• Re: [telecom] Little rewards get people to see truth in politically unf

    From Fred Atkinson@21:1/5 to Monty Solomon on Thu Mar 30 15:27:27 2023
    On 10 Mar 2023 at 23:44:24 EST, Monty Solomon wrote:

    Piecing together why so many people are willing to share
    misinformation online is a major focus among behavioral
    scientists. It's easy to think partisanship is driving it all -
    people will simply share things that make their side look good or
    their opponents look bad. But the reality is a bit more
    complicated. Studies have indicated that many people don't seem to
    carefully evaluate links for accuracy and that partisanship may be
    secondary to the rush of getting a lot of likes on social
    media. Given those results, it's not clear what induces users to
    stop sharing things that a small bit of checking would show to be
    untrue.
    <https://arstechnica.com/?p=1923411>

    While I was working as a radio technician for Duke Power Company in
    North Carolina] it used to amaze me as to the massive amounts of
    misinformation that CB users were spreading around. Mostly, it was
    about radio theory. I will share three of the many stories I heard.

    We had stopped for lunch at a truck stop one day. One of my
    colleagues found somebody installing a power mike on his mobile CB
    unit. When he asked the fellow why he was doing that, he said that by
    putting more audio into the radio, he would get more power out of it.

    When my colleague explained to him that this was not true, the guy
    replied, "Oh, no. All of the CBers are doing it. And they are
    getting a lot more power out.". So, my colleague gave up on trying to
    explain it to the guy. He was clearly hopeless.

    We ran into one fellow who had actually installed the truckers'
    antennas on a Volkswagen Fastback. There was absolutely no way this
    was going to work as those two antennas have to be spaced wide enough
    apart to work properly. He told me that the truckers antennas
    'prevented messing up your SWR (standing wave ratio) when you have a
    'huge metallic load' behind you'. Another hopeless radio expert.

    There was no point in sharing your expertise with them. They would
    always believe other CB users before they would believe experienced
    and well trained FCC-licensed radio technicians.

    An amateur radio operator I knew told me that he was trying to help a
    CB user upgrade to amateur radio. At first, he thought the guy might
    be worthy of his effort.

    When the guy told him that he was only putting out one and a quarter
    watts out of his CB radio because he had a quarter wave antenna (five
    watts times one quarter wave), he totally gave up on helping the guy.

    And there are many other true stories like these. I just couldn't
    believe the massive amounts of misinformation they were spreading.
    So many of them appointed themselves radio experts.

    It wasn't long after I worked as a radio technician that I totally
    gave up on trying to correct their misinformation. It was a lost
    cause.

    Regards,

    Fred Atkinson


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Horne@21:1/5 to Fred Atkinson on Thu Mar 30 20:59:04 2023
    On 3/30/2023 11:27 AM, Fred Atkinson wrote:

    While I was working as a radio technician for Duke Power Company in
    North Carolina] it used to amaze me as to the massive amounts of misinformation that CB users were spreading around. Mostly, it was
    about radio theory. I will share three of the many stories I heard.

    We had stopped for lunch at a truck stop one day. One of my
    colleagues found somebody installing a power mike on his mobile CB
    unit. When he asked the fellow why he was doing that, he said that
    by putting more audio into the radio, he would get more power out of
    it.

    When my colleague explained to him that this was not true, the guy
    replied, "Oh, no. All of the CBers are doing it. And they are
    getting a lot more power out.". So, my colleague gave up on trying
    to explain it to the guy. He was clearly hopeless.

    Well, it's "sort of" true, at least in theory: the Class=D Citizens
    Radio Service, which we know as "Citizens Band," uses Amplitude
    Modulation, just like broadcast AM stations in the 550-1700 KHz
    Broadcast band.

    In order to perform Amplitude Modulation (AM), the transmitter must
    add and subtract power from the outgoing carrier signal, and that
    change is done by the transmitter's modulator, which takes the
    microphone's signal and amplifies it to change the amount of
    radio-frequency power going to the antenna.

    However, in most CB sets, the amplified signals from the microphones
    are run through a low-cost "compression" circuit called a "Clipper,"
    which is supposed to maximize power output from the radio, but also
    adds a LOT of distortion, and putting more audio power into the
    clipper circuit just produces more distortion in the transmitted
    signal. The increased power from a power mic, sad to say, is usually
    heard as a distorted and hard-to-understand sound when it's received.

    ... which means, as a practical matter, that "Power" microphones only
    increase the ability of salesmen to brag about their paychecks at
    "Power" lunches.

    We ran into one fellow who had actually installed the truckers'
    antennas on a Volkswagen Fastback. There was absolutely no way this
    was going to work as those two antennas have to be spaced wide enough
    apart to work properly. He told me that the truckers antennas
    'prevented messing up your SWR (standing wave ratio) when you have a
    'huge metallic load' behind you'. Another hopeless radio expert.

    Well, he might not have been aware of it, but that CB'er could have
    achieved much better results by spending the time to properly bond a
    single antenna's feedline to the roof of his car, which would provide
    a proper "Counterpoise," and dramatically increase the "Field Strengh"
    of the transmitted signal, and also maximize the strength of signals
    received from other CB sets.

    There was no point in sharing your expertise with them. They would
    always believe other CB users before they would believe experienced
    and well trained FCC-licensed radio technicians.

    [Snip]

    And there are many other true stories like these. I just couldn't
    believe the massive amounts of misinformation they were spreading.
    So many of them appointed themselves radio experts.

    It wasn't long after I worked as a radio technician that I totally
    gave up on trying to correct their misinformation. It was a lost
    cause.

    I've commented before on the sad tragedy which is the Citizens Band,
    so I won't labor the point, other than to say "You're right."

    Bill Horne

    --
    (Please remove QRM for direct replies)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)