• Re: An example of app development in the real world which is impossible

    From Danart@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 7 05:04:09 2024
    Andrew wrote:
    This recent thread is an example of how app development can happen
    in the
    real world where one developer abandons an app, and other
    developers pick
    it up, and then they ask for user input and they add everything
    people
    want.

    *Android Usenet news newsreader*

    https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=51238&group=comp.mobile.android#51238


    Not only is the iPhone a dumb terminal that has nothing by way of functionality that Android didn't have on free phones years ago,
    but you can't update iOS and then load & test an APK in the
    real world
    like this Pia Hong Usenet newsreader was recently improved that
    way.

    Compare the brain-dead functionality of NewsTap, for example, to
    that of this PiaHong Android Usenet Newsreader recently improved.

    Name: OC-ModNewsReader 2.02.M17.apk
    Size: 3926860 bytes (3834 KiB)
    SHA256:
    BB05B9FD454AD8D38047484FEA338DE9FDAB056F56B66D39C114162A53883815

    https://mega.nz/file/uYJSwBJD#3Ya4p0HpSczyt95c_MnXjyBXYqP5J_Phkz0gZ9RbkCI


    Such useful collaborative work on old apps no longer updated by
    their
    developers is impossible with iOS and yet - it's rather common on
    Android.

    Which is why Android does hundreds of useful things that iOS can't
    do, and
    yet, there's nothing whatsoever by way of functionality that iOS
    does that
    Android doesn't already do (usually on an old free Android phone
    too!).

    The reason iOS is brain dead compared to Android is both obvious
    & simple:
    a. Most functionality is provided by developers
    b. Apple severely restricts what developers can provide
    c. Google can't.

    Even when Apple provides an app (such as the iOS camera app),
    there's no
    competition, so again, iOS is brain dead within apps compared to
    Android.

    The end result shows why iOS devices don't actually work in the
    real world.

    iOS is for people who do not know computers. That
    is the Apple way. It is literally based off Steve Jobbs association
    with women after he made it big. Like his daughters mother whom he
    called a $#$@. People like that who sleeps around and goes partying.
    That is what Apple is really about. Computers for non computer people.


    OSX ( even now ) runs on a form of Unix called BSD. Apple licensed it
    out, so they could have as much support and have no problems in the
    future. Might as well just learn Linux and install Ubuntu and ignore
    Apple all together unless you like checks after checks in your
    software.

    Apple ( Jobbs ) wanted control. He saw the future. You do not pay for
    the ownership of the software just the usage of it.


    ........................

    What is funny is how many people are porting there iOS apps to Android
    and PC and watching their sales actually rise. iOS is like saying
    "I am a Linux user and do not even know it", where android
    admits that it is Linux at some parts of it's execution.
    Is iOS in your Smart-TV's ? NO. Is iOS a desktop system now gone
    portable ? Nope.


    This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=664612621#664612621

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)