I have reported a regression in latest Linux kernel in Debian Stable:
segfault at amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071080
You made this bug report less than 48 hours ago. While I can certainly understand that you would like to see it fixed, that's not an
inordinate amount of time to wait.
What probably _would_ be helpful is to see whether you can recreate
the same scenario with the vanilla kernel.org kernels of the same
versions; confirming that the issue exists with the vanilla 6.1.90
kernel _and_ that the issue goes away when booting the vanilla kernel
of whatever exact version your earlier package is (I'm guessing
6.1.85), both when built with the same configuration options as the
kernels shipped by Debian. That would confirm whether what you are
seeing is something somehow introduced by Debian, or an upstream bug.
On 16/05/2024 17:35, piorunz wrote:
As much as I would like to try vanilla kernel, I don't want to break my
system. I use Debian Stable, don't know if things would just work with
vanilla kernel.
You may try bookworm-backports kernel 6.6.13+bpo-amd64
You may check https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ for reports similar to your one.
Be realistic, to get the bug fixed, there should be affected persons motivated enough to try vanilla kernel or even to build custom kernels with provided patches. Developers time is limited and expensive resource. It may be directed to fixing other bugs. If you can compare Debian and upstream kernels you may get the issue fixed quicker. Direct communication with
driver developers may be more effective.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 102:39:08 |
Calls: | 6,851 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,355 |
Messages: | 5,415,466 |