1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.DATABASES.IBM-DB2

  • Rollforward to PIT - 10.5.7 bug???

    From Jeremy Rickard@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 28 14:28:47 2017
    Hi,

    A SAP application suggests that a near-line storage database should be rolled forward to a point in time that includes microsecond precision.

    DB2 syntax supports only second granularity, but I thought I'd test what happens if you specify microseconds. The answer is that it rounds, but more interestingly in the course of my test I get some seemingly incorrect results.

    See below, using an example without the microseconds...

    db2inst1: db2 connect to TEST

    Database Connection Information

    Database server = DB2/LINUXX8664 10.5.7
    SQL authorization ID = DB2INST1
    Local database alias = TEST

    db2inst1: db2 "create table TIMES(TIMESTAMP timestamp not null default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, TEXT varchar(30) not null)"
    DB20000I The SQL command completed successfully.
    db2inst1: db2 "insert into TIMES(text) values ('test 1')"
    DB20000I The SQL command completed successfully.
    db2inst1: db2 "insert into TIMES(text) values ('test 2')"
    DB20000I The SQL command completed successfully.
    db2inst1: db2 "insert into TIMES(text) values ('test 3')"
    DB20000I The SQL command completed successfully.

    db2inst1: db2 "select * from TIMES"

    TIMESTAMP TEXT
    -------------------------- ------------------------------ 2017-01-27-10.16.34.563226 test 1
    2017-01-27-10.17.21.205592 test 2
    2017-01-27-10.17.21.250648 test 3

    3 record(s) selected.

    db2inst1: db2 connect reset
    DB20000I The SQL command completed successfully.

    db2inst1: db2 archive log for db TEST
    DB20000I The ARCHIVE LOG command completed successfully.

    db2inst1: db2 "restore database TEST from /home/db2inst1/backup/data without prompting"
    SQL2540W Restore is successful, however a warning "2539" was encountered during Database Restore while processing in No Interrupt mode.

    db2inst1:~$ db2 "rollforward database TEST to 2017-01-27-10.17.20 using local time and complete"

    Rollforward Status

    Input database alias = TEST
    Number of members have returned status = 1

    Member ID = 0
    Rollforward status = not pending
    Next log file to be read =
    Log files processed = -
    Last committed transaction = 2017-01-27-10.17.20.000000 Local

    DB20000I The ROLLFORWARD command completed successfully.
    db2inst1:~$ db2 "select * from TIMES"

    TIMESTAMP TEXT
    -------------------------- ------------------------------ 2017-01-27-10.16.34.563226 test 1
    2017-01-27-10.17.21.205592 test 2

    2 record(s) selected.

    I would expect my rolled forward database to contain only row "test 1".

    Anyone have any thoughts on this?

    Regards,

    Jeremy Rickard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ian@21:1/5 to Jeremy Rickard on Wed Feb 1 16:32:55 2017
    On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 3:28:48 PM UTC-7, Jeremy Rickard wrote:


    Anyone have any thoughts on this?


    This certainly looks like an issue to me. I'd suggest you open a PMR.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeremy Rickard@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 5 12:44:13 2017
    Thanks, if I can replicate in the customer's own AIX environment then maybe I can report via SAP, since unfortunately there is no direct IBM support channel available.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bwmiller16@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Jeremy Rickard on Tue May 9 06:34:15 2017
    On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 3:44:17 PM UTC-5, Jeremy Rickard wrote:
    Thanks, if I can replicate in the customer's own AIX environment then maybe I can report via SAP, since unfortunately there is no direct IBM support channel available.

    Dude, that's an ugly bug!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)