I recall sysops talking about configuring lynx (text-based "web"
browser) to run as a door on their *nix Synchronet system. Anyone
have that up and going for a demo?
Add a native program called runlynx
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: nelgin to Digital Man on Sun Feb 11 2024 11:48 pm
Add a native program called runlynx
Yeah, I was asking if there's a BBS running it already, available as
a demo (for someone else), not (yet) instructions on how to do it. :-)
I recall sysops talking about configuring lynx (text-based "web" browser) to run as a door on their *nix Synchronet system. Anyone have that up and going for a demo?
Re: Lynx?Don't worry, you can always restore from backup.
By: Digital Man to All on Sun Feb 11 2024 08:57 pm
I recall sysops talking about configuring lynx (text-based "web" browser) to run as a door on their *nix Synchronet system.
Anyone have that up and going for a demo?
I've always wanted to try that but have been scared to.. I have a
tendency to skim documents and my luck, I would have it setup
incorrectly and someone will be playing around on my shell while I'm
asleep and I wake up to a wiped out hdd.. lol Tim Smith (kk4qbn)
---
â– Synchronet â– KK4QBN BBS - kk4qbn.synchro.net - Chatsworth, GA USA
Yeah, I was asking if there's a BBS running it already, available as a demo (for someone else), not (yet) instructions on how to do it. :-)
to skim documents and my luck, I would have it setup incorrectly andDon't worry, you can always restore from backup. --
someone will be playing around on my shell while I'm asleep and I wake up
---
Yeah, I was asking if there's a BBS running it already, available as a demo
I recall sysops talking about configuring lynx (text-based "web"
browser) to run as a door on their *nix Synchronet system. Anyone have that up and going for a demo?
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: Digital Man to nelgin on Sun Feb 11 2024 09:50 pm
Yeah, I was asking if there's a BBS running it already, available as a demo
By the way, do you have any suggestions of how to get the program to use CP437 rather than UTF-8? I'm running it in Linux. Under WWIV, I _believe_ all I did was add a TERM=ansi-bbs setting in my run script, but that doesn't seem to be doing it with Synchronet. I do have the correct terminfo stuff, of course. I've tried also using the options of the program itself to assume CP437 of all web pages, but when you go to the 'setup' dropdown, it still uses UTF-8 for default.
It's not a big deal, but every once in a while you get an odd character.
The ExternalTermANSI setting in ctrl/sbbs.ini controls the TERM env var when exectuing external programs (defaults to "pc3" for Linux, but Deuce is suggesting "pcansi" instead). Try changing that setting.
The ExternalTermANSI setting in ctrl/sbbs.ini controls the TERM env var when
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: Digital Man to Phigan on Mon Feb 12 2024 12:18 pm
The ExternalTermANSI setting in ctrl/sbbs.ini controls the TERM env var when exectuing external programs (defaults to "pc3" for Linux, but Deuce is suggesting "pcansi" instead). Try changing that setting.
Mine actually was already set to "ansi-bbs", assuming it's what you would want the TERM setting to be, right? I don't think there's a "pc3" or "pcansi" TERM setting, is there?
I'll try it anyway, though :)
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: Digital Man to Phigan on Mon Feb 12 2024 12:18 pm
The ExternalTermANSI setting in ctrl/sbbs.ini controls the TERM env var when
I found that the TERM setting was already ansi-bbs when running links. So, it must've been something else that sets the default character set.
Probably 'LANG'.
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: Digital Man to Phigan on Mon Feb 12 2024 02:20 pm
Probably 'LANG'.
I checked that, and LANG is UTF-8 under WWIV. Doesn't seem to affect it. There wasn't anything that seemed significant in the differences of environment variables when running via WWIV and Synchronet, which I checked by putting a 'set' in the execution script.
One thing that I did notice, I could send keystrokes to 'more' through WWIV but not through Synchronet. In SN I had to kill 'more' from command line.
You might have to 'export' it too (?).
Was the keystroke ^C by chance?
There was a bug recently introduced (in Linux builds) and recently fixed (in sbbs) where ^C didn't interrupt external programs executed by sbbs.
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: Digital Man to Phigan on Mon Feb 12 2024 10:32 pm
You might have to 'export' it too (?).
Yeah, I always 'export'.
Was the keystroke ^C by chance?
There was a bug recently introduced (in Linux builds) and recently fixed (in sbbs) where ^C didn't interrupt external programs executed by sbbs.
No, any key. What I mean is that on the WWIV board, I put "set|more" in the exec script and I was able to press space and q and such. When I did the same on the SN board, I couldn't send any input to more and had to kill it. Links still takes the input, oddly enough. Not sure if it makes a difference, but I have to have "native script" set to yes, otherwise it says this node doesn't support dosemu or somesuch message.
Was the keystroke ^C by chance?
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: Digital Man to Phigan on Mon Feb 12 2024 10:32 pm
Was the keystroke ^C by chance?
What were you going to say if it had been ^C? Is there something blocking that control code? I noticed I can't cancel out of "windows" in Links and have to just accept and get an error sometimes.
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: Phigan to Digital Man on Wed Feb 14 2024 09:31 am
Re: Re: Lynx?
By: Digital Man to Phigan on Mon Feb 12 2024 10:32 pm
Was the keystroke ^C by chance?
What were you going to say if it had been ^C? Is there something
blocking that control code? I noticed I can't cancel out of
"windows" in Links and have to just accept and get an error
sometimes.
There was a bug that was recently fixed that prevented ^C from
interrupting external programs in Linux versions of SBBS.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 409 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 47:12:36 |
Calls: | 8,570 |
Files: | 13,222 |
Messages: | 5,929,005 |