Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
Is iOS' Health and Fitness apps not good enough?
Nope. They don't record cycling/walking information on their own. They
need an app.
Although they do suggest apps and Komoot looked interesting. Requires an account, however.
Already noted - thx. I use Trails - which has disappeared from the App
Store (AFAICT).
In the days when iPads had huge screens
However, once Android batteries started lasting forever and the screens became huge at the same time, I stopped using the iPad for any tracking.
Have you ever seen that message that an app was "terminated by iOS" before?
I have not. This is a first. It's expected with Apple. But still the first.
In article <tvpphe$3vs6f$1@paganini.bofh.team>, Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
In the days when iPads had huge screens
in what days were those?
ipad screen sizes have *increased* over the years.
However, once Android batteries started lasting forever and the screens
became huge at the same time, I stopped using the iPad for any tracking.
google's entire business model is tracking, so if tracking is what you
want, google is the way to go.
google even tracks you when you turn off location services, they're
*that* good.
always choose the best tool for the job.
Have you ever seen that message that an app was "terminated by iOS" before?
sure have.
I have not. This is a first. It's expected with Apple. But still the first.
you don't even know what it means, by your own admission, so how do you
know that it's expected or why it happened? you don't.
what *is* expected is that you invent another conspiracy theory, and
you've fulfilled that expectation.
In the days when iPads had huge screens
in what days were those?
Your memory is that of a gnat, nospam, as I published a bunch of tutorials
on using the iPad for hiking purposes because of the screen & battery life.
ipad screen sizes have *increased* over the years.
The point you whooshed on, and which I said so it just means you're stupid, nospam, seriously... that's not even an ad hominem attack - it's a fact, which is that Android phablets got larger and the batteries last forever nowadays (I don't even charge overnight anymore - and haven't in a while).
Only on an iPhone are people stuck tethered to an outlet every night.
You forget *Apple's business model _requires_ you to be tracked* in almost everything that you do, nospam, and no amount of your lies changes that.
HINT: Android phones work fine (even better) without a Google Account...
google even tracks you when you turn off location services, they're
*that* good.
You always claim Google made Apple do all the bad things Apple does.
Why?
You can turn off the location tracking, nospam. Well, you can't.
You're on iOS.
The iPhone won't work for most people without Apple tracking built in.
HINT: You don't need a Google account to download apps on Android
while Apple inserts a unique tracking ID into every app on iOS!
always choose the best tool for the job.
At this point in time, the iPad isn't the best tool for _any_ job,
unfortunately, now that it can't even do basic hiking like it used to
(where I'm talking about the best iOS hiking app being "terminated").
If you can think of anything the iPad can do that my Android phone doesn't already do (probably years ago even), please let me know as the only thing
I use the iPad for nowadays is (a) google voice, and (b) test your bullshit (and you always fail).
HINT: Look at Jolly Roger's bullshit about 1Blocker I recently tested.
Have you ever seen that message that an app was "terminated by iOS" before?
sure have.
What does it even mean to be "terminated by iOS" nospam?
I'm not afraid to admit I've never seen that message before.
You pop it on the charger when it needs it, and an hour or two later, it's fully charged again. It's that easy with Android.
Only with iOS are you stuck tethered to a charging cable every night.
Again, you know nothing about Android, nospam.
You don't even use Android devices, nospam.
You don't even own a modern iOS device for heaven's sake.
If you think the free 1Blocker is _not_ crippleware, nospam, then again,
it's not an ad hominem attack to say that you're incredibly stupid.
FACT: *1Blocker freeware is crippleware*
One difference between you and me, nospam, is I lie & you prove what you say.
Your memory is that of a gnat, nospam, as I published a bunch of tutorials >> on using the iPad for hiking purposes because of the screen & battery life.
your avoiding answering the question is noted.
You forget *Apple's business model _requires_ you to be tracked* in almost >> everything that you do, nospam, and no amount of your lies changes that.
false.
HINT: Android phones work fine (even better) without a Google Account...
no they don't, because doing that removes a *significant* amount of functionality.
google even tracks you when you turn off location services, they're
*that* good.
You always claim Google made Apple do all the bad things Apple does.
Why?
nobody claimed that, and it wasn't true the last zillion times you said
it either.
You can turn off the location tracking, nospam. Well, you can't.
You're on iOS.
false.
unlike on android, turning off location on ios actually turns it off.
The iPhone won't work for most people without Apple tracking built in.
apple doesn't track people.
but even if we are to assume your statement as true, android won't work
'for most people' without a google account.
HINT: You don't need a Google account to download apps on Android
while Apple inserts a unique tracking ID into every app on iOS!
they do not, as has been explained to you many times.
HINT: Look at Jolly Roger's bullshit about 1Blocker I recently tested.
you don't know how it works so any tests you might have done are void.
Apple put cheap batteries in the iPhone and all your denials don't change that fact which is _easily_ proven simply by looking at the AH ratings.
They won't last as many cycles as the better batteries in Androids, nospam.
Notice I turn into a child whenever confronted with facts.
If I left this newsgroup, the group would be civil without me.
In article <tvqd9u$1uhe$1@paganini.bofh.team>, Andy Burnelli
<nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
If you think the free 1Blocker is _not_ crippleware, nospam, then
again, it's not an ad hominem attack to say that you're incredibly
stupid.
FACT: *1Blocker freeware is crippleware*
it has a free tier with paid options, just like countless other apps
on all platforms.
it's also not the only option for content blocking.
your fixation with one single app, which you do not even understand
how it works, demonstrates ignorance.
You pop it on the charger when it needs it, and an hour or two later, it's >> fully charged again. It's that easy with Android.
it's also that easy for just about every modern consumer electronic
device with rechargeable batteries, and often quite a bit less than 'an
hour or two later'.
Only with iOS are you stuck tethered to a charging cable every night.
false.
iphones are among the phones with the longest run time per charge.
FACT: *1Blocker freeware is crippleware*
it has a free tier with paid options, just like countless other apps on
all platforms.
it's also not the only option for content blocking.
your fixation with one single app, which you do not even understand how
it works, demonstrates ignorance.
One difference between you and me, nospam, is I lie & you prove what you say.
ftfy
He's only fixated on it because I happened to recommend it (among others
like AdGuard) for blocking ads in Safari, which it does for FREE without
any in-app purchases. : )
He desperately wants to paint it as "crippleware" simply because it
has additional features (such as whole-device ad blocking) that can be enabled with an in-app purchase.
And as you say, countless apps on the
App Store have free functionality with optional in-app purchases for additional functionality. And like all of those other apps, any adult
can plainly see that 1Blocker's basic ad blocking functionality is
indeed completely FREE. Same with AdGuard and numerous other iOS ad
blockers. He desperately wants us to ignore these FACTS, because he
is driven by his FEELINGS of irrational hate. He's a loser.
Apple put cheap batteries in the iPhone and all your denials don't change
that fact which is _easily_ proven simply by looking at the AH ratings.
the ah rating has nothing to do with cheapness.
also, comparing ah rating between completely different hardware is meaningless.
They won't last as many cycles as the better batteries in Androids, nospam.
false.
the batteries in both iphones and the 'better batteries in androids'
(weasel words) are lithium polymer batteries.
the difference is that android hardware is less power efficient.
now go look at the batteries in the cheap android phones.
Notice I turn into a child whenever confronted with facts.
If I left this newsgroup, the group would be civil without me.
ftfy
Apple put cheap batteries in the iPhone and all your denials don't change >> that fact which is _easily_ proven simply by looking at the AH ratings.
the ah rating has nothing to do with cheapness.
There are _many_ news reports that Apple cheaped out on iPhone batteries.
That you're completely ignorant of battery charge/discharge cycles is
typical for you iKooks, who only know what Apple marketing feeds you.
the batteries in both iphones and the 'better batteries in androids' (weasel words) are lithium polymer batteries.
the difference is that android hardware is less power efficient.
now go look at the batteries in the cheap android phones.
My _free_ Android phone
has a better battery than any battery ever put into
any iPhone ever built,
There are _many_ news reports that Apple cheaped out on iPhone batteries.
no there aren't, and again, that's unrelated to ah ratings.
Apple put cheap boards & separators and cheaper smaller batteries to lower cost (for Apple) around the iPhone 12 time frame and then Apple got hungry and kept it cheap for battery components in the later iPhones after that.
Go back to the archives and look at the references you ignored saying that.
Alan Browne wrote:
Already noted - thx. I use Trails - which has disappeared from the
App Store (AFAICT).
I looked at my Maps folder for Ant and it seems "Topo Reader" was unilaterally "terminated" by iOS on my iPad, whatever that message means.
Apple has a way of making sure only apps in the walled garden remain.
On 27 Mar 2023, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Apple put cheap boards & separators and cheaper smaller batteries to
lower cost (for Apple) around the iPhone 12 time frame and then
Apple got hungry and kept it cheap for battery components in the
later iPhones after that.
that is absolutely false.
You say that but you provide nothing but indignation because it's
true.
On 27 Mar 2023, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
There are _many_ news reports that Apple cheaped out on iPhone
batteries.
no there aren't, and again, that's unrelated to ah ratings.
He's right.
Apple put cheap boards & separators and cheaper smaller batteries to lower >> cost (for Apple) around the iPhone 12 time frame and then Apple got hungry >> and kept it cheap for battery components in the later iPhones after that.
that is absolutely false.
Go back to the archives and look at the references you ignored saying that.
do that yourself and try to understand what those references actually
say, versus what you want them to say.
Jolly Roger wrote:
He's only fixated on it because I happened to recommend it (among
others like AdGuard) for blocking ads in Safari, which it does for
FREE without any in-app purchases. : )
You forget, Jolly Roger, that I own & use _both_ iOS & Android
platforms. You do not.
iOS vs Android.
equivalent on Android.
He desperately wants to paint it as "crippleware" simply because it
has additional features (such as whole-device ad blocking) that can
be enabled with an in-app purchase.
for Android users
And as you say, countless apps on the App Store have free
functionality with optional in-app purchases for additional
functionality. And like all of those other apps, any adult can
plainly see that 1Blocker's basic ad blocking functionality is indeed
completely FREE. Same with AdGuard and numerous other iOS ad
blockers. He desperately wants us to ignore these FACTS, because he
is driven by his FEELINGS of irrational hate. He's a loser.
you are too ignorant to evaluate software
Android owners
You say that but you provide nothing but indignation because it's
true.
The burden of proof is on you since you are making the (obviously false) claim.
The burden of proof is on you since you are making the (obviously false) claim.
On 2023-03-27, Nil <rednoise9@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
On 27 Mar 2023, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in
misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Apple put cheap boards & separators and cheaper smaller batteries to
lower cost (for Apple) around the iPhone 12 time frame and then
Apple got hungry and kept it cheap for battery components in the
later iPhones after that.
that is absolutely false.
You say that but you provide nothing but indignation because it's
true.
The burden of proof is on you since you are making the (obviously false) claim.
Nope. And until either one of you coughs up objectively verified
evidence of Apple supposedly "cheaping out on batteries", everyone else
will just assume you're full of shit.
On 27 Mar 2023, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Apple put cheap boards & separators and cheaper smaller batteries to lower >>> cost (for Apple) around the iPhone 12 time frame and then Apple got hungry >>> and kept it cheap for battery components in the later iPhones after that. >>that is absolutely false.
You say that but you provide nothing but indignation because it's true.
Go back to the archives and look at the references you ignored saying that. >>do that yourself and try to understand what those references actually
say, versus what you want them to say.
You never reads the news of what Apple does given that Apple putting cheap boards and components starting with the iPhone 12 is very well documented.
Since the claim IS false, it will be funny (again) when The Trolls link to
an opinion piece that agrees with THEIR opinion on the matter, and thus
claim ³Here this link proves my claim!²
As always, it is to laugh.
Android is irrelevant here, trollboi.
On 27 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
You say that but you provide nothing but indignation because it's
true.
The burden of proof is on you since you are making the (obviously false)
claim.
I wanted to first prove how ignorant you are of all the news everyone else knows because everyone but you reads the news about what Apple does.
Even better, I wanted to show you deny everything that you don't like.
You don't even *think* for a second before you deny what everyone knows.
Jolly Roger wrote:
Android is irrelevant here, trollboi.
What's interesting is you are so _desperate_ to make facts go away
On 27 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Nope. And until either one of you coughs up objectively verified
evidence of Apple supposedly "cheaping out on batteries", everyone else
will just assume you're full of shit.
You deny it.
Only because you don't like it.
It's the kind of person you are which almost nobody normal is.
Just you.
Most people *think* before they deny what everyone else knows.
But not you.
Everyone but you knows about Apple putting cheap battery components in the iPhone 12, and you deny it without even *thinking* about it for a second.
What's wrong with you?
On 2023-03-27 12:51, Nil wrote:
On 27 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in
misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
You say that but you provide nothing but indignation because it's
true.
The burden of proof is on you since you are making the (obviously
false) claim.
I wanted to first prove how ignorant you are of all the news everyone
else knows because everyone but you reads the news about what Apple
does.
Even better, I wanted to show you deny everything that you don't
like. You don't even *think* for a second before you deny what
everyone knows.
And STILL you don't provide a shred of this "news" you claim exists.
On 2023-03-27 12:53, Nil wrote:
On 27 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in
misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Nope. And until either one of you coughs up objectively verified
evidence of Apple supposedly "cheaping out on batteries", everyone
else will just assume you're full of shit.
You deny it.
Only because you don't like it.
What's wrong with you?
Still waiting for your to prove it's actually happened.
it's even better when they link to something that says the opposite of
what they're claiming. it saves everyone else a lot of work.
And STILL you don't provide a shred of this "news" you claim exists.
That's because it doesn't exist.
Hitchen's Razor
The FACT is the OP asked for an *iOS* cycle/walking app, and you're here blabbing about how Android is supposedly superior.
Still waiting for your to prove it's actually happened.
Don't hold your breath.
On 27 Mar 2023, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
it's even better when they link to something that says the opposite of
what they're claiming. it saves everyone else a lot of work.
You just deny whatever it is about Apple that you don't happen to like.
And yet, everyone knows it was well documented that Apple cheaped out on
the iPhone 12 batteries (both the boards and the other components).
Everyone but you.
I want to show how not normal people like you are who deny things
without knowing a single thing about what it is they are denying.
Still waiting for your to prove it's actually happened.
On 27 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Still waiting for your to prove it's actually happened.
You were provided the links.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
A simple example of this "documentation" would have served better than
all that verbiage.
On 27 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
You were provided the links.
You're lying.
I wanted to show everyone how you are ignorant of everything about Apple.
You were provided the links.
You're lying.
On 27 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
A simple example of this "documentation" would have served better than
all that verbiage.
I wanted to show everyone how you are ignorant of everything about Apple.
On 27 Mar 2023, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
How about normal claims require normal evidence which is that it's
already well documented because it's true & everyone but you knows this.
It's a toss up if Alan Baker or Jolly Roger or nospam is more ignorant than Alan Browne, which I wanted to point out because if the four of them left this newsgroup, it would approach the normality of other Usenet newsgroups.
Everyone knows, but the iKooks, what Apple did...
<https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/21/21394985/apple-iphone-12-battery-cost-5g-kuo>
<https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/08/21/apple-to-offset-cost-of-5g-iphone-components-with-cheaper-battery-tech>
<https://www.maticstoday.com/2020/08/21/why-apple-is-using-cheap-battery-parts-in-iphone-12/>
<https://9to5mac.com/2020/08/21/kuo-iphone-12-5g-component-cost/>
<https://www.pcmag.com/news/report-iphone-12-to-use-smaller-cheaper-battery>
<https://www.macrumors.com/2020/08/20/kuo-iphone-12-battery-board/>
<https://www.timesnownews.com/technology-science/article/apple-opting-for-cheaper-battery-parts-to-cut-costs-on-5g-iphone-12-analyst-ming-chi-kuo/640657>
<https://techlog360.com/apple-will-use-cheaper-parts-in-the-iphone-12/>
<https://www.phonearena.com/news/apple-to-skimp-on-battery-tech-for-5g-iPhones-says-Kuo_id126708>
Notice that the iKooks all denied without even *thinking* about it.
They just don't like what Apple did so they deny that Apple did it.
Even Apple doesn't deny it.
Just the iKooks.
If they iKooks this newsgroup, it would approach normalcy of other groups.
On 2023-03-27 14:51, Nil wrote:
On 27 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in
misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
A simple example of this "documentation" would have served better
than all that verbiage.
I wanted to show everyone how you are ignorant of everything about
Apple.
And I've just shown that you're not bright enough to realize you've
reference one report by one analyst as if it were nine.
In article <tvs6vk$3887t$1@dont-email.me>, Nil
<rednoise9@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
Apple put cheap boards & separators and cheaper smaller batteries to lower >> cost (for Apple) around the iPhone 12 time frame and then Apple got hungry >> and kept it cheap for battery components in the later iPhones after that.
that is absolutely false.
On 2023-03-27 14:26, Nil wrote:
On 27 Mar 2023, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote in
misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
How about normal claims require normal evidence which is that it's
already well documented because it's true & everyone but you knows
this.
It's a toss up if Alan Baker or Jolly Roger or nospam is more
ignorant than Alan Browne, which I wanted to point out because if the
four of them left this newsgroup, it would approach the normality of
other Usenet newsgroups.
Everyone knows, but the iKooks, what Apple did...
So what you really have is ONE report by ONE analyst...
...who is far from all-knowing.
If they iKooks this newsgroup, it would approach normalcy of other
groups.
Notice also that Arlen has added a new posting nym.
On 27 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Still waiting for your to prove it's actually happened.
You were provided the links.
On 27 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad:
And STILL you don't provide a shred of this "news" you claim exists.
That's because it doesn't exist.
Oh, it exists.
It was well documented.
It was big news when it came out
Apple couldn't deny it.
Because it's true.
Jolly Roger wrote:
The FACT is the OP asked for an *iOS* cycle/walking app, and you're
here blabbing about how Android is supposedly superior.
And yet, I trolled about Android in response.
Links to an analyst claiming he believed something might happen aren't
proof of something actually happening, child.
On 28 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Links to an analyst claiming he believed something might happen aren't
proof of something actually happening, child.
I waited to provide the references because I wanted everyone to know that
you are ignorant of everything about Apple (you don't ever read the news).
Even Apple couldn't dispute it because if they could, they would.
And they didn't. Because they can't.
On 28 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Not only that, but it's just a rumor from an analyst who didn't say
Apple was using inferior batteries, but that he believes Apple "will
reduce the number of rigid-flex battery board layers and squeeze active
cell components into a smaller area".
I waited to provide the references to show how ignorant you iKooks are.
All you ignorant iKooks disputed it without even KNOWING about it.
On 28 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Not only that, but it's just a rumor from an analyst who didn't say
Apple was using inferior batteries, but that he believes Apple "will
reduce the number of rigid-flex battery board layers and squeeze
active cell components into a smaller area".
I waited to provide the references
Apple couldn't dispute it
Or they just didn't feel the need.
I knew about that.
On 28 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
I knew about that.
You did not and that is why I waited because I wanted to show that you ignorant iKooks not only don't know anything about what Apple does, but you will deny on sight anything that Apple does that you simply do not like.
On 27 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Or they just didn't feel the need.
What matters is I waited to give you many chances to prove you knew "something" (anything!) when you flatly denied everything Apple does.
You didn't.
You denied everything (without thinking!) because you didn't like it.
It's always the case you ignorant iKooks don't even read the news.
The sooner you leave this newsgroup, the better for everyone else.
I knew that Kuo had made a CLAIM.
Show a single example of me denying it.
On 28 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
I knew that Kuo had made a CLAIM.
You had too many chances to mention if you knew it
On 28 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
I knew that Kuo had made a CLAIM.
You had too many chances to mention if you knew it and you never did.
You repeatedly, over & over, denied it ONLY because you didn't like it.
On 28 Mar 2023, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Show a single example of me denying it.
Show a single example of you knowing about it before I told you about it.
On 28 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Nobody but you cares this much about baseless rumors, dummy.
What I cared about was a baseless rumor
Nobody but you cares this much about baseless rumors, dummy.
On 28 Mar 2023, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote in misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy:
Nobody but you cares this much about baseless rumors, dummy.
What I cared about was showing you denied everything you didn't like
about Apple without you ever having known a single thing about Apple.
There are _many_ news reports that Apple cheaped out on iPhone batteries.
no there aren't, and again, that's unrelated to ah ratings.
That you're completely ignorant of battery charge/discharge cycles is
typical for you iKooks, who only know what Apple marketing feeds you.
battery technology is the same for most modern devices (lithium ion or lithium polymer), which means the cycle counts will be the same (aside
from individual variances).
further, cycle count is unrelated to ah rating.
you're very ignorant about a lot of things.
the batteries in both iphones and the 'better batteries in androids'
(weasel words) are lithium polymer batteries.
the difference is that android hardware is less power efficient.
now go look at the batteries in the cheap android phones.
My _free_ Android phone
unless you stole it (something which cannot be ruled out), it wasn't
free.
has a better battery than any battery ever put into
any iPhone ever built,
you're delusional.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 307 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 116:42:40 |
| Calls: | 6,854 |
| Files: | 12,355 |
| Messages: | 5,416,751 |
