Angry trolls incoming! ; )
Jolly Roger wrote:
Angry trolls incoming! ; )
An _adult_ blah blah blah
An _adult_ observation
it's also from a company who has a vested interest in scaring users to
buy their anti-malware products on various platforms.
that's also is why malware on ios is *extremely* difficult to do
effectively and at scale.
*Emails reveal 128 million iOS users were affected by XcodeGhost malware*
that was because some chinese developers had download issues getting
xcode from apple, so they instead used a copy of xcode that had malware
in it. it was quickly patched and no longer an issue.
Last we looked at this in detail, it was always the case that a properly
configured Android was far more expensive to successfully crack into in
pentests than a properly configured iOS device - simply because Apple.
that is absolutely false.
it's much easier to crack into an android phone than android.
it helps to actually understand how it's done rather than simply read linkbait headlines.
That's good advice except that Apple adds at least one zero-day hole every >> single month into iOS (for years and years they've done that), so what he's >> doing by adding the latest release is adding another zero-day hole too. :)
false, and further demonstrates your lack of knowledge about security,
not just iphones.
Worse, iOS can _only_ update by updating the entire release, whereas at
least with Android he'd be able to update whatever file has the hole. :)
also false.
some ios updates are a few megabytes, whereas the 'entire release' is a
few gigabytes. one of those is much smaller than the other. guess what
that means.
keep up the good work. you don't want to say anything that's actually correct, now do you? that would ruin your stellar record of being wrong
about everything.
As we already said, it's well known (and we've discussed this in detail)
that a "properly configured" Android is _always_ safer than a properly
configured iOS ever can be.
that is not only false, but 'properly configured android' is very
difficult to do to do to where it's as secure as ios out of the box.
If nospam wants to disagree, he'll need to
provide cites since it's well known as proven in published pentests.
those mythical published pentests don't show what you think they do.
However, Android does allow lots of app functionality that iOS doesn't so
there are a few things that android can do that ios cannot and a bunch
of things that ios can do that android cannot.
no device does everything in every situation.
unlike android, it's difficult to compromise an iphone (don't believe
the misleading linkbait headlines).
Then how come jailbreaks work nospam?
jailbreaking requires multiple exploits and physical possession of the
phone.
that's very different than a user being sent a link in a rogue email or
text message, which they tap.
it helps to actually understand how things work, something you are
incapable of.
You don't know how Android updates and you don't know how iOS updates.
They're different.
i have both, so yes i do, along with mac and windows too, as well as
desktop and embedded linux.
it's much easier to crack into an android phone than android.
Tell that to the people running pen tests who say otherwise.
it helps to actually understand how it's done rather than simply read linkbait headlines.
some ios updates are a few megabytes, whereas the 'entire release' is a
few gigabytes. one of those is much smaller than the other. guess what
that means.
You don't know how Android updates and you don't know how iOS updates. They're different.
And stop the bullshit about the "few gigabytes" because only a moron
doesn't know what I mean when I say the entire OS has to be updated.
You _know_ exactly what I mean by iOS being monolithic.
there are a few things that android can do that ios cannot and a bunch
of things that ios can do that android cannot.
There is _zero_ app functionality in iOS that isn't already in Android.
Then tell us which two dozen core modules update over the Internet (without the carriers even involved!) on the modern Android 10 and above nospam.
Then tell us which two dozen core modules update over the Internet (without >> the carriers even involved!) on the modern Android 10 and above nospam.
right after you explain how ios updates that are just a few megabytes
for a roughly 2 gigabyte os can be considered 'monolithic'.
perhaps you should start by explaining the difference between mega- and
giga- before moving onto the more complex topics.
In article <t4roca$1acr$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
<spam@nospam.com> wrote:
Then tell us which two dozen core modules update over the Internet (without >> the carriers even involved!) on the modern Android 10 and above nospam.
right after you explain how ios updates that are just a few megabytes
for a roughly 2 gigabyte os can be considered 'monolithic'.
perhaps you should start by explaining the difference between mega- and
giga- before moving onto the more complex topics.
nospam wrote:
Then tell us which two dozen core modules update over the Internet
(without
the carriers even involved!) on the modern Android 10 and above nospam.
right after you explain how ios updates that are just a few megabytes
for a roughly 2 gigabyte os can be considered 'monolithic'.
Stop playing stupid nospam.
You know that _every_ fix by Apple to the OS _requires_ an entirely new OS version (whether or not any individual iOS device has the prior version).
None of the other four common consumer operating systems do that.
Just iOS.
The mechanism iOS uses is so primitive that it _slows_ down fixes, nospam. *Why Apple should provide standalone updates for native iOS apps* <https://9to5mac.com/2022/01/21/heres-why-apple-should-provide-standalone-updates-for-native-ios-apps/>
perhaps you should start by explaining the difference between mega- and
giga- before moving onto the more complex topics.
Stop acting like Alan Baker whose only purpose on Usenet is to bolster his own low self esteem by your kindergarten arguments about mega vs giga.
You know that _every_ fix by Apple to the OS _requires_ an entirely new OS version (whether or not any individual iOS device has the prior version).
None of the other four common consumer operating systems do that.
If the entire OS (in this case iOS 14) comes in at nearly 3 gigabytes...
...please explain how the pending update to 14.15.1 is only 133 megabytes...
...roughly 4% of that size...
...please explain how that can be a monolithic install of the OS
...please explain how that can be a monolithic install of the OS
math is hard.
You know that _every_ fix by Apple to the OS _requires_ an entirely new OS >> version (whether or not any individual iOS device has the prior version).
they increment the version number to make it easy to differentiate from
the previous versions. that's a good thing.
nospam wrote:
...please explain how that can be a monolithic install of the OS
math is hard.
The adults will notice that nospam _hates_ the fact iOS uses a primitive monolithic update mechanism which no other modern operating system uses.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 67:49:56 |
Calls: | 6,915 |
Files: | 12,379 |
Messages: | 5,431,814 |