Hello,
More of my philosophy about the Liberty of the national motto of France and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I have just said the following:hurt the oneself, and how for example can we be free to practice Sado-masochism or the like that can harm and hurt others when there is freely given informed consent between adults ?"
"In the national motto of France there is a problem and it is that Liberty consists of being able to do "anything" that does not harm others, but i think that we can not say that it is like the being free speech, since how can we be free to harm or the
And so that to understand that i am truthful , so read the following
article that explains the kind of Liberty of the national motto of France, and here is how it explains the Liberty of the national motto of France:
“Liberty consists of being able to do anything that does not harm others: thus, the exercise of the natural rights of every man or woman has no bounds other than those that guarantee other members of society the enjoyment of these same rights“.
And here is the article and read it carefully:
https://frenchmoments.eu/national-motto-of-france/
More of my philosophy of is the national motto of France an ideal and more of my thoughts..harmony we have also to create a good meaning of human life, also in the national motto of France there is a problem and it is that Liberty consists of being able to do "anything" that does not harm others, but i think that we can not say that it is like
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
as you have just noticed that i have just said that the national motto
of France of "Liberty, equality, fraternity" is an ideal, so i say
that it is an ideal since Fraternity – or brotherhood – is about moral obligations and harmony, so i think the being harmony of it makes it an ideal, so it is why i say that it makes the national motto an ideal, and i think that so that to attain
And i think i am smart, and i will say that what is also lacking is the meaning of human life, since the good meaning of human life must be enough strong so that to make the the ideal stand up, so what is this enough strong that makes it stand up ? soi think that the USA national motto of the "In God we trust" is important and i think that the trusting God or the believing God or the believing enough God makes the meaning of human life enough strong so that to make stand up the ideal , so then you
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kFxTDu6_jus
And read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that you understand correctly my views about the meaning of human life:
More of my philosophy about nihilism and about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and i think i am a philosopher, so now i will invite you to look carefully at the following video:
Life Has Never Been Easier: So Why Is Everyone Depressed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ-zyVHYxyw
So i am quickly discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence inhuman life and it is a mistake , since by logical analogy i can for example say: What is it that we call a genetically smart human a genetically smart human ? so as you notice that the calling a genetically smart human is a relative way of measuring
the above video, and the patterns are the following:
So notice that the above video is saying that life has never been easier so why everyone is depressed, but i think that i am a philosopher and i say that the above video is making a big mistake and it is that he is comparing our human life with the old
I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about nihilism so that to understand:
https://academyofideas.com/2022/11/nietzsche-and-nihilism-a-warning-to-the-west/
So notice carefully in the above article that it defines nihilism as
the following:
"Nihilism is the conviction that there is no meaning to life, that the world is inhospitable to our highest hopes and values, and that there are no gods or higher purposes to justify our suffering. To be a nihilist is to flirt with despair and thesentiment that life is not worth living."
So then i can say that in philosophy you have to make a difference between the problematics of the lack of the meaning of human life and of that of the becoming rich by for example the way of the engine of egoism as has said it the philosopher andeconomist Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, since i am a philosopher that says that you can become rich as a country, but the lack of meaning of human life can make the "way" or the "path" of the becoming rich of the country not good, since
More of my philosophy about my model of what is consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am really smart, but you have to understand my model that explains what is consciousness and self-consciousness, so my model is not trying to explain all the low levels of consciousness, but what it explains is that human consciousness giveslike the true meaning by composing with our feelings of what is reality and with consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so now you are then understanding that my model explains that it is like a dynamic reification, i mean that when
More of my philosophy about self-awareness or self-consciousness and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, sowich you compose the consciousness, so then after smartness obtains like a true meaning by using consciousness of who you are by looking at yourself, so self-awareness or self-consciousness is developed. And it is my explanation of what is consciousness.
i have just explained more what is consciousness, read it below, and now i will explain what is self-awareness or self-consciousness:
So i think that self-awareness or self-consciousness of a human is also
like a reification + the smartness, since i think that consciousness of yourself is obtained by knowing about the true meaning of yourself by also using like a reification with feelings and consciousness of time and space and matter and reality with
More of my philosophy about the process of reification and more about human consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
Reification is when you think of or treat something abstract as a physical thing. Reification is a complex idea for when you treat something immaterial — like happiness, fear, or evil — as a material thing, so i think that human conscicousness isby logical analogy like
the process of Reification, i mean that a concept in our brain is not just a class or object like in object oriented programming, since i mean that a class in object oriented programming is not just a class but it is also reification by our brain,since we are also reifying the class with or by using the true meaning from our human consciousness, so it is like composability since we are composing with consciousnesses of time and space and reality from the low level to the high level, so it is the
More of my philosophy about are we going to have an artificial intelligence winter and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..artificial intelligence is the meaning from human consciousness, since without this "meaning", it is like a closed system that is limited as i am explaining it below, since the meaning from human consciousness permits to construct from the low level of
I think i am really smart, and now i will make a prediction,
so from my below kind of logical proof(but of course that i will soon make it a more sophisticated proof), i think it permits me to make a prediction, and it is that there will be an artificial intelligence winter, i mean that what is lacking to
More of my philosophy about how to beat artificial intelligence and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i will ask a philosophical question of:
How to beat artificial intelligence ?
So i think i am smart and i will start by giving you a good example so that you understand:is the weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4, i mean that human consciousness is able to make such generalizations with the help of the meaning from human consciousness when the pattern to be discovered is unknown to artificial
So if i say:
If a then b
and
if b then c
A human can logically infer that it means: then a then c
But the problem in artificial intelligence is that the patterns
comes from the data on wich artificial intelligence was trained ,
so how for example artificial intelligence does "generalize" the above example and make it a theorem in mathematics?, i mean that so that a human generalizes from the above example he also use the "meaning" from human consciousness, so i think that it
so here it is:statement (a) must also imply the third statement (c). This principle holds for all statements that have the logical structure of implication, regardless of the specific content of the statements."
So i have just asked ChatGPT the following question:
"Make a theorem of the following: if a then b and if b then c then a then c"
And here is what answered ChatGPT:
"The theorem can be stated as follows:
If a implies b, and if b implies c, then a implies c.
This theorem is known as the transitive property of implication, or the principle of transitivity. It states that if a statement (a) implies another statement (b), and if that statement (b) in turn implies a third statement (c), then the original
So if you are smart you will notice that in the above answer of ChatGPT, ChatGPT is not understanding the meaning of the theorem, and it hasand of artificial intelligence, and of course i think you are now understanding how to beat artificial intelligence, since i think that artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT needs patterns that help it compose other new patterns, but it can not compose
not constructed the theorem from the low level constructs such as in my above example, but it is just discovering the theorem from the patterns on the data on wich it has been trained, so now you are understanding the limit of the smartness of ChatGPT
More of my philosophy about energy consumption of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
So as you have just noticed that I have just talked about artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT, and of course i have also to talk about energy consumption of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4, so i invite you to read the following newarticle about it that talks
about Memristors that are a highly promising lead to provide low-energy consumption artificial intelligence:
Read more here in the following article:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/memristor-devices-ai
More of my philosophy about the other weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think that the other weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is that when in mathematics you havea differentiable function , you can find the derivative of it and be exact, but artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is not this kind of exactness, since it approximates more and more by being trained on the data , so the quality is dependent on the
And i think that the genetic algorithm has the same problem,
read my following thoughts about it so that you understand my views:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YwW7mgTaJOw
More of my philosophy about sex and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..intelligence like ChatGPT can make you really efficient since it is efficient, so i think we have not to waste our time with sex, but we have to learn how to be efficient with such artificial intelligence tools as ChatGPT so that to be much more smart so
I think that sex is not a sophisticated thing, since it is so easy to have sex and you can easily waste your too much time with sex and you can easily become stupid with sex and such, so sex is not really efficient, but i think that artificial
More of my philosophy of does ChatGPT has a kind of common sense reasoning and more of my thoughts..
So today i will ask a question of: Does ChatGPT has some kind of common sense reasoning ? i think it has a kind common sense reasoning since itfollowing interactions with ChatGPT how it has logically inferred a kind of common sense reasoning from the patterns of the data on wich it has been trained on, here it is and read it carefully so that to notice:
can logically infer it from the patterns of the data on wich it has been trained on, and even if it is limited by the smartness of the data on wich it has been trained, i think that ChatGPT can become really powerful and really useful, and notice on my
I have asked ChatGPT the following:
If a car goes from Casablanca to Rabat and if it goes from Rabat to Fez , how many kilometers does the car has traveled ?
ChatGPT has answered:
"I'm sorry, but I don't have enough information to accurately determine how many kilometers the car has traveled. The distance between Casablanca and Rabat is about 95 kilometers, and the distance between Rabat and Fez is about 210 kilometers. However,I don't know the exact route the car took, so it is possible that it traveled a greater distance. Additionally, I don't know if the car made any other trips beyond the ones you mentioned. Without this information, it is not possible to accurately
And i have answered ChatGPT:
"Just give an approximation"
And ChatGPT has answered:approximation and the actual distance traveled could be different, depending on the exact route the car took and any other trips it may have made."
"Based on the information you have provided, it is possible that the car traveled a distance of around 305 kilometers, if it went directly from Casablanca to Rabat and then from Rabat to Fez. However, it is important to note that this is just an
More of my philosophy about is ChatGPT going to replace jobs and about the law of accelerating returns and more of my thoughts..
I have just looked at the following new video about ChatGPT with GPT4,
and i invite you to look at it:
This A.I. will Change the World Forever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7KfELRxc3E
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,with GPT4 is trained on enormous amounts of text of variable quality from the internet, so then it causes that we can not be sure about the quality of ChatGPT, so it is why i don't think that ChatGPT will replace jobs as is saying it the above video,
so i am not in accordance with the above video, since i can do predictions about ChatGPT, so is it going to replace many jobs ? so i will say that the problem of the quality of data on wich ChatGPT is trained is not solved, i mean that ChatGPT even
More of my philosophy about supervised and unsupervised learning in artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I have to explain something important, so GPT of ChatGPT uses a combination of unsupervised pre-training and supervised fine-tuning,this process of recognizing by GPT is not the understanding the "meaning", but it is just discovering patterns with calculations in the data that make you recognize the things.
so i think that the patterns are discovered from the data in the unsupervised pre-training, so it means that ChatGPT doesn't for example know about what is a verb or an adverb, but it is just the doing calculations of finding the patterns that make GPT recognize what is a verb or an adverb, so as you notice that
More of my philosophy about creativity of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and more of my thoughts..
I invite you to read the following article that says the followingprojects remains a task that requires the creativity of a human brain that an artificial intelligence will never have."
about artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT:
"Stakeholders in the IT development sector are nevertheless of the opinion that artificial intelligence is only good for automating redundant tasks and will not go beyond this level. The development of specifications or specifications for large IT
Read more in the following web link (and you have to translate the article from french to english):
AI startup predicts 'relying on humans to write programs will be outdated in the future'
https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/339951/Une-startup-specialisee-en-IA-predit-que-s-appuyer-sur-des-humains-pour-ecrire-des-programmes-sera-depasse-a-l-avenir-et-ravive-le-debat-sur-la-possible-disparition-du-metier-de-developpeur/
So i think that the above saying from Stakeholders in the IT development sector is not so correct, since artificial intelligence such as ChatGPTpatterns in the data they have been trained on. But i invite you to read about the weaknesses of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT in my following previous thoughts:
can be "creative" by also composing patterns that it discovers from the data it has been trained on, so i say that language models like ChatGPT are as good as the data they have been trained on, they are simply programmed to generate text based on
More of my philosophy about the weaknesses of ChatGPT and about
artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and I think that ChatGPT has been trained not on only free data but on Common Crawl (filtered) and WebText2 andBook1 and Book2 and Wikipedia, other than that i say that language models like ChatGPT are as good as the data they have been trained on, they are simply programmed to generate text based on patterns in the data they have been trained on. So i think i am
Here is my new proverb about artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT:
"The most important in artificial intelligence is not to make it performant, but it is to make it in accordance with the legal system, since if you make artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT too much performant too much rapidly , it can hurt thesystem and make it too much unstable, so the most important in a legal system is to balance correctly the performance with the being stability or being order."
So i invite you to read my below thoughts of how to regulate ChatGPT
so that you notice that the problem is that ChatGPT is too much performant too much rapidly, so you have to know how to correctly balance the performance with the being stability or being order, so here is my
thoughts and reread them carefully so that you understand my views:
More of my philosophy about how to regulate ChatGPT and artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
So i think that OpenAI is not thinking correctly, since the ChatGPTgiven the rights to make an artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT with them that can hurt humans in a not lawful way, since the value of a product or service comes from smartness and/or from work or the hard work, but artificial intelligence tools such
is taking the patterns from the data of creativity of humans and is using them, so i don't think that it has the right to do that, since it is "clear" in our legal system that humans that have also created the patterns of there creativity have not
More of my philosophy about the weakness of Generative Pre-trained Transformer and more of my thoughts..
So i think i am discovering the pattern with my fluid intelligence that explains the weakness of Generative Pre-trained Transformer of like ChatGPT, and it is that ChatGPT can discover the patterns usingfrom his brain, so i think that ChatGPT will still be not capable of this kind of highly smart creativity, but still it remains really powerful and really useful, so i invite you to read my following previous thoughts that make you understand my views:
the existing patterns from the data or knowledge, so it is like using
the smartness of the data, but ChatGPT can not use the smartness of the human brain that also comes with human consciousness that optimizes more smartness, so it can not invent highly smart patterns or things from like is doing it a highly smart human
More precision of my philosophy about the mechanisms of attention and self-attention of Transformers AI models and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think i am understanding deep learning, but i say that Transformers are deep learning + self-attention andattention, and this attention and self-attention permit to grasp "context" and "antecedents", for example when you say the following sentence:
"The animal didn't cross the street because it was too tired"
So we can ask how the artificial intelligence of ChatGPT that uses Generative Pre-trained Transformer will understand that the "it" in
the above sentence is not the street but the animal, so i say that
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 343 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 28:57:16 |
Calls: | 7,556 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,733 |
Messages: | 5,655,449 |
Posted today: | 1 |