Source: ramond
Version: 0.5-4.2
Severity: important
Tags: sid trixie
X-Debbugs-CC: nicolas.dandrimont@crans.org
Dear package ramond maintainer in Debian,
After looking into the package you maintain (ramond, https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ramond), I found that this package
received no maintainer updates in the past 12 years and is not in good
shape. As a result, I am filing an ITS (Intent to Salvage) request
against your package to take over package maintenance according to
section 5.12 in Debian's Developers' Reference [1].
[...]
On Wed, May 1, 2024, at 04:50, Boyuan Yang wrote:
Source: ramond
Version: 0.5-4.2
Severity: important
Tags: sid trixie
X-Debbugs-CC: nicolas.dandrimont@crans.org
Dear package ramond maintainer in Debian,
After looking into the package you maintain (ramond, https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ramond), I found that this package
received no maintainer updates in the past 12 years and is not in
good
shape. As a result, I am filing an ITS (Intent to Salvage) request
against your package to take over package maintenance according to
section 5.12 in Debian's Developers' Reference [1].
[...]
Hi,
Thank you for picking up this package. You should feel free to go ahead
with immediate adoption[1].
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdAdoption
In this day and age, most managed switches are able to block unwanted
IPv6 router advertisements, so before spending much effort on a project
that, last I checked, was dormant upstream, you should assess whether
ramond is still relevant.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 61:57:56 |
Calls: | 6,915 |
Files: | 12,379 |
Messages: | 5,431,371 |