Hello everyone,
I ran into argument with my father about who pays Debian
developement. He says everyone want to eat something and since only
donation won't cut it, corporations and companies which use Debian
need to fund the developement. I understand that some task like kernel maintanace are full-time job and someone needs to pay those people,
but I always thaught that since Debian is community software project,
most of the work comes from volunteers and enthusiasts. So my qustion
is - how does it actually work? Thank you for your answers.
Best regards,
Hi,
krystof@ibse.cz wrote on 31/01/2023 at 10:51:10+0100:
Hello everyone,
I ran into argument with my father about who pays Debian
developement. He says everyone want to eat something and since only
donation won't cut it, corporations and companies which use Debian
need to fund the developement. I understand that some task like kernel
maintanace are full-time job and someone needs to pay those people,
but I always thaught that since Debian is community software project,
most of the work comes from volunteers and enthusiasts. So my qustion
is - how does it actually work? Thank you for your answers.
Best regards,
Debian is a volunteer-run project and therefore, the standard situation
is that people who build and maintain the Debian Ecosystem are doing it
for free. True, some people are allowed by their employeer to do it on
their work time, which could be seen as a sponsorship of the project,
and there's even some who are paid specifically by their employeer to
package some stuff in Debian, but this is not the majority of the Contributors.
So, on the specific aspect of the development, I guess we can agree that it's, indeed, *NOT* funded by any corporation.
That being said, many companies are making donations to the project (or,
to be specific, to its Trusted Organizations - SPI/Debian
France/Debian.ch), as a sponsorship, and to help the project covering
its hosting costs (we need servers, hosting places, etc, to provide our websites and our packages/installers/...).
There are also individuals making such donations.
That being said, these donations can't be used to pay a Developer for
its work in the project. At best it can be used to reimburse some
specific expenses the Developer would make to contribute to the project
(a flight ticket to go to a BSP, some specific hardware, ...).
I hope this makes things clearer.
On 1/31/23 05:43, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
Hi,
krystof@ibse.cz wrote on 31/01/2023 at 10:51:10+0100:
Hello everyone,Debian is a volunteer-run project and therefore, the standard
I ran into argument with my father about who pays Debian
developement. He says everyone want to eat something and since only
donation won't cut it, corporations and companies which use Debian
need to fund the developement. I understand that some task like kernel
maintanace are full-time job and someone needs to pay those people,
but I always thaught that since Debian is community software project,
most of the work comes from volunteers and enthusiasts. So my qustion
is - how does it actually work? Thank you for your answers.
Best regards,
situation
is that people who build and maintain the Debian Ecosystem are doing it
for free. True, some people are allowed by their employeer to do it on
their work time, which could be seen as a sponsorship of the project,
and there's even some who are paid specifically by their employeer to
package some stuff in Debian, but this is not the majority of the
Contributors.
So, on the specific aspect of the development, I guess we can agree
that
it's, indeed, *NOT* funded by any corporation.
That being said, many companies are making donations to the project
(or,
to be specific, to its Trusted Organizations - SPI/Debian
France/Debian.ch), as a sponsorship, and to help the project covering
its hosting costs (we need servers, hosting places, etc, to provide our
websites and our packages/installers/...).
There are also individuals making such donations.
That being said, these donations can't be used to pay a Developer
for
its work in the project. At best it can be used to reimburse some
specific expenses the Developer would make to contribute to the project
(a flight ticket to go to a BSP, some specific hardware, ...).
I hope this makes things clearer.
It does, but we should all remember that TANSTAAFL is a universal
law. It cannot be broken.
So something like this needs to be said:
Make it easier for John Q. Public's like me to contribute to those
support funds. I'm not Elon Musk, but I could manage a $50 bill from
time to time. Make it easier for the users who have benefited
greatly, to supply some of those expenses, please.
We are also very aware that info on the suppliers of such funds is a
valuable commodity to the hacker. There are quite a number of American
based charities I do not contribute to simply because they insist on
ones social security number. That ain't gonna happen. Make it the equ
of me handing you a $50 bill, untraceable cash, no strings
attached. It's my thank you.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
So something like this needs to be said:
Make it easier for John Q. Public's like me to contribute to those
support funds. I'm not Elon Musk, but I could manage a $50 bill from
time to time. Make it easier for the users who have benefited greatly,
to supply some of those expenses, please.
We are also very aware that info on the suppliers of such funds is a
valuable commodity to the hacker. There are quite a number of American
based charities I do not contribute to simply because they insist on
ones social security number. That ain't gonna happen. Make it the equ of
me handing you a $50 bill, untraceable cash, no strings attached. It's
my thank you.
how does it actually work?
I don't get paid for this. It's for fun, curiosity, and conscience.
There are also individuals making such donations.
That being said, these donations can't be used to pay a Developer for
its work in the project.
At best it can be used to reimburse some
specific expenses the Developer would make to contribute to the project
(a flight ticket to go to a BSP, some specific hardware, ...).
It does, but we should all remember that TANSTAAFL is a universal law.
It cannot be broken.
We are also very aware that info on the suppliers of such funds is a
valuable commodity to the hacker. There are quite a number of American
based charities I do not contribute to simply because they insist on
ones social security number. That ain't gonna happen. Make it the equ of
me handing you a $50 bill, untraceable cash, no strings attached. It's
my thank you.
Hi,
how does it actually work?
Most of the software in the Debian operating system is taken by Debian
for free from "upstream" projects.
For example i maintain as upstream developer libburn, lisofs, and
libisoburn with their applications cdrskin and xorriso. They are not
specific to Debian or to GNU/Linux.
I support Debian especially by preparing the Debian packages of my
upstream projects. Those get signed and uploaded by Dominique Dumont
who holds a Debian rank, unlike me. See what Debian makes out of my
upstream package libisoburn:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisoburn
I don't get paid for this. It's for fun, curiosity, and conscience.
An easy way to pay back to the world for what i take from it for free.
During the years i got some donations for hardware costs. But that's not
a significant motivation for me.
Aside from getting upstream's work for free, it is quite some work to
prepare all the Debian packages and to coordinate their dependencies (the further software which a package needs to work). That's why several other GNU/Linux distros take the bulk of their packages from Debian for free.
So everybody is taking advantage of everybody. Those who don't maintain software can contribute by submitting bug reports or other feedback.
Of course, one has to be able to afford giving away ones work.
I still work in the proprietary IT industry. The customers see no
problem with paying my employer and to charge their customers.
A completely different social model.
Free software development in large parts swims on top of that model.
It is quite astounding that this coexistence works since decades.
Obviously it benefits both sides.
Have a nice day :)You too Thomas. Very well said Thomas, clarify's it pretty well for the newcomer trying to figure out our model of TANSTAAFL.
Thomas
.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:05:16PM -0500, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
The reasons that there are quite a few charities that I do not contribute to
has to do with two (related) things:
Quite the Scientific Method (TM). Making a few things up to make your
point :-)
Now: Pick one. Prove that it's bad (for a 501, as the SPI is, it
should be feasible: AFAIK their records are open)
The reasons that there are quite a few charities that I do not contribute to has to do with two (related) things:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 05:34:49 AM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
There are also individuals making such donations.
That being said, these donations can't be used to pay a Developer for
its work in the project.
rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 05:34:49 AM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
There are also individuals making such donations.
That being said, these donations can't be used to pay a Developer for
its work in the project.
That being said, there are certainly developers out there, who are working
on company time, to make contributions to Debian (and other) open source software. And folks at places that host the work - like the OSU OSL - are certainly drawing salaries from their parent institutions. I expect a lot of that work is grant funded.
tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:05:16PM -0500, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
contribute toThe reasons that there are quite a few charities that I do not
has to do with two (related) things:
Quite the Scientific Method (TM). Making a few things up to make your
point :-)
Now: Pick one. Prove that it's bad (for a 501, as the SPI is, it
should be feasible: AFAIK their records are open)
Because SPI is a US registered charity, it is covered by
charitynavigator.or <http://charitynavigator.org>g
https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/113390208
which says that as of the last tax failing, SPI spent 94% of
income on their purpose, rather than overhead.
-dsr-
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 05:34:49 AM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
There are also individuals making such donations.
That being said, these donations can't be used to pay a Developer for
its work in the project.
Well that may be true in the case of certain Debian organizations, but
I doubt there is any "universal" rule that would keep me from making a donation to some Debian organization specifically for the purpose of
paying a developer for developing (or maintaining), for example, some specific package / software.
rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 05:34:49 AM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
There are also individuals making such donations.
That being said, these donations can't be used to pay a Developer for
its work in the project.
That being said, there are certainly developers out there, who are
working on company time, to make contributions to Debian (and other)
open source software. And folks at places that host the work - like
the OSU OSL - are certainly drawing salaries from their parent institutions. I expect a lot of that work is grant funded.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 46:05:13 |
Calls: | 6,910 |
Files: | 12,377 |
Messages: | 5,429,524 |