• Re: Google warns users Chrome's incognito mode still tracks data, repor

    From Nyssa@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 21 10:05:43 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy, misc.news.internet.discuss, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    cr0c0d1le wrote:

    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    Good luck with that. I don't have it on any of my
    machines, but when I tried to renew my amateur radio
    license this week I ran into a problem.

    The fcc.gov website will only work in Chrome or Edge.

    After two days of trying work-arounds and other
    browsers, I finally ended up going to a neighbor's
    and using her desktop with Win10 and Edge. The transaction
    went right through.

    I was also told by an fcc "help desk" person that
    the site would not work with Safari either, so Mac
    users are out of luck unless they download Chrome.

    Tying a government website that millions of people
    *have* to use to a Google product known for its
    privacy and security issues is not a good decision
    on the developers' part. I'm wondering at what level
    the decision was made.

    Nyssa, who doesn't have to worry about using that
    website again for ten years, so can only hope that
    somebody wises up before that and makes the government
    websites browser-neutral

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From cr0c0d1le@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 21 09:50:39 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy, misc.news.internet.discuss, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Walther@21:1/5 to Nyssa on Sun Jan 21 16:49:59 2024
    Nyssa wrote:

    The fcc.gov website will only work in Chrome or Edge.

    Working very well here with Vivaldi for Linux (Chromium-based).

    -jw-

    --

    And now for something completely different...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From cr0c0d1le@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 21 15:35:41 2024
    It's IE6 all over again. The difference between now and twenty years ago
    when Firefox came out is that building a web browser is way more
    complicated. I might have to settle for De-Googled Chrome (Chromium) eventually.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Nyssa on Mon Jan 22 00:54:25 2024
    XPost: misc.news.internet.discuss

    Nyssa wrote:

    Tying a government website that millions of people
    have to use to a Google product known for its
    privacy and security issues is not a good decision
    on the developers' part. I'm wondering at what level
    the decision was made.

    From the top!

    Governments generally do not like it's citizens to be private in what
    they do...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 22 10:53:57 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Am 21/01/2024 um 14:50 schrieb cr0c0d1le:
    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    I only use Chrome for Gmail and that's it. They can steal any data they
    want because they already have it.


    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Mon Jan 22 13:57:23 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 21/01/2024 um 14:50 schrieb cr0c0d1le:
    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    I only use Chrome for Gmail and that's it. They can steal any data they want because they already have it.

    Genuinely curious question... why would you use gmail when there are so
    many other free and more private options like disroot, riseup, tutanota,
    posteo etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 23 10:39:47 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Am 22/01/2024 um 12:57 schrieb D:


    On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 21/01/2024 um 14:50 schrieb cr0c0d1le:
    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    I only use Chrome for Gmail and that's it. They can steal any data
    they want because they already have it.

    Genuinely curious question... why would you use gmail when there are so
    many other free and more private options like disroot, riseup, tutanota, posteo etc.


    Who says I am not using them too?

    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Tue Jan 23 14:12:35 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 22/01/2024 um 12:57 schrieb D:


    On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 21/01/2024 um 14:50 schrieb cr0c0d1le:
    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    I only use Chrome for Gmail and that's it. They can steal any data they
    want because they already have it.

    Genuinely curious question... why would you use gmail when there are so
    many other free and more private options like disroot, riseup, tutanota,
    posteo etc.


    Who says I am not using them too?



    You tell me!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Wed Jan 24 10:28:56 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    Am 23/01/2024 um 13:12 schrieb D:


    On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 22/01/2024 um 12:57 schrieb D:


    On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 21/01/2024 um 14:50 schrieb cr0c0d1le:
    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    I only use Chrome for Gmail and that's it. They can steal any data they >>>>> want because they already have it.

    Genuinely curious question... why would you use gmail when there are so >>>> many other free and more private options like disroot, riseup, tutanota, >>>> posteo etc.


    Who says I am not using them too?



    You tell me!

    You are taking liberties.



    I don't understand what you are saying. You make no sense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 24 09:17:34 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Am 23/01/2024 um 13:12 schrieb D:


    On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 22/01/2024 um 12:57 schrieb D:


    On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 21/01/2024 um 14:50 schrieb cr0c0d1le:
    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    I only use Chrome for Gmail and that's it. They can steal any data
    they want because they already have it.

    Genuinely curious question... why would you use gmail when there are
    so many other free and more private options like disroot, riseup,
    tutanota, posteo etc.


    Who says I am not using them too?



    You tell me!

    You are taking liberties.

    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 10:38:48 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Am 24/01/2024 um 09:28 schrieb D:

    On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    Am 23/01/2024 um 13:12 schrieb D:


    On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 22/01/2024 um 12:57 schrieb D:


    On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Ottavio Caruso wrote:



    Am 21/01/2024 um 14:50 schrieb cr0c0d1le:
    I ain't touching Chrome with a ten-foot pole.

    I only use Chrome for Gmail and that's it. They can steal any data >>>>>> they want because they already have it.

    Genuinely curious question... why would you use gmail when there
    are so many other free and more private options like disroot,
    riseup, tutanota, posteo etc.


    Who says I am not using them too?



    You tell me!

    You are taking liberties.



    I don't understand what you are saying. You make no sense.

    Possibly because you are American.

    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)