1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.MAC.ADVOCACY

  • Re: Apple will continue to rely on Qualcomm for 5G chips in 2024 includ

    From Alan@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Sun Jan 8 09:38:14 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2023-01-08 09:23, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    right, just like the various pundits who guaranteed that apple's m1
    chip, which is also 'extremely complex', would not be able to match
    intel and amd processors, except that not only did the m1 match them,
    but far surpassed them and at a fraction of power consumption

    The M1 is worthless with those unpatchable security holes, nospam.

    Have you noticed Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class chip.

    And no, with M1's unpatchable security flaws, it's not best in anything.

    So name a better CPU than the M1, Arlen...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sun Jan 8 17:23:10 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    right, just like the various pundits who guaranteed that apple's m1
    chip, which is also 'extremely complex', would not be able to match
    intel and amd processors, except that not only did the m1 match them,
    but far surpassed them and at a fraction of power consumption

    The M1 is worthless with those unpatchable security holes, nospam.

    Have you noticed Apple has _never_ designed a best-in-class chip.

    And no, with M1's unpatchable security flaws, it's not best in anything.
    --
    In fact, to put it bluntly, the Apple M1 is a veritable piece of shit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)