1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.MAC.MISC

  • EFF Pressures Apple to Completely Abandon Controversial Child Safet

    From nospam@21:1/5 to gordian240@hotmail.com on Mon Sep 6 12:48:05 2021
    In article <sh5gfn$koj$1@dont-email.me>, Jim_Higgins
    <gordian240@hotmail.com> wrote:

    EFF Pressures Apple to Completely Abandon Controversial Child Safety
    Features

    why don't they pressure google, facebook, microsoft and others for an
    even more invasive check?

    maybe the eff has a stash of kiddie porn on apple's servers and doesn't
    want to get caught with it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From William Davis@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 6 14:35:48 2021
    On 2021-09-06 12:43, Jim_Higgins wrote:
    EFF Pressures Apple to Completely Abandon Controversial Child Safety
    Features https://www.macrumors.com/2021/09/06/eff-urges-apple-abandon-csam-plans/

    For the iMessage one, what is the big argument against it? I've seen
    people say it will be used against LGBTQ+ people in places where it is
    illegal to be gay and whatever, but it only sends the message to your
    parents if you send the image.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club on Mon Sep 6 14:41:15 2021
    In article <sh5n24$43s$1@dont-email.me>, William Davis <unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club> wrote:

    For the iMessage one, what is the big argument against it? I've seen
    people say it will be used against LGBTQ+ people in places where it is illegal to be gay and whatever, but it only sends the message to your
    parents if you send the image.

    it's only for kids under 13 years old, and only if their parents opted
    into it, and as you say, only alerts the parents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From William Davis@21:1/5 to nospam on Mon Sep 6 16:03:34 2021
    On 2021-09-06 14:41, nospam wrote:
    In article <sh5n24$43s$1@dont-email.me>, William Davis <unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club> wrote:
    and as you say, only alerts the parents.

    That would still be an issue if it was automatic

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club on Mon Sep 6 16:26:53 2021
    In article <sh5s6m$aju$1@dont-email.me>, William Davis <unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club> wrote:

    and as you say, only alerts the parents.

    That would still be an issue if it was automatic

    it's not, intentionally so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to William Davis on Mon Sep 6 21:16:14 2021
    On 2021-09-06, William Davis <unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club> wrote:
    On 2021-09-06 14:41, nospam wrote:
    In article <sh5n24$43s$1@dont-email.me>, William Davis
    <unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club> wrote:
    and as you say, only alerts the parents.

    That would still be an issue if it was automatic

    It's opt-in.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 7 11:06:45 2021
    Am 06.09.21 um 22:03 schrieb William Davis:
    On 2021-09-06 14:41, nospam wrote:
    In article <sh5n24$43s$1@dont-email.me>, William Davis
    <unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club> wrote:
    and as you say, only alerts the parents.

    That would still be an issue if it was automatic

    Social problems cannot be solved with technology. Never.



    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 7 11:12:11 2021
    Am 06.09.21 um 22:26 schrieb nospam:
    In article <sh5s6m$aju$1@dont-email.me>, William Davis <unbeatable101@ctrl-c.club> wrote:

    and as you say, only alerts the parents.

    That would still be an issue if it was automatic

    it's not, intentionally so.

    It remains in any case Nazi-style surveillance. I would have never done
    such Nazi-methods to my four kids.

    Something went terribly wrong before the kids are sending pictures with explicit content. And activating such a backdoor is expressing total
    distrust to your own kids.


    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)