Hi all!
Testing my SBBS 2.30 installation, which I will be running on both DOS and OS/2 (for good measure). Tried to adapt the old qnet.src but since I have both wget and NCFTP on both DOS and OS/2, I might end up cheating and use those to pull/push QWK/REP files via FTP.
First test - seeing if this message shows up.
Hi all!
Testing my SBBS 2.30 installation, which I will be running on both DOS and
both wget and NCFTP on both DOS and OS/2, I might end up cheating and use those to pull/push QWK/REP files via FTP.
Re: Testing SBBS 2.30 in '24
By: Ltning to All on Mon Mar 04 2024 12:32 am
Hi all!
Testing my SBBS 2.30 installation, which I will be running on both DOS and
got it over here!
both wget and NCFTP on both DOS and OS/2, I might end up cheating and use those to pull/push QWK/REP files via FTP.
very cool man. will have to check it out when you are live.
@MSGID: <65E51429.969.dove-synchronetsysops@kk4qbn.synchro.net>
@REPLY: <65E50944.55250.sync_sys@vert.synchro.net>
@TZ: 412c
Re: Testing SBBS 2.30 in '24
By: Ltning to All on Mon Mar 04 2024 12:32 am
Hi all!
Testing my SBBS 2.30 installation, which I will be running on both DOS
got it over here!
both wget and NCFTP on both DOS and OS/2, I might end up cheating and u those to pull/push QWK/REP files via FTP.
very cool man. will have to check it out when you are live.
...Half of conversation is listening.
Hi all!
Testing my SBBS 2.30 installation, which I will be running on both DOS
and OS/2 (for good measure). Tried to adapt the old qnet.src but since I have both wget and NCFTP on both DOS and OS/2, I might end up cheating
and use those to pull/push QWK/REP files via FTP.
Funny, this looks good in the reply editor - not so much in the message viewer. Wonder if there's something I've missed..
Ltning wrote to All <=-
@MSGID: <65E50944.55250.sync_sys@vert.synchro.net>
Hi all!
Testing my SBBS 2.30 installation, which I will be running on both DOS
Re: Testing SBBS 2.30 in '24
By: kk4qbn to Ltning on Sun Mar 03 2024 07:22 pm
Re: Testing SBBS 2.30 in '24
By: Ltning to All on Mon Mar 04 2024 12:32 am
Hi all!
Testing my SBBS 2.30 installation, which I will be running on both DOS and
got it over here!
Brilliant!
Only problem is that the old code does not seem to handle UNIX newlines (\n only) very well; your reply shows up without carriage returns, so it's a bit hard to read. Weird part is that most/all other/older messages seem to display fine - need to research this a bit more.
(Which is why I'm writing here as the hub user, not from my own bbs).
RE: Testing SBBS 2.30 in '24
BY: kk4qbn to Ltning on Sun Mar 03 2024 19:22:00
@MSGID: <65E51429.969.dove-synchronetsysops@kk4qbn.synchro.net>
@REPLY: <65E50944.55250.sync_sys@vert.synchro.net>
@TZ: 412c
Re: Testing SBBS 2.30 in '24
By: Ltning to All on Mon Mar 04 2024 12:32 am
Hi all!
Testing my SBBS 2.30 installation, which I will be running on both DOS
got it over here!
both wget and NCFTP on both DOS and OS/2, I might end up cheating and u those to pull/push QWK/REP files via FTP.
very cool man. will have to check it out when you are live.
...Half of conversation is listening.
Funny, this looks good in the reply editor - not so much in the message viewer. Wonder if there's something I've missed..
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 412 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 21:15:09 |
Calls: | 8,623 |
Calls today: | 9 |
Files: | 13,238 |
Messages: | 5,936,882 |