This post is only partially related to oberon.
--------------
I can't understand these people who claim `ls -t` is not needed ?!
If you're working in a Dir which has 50 files, some of them 5 years
old, OBVIOUSLY you want the 3 to 7 of the current job to be at the
TOP of the the list; or reversed order would still be usable.
I can't understand these people who claim `ls -t` is not needed ?!
...
that the drwx & lrwx entries have got the size-field missing.
So simply `sorting` on `cut -f N-M` is not helpful.
But I suspect that `awk` could do it?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 307 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 58:41:13 |
Calls: | 6,914 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,379 |
Messages: | 5,430,926 |