XPost: law.court.federal, sac.politics, alt.politics.republicans
XPost: talk.politics.guns

<https://news.yahoo.com/government-prosecute-someone-encouraging-illegal- 184202042.html>

Is it a crime or free speech for someone to "encourage" immigrants to come
to this country illegally, or remain here after their visas have expired?

The Supreme Court grappled with that question Monday in the case of a Sacramento man who charged immigrants $500 to $10,000, and falsely
promised he could help them obtain U.S. citizenship.

He was convicted of 15 counts of fraud as well as two counts of
encouraging two immigrants to overstay their visas.

That latter charge won him a partial acquittal before the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and it posed for the high court a clash between
immigration law and the 1st Amendment.

Since 1952, federal law has made it a crime to "encourage or induce an
alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in
reckless disregard of the fact" that doing so would be illegal.

Pointing to those broad words, the 9th Circuit ruled that the provision violated the 1st Amendment because it could be read to make it a crime for family members or friends to encourage a person to come to this country or
to remain here illegally. The appeals court upheld the 15 fraud counts
against the defendant, Helaman Hansen, and a 20-year prison term.

The justices agreed to hear the government's defense of the "encourage" provision of the law, and most of them sounded skeptical of the free-
speech claim, at least in this case.

"He solicited immigrants and defrauded them. He was taking advantage of
very vulnerable people," said Justice Neil M. Gorsuch. "This law has been
on the books for 50 years."

Justice Amy Coney Barrett agreed, noting there is no record of the law
being used to prosecute innocent people for encouraging immigrants to stay
in this country.

But the court's liberals said they saw a potential free-speech problem.

"This statute criminalizes words," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

Justice Elena Kagan agreed that the law's wording is so broad that it
could threaten everyday conversations. What if a lawyer, doctor or
neighbor advises someone they should stay in this country even if they are undocumented, she asked.

"They say, 'I really think you should stay.' What happens?" she said to
Deputy Solicitor Gen. Brian Fletcher.

He replied the government has not and will not prosecute people for such
family or friendly conversations. If such a case arises, he added, the defendant should invoke the 1st Amendment as a defense.

He urged the court not to strike down the "encourage or induce" provision solely because it could be potentially misused in future cases.

Several of the justices also noted that Hansen may be entitled to win a
retrial for part of his case because the jury instructions were flawed.

The case was United States vs. Hansen, and a written opinion can be
expected by late June.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Comments:

Carlos
6 hours ago

'"This statute criminalizes words," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor.'"---
funny how the commie types in Congress have proposed a bill that does just
that with words they declare at "hate speech'!


--
"LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
recover with no after effects.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)