I think we are loosing messages - Oli alerted me to some discrepancies that he is seeing via Hub 1 and Hub 3.

With that, I've done a comparision of what is on Hub 3, with what I have at 2/116 (thereby possibly including Hub 2 as an issue) - this is what I see.

Using the "stats" message as a base:
Sender fsxNet HUB
To All
Subject fsxNet Weekly fsx_mys
X-FTN-AREA FSX_MYS
X-FTN-TID Mystic BBS 1.12 A43
X-FTN-MSGID 21:1/100 457610fc
when_written 5E08A28E 030C Sun Dec 29 2019 11:56 pm UTC+13:00
when_imported 5E088687 9258 Sun Dec 29 2019 09:57 pm AEDT

Since receving this message from Hub 1 - on 2/116, I see 9 additional messages posted in FSX_MYS:
4997 Phoobar Vk3jed R Re: Not sure what's wrong...
4998 Greg Youngblood Al Question about BBS Ads (Ansi)
4999 Vk3jed Phoobar Re: Not sure what's wrong...
5000 Analog All R Python parsing of Pascal records
5001 xqtr Analog R Re: Python parsing of Pascal records
5002 Analog xqtr * Re: Python parsing of Pascal records
5003 xqtr Analog * Re: Python parsing of Pascal records
5004 Analog xqtr * Re: Python parsing of Pascal records
5005 Analog All * Mystic Python crashes when importing PIP packages

However, on Hub 3: I only see 4:
685 Greg Youngblood Al Question about BBS Ads (Ansi)
686 Vk3jed Phoobar Re: Not sure what's wrong...
687 xqtr Analog * Re: Python parsing of Pascal records
688 xqtr Analog * Re: Python parsing of Pascal records

The one I used to identify the messing messages was a message from Tony to Phoobar:
Sender Vk3jed
To Phoobar
Subject Re: Not sure what's wrong...
X-FTN-AREA FSX_MYS
X-FTN-MSGID 7758.fsx-fsx_mys@21:1/109 226e8550
X-FTN-REPLY 21:2/147 2a05b891
when_written 5E092F3C 0294 Mon Dec 30 2019 09:57 am UTC+11:00
when_imported 5E0931E3 9258 Mon Dec 30 2019 10:08 am AEDT

On 2/116, I have this message and the original 2a05b891 - however, on Hub 3 I do not have 2a05b891.
Sender Phoobar
To Vk3jed
Subject Re: Not sure what's wrong...
X-FTN-AREA FSX_MYS
X-FTN-TID Mystic BBS 1.12 A43
X-FTN-MSGID 21:2/147 2a05b891
when_written 5E07A1FA FE20 Sun Dec 29 2019 05:42 am UTC-8:00
when_imported 5E08AD84 9258 Mon Dec 30 2019 12:43 am AEDT

So the question is, why wasnt 2a05b891 sent to Hub 3? I'll reply from Hub 3, if
I see this message arrive there...
...deon


... When it's three O'clock in New York, it's still 1938 in London.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)

Re: Missing messages on Hub 3
By: Alterego to Avon on Wed Jan 01 2020 11:01 am

So the question is, why wasnt 2a05b891 sent to Hub 3? I'll reply from Hub

3, if

I see this message arrive there...

So I see this message on Hub 3 :)
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
* Origin: ANSITEX-DEV: Testing InterBBS Videotex! (21:3/100)

On 01 Jan 2020 at 11:01a, Alterego pondered and said...

I think we are loosing messages - Oli alerted me to some discrepancies that he is seeing via Hub 1 and Hub 3.

OK

The one I used to identify the messing messages was a message from Tony
to Phoobar:
Sender Vk3jed
To Phoobar
Subject Re: Not sure what's wrong...
X-FTN-AREA FSX_MYS
X-FTN-MSGID 7758.fsx-fsx_mys@21:1/109 226e8550
X-FTN-REPLY 21:2/147 2a05b891

On 2/116, I have this message and the original 2a05b891 - however, on
Hub 3 I do not have 2a05b891.
Sender Phoobar
To Vk3jed
Subject Re: Not sure what's wrong...
X-FTN-AREA FSX_MYS
X-FTN-TID Mystic BBS 1.12 A43
X-FTN-MSGID 21:2/147 2a05b891
when_written 5E07A1FA FE20 Sun Dec 29 2019 05:42 am UTC-8:00 when_imported 5E08AD84 9258 Mon Dec 30 2019 12:43 am AEDT

So the question is, why wasnt 2a05b891 sent to Hub 3? I'll reply from
Hub 3, if I see this message arrive there...

So if I understand this correctly, it was created in NET 2 by a NET 2 node,
and sent from 2/100 on to your 2/xxx address but seemingly not sent to 3/100 via 1/100?

I'll check to see if I can find the message here at 1/100 and also look at 2/100

Can you post the message body copy also so I can cross reference please.

Let me know if I have misunderstood anything.

Best, Paul

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)

Re: Re: Missing messages on Hub 3
By: Avon to Alterego on Wed Jan 01 2020 07:16 pm

So if I understand this correctly, it was created in NET 2 by a NET 2 node, and sent from 2/100 on to your 2/xxx address but seemingly not sent to 3/100 via 1/100?

Actually, I thought Hub 2 was sending directly to the other Hubs 1/3/4 - but yes, it didnt do that, nor did I receive it from another hub.

Can you post the message body copy also so I can cross reference please.

X-FTN-REPLY 21:2/147 2a05b891

Sender Phoobar
To Vk3jed
Subject Re: Not sure what's wrong...
X-FTN-AREA FSX_MYS
X-FTN-TID Mystic BBS 1.12 A43
X-FTN-MSGID 21:2/147 2a05b891
X-FTN-REPLY 7754.fsx-fsx_mys@21:1/109 226dcad7
X-FTN-SEEN-BY 1/100 2/100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114
X-FTN-SEEN-BY 115 116 118 119 120 1202 121 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
X-FTN-SEEN-BY 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 150
X-FTN-SEEN-BY 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 3/100 4/100
X-FTN-PATH 2/147 100
when_written 5E07A1FA FE20 Sun Dec 29 2019 05:42 am UTC-8:00
when_imported 5E08AD84 9258 Mon Dec 30 2019 12:43 am AEDT

ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄúúúú
³ Subj: Re: Not sure what's wrong...
³ Attr: Replied
³ To : Vk3jed
³ From: Phoobar (21:2/147)
³ Date: Sun Dec 29 2019 05:42 am UTC-8:00 (2.9 days ago) ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄúúúúúú

With all the trouble I've been having with the little things which ha

bit me...may just do a readme or something like it for noobs to cover all their bases.

You might be the perfect person to write that, from your experiences. :)

May attempt to get it going at the end of the week. This one is my long week with next week my short one.

Phoobar/ACME BBS - Member of fsxNet/WWIVNet/SciNet
-+- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Raspberry Pi/32)
# Origin: ACME BBS-I am Wile E Ki-oh-tay, Super Genius (21:2/147)
...deon


... Love is being willing to share your toothbrush with someone else.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)

01 Jan 20 11:01, you wrote to Avon:

I think we are loosing messages - Oli alerted me to
some discrepancies that he is seeing via Hub 1 and
Hub 3.

i think i've received the missing messages fro last year with a bunch of dupes.


























































































































































































































































































































































did anyone did a rescan or where there packets stuck somewhere?

* Origin: 🌈 (21:1/151)

Re: Missing messages on Hub 3
By: Oli to Alterego on Tue Jan 07 2020 09:10 am

i think i've received the missing messages fro last year with a bunch of dupes.
did anyone did a rescan or where there packets stuck somewhere?

I had a bunch of bad packets, and some packets lots in a deep directory which I
forced them to be tossed - a side affect of the Hub 2 configuration with Hub 3.

Hopefully should be good now...
...deon


... A stockbroker is someone who invests your money until it is all gone.
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)

On 01 Jan 2020 at 11:26p, Alterego pondered and said...

Can you post the message body copy also so I can cross reference plea

X-FTN-REPLY 21:2/147 2a05b891

Sender Phoobar
To Vk3jed
Subject Re: Not sure what's wrong...
X-FTN-AREA FSX_MYS
X-FTN-TID Mystic BBS 1.12 A43
X-FTN-MSGID 21:2/147 2a05b891

On the NET 2 HUB I see

[snip]

From : Phoobar Msg # : 1003 of 1055
To : Vk3jed Msg Date : 29/12/19 05:42
Subj : Re: Not sure what's wrong... Refer to : 1001
Stat : Echo See Also : 1005

ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
@TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A43
@MSGID: 21:2/147 2a05b891
@REPLY: 7754.fsx-fsx_mys@21:1/109 226dcad7
@TZUTC: -0800
@SEEN-BY: 2/100 147
@PATH: 2/147

With all the trouble I've been having with the little things which ha bit me...may just do a readme or something like it for

[snip]

In MUTIL I can see this being tossed to 1/100, 3/100, 4/100

[snip]

! Dec 29 08:42:10 Import from Z:\mystic\echomail\in\
+ Dec 29 08:42:10 Extracting 0000002f.su0
- Dec 29 08:42:10 unzip -oqqjC "Z:\mystic\echomail\in\0000002f.su0"
"*.pkt" -d Z:\mystic\temputil\
+ Dec 29 08:42:10 Importing 11685ddc.pkt (21:2/147 to 21:2/100)
+ Dec 29 08:42:10 Import #1003 to FSX_MYS
+ Dec 29 08:42:10 Export FSX_MYS #1003 to 21:2/157@fsxnet
+ Dec 29 08:42:10 Export FSX_MYS #1003 to 21:1/100@fsxnet
+ Dec 29 08:42:10 Export FSX_MYS #1003 to 21:3/100@fsxnet
+ Dec 29 08:42:10 Export FSX_MYS #1003 to 21:4/100@fsxnet

[snip]

then

[snip]

- Dec 29 08:42:13 EXEC: zip -qj9
Z:\mystic\echomail\out\primary\ffff0000.sur Z:\mystic\temputil\1178db05.pkt
+ Dec 29 08:42:13 Adding PKT "Z:\mystic\echomail\out\primary\ffff0000.sur" to FLO Z:\mystic\echomail\out\primary\00030064.cloDec 29 08:42:26 Scanning 21:3/100

[snip]

I see a fidopoll to 3/100 from 2/100 a few secs later

[snip]


Dec 29 08:42:26 Scanning 21:3/100
Dec 29 08:42:27 Queued 1 files (963 bytes) to 21:3/100
Dec 29 08:42:27 Polling BINKP node 21:3/100 (Deon George) by IPV4
Dec 29 08:42:27 Connecting to alterant.leenooks.net:24555
Dec 29 08:42:27 Using address 121.208.17.161
Dec 29 08:42:27 Connected IPV4 to 121.208.17.161
Dec 29 08:42:27 S: NUL SYS fsxNet [Net2] Tholian
Dec 29 08:42:27 S: NUL ZYZ Todd Zieman - Solaris
Dec 29 08:42:27 S: NUL TIME Sun, 29 Dec 2019 08:42:27 -0500
Dec 29 08:42:27 S: NUL VER Mystic/1.12A43 binkp/1.0
Dec 29 08:42:27 S: NUL BUILD 2019/03/03 01:36:36 Windows/64
Dec 29 08:42:27 S: ADR 21:2/100@fsxnet
Dec 29 08:42:27 R: NUL OPT UTF
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: NUL OPT CRAM-MD5-37edd591322a077c6551ddbdc726cf2c
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: NUL SYS Alterant Game Server, TCP/IP 1
Dec 29 08:42:28 System Alterant Game Server, TCP/IP 1
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: NUL ZYZ Deon George
Dec 29 08:42:28 SysOp Deon George
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: NUL LOC Parkdale, VIC AU
Dec 29 08:42:28 Location Parkdale, VIC AU
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: NUL PHN
Dec 29 08:42:28 Info PHN
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: NUL NDL CM,TCP,IFC,TEL,VMP,BND
Dec 29 08:42:28 Info NDL CM,TCP,IFC,TEL,VMP,BND
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: NUL TIME Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:42:27 +1100
Dec 29 08:42:28 Info TIME Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:42:27 +1100
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: NUL VER Taurus/5.114.2013.19/Winter/FastMM
4.991/DEBUG/Win32 binkp/1.1
Dec 29 08:42:28 Mailer Taurus/5.114.2013.19/Winter/FastMM 4.991/DEBUG/Win32 binkp/1.1
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: ADR 10:1/2 10:2/0 618:510/2 618:510/3 516:999/998 21:3/100 Dec 29 08:42:28 S: PWD
Dec 29 08:42:28 R: OK secure
Dec 29 08:42:28 S: NUL QSIZE 1 files 963 bytes
Dec 29 08:42:29 Sending: ffff0000.sur (963 bytes)
Dec 29 08:42:29 S: FILE ffff0000.sur 963 1577608934 0
Dec 29 08:42:29 R: GOT ffff0000.sur 963 1577608934
Dec 29 08:42:30 S: EOB
Dec 29 08:42:30 R: EOB
Dec 29 08:42:30 Session ended (1 sent, 0 rcvd, 0 skip)

[snip]


I can see the packet arrive at 1/100 and in the SEEN-BY there 3/100 appears
so 1/100 would not have tossed it onwards to you. I expect (but have not checked) the same to be the case for 4/100

So yeah, looks like packets were being sent by 2/100 to 3/100 in this
instance.

[time passes]

For the benefit of those following along Deon and I nutted out that a rule at 3/100 was ensuring those 2/100 packets were not being tossed at 3/100 but he has changed things now.

But we also opted to remove 2/100 from feeding 3/100 for now so all packets
to 3/100 will come to it via 1/100 or 4/100 at this time.

Netmail sent from NET 2 for NET 3 will be routed via NET 1 then sent onwards
:)

Best, Paul

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)