I am currently preparing/testing Debian packages of the upcoming OPM release by uploading them to experimental. I noted that packages for both hppa and riscv64No.
are failing for this release of opm-common [1] that did build before. riscv64 [2] might
be a compiler issue of g++-12 and hence not happen unstable. For hppa [3] it is due
to added tests which fail because wrong treatment of endianness.
Both are "unofficial ports". Would these failing builds block migration to testing
if uploaded to unstable?
Hi,
I am currently preparing/testing Debian packages of the upcoming OPM release by uploading them to experimental. I noted that packages for both hppa and riscv64
are failing for this release of opm-common [1] that did build before. riscv64 [2] might
be a compiler issue of g++-12 and hence not happen unstable. For hppa [3] it is due
to added tests which fail because wrong treatment of endianness.
Both are "unofficial ports". Would these failing builds block migration to testing
if uploaded to unstable?
Cheers,
Markus
[1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=markus%40dr-blatt.de
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=opm-common&arch=riscv64&ver=2022.04%7Erc1-1&stamp=1651151421&raw=0
[3] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=opm-common&arch=hppa&ver=2022.04%7Erc1-1&stamp=1651103022&raw=0
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 45:36:21 |
Calls: | 6,910 |
Files: | 12,377 |
Messages: | 5,429,451 |