On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:39:26 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 8:55:41 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:
On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 10:36:09 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:
The latest scoop neckline evidence is totally valid and is legitimate film evidence that does accurately portray the neckline on Prayer Man's garment...The Prayer Man people are currently abusing their censorship-gained privilege and trying an end around
in order to force the false suggestion that the scoop neckline is somehow manipulated...Jim DiEugenio assumes the entitled privilege of making absolute pronouncements without ever providing any technical explanation that would be required of anyone else..
.Jim is doing his usual bullshit and trying to rescue the Prayer Man trolls...However the technical evidence that the crook Gordon excluded from his website by means of dirty banning won't let DiEugenio get away with it...
The Prayer Man idiots are trying to get away with ignoring that the original Darnell film will produce the exact same scoop neckline as seen in Kamp's image...Jim DiEugenio is lying...This will be proven once the original Darnell film is scanned and
produces the exact same image - proving that the neckline has not been manipulated and Kamp's frame is accurate...The Prayer Man cultists are delusional if they think they can get away with just ignoring this...They are trying to use swarm trolling to
avoid the obvious...That Kamp's new frame is damning proof that Prayer Man is Stanton...Dirty Jim knows what his job is...By the way, the original Wiegman celluloid will also produce Davidson's woman's face exactly - also confirming that Davidson was
totally accurate and serves as credible proof that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...
If you go to the best enlargements of the previous Darnell image of Prayer Man you can see that the skin area seen in the scoop neckline is present in that image in exact proportion to Kamp's clear frame...The original Prayer Man frame was more blurry
than Kamp's new frame, however it was of clear enough resolution that it shows the proportion of white skin to clothing and you can see the exact proportion of skin seen in the scoop neckline image is present in that previous image...This is confirming
proof that Kamp's scoop neckline frame is totally accurate and credible and is not manipulated as the Prayer Man people are desperately claiming...They are just ignoring the most intelligent analyses that disprove them...They are lying and trying to
ignore that Kamp's new frame is sharper because Darnell's camera was still (despite their lies trying to say the opposite)...Stancak is trying to get away with ignoring that Kamp's new frame is sharper because Darnell's camera stopped sweeping and
therefore took a sharp frame...This is the simple obvious that the Education Forum allows Stancak to avoid by posting lengthy pseudo-science bullshit that then gets armchair praise from the useful idiots who know what their job is...Stancak is
dishonestly trying to avoid admitting that the previous Blue-Ray version was blurry and Kamp's new frame is sharp and therefore depicts Prayer Man's neckline more accurately...The Education Forum is organized and dedicated dishonesty based on stupid
censorship...Backwards dumb-down moderation...
This proof needs to be shown on the Education Forum and the Prayer Man people need to be forced to answer it...Only that is being prevented by one UK-based cyber criminal named James Gordon...Greg Parker will ignore all this and troll and his useful
idiot proxies on the Education Forum will ignore it...However it is still credible proof that proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The Education Forum is also trying to get away with the murder of ignoring that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton's exact 5 foot
4 height and possesses her elbow-length sleeve as seen in Owens...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)