1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.AI.PHILOSOPHY

  • The Second Abstraction of AI

    From Douglas Eagleson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 13 10:31:23 2021
    I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

    And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

    We are AI or was it borg?

    btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
    in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
    ball of wax.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Douglas Eagleson@21:1/5 to Douglas Eagleson on Fri Sep 24 12:19:52 2021
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

    And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

    We are AI or was it borg?

    btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
    in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
    ball of wax.

    Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Stockbauer@21:1/5 to Douglas Eagleson on Fri Sep 24 12:40:25 2021
    On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:19:53 PM UTC-5, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

    And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

    We are AI or was it borg?

    btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
    in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
    ball of wax.
    Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?

    Self-reference produces a lot of paradoxes like "this sentence is false ", the Epimenides
    paradox . I guess what you call a We or an I paradox. if you study Douglas Hofstadter's work you'll see he put a lot of effort into defining the "I" , how it forms throughout one's life.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Stockbauer@21:1/5 to Don Stockbauer on Wed Nov 3 01:23:39 2021
    On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:40:26 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:19:53 PM UTC-5, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

    And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

    We are AI or was it borg?

    btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
    in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
    ball of wax.
    Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?
    Self-reference produces a lot of paradoxes like "this sentence is false ", the Epimenides
    paradox . I guess what you call a We or an I paradox. if you study Douglas Hofstadter's work you'll see he put a lot of effort into defining the "I" , how it forms throughout one's life.

    Or maybe not. Who the hell knows in this complicated day and age?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Douglas Eagleson@21:1/5 to Don Stockbauer on Mon Jan 10 13:31:39 2022
    On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 4:23:42 AM UTC-4, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:40:26 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:19:53 PM UTC-5, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

    And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

    We are AI or was it borg?

    btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
    in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
    ball of wax.
    Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?
    Self-reference produces a lot of paradoxes like "this sentence is false ", the Epimenides
    paradox accept. I guess what you call a We or an I paradox. if you study Douglas Hofstadter's work you'll see he put a lot of effort into defining the "I" , how it forms throughout one's life.
    Or maybe not. Who the hell knows in this complicated day and age?

    here are some links where I explain myself

    https://douglasmeaglesonportal.yolasite.com https://platosschoolhouse.blogspot.com

    The school house is a learning blog. The classical
    Greek theorists I claim as fully sufficient for logic
    of basic formal thought.

    The basic challenge is to apply relation implication
    as assumptive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Stockbauer@21:1/5 to Douglas Eagleson on Fri Jan 14 05:12:46 2022
    On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 3:31:41 PM UTC-6, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 4:23:42 AM UTC-4, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:40:26 PM UTC-5, Don Stockbauer wrote:
    On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 2:19:53 PM UTC-5, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:31:24 PM UTC-4, Douglas Eagleson wrote:
    I first posted in sci.crypt by mistake:

    And to new world begins:: Structuring an AI https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/24/2021-18108/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework

    We are AI or was it borg?

    btw: when we put the essence of Columbo, the tv detective,
    in an detective's AI, it is going to be an interesting
    ball of wax.
    Does anybody know of a We or I paradox?
    Self-reference produces a lot of paradoxes like "this sentence is false ", the Epimenides
    paradox accept. I guess what you call a We or an I paradox. if you study Douglas Hofstadter's work you'll see he put a lot of effort into defining the "I" , how it forms throughout one's life.
    Or maybe not. Who the hell knows in this complicated day and age?
    here are some links where I explain myself

    https://douglasmeaglesonportal.yolasite.com https://platosschoolhouse.blogspot.com

    The school house is a learning blog. The classical
    Greek theorists I claim as fully sufficient for logic
    of basic formal thought.

    The basic challenge is to apply relation implication
    as assumptive.

    That's nice.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)