All the fucking worthless doomsayers in the on-line press have a habit
of claiming that X Window is dead.
But my Gentoo emerge for this week saw that following X updates:
libXdmcp
libxcb
xlsfonts
xrefresh
libXcursor
xev
xauth
xpr
libXaw3d
x11-apps/editres
xfontsel
xmessage
Whoa! That's a lot of fucking updates!
X Window is very much alive and kicking.
I will soon be exploring Wayland but X Window will be my main GUI
for a LONG time.
my Gentoo emerge for this week
On 3/9/2024 2:22 PM, Liability Larry wrote:
my Gentoo emerge for this week
Python rescues the Gentoo tinkerer again!
The Python Software Foundation is due a serious donation for saving you untold hours administering your GuhNoo crapbox.
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 19:55:50 -0500, DFS wrote:
On 3/9/2024 2:22 PM, Liability Larry wrote:
my Gentoo emerge for this week
Python rescues the Gentoo tinkerer again!
The Python Software Foundation is due a serious donation for saving you
untold hours administering your GuhNoo crapbox.
https://bedrocklinux.org/
He should switch to Bedrock Linux.
"Bedrock Linux is a meta Linux distribution which allows users to mix-and- match components from other, typically incompatible distributions. Bedrock integrates these components into one largely cohesive system."
Endless hours of tinkering! The potential for endless FUBARs!
All the fucking worthless doomsayers in the on-line press have a habit
of claiming that X Window is dead.
But my Gentoo emerge for this week saw that following X updates:
libXdmcp
libxcb
xlsfonts
xrefresh
libXcursor
xev
xauth
xpr
libXaw3d
x11-apps/editres
xfontsel
xmessage
Whoa! That's a lot of fucking updates!
X Window is very much alive and kicking.
I will soon be exploring Wayland but X Window will be my main GUI
for a LONG time.
Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> wrote at 19:22 this Saturday (GMT):
All the fucking worthless doomsayers in the on-line press have a habit
of claiming that X Window is dead.
But my Gentoo emerge for this week saw that following X updates:
libXdmcp
libxcb
xlsfonts
xrefresh
libXcursor
xev
xauth
xpr
libXaw3d
x11-apps/editres
xfontsel
xmessage
Whoa! That's a lot of fucking updates!
X Window is very much alive and kicking.
I will soon be exploring Wayland but X Window will be my main GUI
for a LONG time.
I prefer X too.
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:10:02 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote in <usl0ia$348lm$1@dont-email.me>:
Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> wrote at 19:22 this Saturday (GMT):
All the fucking worthless doomsayers in the on-line press have a habit
of claiming that X Window is dead.
But my Gentoo emerge for this week saw that following X updates:
libXdmcp
libxcb
xlsfonts
xrefresh
libXcursor
xev
xauth
xpr
libXaw3d
x11-apps/editres
xfontsel
xmessage
Whoa! That's a lot of fucking updates!
X Window is very much alive and kicking.
I will soon be exploring Wayland but X Window will be my main GUI
for a LONG time.
I prefer X too.
Same here, though the games I run use DXVK to talk to the Vulkan
API on NVidia's Linux driver. (I think X is only minimally-involved
there.)
BTW: It's not "X Window" it's "the X Window System", or just "X".
Sometimes, people call it "X Windows", but I've never
seen "X Window" unless discussing an actual window on X.
On 3/10/2024 3:26 PM, vallor wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:10:02 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07
<candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote in
<usl0ia$348lm$1@dont-email.me>:
Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> wrote at 19:22 this Saturday (GMT):
All the fucking worthless doomsayers in the on-line press have a habit >>>> of claiming that X Window is dead.
But my Gentoo emerge for this week saw that following X updates:
libXdmcp
libxcb
xlsfonts
xrefresh
libXcursor
xev
xauth
xpr
libXaw3d
x11-apps/editres
xfontsel
xmessage
Whoa! That's a lot of fucking updates!
X Window is very much alive and kicking.
I will soon be exploring Wayland but X Window will be my main GUI
for a LONG time.
I prefer X too.
Same here, though the games I run use DXVK to talk to the Vulkan
API on NVidia's Linux driver. (I think X is only minimally-involved
there.)
BTW: It's not "X Window" it's "the X Window System", or just "X".
Sometimes, people call it "X Windows", but I've never
seen "X Window" unless discussing an actual window on X.
Another off-charter post.
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 19:55:50 -0500, DFS wrote:
On 3/9/2024 2:22 PM, Liability Larry wrote:
my Gentoo emerge for this week
Python rescues the Gentoo tinkerer again!
The Python Software Foundation is due a serious donation for saving
you untold hours administering your GuhNoo crapbox.
https://bedrocklinux.org/
He should switch to Bedrock Linux.
"Bedrock Linux is a meta Linux distribution which allows users to
mix-and-
match components from other, typically incompatible distributions.
Bedrock integrates these components into one largely cohesive system."
Endless hours of tinkering! The potential for endless FUBARs!
But will it serve up a Bronto burger?
Sometimes, people call it "X Windows", but I've never seen "X Window"
unless discussing an actual window on X.
To put a finer point on it for those with a Windows burr up their butt, there's a definite advantage to running DXVK on Linux vs. DX-whatever-Windows-is-shoveling-at-you.
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:03:11 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
To put a finer point on it for those with a Windows burr up their butt,
there's a definite advantage to running DXVK on Linux vs.
DX-whatever-Windows-is-shoveling-at-you.
Is there any advantage to running DXVK on Linux unless you're trying to
use games developed for Windows?
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:44:34 -0400, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
Another off-charter post.
Fine:
To put a finer point on it for those with a Windows burr up their butt, there's a definite advantage to running DXVK on Linux vs. DX-whatever-Windows-is-shoveling-at-you.
BTW: It's not "X Window" it's "the X Window System", or just "X".
Sometimes, people call it "X Windows", but I've never
seen "X Window" unless discussing an actual window on X.
vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:44:34 -0400, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
Another off-charter post.
Jeezuzz, will you shut up man?
vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
BTW: It's not "X Window" it's "the X Window System", or just "X".
I say fsck you to Elon Musk.
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:10:02 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07
<candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote in ><usl0ia$348lm$1@dont-email.me>:
Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> wrote at 19:22 this Saturday (GMT):
All the fucking worthless doomsayers in the on-line press have a habit
of claiming that X Window is dead.
But my Gentoo emerge for this week saw that following X updates:
libXdmcp
libxcb
xlsfonts
xrefresh
libXcursor
xev
xauth
xpr
libXaw3d
x11-apps/editres
xfontsel
xmessage
Whoa! That's a lot of fucking updates!
X Window is very much alive and kicking.
I will soon be exploring Wayland but X Window will be my main GUI
for a LONG time.
I prefer X too.
Same here, though the games I run use DXVK to talk to the Vulkan
API on NVidia's Linux driver. (I think X is only minimally-involved
there.)
BTW: It's not "X Window" it's "the X Window System", or just "X".
Sometimes, people call it "X Windows", but I've never
seen "X Window" unless discussing an actual window on X.
-- "In practice, though, Linux users are just as controlled by the
distro makers and FOSS app developers as commercial users are by
Microsoft and closed-source app developers." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
some dumb fsck wrote:
Another off-charter post.
Jeezuzz, will you shut up man?
Jeezuzz, will you shut up man?
You ask that like the dumb fsck doesn't have a decades-old reputation
as an obnoxious, lying POS.
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 3/11/2024 2:16 PM, shitv wrote:
-- "In practice, though, Linux users are just as controlled by theNo doubt about that whatsoever.
distro makers and FOSS app developers as commercial users are by
Microsoft and closed-source app developers." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly >>
For instance, you've not once hacked the source to make any significant >>feature or GUI changes to your Linux apps or desktops.
In theory, you could tinker with the code and screens to your heart's >>content (since you have the source).
In practice, you don't have the skill. Very very very few do.
Got it, bozo?
I don't care about commercial vs. FOSS when it comes to the
philosophy, like would I run X, Y and Z, I'll run anything I want to
run. But there is something great about open source that you're
missing by making such a direct comparison to Winblows software, which
is that you have more choice in how it's specifically implemented for
you. Your Linux distro or any number of people can make it that way.
I'm pretty satisfied with Mint, I'm easy to please, but someone who
wants customization could really do things that are less accessible
with Winblows.
Joel wrote:
some dumb fsck wrote:
-- "In practice, though, Linux users are just as controlled by the(idiocy and lies, snipped)
distro makers and FOSS app developers as commercial users are by
Microsoft and closed-source app developers." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly >>>
Say Boze, you don't seem to realize that skilled people make those changes >*on* *behalf* of the users. And they are not inhibited by commercial >considerations, but by what works weil, improves the code, and satisfies their >wants and almost always the wants of their "customers".
But there is something great about open source that you're
missing by making such a direct comparison to Winblows software, which
is that you have more choice in how it's specifically implemented for
you. Your Linux distro or any number of people can make it that way.
Or ask a developer to do it for them.
Joel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 3/11/2024 2:16 PM, shitv wrote:
-- "In practice, though, Linux users are just as controlled by theNo doubt about that whatsoever.
distro makers and FOSS app developers as commercial users are by
Microsoft and closed-source app developers." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly >>>
For instance, you've not once hacked the source to make any significant
feature or GUI changes to your Linux apps or desktops.
In theory, you could tinker with the code and screens to your heart's
content (since you have the source).
In practice, you don't have the skill. Very very very few do.
Got it, bozo?
Say Boze, you don't seem to realize that skilled people make those changes *on* *behalf* of the users.
And they are not inhibited by commercial
considerations, but by what works weil, improves the code, and satisfies their
wants and almost always the wants of their "customers".
Joel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 3/11/2024 2:16 PM, shitv wrote:
-- "In practice, though, Linux users are just as controlled by theNo doubt about that whatsoever.
distro makers and FOSS app developers as commercial users are by
Microsoft and closed-source app developers." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly >>>
For instance, you've not once hacked the source to make any significant >>>feature or GUI changes to your Linux apps or desktops.
In theory, you could tinker with the code and screens to your heart's >>>content (since you have the source).
In practice, you don't have the skill. Very very very few do.
Got it, bozo?
Say Boze, you don't seem to realize that skilled people make those changes *on* *behalf* of the users. And they are not inhibited by commercial considerations, but by what works weil, improves the code, and satisfies their
wants and almost always the wants of their "customers".
I don't care about commercial vs. FOSS when it comes to the
philosophy, like would I run X, Y and Z, I'll run anything I want to
run. But there is something great about open source that you're
missing by making such a direct comparison to Winblows software, which
is that you have more choice in how it's specifically implemented for
you. Your Linux distro or any number of people can make it that way.
I'm pretty satisfied with Mint, I'm easy to please, but someone who
wants customization could really do things that are less accessible
with Winblows.
Or ask a developer to do it for them.
Perfect? No. Even OSS developers can be assholes.
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
MS ignored me for a LONG time when I kept complaining that Outlook
online never actually deleted messages (even though you moved them to >>Trash, then went to Trash and deleted them again, you could still
resurrect the motherfuckers.) I complained about it every few months
and nothing was done. I gave up.
That was years ago. I just checked, and you can still "recover" stuff
you tried to delete 2x already. I just "recovered" old emails from 2.5 >>months ago, even though the screen says "Items in this folder will be >>deleted in 30 days."
Gawd. Just delete them already! I HATE that kind of handholding.
A better argument against M$ Office could not have been offered.
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
MS ignored me for a LONG time when I kept complaining that Outlook
online never actually deleted messages (even though you moved them to
Trash, then went to Trash and deleted them again, you could still
resurrect the motherfuckers.) I complained about it every few months
and nothing was done. I gave up.
That was years ago. I just checked, and you can still "recover" stuff
you tried to delete 2x already. I just "recovered" old emails from 2.5
months ago, even though the screen says "Items in this folder will be
deleted in 30 days."
Gawd. Just delete them already! I HATE that kind of handholding.
A better argument against M$ Office could not have been offered.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:16:55 -0500, chrisv wrote:
Jeezuzz, will you shut up man?
You ask that like the dumb fsck doesn't have a decades-old reputation
as an obnoxious, lying POS.
Decades old?
Holy shiite! I always knew that the DuFuS was a sexually impotent dud
but to think that he has not experienced a sexual orgasm in DECADES makes
him even more of a TOTAL DEGENERATE.
Of course, that explains why he is Stallman's groupie.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
Aside: The fact that his wife is a loathsome dog is NOT an excuse.
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 00:16 this Tuesday (GMT):
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
MS ignored me for a LONG time when I kept complaining that Outlook >>>>online never actually deleted messages (even though you moved them to >>>>Trash, then went to Trash and deleted them again, you could still >>>>resurrect the motherfuckers.) I complained about it every few months >>>>and nothing was done. I gave up.
That was years ago. I just checked, and you can still "recover" stuff >>>>you tried to delete 2x already. I just "recovered" old emails from 2.5 >>>>months ago, even though the screen says "Items in this folder will be >>>>deleted in 30 days."
Gawd. Just delete them already! I HATE that kind of handholding.
A better argument against M$ Office could not have been offered.
The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
saved.
Microsoft is just trying to be all-inclusive, but at the expense of
common sense it would appear. I had actually been using the Outlook
for Windows beta before I flushed Win11, it worked well with my MS
account's email as well as my Google account's, but having Edge and
Chrome to access the respective accounts under Linux is just as good.
It wasn't the same Outlook that was included in the Office suite of
software.
I just use mutt to connect to a gmail server. If I need to sign something I'll >use gmail in a browser.
Every few days I have to d d d d d d d to clean out mutt. But I wouldn't be >surprised to find that gmail, like crimosoft, saves stuff 4ever.
Every few days I have to d d d d d d d to clean out mutt. But I wouldn't
be surprised to find that gmail, like crimosoft, saves stuff 4ever.
I just use mutt to connect to a gmail server. If I need to sign something I'll
use gmail in a browser.
Every few days I have to d d d d d d d to clean out mutt. But I wouldn't be >>surprised to find that gmail, like crimosoft, saves stuff 4ever.
Gmail for some reason, just hates email. It will reject perfectly valid
RFC 2822 compliant email addresses.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2822#appendix-A.5
No idea why tho.
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 07:06:56 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Every few days I have to d d d d d d d to clean out mutt. But I wouldn't
be surprised to find that gmail, like crimosoft, saves stuff 4ever.
I don't necessarily believe it but there isn't much if I log into gmail.
My regular account is set up to pull anything off gmail unlike my proton account.
candycanearter07 wrote:
The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
saved.
Microsoft is just trying to be all-inclusive, but at the expense of
common sense it would appear.
Yaxley Peaks wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
I just use mutt to connect to a gmail server. If I need to sign something I'll
use gmail in a browser.
Every few days I have to d d d d d d d to clean out mutt. But I wouldn't be >>>surprised to find that gmail, like crimosoft, saves stuff 4ever.
Gmail for some reason, just hates email. It will reject perfectly valid
RFC 2822 compliant email addresses.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2822#appendix-A.5
No idea why tho.
Me neither. My emails are responses or messages to familiar addresses.
Maybe you're emailing to addresses in Chy-na? :-D
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 07:06:56 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Every few days I have to d d d d d d d to clean out mutt. But I
wouldn't be surprised to find that gmail, like crimosoft, saves stuff
4ever.
I don't necessarily believe it but there isn't much if I log into
gmail.
My regular account is set up to pull anything off gmail unlike my
proton account.
I stil get email from entities I resigned from years ago, such as the
IEEE.
Proton mail.
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:34:32 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 07:06:56 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Every few days I have to d d d d d d d to clean out mutt. But I
wouldn't be surprised to find that gmail, like crimosoft, saves stuff
4ever.
I don't necessarily believe it but there isn't much if I log into
gmail.
My regular account is set up to pull anything off gmail unlike my
proton account.
I stil get email from entities I resigned from years ago, such as the
IEEE.
I still get those too. I bailed in the '80s after Irwin Feerst lost his battle to have the IEEE act in the interest of engineers rather than employers. Everything he said about outsourcing and the abuse of H-1B
visas is as relevant, if not more so, today.
Can't stand the competition, eh?
Years ago, Lou Dobbs showed a video of Congressmen grilling Bill Gates
about H-1B visas, and Dobbs ranted (justifiably so) about "congressmen groveling before a billionaire". Cut to today, and that rant seems quite ironic given Dobb's groveling before his Cheetoh Jesus.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:21:17 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Can't stand the competition, eh?
Years ago, Lou Dobbs showed a video of Congressmen grilling Bill Gates
about H-1B visas, and Dobbs ranted (justifiably so) about "congressmen
groveling before a billionaire". Cut to today, and that rant seems quite
ironic given Dobb's groveling before his Cheetoh Jesus.
If doctors can have their very influential trade union, the AMA, why not engineers?
Joel wrote:
candycanearter07 wrote:
The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it >>>saved.
Microsoft is just trying to be all-inclusive, but at the expense of
common sense it would appear.
Windows is a one-size-fits-all compromise. There's simply no way that
it will behave optimally for all, or even most, users. The world
needs more choice.
I just use mutt to connect to a gmail server. If I need to sign something I'll
use gmail in a browser.
Every few days I have to d d d d d d d to clean out mutt. But I wouldn't be >>surprised to find that gmail, like crimosoft, saves stuff 4ever.
Gmail for some reason, just hates email. It will reject perfectly valid
RFC 2822 compliant email addresses. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2822#appendix-A.5
No idea why tho.
Doctors are businessmen, engineers are employees.
Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:39:59 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.
Yeah, but we make movies about (dead, Communist) physicists.
I saw it pirated when the HDcam version got available very soon after
its release. Hated it. One should never see a cam version of a movie.
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:39:59 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.
Yeah, but we make movies about (dead, Communist) physicists.
And call "liberals" by the appellation of "Communist" :-D
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:05:16 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:39:59 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
Do you know who needed Union support in this country. Physicists! You
didn't have that, and therefore became a second world country.
Yeah, but we make movies about (dead, Communist) physicists.
And call "liberals" by the appellation of "Communist" :-D
While Oppenheimer may not have had a CPUSA card in his wallet he offered financial support to it and its front groups.
https://www.commentary.org/articles/harvey-klehr/oppenheimer-was-a-communist/
In some ways I respect old school CPUSA members for than 'liberals'. I include 'classical liberals' in that too.
The terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are grossly ill-defined these
days.
Skunked, if I may say so.
The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
saved.
Le 12-03-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
saved.
I don't like trash systems. I don't need them and I hate when I can't
bypass them.
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:45:34 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
The terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are grossly ill-defined these
days.
Skunked, if I may say so.
Three steps beyond skunked...
Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D
Le 12-03-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
The trash system is already a safety net, you don't need to keep it
saved.
I don't like trash systems. I don't need them and I hate when I can't
bypass them.
In the old days, they'd call you a "Commie". These days, the call you a "liberal".
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D
There are more conservative Linux lovers, it seems. Freedom lovers
are mostly on the right, collectivists and tyrants are mostly on the
left.
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 08:58:46 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
In the old days, they'd call you a "Commie". These days, the call you a
"liberal".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8yhFJ8C6j0
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:sure we can
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D
There are more conservative Linux lovers, it seems. Freedom lovers
are mostly on the right, collectivists and tyrants are mostly on the
left.
Overgeneralization. For example, some on the "right" want to curtail the
self-determination of women; one even thinks they should not be allowed to >> vote. Or, businessmen should have freedom to do what they want regardless
of the effect on their employees or the environment.
Rather than "left" and "right", it seems to me to be more like "zealots"
and "pragmatists".
But we could argue for a long time about the details. And what "freedom" means.
We generally cannot do or say anything we want to without consequences.
% wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:sure we can
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Buncha communist pinko liberal Linux lovers around here! :-D
There are more conservative Linux lovers, it seems. Freedom lovers
are mostly on the right, collectivists and tyrants are mostly on the
left.
Overgeneralization. For example, some on the "right" want to curtail the >>> self-determination of women; one even thinks they should not be allowed to >>> vote. Or, businessmen should have freedom to do what they want regardless >>> of the effect on their employees or the environment.
Rather than "left" and "right", it seems to me to be more like "zealots" >>> and "pragmatists".
But we could argue for a long time about the details. And what "freedom" means.
We generally cannot do or say anything we want to without consequences.
Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of
people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
Hell, just waving the American flag causes some leftist weirdos to
feel "unsafe". They should just get the fsck out, IMO. We've got
leftists fresh off the boat from utter shitholes who have the audacity
to criticize our way of doing things. Inclusion? They'll slaughter
each other for being the wrong kind of Muslim!
chrisv wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Try it and see! Make fun of Cheetoh Jesus in the midst of a bunch of >>>people toting American flags defaced by the face of EXPOTUS45.
Hell, just waving the American flag causes some leftist weirdos to
feel "unsafe". They should just get the fsck out, IMO. We've got
leftists fresh off the boat from utter shitholes who have the audacity
to criticize our way of doing things. Inclusion? They'll slaughter
each other for being the wrong kind of Muslim!
"Buh wuddaboud ...?"
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 51:10:52 |
| Calls: | 6,911 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,379 |
| Messages: | 5,430,026 |