Hey all,
Looking for someone to test the A44 prealpha upgrade.
I finally got the new theme system to workable, at least enough to get a release out (which should also fix the date bug in MUTIL). Keep in mind this has a LOT of changes. The theme editor is only somewhat working.
Happy to see ya back! I did have a bug request possible I posted else where but will post it here as well the acs OV and -V can not be checked on a new user even after doing the verification on their first logon; I
testing this and also turned this off with the same results. Each time the user would need to log out and back onto the BBS to see the -V for email verification to pop up for them.
testing this and also turned this off with the same results. Each ti the user would need to log out and back onto the BBS to see the -V fo email verification to pop up for them.
I think this is fixed now in the latest A44 prealpha. Thank you and let me know if you do end up trying it and you still have issues.
Hey all,
Looking for someone to test the A44 prealpha upgrade.
Hey all,
Looking for someone to test the A44 prealpha upgrade.
release out (which should also fix the date bug in MUTIL). Keep in mind this has a LOT of changes. The theme editor is only somewhat working.
Looking for someone to test the A44 prealpha upgrade.
Thanks! Could you please take a look at a few other issues
(SEEN-BY lines and wrapping of text) that I have been in touch
about by email? It would be great if the next version could
address those.
Looking for someone to test the A44 prealpha upgrade.
Thanks! Could you please take a look at a few other issues (SEEN-BY
lines and wrapping of text) that I have been in touch about by email? It would be great if the next version could address those.
..oh and thanks for the updates level 3 logging in the way tossing and packing is being reported. Very helpful.
Could you also enable the logging menu functionality in this build?
Hey g00r00, testing on Ubuntu 18.04.3 x64. Upgraded from A43 today. No
big deal, the prompts.dat/prompts.txt thing you've likely heard about,
but aside from that things worked out.
I noticed my <bbs>/scripts/ directory was moved but its subdirectories were not. Same with <bbs>/text/.
been neglecting e-mail a lot lately (ie I haven't been reading it since maybe November sometime)
At the current moment I don't know of the SEEN-BY issue but I will of course get it cleared up ASAP once I do!
and maybe all the other FTN bugs:
I ran the update, but the /scripts folder was missing for me.
Hey all,
Looking for someone to test the A44 prealpha upgrade.
I finally got the new theme system to workable, at least enough to get a release out (which should also fix the date bug in MUTIL). Keep in mind this has a LOT of changes. The theme editor is only somewhat working.
At the current moment I don't know of the SEEN-BY issue but I will of course get it cleared up ASAP once I do!
Thank you, Yeah probably best if you just look for the 3-4 emails I sent and that should hopefully sum up quite a bit of what's been picked up.
wrong file timestamps in binkp (offsetted by the timezone)
wrong format in the binkp time field (but that is only informational, afaik)
wrong month in the pkt header
I ran the update, but the /scripts folder was missing for me.
It should now end up in <bbs>/themes/default/scripts
Found one item seems to be limited on the path for the theme location, an example say I wanted to do:
/mystic/data/theme/ansi/menu instead of menus, this could be me or is there a short way to do that from the fallbacks provided?
Can you show this? There were some older versions where something
like this would happen, but it was because of another BBS software
that is no longer in development creating improper fields.
Found one item seems to be limited on the path for the theme location example say I wanted to do:
/mystic/data/theme/ansi/menu instead of menus, this could be me or i there a short way to do that from the fallbacks provided?
You don't have separate paths for those anymore. You have a root theme directory and all themes go in there. So there is only one path now
that is configurable and thats where your themes go (in system paths).
Then the theme directory (say c:\bbsthemes\) has a directory one per theme. Under that is "text" "scripts" and "menus" directories. You
cannot change those names.
Mystic creates packets with the month off by one in the packet header,
for example in January, mystic sets the month as 1, whereas it should be 0.
Great to see you back by the way :)
Mystic creates packets with the month off by one in the packet
header, for example in January, mystic sets the month as 1,
whereas it should be 0.
Thanks, this has been fixed. Its amazing it went like a decade
unnoticed!
Thank you, Yeah probably best if you just look for the 3-4 emails I s and that should hopefully sum up quite a bit of what's been picked up
The SEENBY should hopefully be fixed now!
If you get a chance to try it let me know, and if it works then I will spring on some more changes (the start of the stat tracking) that could totally break everything lol.
The SEENBY should hopefully be fixed now!
If you get a chance to try it let me know, and if it works then I will spring on some more changes (the start of the stat tracking) that could totally break everything lol.
wrong file timestamps in binkp (offsetted by the timezone)
Just double checked and the standard I am looking at says to give the
Unix time of the file. It does not say it should be UTC. But if you
can find something official that clarifies that let me know.
wrong format in the binkp time field (but that is only
informational, afaik)
Can you elaborate? Are you looking at an old version or something?
Here is what it says:
_NUL "TIME remote_date_time"
remote_date_time format is described in [RFC822].
The format given fits that described in RFC822.
wrong month in the pkt header
Can you show this? There were some older versions where something
like this would happen, but it was because of another BBS software
that is no longer in development creating improper fields.
Mystic creates packets with the month off by one in the packet
header, for example in January, mystic sets the month as 1,
whereas it should be 0.
Thanks, this has been fixed. Its amazing it went like a decade
unnoticed!
The SEENBY should hopefully be fixed now!
If you get a chance to try it let me know, and if it works then I will spring on some more changes (the start of the stat tracking) that could totally break everything lol.
So as you can see there's some additional forward slashes showing at the start of the second (and subsequent) SEEN-BY lines which don't look
right to me. But I do think you're heading in the right direction with
Mystics BBS interpretation isn't accepted by the linux date command. I think it was a missing + or space character. Some tiny detail was wrong.
I know that I've got from Avon's 1/100 Hub had a invalid month in December. AFAIK the packets were created by Mystic BBS A43. Fidonet mail packets weirdly use 0 to 11 (0: Jan, 11: Dec). I have no idea why, but that's the way it's specified. Mystic is one month off (1 to 12).
Hi ho... OK day two so I tested the next build but sadly can only report the same issue observed as last night
Mystics BBS interpretation isn't accepted by the linux date
command. I think it was a missing + or space character. Some
tiny detail was wrong.
You'll need to be more specific than that.
I just noticed that the FSX mail doesn't seem to be getting to the BBS I was using (not sure if my replies have gone out either) so I am a bit behind.
I just fixed up the SEEN-BY again and I will make another build shortly, So there should be a build dated Jan 24th shortly that has the fix.
just compare it with the date format that binkd is using. the difference is at the end of the string. i don't think it's important. i only looked into this, because i thought that was the reason for the wrong file timestamps (but it's not).
the line breaking at 80 chars is much more problematic ...
I tested the following and we're getting there but there is still an
issue I think with the logic being applied.
Thanks for the update. This is challenging to test because I don't have any system capable of reproducing the situation at the moment.
Along the echomail lines, I saw your message about potential issues with FLO files so I have introduced FLO.TXT! We got rid of the BUSYLOG and
now we get another one ;)
I made a special build for you (anyone really) who wants to help locate any issues with FLO logs. The builds below will create a "flo.txt" in
the same directory anytime one of the flow files are modified in any
way. If there is some sort of error or issue with FLO it should be captured in that .txt file.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 410 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 99:15:14 |
Calls: | 8,588 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,228 |
Messages: | 5,934,333 |