• Re: Question about Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106

    From Martin Steigerwald@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 15 18:00:01 2023
    Hi Merlin,

    Merlin Cooper - 15.05.23, 16:35:59 CEST:
    Are there any plans to upload Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to
    Unstable and unblock them for inclusion in Testing? The Full Freeze
    is coming up soon, and Unstable / Testing are still stuck on Plasma
    5.27.2 and Frameworks 5.103. The newer versions fix tons of bugs
    (including many Wayland bugs), so their inclusion in Debian 12 would
    be supremely appreciated by Debian KDE users.

    Please see

    bug #1035056 [pre-approval] plasma-desktop 5.27.X

    https://bugs.debian.org/1035056

    As well as IRC channel #debian-qt-kde

    Best,
    --
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy M Butterworth@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 16 02:40:01 2023
    On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:51 AM Merlin Cooper <mxanthropocene@outlook.com> wrote:

    (I accidentally sent this email directly to Coufcouf and DeltaOne, I
    should have posted it to the list... sorry!)

    Hello,

    Are there any plans to upload Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to
    Unstable and unblock them for inclusion in Testing? The Full Freeze is
    coming up soon, and Unstable / Testing are still stuck on Plasma 5.27.2 and Frameworks 5.103. The newer versions fix tons of bugs (including many
    Wayland bugs), so their inclusion in Debian 12 would be supremely
    appreciated by Debian KDE users.

    I see no reason why an unblock request wouldn't be granted considering
    GNOME 43.4 was allowed to migrate recently, and these new versions focus
    only on fixing bugs rather than adding features.

    I hope you consider uploading Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to
    Unstable, and requesting an unblock so they can migrate to Testing and be included in Debian 12, that way Debian KDE users can have the best possible experience.


    You are not alone. I would also like to see plasma 5.27.5 or newer updated
    in Bookworm.
    Tim


    Thank you for all your hard work!
    Merlin



    --
    ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
    ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
    ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀

    <div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:51 AM Merlin Cooper &lt;<a href="mailto:mxanthropocene@outlook.com">mxanthropocene@outlook.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
    0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg8459777625673016836">




    <div dir="ltr">
    <div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
    (I accidentally sent this email directly to Coufcouf and DeltaOne, I should have posted it to the list... sorry!)</div>
    <div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">

    </div>
    <div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
    <span style="font-size:12pt">Hello,</span>
    <div style="font-
  • From Luc Castermans@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 16 07:20:01 2023
    Hi

    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental yesterday.
    The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.

    Thanks!!

    Luc

    Op ma 15 mei 2023 om 17:53 schreef Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>:

    Hi Merlin,

    Merlin Cooper - 15.05.23, 16:35:59 CEST:
    Are there any plans to upload Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to Unstable and unblock them for inclusion in Testing? The Full Freeze
    is coming up soon, and Unstable / Testing are still stuck on Plasma
    5.27.2 and Frameworks 5.103. The newer versions fix tons of bugs
    (including many Wayland bugs), so their inclusion in Debian 12 would
    be supremely appreciated by Debian KDE users.

    Please see

    bug #1035056 [pre-approval] plasma-desktop 5.27.X

    https://bugs.debian.org/1035056

    As well as IRC channel #debian-qt-kde

    Best,
    --
    Martin




    --
    Luc Castermans
    mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com

    <div dir="ltr"><div>Hi</div><div><br></div><div>On top and for the record.</div><div><br></div><div>I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental yesterday.   The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!!<br>
    </div><div><br></div><div>Luc<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Op ma 15 mei 2023 om 17:53 schreef Martin Steigerwald &lt;<a href="mailto:martin@lichtvoll.de">martin@lichtvoll.de</a>&gt;:<br></div><blockquote
    class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi Merlin,<br>

    Merlin Cooper - 15.05.23, 16:35:59 CEST:<br>
    &gt; Are there any plans to upload Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.106 to<br> &gt; Unstable and unblock them for inclusion in Testing? The Full Freeze<br> &gt; is coming up soon, and Unstable / Testing are still stuck on Plasma<br> &gt; 5.27.2 and Frameworks 5.103. The newer versions fix tons of bugs<br>
    &gt; (including many Wayland bugs), so their inclusion in Debian 12 would<br> &gt; be supremely appreciated by Debian KDE users.<br>

    Please see<br>

    bug #1035056 [pre-approval] plasma-desktop 5.27.X<br>

    <a href="https://bugs.debian.org/1035056" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.debian.org/1035056</a><br>

    As well as IRC channel #debian-qt-kde<br>

    Best,<br>
    -- <br>
    Martin<br>


    </blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">Luc Castermans<br>mailto:<a href="mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com" target="_blank">luc.castermans@gmail.com</a></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luc Castermans@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 09:10:01 2023
    +1

    Op 19-05-2023 om 09:00 schreef Martin Steigerwald:
    Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.
    Installing as well.

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.

    Ciao,

    --
    m.vr.gr.

    Luc Castermans
    mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Steigerwald@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 09:10:01 2023
    Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.

    Installing as well.

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.

    Ciao,
    --
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Steigerwald@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 09:30:01 2023
    Martin Steigerwald - 19.05.23, 09:19:31 CEST:
    I recommend against posting to the bug report, the Qt/KDE team is
    doing a marvelous job at arguing in favor of having at least the
    packages with changes or at least with non-cosmetic changes from
    5.27.5 in Bookworm. Please let them do their job. […]

    Or in favor of having all of Plasma 5.27.5 in a point release for
    Bookworm. For me both approaches would work well. The point is to get
    those bug fixes into stable.

    For my machines it does not matter, I am following unstable anyway.
    However for some machines I administrate for others it makes a
    difference.

    Ciao,
    --
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sedat Dilek@21:1/5 to martin@lichtvoll.de on Fri May 19 09:20:01 2023
    On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:01 AM Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:

    Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.

    Installing as well.


    Hi Martin, Hi Luc,

    Can you share how you upgraded to KDE/Plasma version 5.25.5?

    Thanks.

    Best regards,
    -Sedat-

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.

    Ciao,
    --
    Martin



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sedat Dilek@21:1/5 to martin@lichtvoll.de on Fri May 19 09:30:01 2023
    On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:19 AM Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:
    ...
    Plasma 5.27.5 installed here.

    % aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'

    % dpkg -l | grep "5\.27\.2"
    [… no output …]


    Hi Martin,

    I can confirm...

    Installed 102 packages - upgradable packages available 102 - looks
    good on a simulated upgrade.

    Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104?

    Here 275 packages installed - on a simulated upgrade the same amount
    of packages.

    Thanks.

    Best regards,
    -Sedat-

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Steigerwald@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 09:20:01 2023
    Hi,

    Martin Steigerwald - 19.05.23, 09:00:37 CEST:
    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.

    Installing as well.

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.

    Please keep in mind that the release team raised valid concerns. And on
    any account it is important to treat them with respect. They are doing a challenging job on a challenging time frame. You know Debian Stable is
    called stable for a reason! To ensure that it requires excellent
    cooperation between the package developers and the release time. Please respect that.

    I recommend against posting to the bug report, the Qt/KDE team is doing
    a marvelous job at arguing in favor of having at least the packages with changes or at least with non-cosmetic changes from 5.27.5 in Bookworm.
    Please let them do their job. In case you installed 5.27.5 from
    experimental, tested it and like to vote on its stability, please do so
    here. And for not on the bug report. Someone from the Qt/KDE team can
    point to the thread with the votes if need be.

    Plasma 5.27.5 installed here.

    % aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'

    % dpkg -l | grep "5\.27\.2"
    [… no output …]

    I bet there is a variant for this for "apt" as well, but I never looked
    it up.

    Please only do so if you are willing to help testing and are careful
    about reading apt/aptitude output and about aborting the process in case
    it likes to remove packages you'd rather want to keep. Here I had no
    issues with upgrading, but that does not mean that it works on your
    system as well.

    Best,
    --
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Steigerwald@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 09:50:02 2023
    No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates
    extra work for me.

    Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 09:28:46 CEST:
    Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104?

    No.

    I am not aware of any plans to get KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later into
    Bookworm. AFAIK Frameworks consists of a lot more packages than Plasma.
    I don't see how KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later can still enter Bookworm
    before the release.

    So I'd rather test with 5.103 for now. If that works well I intend to
    give a feedback there. Then I may still decide to upgrade KF to 5.104.

    I wonder whether it might be a good idea to allow for an update during
    the stable cycle.

    Ciao,
    --
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luc Castermans@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 09:40:01 2023
    Hi

    On one machine I performed a

    apt upgrade -t experimental

    After which I needed to make few corrections on non-KDE related
    packages. The machine is running fine!!

    On the other machine the upgrade did not succeed due to failing
    dependencies. It went back to stable.


    Regards,

    Luc



    Op 19-05-2023 om 09:15 schreef Sedat Dilek:
    On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:01 AM Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:
    Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.
    Installing as well.

    Hi Martin, Hi Luc,

    Can you share how you upgraded to KDE/Plasma version 5.25.5?

    Thanks.

    Best regards,
    -Sedat-

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.

    Ciao,
    --
    Martin


    --
    m.vr.gr.

    Luc Castermans
    mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luc Castermans@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 09:50:02 2023
    I installed Frameworks 104. All looks great!

    Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12
    KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5
    KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0
    Qt Version: 5.15.8
    Kernel Version: 6.3.0-0-amd64 (64-bit)
    Graphics Platform: X11
    Processors: 4 × Intel® Core™ i5-4200U CPU @ 1.60GHz
    Memory: 7.2 GiB of RAM
    Graphics Processor: Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400
    Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
    Product Name: HP ProBook 430 G1
    System Version: A3009CD20303

    Op vr 19 mei 2023 om 09:40 schreef Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>:

    No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates
    extra work for me.

    Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 09:28:46 CEST:
    Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104?

    No.

    I am not aware of any plans to get KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later into Bookworm. AFAIK Frameworks consists of a lot more packages than Plasma.
    I don't see how KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later can still enter Bookworm
    before the release.

    So I'd rather test with 5.103 for now. If that works well I intend to
    give a feedback there. Then I may still decide to upgrade KF to 5.104.

    I wonder whether it might be a good idea to allow for an update during
    the stable cycle.

    Ciao,
    --
    Martin




    --
    Luc Castermans
    mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com

    <div dir="ltr"><div>I installed  Frameworks 104.  All looks great! <br></div><div><br></div><div>Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12<br>KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5<br>KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0<br>Qt Version: 5.15.8<br>Kernel Version: 6.3.0-0-
    amd64 (64-bit)<br>Graphics Platform: X11<br>Processors: 4 × Intel® Core™ i5-4200U CPU @ 1.60GHz<br>Memory: 7.2 GiB of RAM<br>Graphics Processor: Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400<br>Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard<br>Product Name: HP ProBook 430 G1<br>
    System Version: A3009CD20303</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Op vr 19 mei 2023 om 09:40 schreef Martin Steigerwald &lt;<a href="mailto:martin@lichtvoll.de">martin@lichtvoll.de</a>&gt;:<br></div><blockquote class="
    gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates <br>
    extra work for me.<br>
    <b
  • From Luc Castermans@21:1/5 to Martin Steigerwald on Fri May 19 10:40:01 2023
    ------0XWZV9ONMLLXZ05X8HQ7SZXH52AL5H
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    yep. i was lucky indeed. Only i had to repair a SSL package. LibreOffice got upgraded but i was okay with that


    Luc

    Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> schreef op 19 mei 2023 07:45:13 UTC: >Luc Castermans - 19.05.23, 09:38:23 CEST:
    On one machine I performed a

    apt upgrade -t experimental

    Without limiting the set of packages to upgrade? If so, you likely have >installed all packages from experimental, possibly including some that
    are really experimental. One may argue whether experimental is the right >place for bug fix updates during the release cycle, but it is used that
    way. However outside of release cycle it is used for test versions of >software. So you may have installed all kinds of funny and really
    unstable stuff on your system.

    Don't do that!

    I'd never ever do that. I posted the exact aptitude call for a reason.

    However maybe I am going to refrain from posting the exact commands
    again, so that people need to figure it out themselves and learn about
    the possible consequences.

    Anyway, you get you keep the pieces if anything breaks.

    After which I needed to make few corrections on non-KDE related
    packages. The machine is running fine!!

    As far as you can see after just a few minutes.

    Best,
    --
    Martin



    ------0XWZV9ONMLLXZ05X8HQ7SZXH52AL5H
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <html><head></head><body><div dir="auto">yep. i was lucky indeed. Only i had to repair a SSL package. LibreOffice got upgraded but i was okay with that<br><br><br>Luc</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">Martin Steigerwald &lt;martin@
    lichtvoll.de&gt; schreef op 19 mei 2023 07:45:13 UTC:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
    <pre class="k9mail"><div dir="auto">Luc Castermans - 19.05.23, 09:38:23 CEST:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="auto">On one machine I performed a<br><
    apt upgrade -t experimental<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br>Without limiting the set of packages to upgrade? If so, you likely have <br>installed all packages from experimental, possibly including some that <br>are really experimental. One
    may argue whether experimental is the right <br>place for bug fix updates during the release cycle, but it is used that <br>way. However outside of release cycle it is used for test versions of <br>software. So you may have installed all kinds of funny
    and really <br>unstable stuff on your system.<br><br>Don't do that!<br><br>I'd never ever do that. I posted the exact aptitude call for a reason.<br><br>However maybe I am going to refrain from posting the exact commands <br>again, so that people need to
    figure it out themselves and learn about <br>the possible consequences.<br><br>Anyway, you get you keep the pieces if anything breaks.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-
    left: 1ex;"><div dir="auto">After which I needed to make few corrections on non-KDE related<br>packages. The machine is running fine!!<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br>As far as you can see after just a few minutes.<br><br>Best,<br></div></pre></
    blockquote></div></body></html>
    ------0XWZV9ONMLLXZ05X8HQ7SZXH52AL5H--

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_COUDERC?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 10:30:01 2023
    Le 19 mai 2023 09:00:37 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> a écrit :
    Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.

    Installing as well.

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.

    Yes, useful for us there so we get some feedback that we're not talking nonsense when saying the new version is an improvement. 🙂

    But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our case more difficult.

    Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break more than it fixes.
    In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests.

    We may get a signoff for some but not all packages.


    Thanks all for your tests, feedback and support !

    --
    Aurélien

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_COUDERC?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 10:40:01 2023
    Le 19 mai 2023 09:39:52 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> a écrit :
    No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates >extra work for me.

    Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 09:28:46 CEST:
    Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104?

    No.

    I am not aware of any plans to get KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later into >Bookworm.

    No we have no plans for that.

    The ratio of important bug fixed vs. total number of packages to upgrade isn't worth it.

    If you identify specific bugs that affect you we may try and back port individual fixes.


    Happy hacking,
    --
    Aurélien

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Steigerwald@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 11:20:01 2023
    Dear Aurlien

    Aurlien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 10:09:56 CEST:
    But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the
    unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our
    case more difficult.

    Thanks for your clarification. I thought so as well as an aftermath of my
    mail and recommended not to send anything to the unblock bug report in
    another mail.

    Also thanks for your confirmation regarding KF.

    Best,
    --
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Diederik de Haas@21:1/5 to =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien?= COUDERC on Fri May 19 11:15:50 2023
    Copy: debian-kde@lists.debian.org

    On Friday, 19 May 2023 10:09:56 CEST Aurlien COUDERC wrote:
    Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break more than it fixes. In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests.

    If you have an exact list of packages + versions, I can test those exact combinations (which seems more useful then a random mix).
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZGc+RgAKCRDXblvOeH7b bk7IAP93nCCjfnnCo6sxi7u3nCofKbxeRRbMFSMiO6EjMKKphwD+KkgmnHuJUcEU Va47WtGnNHNLccQ/8RxxBNrz/ffaCgw=
    =cOKn
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sedat Dilek@21:1/5 to martin@lichtvoll.de on Fri May 19 11:30:01 2023
    On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:40 AM Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:

    No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates
    extra work for me.


    In my email-client:
    Reply: Martin Steigerwald
    Reply-all: Martin Steigerwald + ML <--- My default (dropping you each
    time is extra-time for me as well)

    -Sedat-

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sedat Dilek@21:1/5 to libre@coucouf.fr on Fri May 19 11:30:02 2023
    On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:30 AM Aurélien COUDERC <libre@coucouf.fr> wrote:



    Le 19 mai 2023 09:39:52 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> a écrit :
    No need to copy me directly. Actually I prefer that you do not. Creates >extra work for me.

    Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 09:28:46 CEST:
    Did you install and test KDE/Frameworks version 5.104?

    No.

    I am not aware of any plans to get KDE Frameworks 5.104 or later into >Bookworm.

    No we have no plans for that.

    The ratio of important bug fixed vs. total number of packages to upgrade isn't worth it.

    If you identify specific bugs that affect you we may try and back port individual fixes.


    Thanks for the information I just upgraded to KP/5.27.5 (only - NOT
    KF/5.104) successfully.

    -Sedat-

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Diederik de Haas@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 11:32:36 2023
    On Friday, 19 May 2023 09:19:31 CEST Martin Steigerwald wrote:
    % aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'

    You can use 'safe-upgrade' instead of 'install'
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZGdCNAAKCRDXblvOeH7b bnSiAQDkWA7LMWqdulMdGcI/qFHpmoFFgvx2fJfgUz/022lIOQD8CqZ85lJHkZvx z0uzT+E/eg4EJzyNobFRpxp4cd5x7AQ=
    =2M2a
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Steigerwald@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 12:50:02 2023
    Sedat Dilek - 19.05.23, 11:24:18 CEST:
    In my email-client:
    Reply: Martin Steigerwald
    Reply-all: Martin Steigerwald + ML <--- My default (dropping you each
    time is extra-time for me as well)

    Well it is easy: I provided support. I did not ask for support. In case
    I decide to limit my time in providing support I will first drop
    answering to mails that are in copy to me. I.e. your mails. It is simple
    as that, cause I decide how I spend my time. And I may limit it,
    especially in case I feel a lack of respect for the time I use to help
    others along.

    There can be reasons for CC to make someone aware of a mail one may
    otherwise miss. I don't need that. Especially I don't need that for a
    low volume mailing list like this. For each CC'd mail I receive two
    copies of the mail with mailing lists for the Debian community – mailing lists for the KDE community are set up differently. In case I reply to
    the wrong one, I break the thread. And it just happened with that thread already. I simply do not like to deal with this kind of hassle by
    default.

    Also please look at this Code of Conduct for Debian mailing lists:

    "When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon
    copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request to be
    copied."

    https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct

    Now you either respect my wish, or you don't. And I decide what I do
    with that.

    Best,
    --
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luc Castermans@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 13:20:02 2023
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    Dear

    I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using:

    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'

    Now it is running

    Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12
    KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5
    KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0
    Qt Version: 5.15.8
    Kernel Version: 6.1.0-9-amd64 (64-bit)
    Graphics Platform: X11
    Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor
    Memory: 31.3 GiB of RAM
    Graphics Processor: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030/PCIe/SSE2
    Manufacturer: BIOSTAR Group
    Product Name: A320MH

    Thank you very much team!!

    Luc


    Op 19-05-2023 om 10:09 schreef Aurélien COUDERC:

    Le 19 mai 2023 09:00:37 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald<martin@lichtvoll.de> a écrit :
    Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.
    Installing as well.

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.
    Yes, useful for us there so we get some feedback that we're not talking nonsense when saying the new version is an improvement. 🙂

    But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our case more difficult.

    Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break more than it fixes.
    In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests.

    We may get a signoff for some but not all packages.


    Thanks all for your tests, feedback and support !

    --
    Aurélien

    --
    m.vr.gr.

    Luc Castermans
    mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com

    <!DOCTYPE html>
    <html>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
    </head>
    <body>
    <p>Dear</p>
    <p>I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed
    later, using:<br>
    </p>
    <p><span style="font-family:monospace"><span
    style="color:#000000;background-color:#ffffff;">aptitude
    install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    </span><br>
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'<br>
    </span></p>
    <p>Now it is running</p>
    <p><span style="font-family:monospace">Operating System: Debian
    GNU/Linux 12<br>
    KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5<br>
    KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0<br>
    Qt Version: 5.15.8<br>
    Kernel Version: 6.1.0-9-amd64 (64-bit)<br>
    Graphics Platform: X11<br>
    Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor<br>
    Memory: 31.3 GiB of RAM<br>
    Graphics Processor: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030/PCIe/SSE2<br>
    Manufacturer: BIOSTAR Group<br>
    Product Name: A320MH<br>
    </span></p>
    <p>Thank you very much team!!</p>
    <p>Luc<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Op 19-05-2023 om 10:09 schreef Aurélien
    COUDERC:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
    cite="mid:3F8838D2-E028-4F8A-8D2E-6128A19149AF@coucouf.fr">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">

    Le 19 mai 2023 09:00:37 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:martin@lichtvoll.de">&lt;martin@lichtvoll.de&gt;</a> a écrit :
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
    Installing as well.

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
    Yes, useful for us there so we get some feedback that we're not talking nonsense when saying the new version is an improvement. 🙂

    But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our case more difficult.

    Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break more than it fixes.
    In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests.

    We may get a signoff for some but not all packages.


    Thanks all for your tests, feedback and support !

    --
    Aurélien

    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
    m.vr.gr.

    Luc Castermans
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com">mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com</a></pre>
    </body>
    </html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_COUDERC?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 15:00:01 2023
    ------AM2I1A9D10WHIDHDVJHZP0P6OS0FD3
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see the point.



    Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans <luc.castermans@gmail.com> a écrit :
    Dear

    I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using:

    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'

    Now it is running

    Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12
    KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5
    KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0
    Qt Version: 5.15.8
    Kernel Version: 6.1.0-9-amd64 (64-bit)
    Graphics Platform: X11
    Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor
    Memory: 31.3 GiB of RAM
    Graphics Processor: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030/PCIe/SSE2
    Manufacturer: BIOSTAR Group
    Product Name: A320MH

    Thank you very much team!!

    Luc


    Op 19-05-2023 om 10:09 schreef Aurélien COUDERC:

    Le 19 mai 2023 09:00:37 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald<martin@lichtvoll.de> a écrit :
    Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.
    Installing as well.

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.
    Yes, useful for us there so we get some feedback that we're not talking nonsense when saying the new version is an improvement. 🙂

    But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our case more difficult.

    Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break more than it fixes.
    In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests.

    We may get a signoff for some but not all packages.


    Thanks all for your tests, feedback and support !

    --
    Aurélien

    --
    m.vr.gr.

    Luc Castermans
    mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com

    ------AM2I1A9D10WHIDHDVJHZP0P6OS0FD3
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <!doctype html>
    <html>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
    </head>
    <body><div dir="auto">You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see the point.<br><br></div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans &lt;luc.castermans@gmail.com&gt; a é
    crit :</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

    <p>Dear</p>
    <p>I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed
    later, using:<br>
    </p>
    <p><span style="font-family:monospace"><span style="color:#000000;background-color:#ffffff;">aptitude
    install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    </span><br>
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'<br>
    </span></p>
    <p>Now it is running</p>
    <p><span style="font-family:monospace">Operating System: Debian
    GNU/Linux 12<br>
    KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5<br>
    KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0<br>
    Qt Version: 5.15.8<br>
    Kernel Version: 6.1.0-9-amd64 (64-bit)<br>
    Graphics Platform: X11<br>
    Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor<br>
    Memory: 31.3 GiB of RAM<br>
    Graphics Processor: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030/PCIe/SSE2<br>
    Manufacturer: BIOSTAR Group<br>
    Product Name: A320MH<br>
    </span></p>
    <p>Thank you very much team!!</p>
    <p>Luc<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Op 19-05-2023 om 10:09 schreef Aurélien
    COUDERC:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:3F8838D2-E028-4F8A-8D2E-6128A19149AF@coucouf.fr">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">

    Le 19 mai 2023 09:00:37 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:martin@lichtvoll.de">&lt;martin@lichtvoll.de&gt;</a> a écrit&nbsp;:
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Hi Luc.

    Luc Castermans - 16.05.23, 07:11:33 CEST:
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On top and for the record.

    I installed all of KDE, plasma 5.25.5 etc. from Experimental
    yesterday. The upgrade went smooth, all worked well.
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
    Installing as well.

    I don't know whether it helps if some users "vote" for its stability?
    But I am willing to do so if after a few days of test there is no
    regression compared to the current state.
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
    Yes, useful for us there so we get some feedback that we're not talking nonsense when saying the new version is an improvement. 🙂

    But please don't contact the release team directly nor comment on the unblock bug report about bit, it would only add noise and make our case more difficult.

    Also if people here could find the time to try and mix some .2 and .5 packages and report back, that would be useful to confirm it doesn't break more than it fixes.
    In particular mixing core components like kwin, libkscreen, plasmas workspace/desktop would be interesting tests.

    We may get a signoff for some but not all packages.


    Thanks all for your tests, feedback and support !

    --
    Aurélien

    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
    m.vr.gr.

    Luc Castermans
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com">mailto:luc.castermans@gmail.com</a></pre>
    </blockquote></div></body>
    </html>

    ------AM2I1A9D10WHIDHDVJHZP0P6OS0FD3--

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Steigerwald@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 16:00:01 2023
    Hi,

    Aurlien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 14:41:44 CEST:
    Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans
    <luc.castermans@gmail.com> a crit :
    Dear

    I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, >using:

    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'

    You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see
    the point.

    The version you specify is the version you like to upgrade to
    experimental. So 103 is about right.

    I will postpone upgrading to 5.104 a bit longer. So far all is fine and
    Plasma 5.27.5 works nicely.

    Thanks,
    --
    Martin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tv.debian@21:1/5 to Luc Castermans on Fri May 19 15:20:01 2023
    19/05/2023 09:44, Luc Castermans wrote:
    I installed Frameworks 104. All looks great!

    Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 12
    KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.5
    KDE Frameworks Version: 5.104.0


    I upgraded a Sid system to both plasma and Framework, if you have
    development packages installed Framework requires manual intervention in aptitude to upgrade successfully, at least for me.

    I am using Wayland only, and so far I saw a difference in how High DPI
    (2K screen) is handled for Mozilla applications (Firefox and
    Thunderbird, both from Debian repo). Both had their UI mangled, being
    way too big and not following the rest of the system for fonts and
    scaling. Also saw rapid flickering in drop-down menus in non-plasma applications. I fixed Mozilla apps, but still got occasional flickering breaking the use of drop-down menus.

    Downgrading Plasma and Framework doesn't restore Mozilla (and possibly
    other GTK) apps UI. I ended up restoring from backup to Sid.

    So not all smooth, probably due to Framework and not PLasma. I will try
    Plasma only this W-E.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_COUDERC?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 19 16:20:01 2023
    Le 19 mai 2023 15:52:24 GMT+02:00, Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> a écrit :
    Hi,

    Aurélien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 14:41:44 CEST:
    Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans ><luc.castermans@gmail.com> a écrit :
    Dear

    I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later,
    using:

    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'

    You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see
    the point.

    The version you specify is the version you like to upgrade to
    experimental. So 103 is about right.

    I will postpone upgrading to 5.104 a bit longer. So far all is fine and >Plasma 5.27.5 works nicely.

    Indeed, thanks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luc Castermans@21:1/5 to Martin Steigerwald on Sat May 20 09:20:01 2023
    ------O2A9NPQAHJRZM79PESUY9EMFI7BM1R
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    indeed. The command should have contained 104 instead of 103

    Luc

    Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> schreef op 19 mei 2023 13:52:24 UTC: >Hi,

    Aurélien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 14:41:44 CEST:
    Le 19 mai 2023 13:11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans ><luc.castermans@gmail.com> a écrit :
    Dear

    I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later,
    using:

    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'

    You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see
    the point.

    The version you specify is the version you like to upgrade to
    experimental. So 103 is about right.

    I will postpone upgrading to 5.104 a bit longer. So far all is fine and >Plasma 5.27.5 works nicely.

    Thanks,
    --
    Martin



    ------O2A9NPQAHJRZM79PESUY9EMFI7BM1R
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <html><head></head><body><div dir="auto">indeed. The command should have contained 104 instead of 103<br><br>Luc</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">Martin Steigerwald &lt;martin@lichtvoll.de&gt; schreef op 19 mei 2023 13:52:24 UTC:</
    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
    <pre class="k9mail"><div dir="auto">Hi,<br><br>Aurélien COUDERC - 19.05.23, 14:41:44 CEST:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="auto">Le 19 mai 2023 13:
    11:01 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans <br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">&lt;luc.castermans@gmail.com&gt; a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote
    class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="auto">Dear<br><br>I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later,<br>using:<br><br>aptitude install -t experimental '
    ~i ~V5\.27\.2'<br>aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br> You probably meant 104 for the second command otherwise I don't see<br> the point.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br>The version you
    specify is the version you like to upgrade to <br>experimental. So 103 is about right.<br><br>I will postpone upgrading to 5.104 a bit longer. So far all is fine and <br>Plasma 5.27.5 works nicely.<br><br>Thanks,<br></div></pre></blockquote></div></body><
    /html>
    ------O2A9NPQAHJRZM79PESUY9EMFI7BM1R--

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_COUDERC?=@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 20 10:40:01 2023
    Le 20 mai 2023 09:11:56 GMT+02:00, Luc Castermans <luc.castermans@gmail.com> a écrit :
    indeed. The command should have contained 104 instead of 103

    Nope, Martin corrected me on that, the expression selects the packages that you *want* to upgrade so 5.103.0 / 5.27.2 are correct.

    Best,
    --
    Aurélien

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Diederik de Haas@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 25 11:43:03 2023
    On Friday, 19 May 2023 13:11:01 CEST Luc Castermans wrote:
    I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using:

    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'

    I hadn't upgraded to those packages, but earlier today I did reboot my laptop and when I logged in, my desktop was completely blank and no longer had the icons and plasma widgets I had on them.

    After doing `aptitude safe-upgrade '~i~V5\.27\.2' -t experimental` and another reboot (maybe a logout/login would be sufficient; we'll never know), I had my normal desktop back.

    I haven't yet tried upgrade Frameworks, but the Plasma package update definitely fixed an issue on my laptop.

    Cheers,
    Diederik
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZG8tpwAKCRDXblvOeH7b bq27AQCrD7alefGpDOYeJOTCxg57yzDVHKHXp6AKUNdyhFNK9AEAsuaXlyg4UVt9 VgopBe/zmsZFXfWDoBomeF5DaXzRBAU=
    =PKKk
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luc Castermans@21:1/5 to Diederik de Haas on Thu May 25 12:00:01 2023
    ------9UFMXAU9TMMGR03I9TXUUH3JSZEING
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    i have two PC's on this level and have not seen strange behaviour as of today.

    Luc

    Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> schreef op 25 mei 2023 09:43:03 UTC: >On Friday, 19 May 2023 13:11:01 CEST Luc Castermans wrote:
    I just upgraded the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using: >>
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'
    aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'

    I hadn't upgraded to those packages, but earlier today I did reboot my laptop >and when I logged in, my desktop was completely blank and no longer had the >icons and plasma widgets I had on them.

    After doing `aptitude safe-upgrade '~i~V5\.27\.2' -t experimental` and another
    reboot (maybe a logout/login would be sufficient; we'll never know), I had my >normal desktop back.

    I haven't yet tried upgrade Frameworks, but the Plasma package update >definitely fixed an issue on my laptop.

    Cheers,
    Diederik
    ------9UFMXAU9TMMGR03I9TXUUH3JSZEING
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    <html><head></head><body><div dir="auto">i have two PC's on this level and have not seen strange behaviour as of today.<br><br>Luc</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">Diederik de Haas &lt;didi.debian@cknow.org&gt; schreef op 25 mei 2023
    09:43:03 UTC:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
    <pre class="k9mail"><div dir="auto">On Friday, 19 May 2023 13:11:01 CEST Luc Castermans wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="auto">I just upgraded
    the machine which was messed up earlier, fixed later, using:<br><br>aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.27\.2'<br>aptitude install -t experimental '~i ~V5\.103\.0'<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br>I hadn't upgraded to those packages, but
    earlier today I did reboot my laptop <br>and when I logged in, my desktop was completely blank and no longer had the <br>icons and plasma widgets I had on them.<br><br>After doing `aptitude safe-upgrade '~i~V5\.27\.2' -t experimental` and another <br>
    reboot (maybe a logout/login would be sufficient; we'll never know), I had my <br>normal desktop back. <br><br>I haven't yet tried upgrade Frameworks, but the Plasma package update <br>definitely fixed an issue on my laptop.<br><br>Cheers,<br> Diederik</
    </pre></blockquote></div></body></html> ------9UFMXAU9TMMGR03I9TXUUH3JSZEING--

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)