Unfortunately, the current package wpasupplicant is unable to do WPA3-Personal authentication.
What alternatives to it exist?
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari" <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the support. Even the package description says that.
I do not know whether you have heard of the search engine named google,Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AMCould you provide me the URL to the package description please?
From: "Anssi Saari" <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
support. Even the package description says that.
Thanks.
Stella
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AM
From: "Anssi Saari" <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the support. Even the package description says that.
Could you provide me the URL to the package description please?
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:18 AM
From: tomas@tuxteam.de
To: "Stella Ashburne" <rewefie@gmx.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
This one?
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:40:33PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AMCould you provide me the URL to the package description please?
From: "Anssi Saari" <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
support. Even the package description says that.
This one?
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
Cheers
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:03 AM
From: "Bret Busby" <bret@busby.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
On 4/1/24 06:18, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:40:33PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
This one?
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
Cheers
And, from the link that Tomas posted;
"
-- Package: wpasupplicant (2:2.10-12)
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 6:57 AMAs stated in my original post, I am using Debian, not ArchLinux.
From: "Bret Busby" <bret@busby.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
I do not know whether you have heard of the search engine named google,
but, from doing a search of the World Wide Web, using google, the
following are some of the first results displayed.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/wpa_supplicant
- "wpa_supplicant is a cross-platform supplicant with support for WPA,
WPA2 and WPA3 (IEEE 802.11i). It is suitable for desktops, laptops and
embedded systems. It is the IEEE 802.1X/WPA component that is used in
the client stations. It implements key negotiation with a WPA
authenticator and it controls the roaming and IEEE 802.11
authentication/association of the wireless driver."
So your quote from ArchLinux's wiki is irrevelant to Debian's version of wpasupplicant.
On 4/1/24 05:40, Stella Ashburne wrote:
I do not know whether you have heard of the search engine named google,
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 5:16 AMCould you provide me the URL to the package description please?
From: "Anssi Saari" <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support
WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have the
support. Even the package description says that.
Thanks.
Stella
but, from doing a search of the World Wide Web, using google, the
following are some of the first results displayed.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/wpa_supplicant
- "wpa_supplicant is a cross-platform supplicant with support for WPA,
WPA2 and WPA3 (IEEE 802.11i). It is suitable for desktops, laptops and embedded systems. It is the IEEE 802.1X/WPA component that is used in
the client stations. It implements key negotiation with a WPA
authenticator and it controls the roaming and IEEE 802.11 authentication/association of the wireless driver."
https://w1.fi/wpa_supplicant/
- "Linux WPA/WPA2/WPA3/IEEE 802.1X Supplicant
wpa_supplicant is a WPA Supplicant for Linux, BSD, Mac OS X, and Windows
with support for WPA, WPA2 (IEEE 802.11i / RSN), and WPA3. It is
suitable for both desktop/laptop computers and embedded systems.
Supplicant is the IEEE 802.1X/WPA component that is used in the client stations. It implements key negotiation with a WPA Authenticator and it controls the roaming and IEEE 802.11 authentication/association of the
wlan driver.
wpa_supplicant is designed to be a "daemon" program that runs in the background and acts as the backend component controlling the wireless connection. wpa_supplicant supports separate frontend programs and a text-based frontend (wpa_cli) and a GUI (wpa_gui) are included with wpa_supplicant."
and, of course, ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wpa_supplicant
- "wpa_supplicant is a free software implementation of an IEEE 802.11i supplicant for Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, QNX, AROS, Microsoft Windows,
Solaris, OS/2 (including ArcaOS and eComStation)[2] and Haiku.[3] In
addition to being a WPA3 and WPA2 supplicant, it also implements WPA and older wireless LAN security protocols.
Features
Features include:[4]
WPA-PSK and WPA2-PSK ("WPA-Personal", pre-shared key)
WPA3[5]
WPA with EAP ("WPA-Enterprise", for example with RADIUS authentication server)
RSN: PMKSA caching, pre-authentication
IEEE 802.11r
IEEE 802.11w
Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS)
Included with the supplicant are a GUI and a command-line utility for interacting with the running supplicant. From either of these interfaces
it is possible to review a list of currently visible networks, select
one of them, provide any additional security information needed to authenticate with the network (for example, a passphrase, or username
and password) and add it to the preference list to enable automatic reconnection in the future."
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
The main heading of that web page is Package: wpasupplicant (2:2.10-12)
Immediately below it is the sub-heading that states
client support for WPA and WPA2 (IEEE 802.11i)
I fail to see WPA3 mentioned therein.
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:16 AM
From: "Bret Busby" <bret@busby.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
It is unfortunate that you refused to read the Debian package
description to which you were referred.
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:14 AMI totally agree with you on this point.
From: "Pocket" <pocket@columbus.rr.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Are you comparing the same package/version arch to debian? The debian
one may not be the latest and the arch is almost always the latest.
He quoted ArchLinux's version of wpasupplicant when I am using Debian's version.
He's like comparing apples to oranges.
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:25 AM
From: "Bret Busby" <bret@busby.net>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
but, as you insist on whining, rather than making an effort, then, you
will never be satisfied until you have caused sufficient (for you)
gratuitous irritation...
Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have theCould you provide me the URL to the package description please?
support. Even the package description says that.
Are you sure? WPA3-Personal is hardly new so Bookworm should have
the support. Even the package description says that.
Could you provide me the URL to the package description please?
Hi guys
My Debian distro has a kernel version of 6.1.69-1 and the installed wpasupplicant's version for Debian Bookworm is 2:2.10-12.
I don't use Network Manager; instead I rely solely on the ifup and ifdown scripts to bring up my network interfaces.
My wireless router in my BFF's residence is capable of performing WPA3-Personal authentication and so is my device.
Unfortunately, the current package wpasupplicant is unable to do WPA3-Personal authentication.
What alternatives to it exist?
Then "fail" seems to be the appropriate word.
If all else fails, read the words in front of you.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:04:52AM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/wpasupplicant
The main heading of that web page is Package: wpasupplicant
(2:2.10-12)
Immediately below it is the sub-heading that states
client support for WPA and WPA2 (IEEE 802.11i)
I fail to see WPA3 mentioned therein.
Read more.
client support for WPA and WPA2 (IEEE 802.11i)
wpa-supplicant is a userspace daemon handling connection and
authentication in wireless and wired networks, primarily secured
with the WPA/WPA2/WPA3 protocols. This software provides key
negotiation with the access point (WPA Authenticator), and controls association with IEEE 802.11i networks.
you refused to recognize that the sub-heading contradicts with the
so-called package's description
three decades younger than you but you don't have to sound patronizing or condescending.
you refused to recognize that the sub-heading contradicts with the so-called package's description
Yes yes, so file a bug report as recommended.
three decades younger than you but you don't have to sound patronizing or condescending.
You started the war.
What's wrong with being old?
You established you're three decades younger but what's your BMI?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 37:49:56 |
Calls: | 6,910 |
Files: | 12,376 |
Messages: | 5,428,821 |