• Trump, Kafka, and Socrates Walk Into A Courthouse

    From Cauf Skiviers@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 28 13:02:08 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa

    We'll long for gentler days, when bread was cheaper and circuses, at
    least, entertaining

    Donald Trump's legacy within the GOP is forever up in the air. Although
    he enjoys steadfast support from large swaths of the Republican base,
    few establishment Republican leaders fully endorse him, with a handful
    openly wearing the "Never Trumper" badge with more pride than
    prejudice.

    Yet, this is nothing next to the solid wall of pure loathing Democrats
    have built around Trump, brick by loyal brick.

    No Democrat is indifferent to Trump. There's no middle ground, no
    lukewarm disdain. Whereas some Republicans may betray him at the
    slightest convenience, Democrats will always remain unwaveringly
    hostile. They can be trusted to spit on Trump's grave, the absence of
    flowers a silent testament to Republican embarrassment. They will write frightening verse and prose about the "Bad Orange Man" long after he's
    dust.

    This kind of loyalty can't be bought, not with money nor office. And
    it's an ironclad reason to believe that Trump's notorious legacy will
    endure.

    To the Democrats, Trump must be stopped at all costs — or else he'll
    persecute the opposition, throw civil rights activists in jail, make
    racism public policy, and maybe kick off World War III. Luckily for us,
    none of that has happened yet, right?

    Their impassioned blindness guides the spectacle of Trump's legal
    battles, blurring the lines between truth and imagination so thoroughly
    that separating fact from fiction might just break reality.

    One might be tempted to call Trump's trials and tribulations
    "Kafkaesque" — conjuring images of shadowy practices and obscure plots.
    But, outside the feverish dreams of E. Jean Carroll, there's nothing
    Kafkaesque about them.

    There's no grand mystery to unpack, where assigning purpose, reason, or
    benefit becomes an impossible task. Everything is laid out plainly.

    From public attorneys voted into office with clear mandates to target
    Trump to judges who can barely conceal their scorn for him, there are
    no dizzying mazes to get lost in here. The bureaucrats running the show
    lack even the wicked dignity of remaining faceless. They campaigned for
    it, they voted for it, plastered it all over the billboards, and made
    sure everyone paid up.

    It speaks to a very cynical perversion of the democratic ideals they
    ostensibly hold dear.

    The title of Franz Kafka's masterpiece on judicial surrealism, "Der
    Prozess," plays a neat trick — meaning both "the trial" and "the
    process" in German. That's precisely where Trump's at. It's not just
    the court cases tearing him up; it's the whole "process" trying to
    grind him down.

    A key distinction exists, though: We are never told the alleged crime
    for which Josef K., Kafka's protagonist, is persecuted. Trump's crime,
    on the other hand, is well-known — and of a rather Socratic nature.

    Socrates was famously accused of "corrupting the youth" of Athens
    during a time when pederasty was a high art — a situation strangely
    similar to today, where the meaning of "corrupting the youth" has once
    again been completely inverted.

    Trump, too, is accused of that type of corruption, though his most
    flagrant — and successful — offense involves corrupting the blue-
    collar, working-class Americans.

    Like Socrates, Trump is clearly guilty as charged. Yet there are no
    angry mobs in this witch hunt. Just as the ancient oligarchy believed
    Athens had to be purified and reaffirmed through the purge of Socrates,
    so too does the modern oligarchy believe that only by purging Trump can
    they cleanse their power halls.

    In these times, where "guilty" has been subverted, it seems inevitable
    that the concept of "innocence" will lose any significance.

    So what will that mean when a jury is asked if Trump is guilty or
    innocent in today's context? Perhaps it no longer matters.

    As Democrats continue to pile straw men onto a long-broken camel's
    back, Trump seems to develop an extreme case of antifragility — almost
    a sort of antimortality. His legend thrives not on the anger of his
    supporters, as it's been said, but on the relentless hate from his
    detractors.

    Trump is the underdog bully, 100% American pit bull — perhaps sporting
    a golden retriever toupee, but I digress — battling a pack of yapping Chihuahuas trying to kill him by a thousand bites. He's Rudy. Except in
    this story Rudy Ruettiger is Bill Romanowski — but d**n if you wouldn't
    cheer for him to make that one play.

    At this point, some might say this is all a bunch of nonsense — and
    perhaps it is. Yet this kind of nonsense could never be written about
    Joe Biden or just about anyone else in politics. Trump is cut from the
    stuff nonsense is made of. And that's irresistible. Unlike Biden, he's
    not just a man of his time; he is the man for these times — when the
    masses want their bread cheaper and their circuses, at least, a little entertaining.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)