On 07/12/2021 20:55, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-07, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 07/12/2021 15:48, Kelly Phillips wrote:
On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:59:51 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
I was *NOT* dismissed from the Royal Navy - for *ANY* reason.
Hard to believe you're still on active duty after all these years. I
guess the stories of insurance sales scams and financial management
scams, not to mention the stories of boating on sewage canals, were all >>>> a ruse to hide the fact that you're still a member of the RN.
Or, it could be that you're simply being dishonest again.
The truth WILL out - always. :-D
Oh, it's out. That cake is fully baked.
I didn't realise that English isn't your first language.
Sorry about that.
What an odd thing to say given that you've been asking the same
questions over and over, and getting the responses in English, for
years.
The Kelly Phillips character has no understanding of the word "dismissed".
On 08/12/2021 00:59, Wolffan - A known Usenet *USER* claimed
I'm not the vile serial homosexual sexual harasser.
Nor me.
On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.
No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
every bit as described.
Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D
Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)
David*GOOD GUY*!
Is snit sharing his jenkem recipe with you? You're just as
dillusonal as he is.
YOU are the one full of shit!
<snip use of real names, inappropriate on Usenet>
On 08/12/2021 18:47, Kelly Phillips wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:53 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
On 08/12/2021 00:14, LegionX wrote:
David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
You've swallowed lies, hook line and sinker. You should be ashamed of yourself.
No sane logical thinking individual would agree with you. You are
every bit as described.
Total rubbish! I have an exemplary, unblemished, service record. :-D
Prove otherwise! (You cannot!)
Careful with those challenges.
*The challenge stands*!
On 08/12/2021 20:25, Snit wrote:
I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with unsupported >> accusations about him. If you can show otherwise I would be curious to see it.
Me too!
On 08/12/2021 21:06, Steve Carroll wrote:
Being that DB has admitted to a number of them it's false to claim
there's no support.
Which ones?
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:16:16 +0000, David Brooks
<DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 08/12/2021 20:25, Snit wrote:
I do not believe David ever asked anyone to put up a page with
unsupported accusations about him. If you can show otherwise I
would be curious to see it.
Well, he DID ask the website owner to put a page up for him,
and the website owner complied. He then asked BD to point out any inaccuracies. BD spotted one #FAKE_NYM he had never used(we only
have his word for that though) and it was removed. All the other
#FAKE_NYMS were "ratified" by BD himself.
EVERY SINGLE ONE has BD's FULL SUPPORT.
I can understand that your known drug abuse might make
interpreting text a tad difficult, but you could try harder.
Better still, get a real job. If you work you wont have time
to make excuses for a proven *LIAR*, *STALKER*and *SLIMER*.
Me too!
You too what? Are they handing out free Royal Navy surplus
dildos?
I'll pass on that.
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
Here's the simple question:
Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
TIA
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021
On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
Here's the simple question:
Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
TIA
[]'s
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
Here's the simple question:
Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
TIA
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:31:59 GMT, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
Here's the simple question:
Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
TIA
[]'s
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
No, snit does drugs. BD drinks.
HTH
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021
Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
Here's the simple question:
Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
TIA
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
One of us is, the other isn’t.
BD drinks.
I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
xposts.
Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.
On 11/12/2021 22:45, Helmut Achterberg wrote:
I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
xposts.
Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.
You are welcome here, Helmut :-)
Shadow is an out-and-out liar.
Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
Here's the simple question:
Which of the #FAKE_NYMS on this page have you NEVER USED?
<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Just list them and your husband/wife/companion/partner snit
can stop fretting over it and go out and look for employment.
TIA
[]'s
:-D
You are welcome here, Helmut.
On 11/12/2021 23:15, Helmut Achterberg wrote:
On 2021-12-11, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 11/12/2021 22:45, Helmut Achterberg wrote:
I wandered in from alt.os.linux and comp.os.linux.advocacy due to
xposts.
Was lurking for a wee bit but had to ask.
You are welcome here, Helmut :-)
Thank you.
Shadow is an out-and-out liar.
I am not in a position to judge anyone nor do I intend to.
I'm a big proponent of the glass house and rocks theory.
Let the cards fall where they may.
Thank you for the kind welcome.
YW :-)
Mike Easter is a proponent of Linux. With his help and advice, I've
recently set up Linux Mint on my old 24 inch Apple iMac.
At present, my @ and " keys are reversed. Could you advise me how to
swop them around?
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
That really is NOT funny.
Tell the TRUTH - I do.
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve
Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>>
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is <redacted> - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)
On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
That really is NOT funny.
Tell the TRUTH - I do.
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>>
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is a *LIAR* -
it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is a *LIAR* -
Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)
Two things:
1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information
he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)
When do you get to blackmailing me?
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow wrote:
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is <redacted> - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>> is not true!)
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail....
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
deranged. :-(
On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade.
Shadow is a *LIAR* -
Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
it is impossible for him to support that claim )It
is not true!)
Two things:
1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:04:03 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5v53$t30$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>>
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
That really is NOT funny.
Tell the TRUTH - I do.
Another plea for attention from Carroll.
On 12/12/2021 14:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote: >>
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
That really is NOT funny.
Tell the TRUTH - I do.
On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
deranged. :-(
Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
Hi Snit!
As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.
On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
deranged. :-(
Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)
Hi Snit!
As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.
On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU!
On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,Shadow is a *LIAR* -
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>
Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
is not true!)
Two things:
1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts
over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What
happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.
Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to using sock puppets. Curious.
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wroteNotice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
<dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,Shadow is a *LIAR* -
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
is not true!)
Two things:
1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts >>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What >>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious. >>
using sock puppets. Curious.
I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.
What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the names.
Many have NOT been used on Usenet.
It's a puzzle!
On 13/12/2021 16:04, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with >>>> me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
Have I not already apologised for so doing, way back?
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
Have I not already apologised for so doing, way back?
I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.
What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the >names.
Many have NOT been used on Usenet.
It's a puzzle!
On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:[....]
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
comparisons between you two.
Yes. It was a joke.
My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
most of us do not have to deal.
In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
a myriad of ways.
Are you now sorry for having done so?
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
I know who you are, what you look like and where you live.
I know friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to
help 'teach you a lesson'
. had you persisted in hurting Snit.
What made you desist from so doing?
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:[....]
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make comparisons between you two.
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:[....]
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
comparisons between you two.
Yes. It was a joke.
My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
most of us do not have to deal.
In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
a myriad of ways.
Are you now sorry for having done so?
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.
What made you desist from so doing?
On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wroteNotice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to
<dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S>
wrote:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,Shadow is a *LIAR* -
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
is not true!)
Two things:
1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts >>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What >>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious. >>
using sock puppets. Curious.
I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.
What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the names.
Many have NOT been used on Usenet.
It's a puzzle!
On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
deranged. :-(
Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)
Hi Snit!
As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.
On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
Again Carroll attacks others even though he has not only threatened (promised)
blackmail but then tried to carry it out -- only to have those he attacked either ignore it or, in the most extreme case, get the police to pay him a visit. As far as I know that finally got Carroll to stop contacting people in my life.
On Dec 13, 2021 at 10:39:05 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp80fp$qa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wroteNotice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to >>> using sock puppets. Curious.
<dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> >>>>> wrote:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,Shadow is a *LIAR* -
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
is not true!)
Two things:
1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts >>>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What >>>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious. >>>
I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.
What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the
names.
Many have NOT been used on Usenet.
It's a puzzle!
Carroll has referred to his use of "aliases" -- socks. He is doing as he does:
looking to have others argue with each other as he stays out of the fray even though he does FAR worse.
He is good at such manipulations and I fell for it many times. I no longer do.
On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:[....]
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
comparisons between you two.
Yes. It was a joke.
My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
most of us do not have to deal.
In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
a myriad of ways.
Are you now sorry for having done so?
I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions. He will continue to lash out and lie and point to his obsessively scavenged and forged quotes about me BECAUSE he cannot actually quote me doing as he accuses. He knows his claims are lies... he just does not care.
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.
What made you desist from so doing?
Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and more. Sometimes he denies it. Sometimes he brags about it.
My understanding, rightly or wrongly,
is that you are well aware that Snit has had to deal with medical >conditions....
*There is no such thing as a FAKE pseudonym*
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:[....]
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
comparisons between you two.
Yes. It was a joke.
You acknowledge it, yet, you still lied by calling it a "LIE".
My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
most of us do not have to deal.
What I'm "well aware" of is that Glasser is a hypochondriac and a
perpetual 'victim' who can't string together many words before a lie
pops out. That extremely incomplete 'list' of his is very real and it's >something he can't explain, it's something you won't even address. So
cut the crap, troll. I don't care about his *alleged* ailments, they are
no reason to do what he does. There are plenty of people with serious
issues who don't resort to the crap he's pulled.
In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
a myriad of ways.
If calling out his lies 'hurts' him then, as his 'friend', you should be >using your time to convince him to stop lying, as opposed to lying on
your own on his behalf.
Are you now sorry for having done so?
I've done nothing to be sorry for.
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
I know who you are, what you look like and where you live.
LOL!
I know friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to
help 'teach you a lesson'
Are we back to 'pikeys' again? ;)
. had you persisted in hurting Snit.
What made you desist from so doing?
You're asking me why I never hurt Snit *as* you write and tell me that
I've done my best to hurt him in a myriad of ways? And you want to be
seen as sober?! If I wanted to do anything to Snit I'd have done it many >years ago.
I'll say it AGAIN, I haven't done the crap that lying ass has falsely
accused me of, he's been lying to you from day one. How can you verify
this? Where is all the proof that he's crowed about for years on end?
Why hasn't the crap he's presented as "evidence" ever convinced any real >posters (as opposed to his sock army)? People see what he does, stop >pretending otherwise and STFU about that pathological liar, there's
nothing you can do to defend him. Deal with it.
On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:49:36 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sp7q2g$1go$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 14:18, Snit wrote:
On Dec 13, 2021 at 4:01:31 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp796b$cap$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
That's yet another of the lies told by Shadow. He's now totally
deranged. :-(
Oh. I was wondering why it was taking you so long. :)
Hi Snit!
As you know already, I'm a guy who likes to /help/ the less fortunate
folk I meet, both on-line and in real-life.
Yes, of course. As do I.
It is sorta funny, and sad, how those who think in terms of harming others cannot imagine others not being like them.
I see no
others in his medical report
On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:[....]
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
comparisons between you two.
Yes. It was a joke.
My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
most of us do not have to deal.
In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in
a myriad of ways.
Are you now sorry for having done so?
I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions.
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.
What made you desist from so doing?
Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and more.
On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds,
claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with
me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
Again Carroll attacks others
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
On 14/12/2021 01:52, Snit wrote:
On Dec 13, 2021 at 10:39:05 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp80fp$qa$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 15:13, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 6:16:34 PM MST, "Kelly Phillips" wrote
<dc7drgp2j6dlkjvvvv1fpt6seot3tt80kj@4ax.com>:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:08:24 +0000, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> >>>>>> wrote:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>>Shadow is a *LIAR* -
Which part of that wasn't true? Hint: it was all true.
it is impossible for him to support that claim) It
is not true!)
Two things:
1. He really doesn't need to support any of that because your own posts >>>>>> over the years do a better job than anyone else could do.
2. Didn't you just say, in another post, "Tell the truth - I do"? What >>>>>> happened? Why couldn't you tell the truth here? Inconvenient?
Notice you lash out with accusations but offer no actual content. Curious.
Notice how you ignore the fact that DB has just, once AGAIN, admitted to >>>> using sock puppets. Curious.
I have NEVER used a *FALSE* pseudonym - they have ALL been genuine.
What you *SHOULD* be asking is *from WHERE* is my stalker collecting the >>> names.
Many have NOT been used on Usenet.
It's a puzzle!
Carroll has referred to his use of "aliases" -- socks. He is doing as he does:
looking to have others argue with each other as he stays out of the fray even
though he does FAR worse.
He is good at such manipulations and I fell for it many times. I no longer do.
I appreciate you warning me.
Thanks. 🙂
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:05:24 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:[....]
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
comparisons between you two.
Yes. It was a joke.
You acknowledge it, yet, you still lied by calling it a "LIE".
My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
most of us do not have to deal.
What I'm "well aware" of is that Glasser is a hypochondriac and a
perpetual 'victim' who can't string together many words before a lie
pops out. That extremely incomplete 'list' of his is very real and it's >>something he can't explain, it's something you won't even address. So
cut the crap, troll. I don't care about his *alleged* ailments, they are
no reason to do what he does. There are plenty of people with serious >>issues who don't resort to the crap he's pulled.
In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in >>> a myriad of ways.
If calling out his lies 'hurts' him then, as his 'friend', you should be >>using your time to convince him to stop lying, as opposed to lying on
your own on his behalf.
Are you now sorry for having done so?
I've done nothing to be sorry for.
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
I know who you are, what you look like and where you live.
LOL!
I know friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to
help 'teach you a lesson'
Are we back to 'pikeys' again? ;)
. had you persisted in hurting Snit.
What made you desist from so doing?
You're asking me why I never hurt Snit *as* you write and tell me that
I've done my best to hurt him in a myriad of ways? And you want to be
seen as sober?! If I wanted to do anything to Snit I'd have done it many >>years ago.
I'll say it AGAIN, I haven't done the crap that lying ass has falsely >>accused me of, he's been lying to you from day one. How can you verify >>this? Where is all the proof that he's crowed about for years on end?
Why hasn't the crap he's presented as "evidence" ever convinced any real >>posters (as opposed to his sock army)? People see what he does, stop >>pretending otherwise and STFU about that pathological liar, there's
nothing you can do to defend him. Deal with it.
While I agree with everything you wrote, could you please
change the subject line?
BD (and from the replies) snit are using it to feed the bots.
Google bots are quite intelligent, but a mass of posts claiming my descriptions of BD and snit are not 100% accurate might stain my
pristine reputation.
TIA
------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":
<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
102 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Stalker".
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021
On 14/12/2021 01:58, Snit wrote:
On Dec 13, 2021 at 8:51:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp7q6c$1go$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 15:14, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> wrote:
On 13/12/2021 00:11, Snit wrote:
On Dec 12, 2021 at 4:08:24 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp5vd9$bpn$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 12/12/2021 16:30, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*!
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:43:07 -0000 (UTC), Steve CarrollShadow is a *LIAR* - it is impossible for him to support that claim )It >>>>>>> is not true!)
<"SteveCarroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
On 2021-12-11, Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> wrote:
(snip)
Are snit and David Brooks the same person?
For virtually all intents and purposes in ACW, yes ;)
BD asks for help(phishing), praises anyone that responds, >>>>>>>> claims he wants to "befriend" them, then uses any personal information >>>>>>>> he can gather to blackmail them. He's been doing it for over a decade. >>>>>>>
When do you get to blackmailing me?
I'm sorry, Snit - I don't DO blackmail.
Then what's the term you use to describe what you attempted to do with >>>> me?
(cue up 'poor memory' AGAIN by DB)
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
Again Carroll attacks others even though he has not only threatened (promised)
blackmail but then tried to carry it out -- only to have those he attacked >> either ignore it or, in the most extreme case, get the police to pay him a >> visit. As far as I know that finally got Carroll to stop contacting people in
my life.
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
On 14/12/2021 01:49, Snit wrote:
On Dec 13, 2021 at 1:25:30 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sp8a7r$q8a$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 13/12/2021 17:53, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-13, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:[....]
I didn't ATTEMPT to do anything to you.
Be honest - I FRIGHTENED YOU! ;-)
You admit to attempting it *as* you say you didn't attempt it.
You've been hanging around Snit too long ;)
It's not like you to be stupid about such things.
First of all, it was a joke... but it's not a giant stretch to make
comparisons between you two.
Yes. It was a joke.
My understanding, rightly or wrongly, is that you are well aware that
Snit has had to deal with medical conditions with which, thankfully,
most of us do not have to deal.
In spite of that, it appears that you have done your best to hurt him in >>> a myriad of ways.
Are you now sorry for having done so?
I do not think Carroll has the capacity to feel regret for his poor actions. >> He will continue to lash out and lie and point to his obsessively scavenged >> and forged quotes about me BECAUSE he cannot actually quote me doing as he >> accuses. He knows his claims are lies... he just does not care.
That really saddens me. :-(
I *DID* frighten you, just for a bit.
No... but go ahead and explain why I would be frightened.
I know who you are, what you look like and where you live. I know
friends in the USA who would have been more than willing to help 'teach
you a lesson' had you persisted in hurting Snit.
What made you desist from so doing?
Carroll and his ex used to repeatedly contact my neighbors and ask them to >> watch me... and Carroll contacted my employer, my co-workers, my clients, and
more. Sometimes he denies it. Sometimes he brags about it.
That's the kind of behaviour engaged in by Dustin Cook.
Threats from such people should not be taken lightly.
Stay safe, Snit. 💕
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Threats from such people should not be taken lightly.
Sadly in the US the police do not take this stuff that seriously.
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened.
You appear to be denying it.
When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
about Aardvark?
What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
when they paid you a visit?
David Brooks wrote:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
when they paid you a visit?
Snit told you?
Well, that's a different story altogether.
We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
You can take that to the bank.
P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
yourself because snit is a pathological liar.
On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
David Brooks wrote:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
when they paid you a visit?
Snit told you?
Well, that's a different story altogether.
We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
You can take that to the bank.
P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
yourself because snit is a pathological liar.
No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to 'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute,
they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
*alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill in
the blank> even *is* the correct person.
The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a
copy of the report. This hasn't happened... it hasn't happened from the
guy who claims he always backs his statements. Glasser doesn't know much about 'the law', if he did he wouldn't have come up with a goofy story
on the level of a 3rd grader. Even DB knows Snit is lying to him, he
just doesn't care. He knows Snit is mentally challenged so he has a soft
spot for him.
On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened.
So whatever you're "told" by someone you call a "friend" is the end all,
be all? Screw what many others have "told" about Snit? Screw the
evidence you keep refusing to look at that proves how ridiculously
dishonest he is? Care to explain why you should be seen as a reasonable person as you hold such a goofy position?
You appear to be denying it.
I am denying it and I'm doing so based on the fact that it never
happened, which is why Snit can't prove it did. He can drum up a
'client' who can falsely claim it did, he can even drum up phony emails
that you won't be able to verify have *anything* to do with me, what he
can't do is show actual evidence because there isn't any. Why do you
think he continually points to the same post and has for the over 15
years? That's not an accident, it's all he has and he has to try an'
spin it to make it appear to back his BS... but it doesn't. Not even
close.
When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
about Aardvark?
I have no idea but unless you can produce evidence of it, it's pointless
to bring it up.
What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?
No visit ever happened. You're being made a fool of by Snit, just like
so many on his 'list' have been before they finally got tired of it. Ask
Snit about his 'friend' Slimer (Silver Slimer), or ask him about DFS.
Today, he calls them out for being "racists" (and perhaps they actually
are) but he never said a peep when they hadn't yet figured him out. He's
a huge phony who uses people (maybe that's why you get along with him?).
'David Brooks' [...]
=
NO EVIDENCE has been provided to show WHERE these pseudonyms have been
used.
"David Brooks" wrote:
[nyms]
'David Brooks' [...]
=
NO EVIDENCE has been provided to show WHERE these pseudonyms have been
used.
Your post I now reply to is using the above nym, right here. The
evidence (MID) is in my "References" header.
On 15/12/2021 20:04, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap >>>> so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened.
So whatever you're "told" by someone you call a "friend" is the end all,
be all? Screw what many others have "told" about Snit? Screw the
evidence you keep refusing to look at that proves how ridiculously
dishonest he is? Care to explain why you should be seen as a reasonable
person as you hold such a goofy position?
What I 'see' and 'hear' on Usenet is often rubbish.
What I see and hear on Messenger and Skype, and what I read in email messages, tends to be more believable.
You have read an honest summary of my career in LinkedIn. What I tell
you is the truth.
All I know about you is that you feel a bit of a failure.
I'm sorry
about that, but lots of musicians trip over drugs and booze during their career.
You appear to be denying it.
I am denying it and I'm doing so based on the fact that it never
happened, which is why Snit can't prove it did. He can drum up a
'client' who can falsely claim it did, he can even drum up phony emails
that you won't be able to verify have *anything* to do with me, what he
can't do is show actual evidence because there isn't any. Why do you
think he continually points to the same post and has for the over 15
years? That's not an accident, it's all he has and he has to try an'
spin it to make it appear to back his BS... but it doesn't. Not even
close.
I've not looked at any post. I simply asked him face-to-face.
On 15/12/2021 20:45, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
David Brooks wrote:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
when they paid you a visit?
Snit told you?
Well, that's a different story altogether.
We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
You can take that to the bank.
P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
yourself because snit is a pathological liar.
No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to
'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those
statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute,
they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
*alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill in
the blank> even *is* the correct person.
The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a
copy of the report. This hasn't happened... it hasn't happened from the
guy who claims he always backs his statements. Glasser doesn't know much
about 'the law', if he did he wouldn't have come up with a goofy story
on the level of a 3rd grader. Even DB knows Snit is lying to him, he
just doesn't care. He knows Snit is mentally challenged so he has a soft
spot for him.
FWIW, I've never seen the police report written after PC536 (*******)
visited me on 07 November 2012 to investigate a complaint made about me
by Aardvark.
If we all know that Snit needs /help/ we should HELP him, not grind him
into dust.
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it.
When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
about Aardvark?
What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?
On 15/12/2021 20:45, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
David Brooks wrote:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
when they paid you a visit?
Snit told you?
Well, that's a different story altogether.
We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
You can take that to the bank.
P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
yourself because snit is a pathological liar.
No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to
'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those
statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute,
they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
*alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill inthe
blank> even *is* the correct person.
The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a
copy of the report.
This hasn't happened... it hasn't happened from the
guy who claims he always backs his statements. Glasser doesn't know much
about 'the law', if he did he wouldn't have come up with a goofy story
on the level of a 3rd grader. Even DB knows Snit is lying to him, he
just doesn't care. He knows Snit is mentally challenged so he has a soft
spot for him.
FWIW, I've never seen the police report written after PC536 (*******)
visited me on 07 November 2012 to investigate a complaint made about me
by Aardvark.
If we all know that Snit needs /help/ we should HELP him, not grind him
into dust.
On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes
this crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you
writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
denying it.
He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into
various Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what
the clients think about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even
admitted contacting one of the clients at one time. And he had
several posts where he made it very clear he was contacting one of
my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other times a
threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy
Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling
them like that and lying was not moral... a shame he could not
figure that out on his own. This "anonymous" person is sometimes
said to be me, sometimes my wife, and sometimes he does not know.
When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they
told me about Aardvark?
What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?
Whatever they told him he has not since then, as far as I know,
contacted outside of Usenet any of the people in my life.
On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it.
He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into various Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what the clients think about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even admitted contacting one of the clients at one time. And he had several posts where he made it very clear he was contacting one of my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other
times a threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling them like that and lying was not moral... a shame he could not figure that out on his own. This "anonymous" person is sometimes said to be me, sometimes my wife, and sometimes he does not know.
When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
about Aardvark?
What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?
Whatever they told him he has not since then, as far as I know, contacted outside of Usenet any of the people in my life.
On Dec 15, 2021 at 2:27:41 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<spdmkd$jk6$2@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 15/12/2021 20:45, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Rick <rickjonestheticktocker@gmail.com> wrote:
David Brooks wrote:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with
him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this
crap so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be
denying it. When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you
think they told me about Aardvark? What did the police say to you
when they paid you a visit?
Snit told you?
Well, that's a different story altogether.
We all know snit's word is as good as gold.
You can take that to the bank.
P.S. Even you can't be this stupid.
P.S.P.S If snit tells you water is wet you had better check for
yourself because snit is a pathological liar.
No cop will ever come to someone's door over an internet related issue
and not write out a report on it. If the cops get involved it isn't to
'mediate' or issue 'warnings' (as Glasser would foolishly have the
reader believe), it's to investigate, to take statements... and those
statements go into the police report. Why? Because cops don't prosecute, >>> they collect evidence. IOW they don't yet know if the person who is
*alleged* (that's all it is at that point) to have committed <fill inthe >>> blank> even *is* the correct person.
The next reality (hurdle for Snit's BS): The police report is a matter
of public record so all Snit would need to do to back his story is get a >>> copy of the report.
You can do this as well as I can. Go fish.
Oh, and not all interactions with the police go into reports.
Add to that we do not even know Carroll's real name. Sometimes he says
it is Steven Petruzzellis, sometimes Steve Carroll, and I think he has
used other names.
Finally, you cannot just get any report you want... you need a reason. Or at least I think so.
David Brooks stopped drinking alcohol on 21 March 2018
<slight snip of STALKING>
On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap
so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it.
He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into various Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what the clients think about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even admitted contacting one of the clients at one time. And he had several posts where he made it very clear he was contacting one of my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other
times a threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling them like that and lying was not moral... a shame he could not figure that out on his own. This "anonymous" person is sometimes said to be me, sometimes my wife, and sometimes he does not know.
When Aardvark sent the police after me, what do you think they told me
about Aardvark?
What did the police say to /you/ when they paid you a visit?
Whatever they told him he has not since then, as far as I know, contacted outside of Usenet any of the people in my life.
On 15/12/2021 02:11, LegionX wrote:
David Brooks <DavidB@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
There are *NO* MIDS supporting the use of the individual Pseudonyms I'm 99% sure that some have been collected by nefarious activities.
David, we did write that MIDs were provided where necessary. What
exactly do you mean by nefarious? Be very specific in what you're
claiming if you'd like us to provide a reasonable answer for
you.
'BoaterDave', 'BoaterDaveTJ', '~BD~', 'BD1', 'BD2', 'Beady', 'Imbeady2', >'David B', 'David B.', 'DavidB', 'David_B', 'David DewGud', 'DavidDewgud
', 'BDonTJ', 'davidontj@gmail.com', 'LovelyLady', 'CommanderB', >'Commander_B', 'Angela Bennett', 'Byker', 'bufordTjustice', 'DonOldham', >'Tony Smith', 'MP.TonySmith', 'Tinkerer', 'Davoud1945', 'Brawdy14', >'HunterBD', 'HunterDB', 'Hunter88', 'Steve Carroll', 'I.Mackie', 'GA11', >'Marley', 'SaabOwner', 'Owner', 'C.A.Strate', 'Derek Feldman', 'A.
Student', 'David in Devon', 'Dudley Brooks', 'Mrs Parrot', 'David G.
Brooks', 'Russell Newbery', 'David B 1466', 'DGB', 'David', 'Anonymous', >'Christine Grist', 'Big Brother', 'PSA', 'davidbrooks_5408', 'Sir Topham >Hatt', 'Jack', 'Jon Botting', 'Jonathanbotting', 'John <Doh>', 'Sidney >Carton', 'Mr On!on', 'BD', 'Strgzr', 'rsoul' forgery, >'David_B@reinstall.T'bird', 'JetProvost' {in Mac forum}, 'asinrutee',
'Jon', 'David Brooks', 'DigbyDB', 'John Doe', 'P C Butts', 'Alli Cat', >'David.Brooks', '111MS' , 'Tinkerer2', 'Dbd', 'David', 'Don Kwicksote', >'PitometerLog', 'Dave', 'BDBHeather', 'David B. Linux' , 'John Smith',
'Joe' [<—83]
NO EVIDENCE has been provided to show WHERE these pseudonyms have been used.
On 16/12/2021 21:16, Snit wrote:
On Dec 15, 2021 at 12:39:33 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<spdg9m$8ab$1@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:
On 15/12/2021 16:29, Steve Carroll wrote:He is now, but other times he has brought my clients' sites into various
On 2021-12-15, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
Perhaps he was simply jesting - like Aardvark did with me.
Joking to the point one of my clients had the police deal with him.
Stop lying, fool. Even you have to know that no one believes this crap >>>> so it can only be meds or similar that have you writing it.
Snit has told me that this actually happened. You appear to be denying it. >>
Usenet forums and made up all sorts of stories about what the clients think >> about the sites and more. Pretty sure he even admitted contacting one of the >> clients at one time. And he had several posts where he made it very clear he >> was contacting one of my employers... sometimes calling it a promise and other
times a threat. He has also backed off that and said some anonymous Jiminy >> Cricket told him that working to get someone fired by trolling them like that
and lying was not moral... a shame he could not figure that out on his own. >> This "anonymous" person is sometimes said to be me, sometimes my wife, and >> sometimes he does not know.
I have no reason at all not to believe what you have told me. I think we should all concentrate on the now, and the future, and not dwell in the
past.
On 16/12/2021 00:02, Apd wrote:
"David Brooks" wrote:
[nyms]
'David Brooks' [...]
=
NO EVIDENCE has been provided to show WHERE these pseudonyms have been
used.
Your post I now reply to is using the above nym, right here. The
evidence (MID) is in my "References" header.
Agreed. ?
Apart from my very obvious 'I'm not trying to hide' nyms, can you
identify from whence the other nyms were copied?
(They were not all from Usenet posts!)
Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
the title accordingly.
On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
[....]
Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
the title accordingly.
Shadow is a *LIAR*.
As far as I'm aware, Snit has never lied to me.
Why should he?
On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
[....]
Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
the title accordingly.
As far as I'm aware, Snit has never lied to me. Why should he?
Most of them, yes, but they were used for illegal posts,
sometimes with links to copyrighted material, private email content, contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
slandered dead people to their loved ones.
Nothing a decent person would post a link to.
On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
[....]
Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe
what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
the title accordingly.
Shadow is a *LIAR*.
According to whom?
On 17/12/2021 00:12, Shadow is <swear words redacted>
[....]
Most of them, yes, but they were used for illegal posts,
sometimes with links to copyrighted material, private email content,
contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
slandered dead people to their loved ones.
You are <redacted>again!
contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
slandered dead people to their loved ones.
Nothing a decent person would post a link to.
On 17/12/2021 00:12, Shadow is *FULL OF SHIT*!
[....]
Most of them, yes, but they were used for illegal posts,
sometimes with links to copyrighted material, private email content,
contained explicit stalking and/or sliming innocent victims, and
slandered dead people to their loved ones.
You are *LYING* again!
Nothing a decent person would post a link to.
*YOU*, dear Shadow, are *NOT* "a decent person", so post away to your
hearts content. Tell everyone about *YOUR* stalking. Fuckwit.
A number of the so called #FAKE NYMS you quote are actually the names of >REAL-LIFE PEOPLE. In other word, *not* MY pseudonyms at all. You been
lying about this from the get-go.
I could /swear/ that you have claimed (falsely) that real names should
not be used on Usenet. Yet here you are, doing that very thing!
On 17/12/2021 00:38, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
[....]
Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe >>>> what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
the title accordingly.
Shadow is a *LIAR*.
According to whom?
*IT IS A FACT*
On 17/12/2021 00:38, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2021-12-17, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 17/12/2021 00:10, Steve Carroll wrote:
[....]
Then in the same respect, readers have no reason at all to not believe >>>> what Shadow says about you. I "think" you'd have been wiser to just
write the second sentence and leave out the first. Snit is well aware
you know he's lying so you'd have lost nothing by being not having
written it. I'm good with your 'logic' if you are <shrug>. I've fixed
the title accordingly.
Shadow is a *LIAR*.
According to whom?
*IT IS A FACT*
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
I'm not interested in reviewing the feud you lost.
Stop blowing smoke, fool, it's not working.
You are not being honest.
Will your children be spending Christmas with
*I was trying to help Snit*
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 08:55:46 +0000, David Brooks <DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
*I was trying to HELP Snit*
<slight snip of inappropriate text>
<DavidBrooks@invalid.invalid> wrote:
*I was trying to HELP Snit*
*I was trying to HELP Snit*
......to determine whether or not <STALKING_TARGET_05> REALLY has a business as
<he> claims.
Sorry
On 2021 Dec 19, David Brooks wrote
(in article <AE05CADD8208837B93@46.165.242.75>):
apologyse
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 457 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 117:04:10 |
| Calls: | 9,325 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 13,534 |
| Messages: | 6,080,913 |