provide a definition, just as our Prime Minister was
asked. Frankly I do not care that you and John Bowes do not agree with
the definition I gave - provided you comply with our laws, and respect
the different opinions of others, why should I care? I sus[pect
however that respect for opinions contrary to your own is a big ask
from you and John. I note that you tried to distract from the issue of >defining a woman with an irrelevncy - yet again when you realise you
do not understand you attempt to go off topic . . .
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to
contribute . . .
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>contribute . . .
So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a
woman is.
Bill.
On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>contribute . . .
So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a
woman is.
Bill.
I have given a definition as equested -
I not that no other definitions have been given.
Ask someone else . . .
On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>Being a good little communist blindly following feral Labour Rich believes you are what you think you are and the mere thought entitles you to invade womens spaces and cheat as women's sport. He's typical of the sheep that blindly follow Labour! Roll on
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>> >>Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>> >>>>>
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need >>>to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>contribute . . .
So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>woman is.
Bill.
I have given a definition as equested -You've done nothing of the sort.
I not that no other definitions have been given.Here, let me help you out.
A woman is an adult human female.
An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.
Agree or disagree?
Ask someone else . . .Why? It's a simple enough question.
Bill.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>Indeed it was, and you have now given a different definition. Thank
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>>> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>> >>>>>
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>>contribute . . .
So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>>woman is.
Bill.
I have given a definition as equested -
You've done nothing of the sort.
I not that no other definitions have been given.
Here, let me help you out.
A woman is an adult human female.
An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.
Agree or disagree?
Ask someone else . . .
Why? It's a simple enough question.
Bill.
On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 06:24:06 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:More garbage from the ever duplicitous Rich! Guess he's just a NZGreen cry baby weeping it's sad little way through what passes for it's hypocritical life...
On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>> >>Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>> >>>>>
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>> >>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need >>>>to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>>contribute . . .
So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>>woman is.
Bill.
I have given a definition as equested -
You've done nothing of the sort.
I not that no other definitions have been given.
Here, let me help you out.
A woman is an adult human female.
An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.
Agree or disagree?
Ask someone else . . .
Why? It's a simple enough question.
Bill.Indeed it was, and you have now given a different definition. Thank
you. You will by now realise that words have meaning that can be
different between different people, and that may change over time. I
have not said which definition I believe, or which I prefer - what
concerns me more is that when I do express view I do not expect
everyone to necessarily agree, or to not have alternative views - you
are entitled to express a different view than anyone else, and we
should respect and at times even celebrate our differences.
https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/q-a-mixed-sex-biology/
Sometimes a simple definition does not cover all all of reality -
greater scientific knowledge can result in changes, and at times
unwanted complexity, but at the end of the day, the labels man or
woman are not immutable or in some cases sufficiently clear. We do
however need to be sensitive to those that do not fit simple labels;
all people have rights, and nobody deserves the wild misinformed
criticism and effectively identity attacks that some rabid nutters
would encourage through their own ignorance and prejudice against
those that are different.
On 2023-04-07, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 06:24:06 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:
Not in all casesOn Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>> >>Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>> >>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need >>>>>to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>>>contribute . . .
So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>>>woman is.
Bill.
I have given a definition as equested -
You've done nothing of the sort.
I not that no other definitions have been given.
Here, let me help you out.
A woman is an adult human female.
An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy >>is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141105165209.htm along with the other links Rich has given below.
Indeed it was, and you have now given a different definition. Thank
Agree or disagree?
Ask someone else . . .
Why? It's a simple enough question.
Bill.
you. You will by now realise that words have meaning that can be
different between different people, and that may change over time. I
have not said which definition I believe, or which I prefer - what concerns me more is that when I do express view I do not expect
everyone to necessarily agree, or to not have alternative views - you
are entitled to express a different view than anyone else, and we
should respect and at times even celebrate our differences.
https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/q-a-mixed-sex-biology/
Sometimes a simple definition does not cover all all of reality -To-days suprise. Rich has switched into sensible mode.
greater scientific knowledge can result in changes, and at times
unwanted complexity, but at the end of the day, the labels man or
woman are not immutable or in some cases sufficiently clear. We do
however need to be sensitive to those that do not fit simple labels;
all people have rights, and nobody deserves the wild misinformed
criticism and effectively identity attacks that some rabid nutters
would encourage through their own ignorance and prejudice against
those that are different.
Which organs alone you have does not one male or female, you need to check what type of brain the person has.
The brain is the most important sex organ.
Why back when I was a student a university, I read an article on the matter of which way to go for the inter-sex baby. The arguement went, female is easier so as it is a baby we can bring it up as a girl. Some chap in the neuro world, asked the question about Which brain did the baby have? No one really stopped and thought about this until the "girl" we a teenanger.
Sorry old chap but I am a man in a women's body. That can not be as girl had been rasied as a girl. Nature vs nurature.
Nowdays the thinking is do no harm, do nothing and let the child grow up. At some point it will know whether its a man or a woman.
The default sex is female. To get a male you need a Y chromosone to "throw a few switches". At fertilisation, at approx 6 months and the start of pubity.
If it does not do this we end with some unusal versions.
Gay men know that they are gay, and trying them to be anything else is a waste of time and effort, not to mention being sexist. We have just about cleared this predijuce.
At the end of the day there will a great deal more understanding about how binary is best for numbers, not people.
On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 06:24:06 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>> >>Ok then tell us.
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>
https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>> >>>>themselves.
Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
Bill.
Yes - can you?
You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need >>>>>to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>>>contribute . . .
So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>>>woman is.
Bill.
I have given a definition as equested -
You've done nothing of the sort.
I not that no other definitions have been given.
Here, let me help you out.
A woman is an adult human female.
An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.
Indeed it was, and you have now given a different definition. Thank
Agree or disagree?
Ask someone else . . .
Why? It's a simple enough question.
Bill.
you. You will by now realise that words have meaning that can be
different between different people, and that may change over time. I
have not said which definition I believe, or which I prefer - what
concerns me more is that when I do express view I do not expect
everyone to necessarily agree, or to not have alternative views - you
are entitled to express a different view than anyone else, and we
should respect and at times even celebrate our differences.
https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/q-a-mixed-sex-biology/
Sometimes a simple definition does not cover all all of reality -
greater scientific knowledge can result in changes, and at times
unwanted complexity, but at the end of the day, the labels man or
woman are not immutable or in some cases sufficiently clear. We do
however need to be sensitive to those that do not fit simple labels;
all people have rights, and nobody deserves the wild misinformed
criticism and effectively identity attacks that some rabid nutters
would encourage through their own ignorance and prejudice against
those that are different.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 65:43:04 |
Calls: | 6,915 |
Files: | 12,379 |
Messages: | 5,431,689 |